Euro bulls wince as US-EU trade deal slams the brakes on rally
The euro, which hit a four-year high of $1.1830 earlier this month, on Tuesday was last at $1.1522, headed for its biggest two-day drop in nearly three years , after the EU agreed to a 15% tariff on its U.S. exports - half the rate President Donald Trump had previously threatened, but well above the roughly 1.5-2% rate prior to his return to the White House.
That's quite a reversal. The euro's 14% gain in the first half of the year was the biggest since its creation, as investors rushed to the common currency on the back of the announcement of a once-in-a-generation shift in German fiscal spending just as U.S. President Donald Trump's erratic trade policies drove flows out of U.S. assets.
But both of those factors are challenged by the agreement: The European economy will still take a hit from the tariffs, while deals the U.S. has agreed with the EU and other partners have reduced fears about a major slowdown there.
"The long euro trade is undoubtedly facing a reality check this week," said Bruno Schneller, managing director at Erlen Capital Management.
"Monday's sharp drop in euro/dollar felt like more than just a reaction to headlines — it exposed how stretched positioning had become in one of the market's most consensus views."
"What stood out wasn't just the magnitude of the move, but the lack of support on the way down."
Going into the weekend, speculators were sitting on a bullish bet on euro futures worth $18.4 billion , the largest since December 2023, according to weekly data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
That position has been building since last December. At the start of the year speculators held one of their largest bearish positions in the euro in almost five years.
The euro also weakened sharply against other currencies on Monday, dropping 0.8% on the pound and 0.7% on the Japanese yen, again after recent gains.
But the bulk of its moves, both up this year, and down this week, have been against the dollar. In trade-weighted terms, the euro is only up about 6% this year.
And its gains on the U.S. currency were already slowing as initial pessimism towards the U.S. at the start of the year faded thanks to strong economic data and earnings, reinforced by the flurry of trade deals with Japan and the EU, and ongoing negotiations with China.
"The (U.S.-EU) trade deal has removed a potential headwind (for the euro) but it has also removed an uncertainty for the dollar too, which leaves the euro looking a little overvalued," said Michael Metcalfe, head of macro strategy at State Street.
But the end of the euro's rally on the dollar is not yet a done deal.
"The vast majority of people - ourselves included - think that this is just a correction to an underlying bull trend in euro/dollar," said Chris Turner, global head of research at ING.
He said the biggest test would be on the dollar side of the currency pair, as investors had now digested the impact of the trade deal on Europe.
Therefore, the focus turns to this week's economic data, including U.S. jobs and inflation and European economic growth, and Wednesday's Federal Reserve meeting.
The Fed is likely to keep U.S. interest rates steady, which may generate more angry rhetoric from Trump who has been pushing for big cuts.
This matters for the dollar. The currency fell sharply earlier this month, including against the euro, when Trump appeared close to trying to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
And even setting aside the trade deal, there are reasons to be optimistic about Europe, particularly given Germany's spending plans.
"We haven't changed our view of upside risks to growth in Europe," said Russel Matthews, portfolio manager at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, who has been neutral on currencies as he balanced "the long term structural bias for a weakening dollar" with "the more positive short-term technical picture."
"The new narrative that the U.S. has got a better deal has tarnished, to some extent, the upside potential from developments in the last three to six months in Europe, but it hasn't necessarily changed that dynamic."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Copper market pays the price for forgetting its TACO hedge
LONDON, July 31 (Reuters) - The copper market got the tariff right but the products wrong. U.S. President Donald Trump's proclamation, opens new tab "to address the effects of copper imports on America's national security" was not what traders were expecting. There will be 50% tariffs on copper imports effective Friday but only on semi-manufactured products such as wire and tube. Refined copper is excluded, at least until January 2027, when a tariff may be phased in if warranted. The tariff trade, which has defined the copper market since February, has imploded. The CME's U.S. contract plummeted by more than 20% on the news, wiping out the previous high premium over the London Metal Exchange (LME) price. The United States is now awash with metal it doesn't need after traders shipped huge tonnages through the yawning arbitrage gap. The copper market forgot Trump's tendency to back down on his most extreme tariff threats. It has, to borrow a current investor meme, just been TACO'd, which stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. The tariffs on semi-finished copper products cover between 400,000 and 500,000 metric tons of annual U.S. imports. America imports considerably more copper as refined metal. Imports last year were just over 900,000 tons. Canada is the largest single supplier of copper products to the U.S., but the supplier base is highly diverse. Last year's imports of copper tubes, for example, came from 32 different countries. The tariffs will also be extended down the product chain to copper-intensive derivative products such as cables, connectors and electrical components, likely ensnaring more supplier countries. The new tariff wall should be a boost for domestic processors, but only if they have the capacity to cover the range and quality of what is currently being imported. The number of product-specific exemptions granted in the coming months will provide an answer. The tariff wall on products will be complemented by restrictions on exports of U.S. mined concentrates and recyclable copper. A quarter of domestically-produced "copper input materials" will be required to be sold in the United States from 2027. That rate will rise to 30% in 2028 and 40% in 2029. That may need more capacity than exists at the current three domestic smelters, even assuming Grupo Mexico ( opens new tab reactivates its idle Hayden plant in Arizona. "High-quality copper scrap" will also be subject to a 25% minimum domestic sales requirement to stimulate domestic recycling. It's not clear what types of scrap qualify or how such a measure is going to work in practice, but the move marks an escalation in the simmering scrap wars. The European Union is also considering, opens new tab export quotas on recyclable copper to stop what it calls "scrap leakage." The prime target is China, which is the world's largest buyer of secondary raw material. The country imported 2.25 million tons of copper scrap in 2024, the highest annual total since 2018, the year before authorities tightened up the purity specifications on imported material. Imports have already slowed this year thanks to a 42% drop in shipments from the United States due to the high CME price premium. Growing resource nationalism in the global scrap market promises profound structural changes in the flow of recyclable materials. But not for refined copper, which is what everyone was expecting. Big trade houses have shipped over half a million tons of copper to the United States for a trade that is now redundant, even if it was a bonanza for those involved. CME warehouses currently hold 232,195 tons of copper, which is the highest tonnage since 2004. Metal is still arriving daily thanks to the last-minute dash to beat what traders thought was the August 1 deadline. The supply chain in the rest of the world is still compensating for the huge suction effect created by the prospect of tariffs. China exported almost 260,000 tons of refined copper between March and June, compared with 78,000 tons in the prior four-month period. Some of it was delivered against a short squeeze on the London market created by the raid on LME stocks for U.S.-deliverable brands of copper. Some of it was non-Chinese metal stripped from bonded warehouses and shipped directly to the United States. China's surging export flows have depleted Shanghai Futures Exchange stocks, which have fallen to 73,423 tons, the lowest level since December. While the futures tariff trade has collapsed overnight, the physical supply chain will take longer to readjust. Analysts are already running the numbers to gauge whether it makes sense for copper to reverse flow back out of the United States. Is that it for the copper tariff trade? Probably not, given the explicit reference to the option of a phased tariff on imports of refined copper, starting at 15% in 2027 and rising to 30% in 2028. It will depend on an update on the state of the domestic market by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick scheduled for the end of June next year. It also depends, of course, on whether Trump changes his mind again before then. You never know with Tariff Man. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court hears arguments over Trump tariffs
July 31 (Reuters) - Oral arguments over President Donald Trump's power to impose tariffs kicked of on Thursday before a U.S. appeals court, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. A panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents, is hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states. "Tariffs are making America GREAT & RICH Again," Trump wrote in a social media post on Thursday morning. "To all of my great lawyers who have fought so hard to save our Country, good luck in America's big case today." Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month. But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for U.S. consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under emergency presidential powers that Trump cited to justify them. They say the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Dan Rayfield, the attorney general of Oregon, one of the states challenging the levies, said that the tariffs were a "regressive tax" that is making household items more expensive. Trump claimed broad authority to set tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets. Trump is the first president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power. He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies, did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
India vows to protect farmers as Trump's 25% tariff threat sparks opposition fury
NEW DELHI, July 31 (Reuters) - India vowed on Thursday to protect its labour-intensive agriculture sector, a central sticking point in bogged-down trade talks with the U.S., as Washington threatened 25% tariffs, triggering outrage from the opposition and a slump in the rupee. Without a deal, the rate will go into effect from Friday and single out India for harsher trade conditions than its major peers, potentially damaging the economy of a strategic U.S. partner in Asia seen as a counterbalance to Chinese influence. Though negotiations are continuing, they have hit a wall due to the United States' insistence that India open its agricultural markets. New Delhi has long shielded the sector, which - with over 40% of the workforce engaged in farming activities - constitutes the most influential voting bloc in the world's most populous nation. "The government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and (medium and small businesses)," India's trade minister Piyush Goyal said in a statement in the parliament. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a CNBC interview on Thursday that the U.S. trade team was frustrated with India, adding that the future of trade deal between the two nations was now up to India. U.S. President Donald Trump had said on Wednesday that, in addition to the 25% tariff on imports from India, the country would face an unspecified penalty for its dealings with Russia and its membership in the BRICS grouping of nations. "I don't care what India does with Russia," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Thursday. "They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care." India's benchmark equity indices, the Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab and BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab, fell as much as 0.9% in early trade before paring losses and both closing around 0.4% lower. The rupee closed 0.2% down at 87.5950 to the dollar after touching its lowest level in more than five months earlier in the day. The government's failure to clinch an agreement with Trump, even as other major world economies like the European Union, Japan and South Korea have struck deals in recent days, sparked anger among India's political opposition. "The government has destroyed our economic policy, has destroyed our defence policy, has destroyed our foreign policy," opposition leader Rahul Gandhi told reporters on Thursday. Economists warned the steep tariff could hurt India's manufacturing ambitions and trim up to 40 basis points off economic growth in the financial year to March 2026. Some doubted whether further negotiations would lead to improved conditions. "While further trade talks may bring the tariff rate down, it appears unlikely that India will secure a significantly better outcome than its eastern neighbours," said Priyanka Kishore, an economist at Asia Decoded. Other countries have negotiated better U.S. tariff rates, with Vietnam agreeing to 20%, Indonesia to 19% and Japan and the EU both facing levies of 15%. On Wednesday, Trump said Washington had reached a trade deal with India's arch-rival Pakistan that Islamabad said would lead to lower tariffs on its exports, though neither side has yet revealed the agreed rate. Since India's short but deadly conflict with Pakistan in May, New Delhi has been unhappy about Trump's closeness with Islamabad and has protested, casting a shadow over trade talks. Despite previous public displays of bonhomie between Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has hardened its stance towards the United States in recent weeks. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10, but India disputes his claim that it resulted from his intervention and trade threats. The U.S., the world's largest economy, currently has a trade deficit of $45.7 billion with fifth-largest economy India.
