Retail profit warnings more than double as high street pressures mount
The data showed that seven UK-listed retailers, including supermarkets, cut profit guidance between April and June.
Britain's retail sector has come under significant pressure since last autumn's Budget move to hike National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and the minimum wage, both taking effect in April.
But EY said the high street was also facing tough consumer spending challenges, with shoppers cutting back and focusing on value.
EY partner Silvia Rindone said the spike in retail warnings 'highlights both softening consumer demand and the deeper structural headwinds facing the sector'.
'Retailers we speak to tell us that falling sales are currently indicative of a longer-term shift, with consumers becoming more value-focused and less brand-loyal, which leaves cost-pressured retailers in a bind,' she said.
Tariff woes sparked by US President Donald Trump waging a trade war also featured heavily in the report, contributing to a rise in the number of alerts more widely across corporate plc.
The report found that the number of profit warnings issued by UK-listed companies rose by 20% to 59 in the second quarter compared with 49 a year ago.
The top factor was policy change and geopolitical uncertainty, cited in nearly half (46%) of all warnings – up from 4% a year earlier and the highest since the study was launched over 25 years ago.
Over one in three (34%) warnings flagged tariff-related impacts, such as weaker demand, supply chain disruption and volatility in currency movements.
The proportion of warnings to cite contract and order cancellations or delays remained at a record high of 40% in the quarter.
Jo Robinson, EY-Parthenon partner and turnaround and restructuring strategy leader, said: 'The latest profit warnings data reflects the scale of persistent uncertainty and how heavy it continues to weigh on UK businesses.
'While this uncertainty has been a recurring theme since mid-2024, it has intensified so far this year – driven largely by geopolitical tensions and policy shifts – compounding pressure on both earnings and forecasts.
'While the announcement of global tariffs has clearly played a part in amplifying uncertainty, they are just one factor among broader geopolitical and policy upheaval.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
US-China talks to restart as hopes grow for trade war truce extension
The US and China are due to start a fresh round of talks on Monday as expectations grow that the world's two biggest economies could agree a 90-day extension to their trade war meetings in Sweden - led on Washington's side by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and for Beijing by Vice Premier He Lifeng - come hours after US President Donald Trump announced a framework tariffs deal with the European current 90-day truce between the US and China - which saw the two countries temporarily lowering tariffs on each other - is set to end on 12 Trump returned to the White House in January, the US and China had raised import levies on each other to more than 100%. The current 90-day tariffs pause came after top officials from the US and China met in Geneva and London earlier this week, Bessent said talks with China were in "a very good place" and suggested the new round of talks could result in a second Monday, citing sources on both sides, the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported that the US and China are expected to extend the truce by another three BBC has contacted the Chinese embassy in the US and the US Treasury Department for latest US-China talks come after Washington struck deals with both the EU and Japan in the last Sunday, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade agreement ended a months-long standoff between two of the world's biggest economic week, Trump said Washington had agreed a "massive" trade deal with the agreement, Japan would invest $550bn (£407bn) in the US while its goods sold to America would be taxed at 15% when they reach the country - below the 25% tariff Trump had US has also struck tariffs deals with the UK, Indonesia and 10%, Britain has negotiated the lowest US tariff rate so similar breakthrough is expected from the US-China talks this week but, with expectations of an extension to their truce, there are hopes that global trade will not be hit by fresh tariffs disruption.
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
Independence will be won by narratives, not technicalities
I was happy to do this because I am quite sure an online subscription to the paper is a bargain. In summary, I suggested there are three reasons why The National is of value: It seeks to tell the truth in a world where that is rare The paper is clear about what it seeks to achieve, which is Scottish independence, and what it wants from doing so, believing it will benefit everyone in the country. It tries harder than any newspaper I know to explain how the goals that it promotes might be achieved Together, these add up to a narrative, and narrative mattersto me. Simultaneously, I was discussing with a team what makes for a good YouTube video. I am now creating more than 400 of these a year and, on average, they are attracting significantly more views than is typical for that channel, so I hope I have some insight into this. READ MORE: Man arrested for 'carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word' My summary on this, which I have learned through painful experience, is that there are usually five steps to this process, which are largely consistent with any narrative anyone might ever want to create. These are: You have a situation involving an unresolved stress that needs to be resolved as the story progresses The narrator of the story has a desire to resolve this issue, which they can explain, including by suggesting what outcome they want There is a problem or conflict that must be resolved before change can take place The necessary conditions to remove that obstacle to progress can be described The consequence is that the stress can be removed, and the person engaging with the story can understand how they might be better off as a result I am not claiming any great or novel insight here (pun intended). All I am relating is the foundation of the plot for just about any book, film or even newspaper column that you have ever read or watched. Of course, there are lots of ways in which variations on this theme can be created, but the fact is that, as life has taught me, resolving stress is pretty much what everything in life is about. It was undoubtedly the basis of my professional life during the 40 years I worked as a chartered accountant. Why is it worth relating these two tales? It is because understanding how narratives are created and resolved is crucial to the cause of Scottish independence, as well as to the broader political economy. The reason is quite simple: the hearts, souls and minds of those who will have to vote for independence will not be swayed by technicalities, however important they might be; nor are our relationships of power ever altered using financial or other data. Instead, it is stories that make and change our world. As a result, it is the power of the independence movement to create stories that really matters. Using the plot steps I note above, I suspect that every reader of this newspaper knows what the conflict Scotland faces is. It is being governed by interests that are wholly uninterested in the wellbeing of the people of Scotland, and they are based in another country. I do, again, suspect most readers are very well aware of what they desire. They wish for an independent Scotland. What we do, however, know is that there is a conflict, and that is that the Westminster political parties do not want Scotland – or Wales or Northern Ireland, come to that – to be independent. They wish to hang on to their remaining colonies. They are putting every obstacle they can in the way of independence. I'll jump a stage and suggest most people reading this article would also know the people of Scotland will be better off than they are now if independence is won. The end of this story is known. In that case, using this simple analytical tool, we can see that the problem for the Scottish independence cause is at stage four of the narrative process. What the SNP, in particular, are having difficulty with is explaining how the obstacles to progress can be removed. What John Swinney said recently has done very little to change this. That is, then, what the political economic debate in Scotland must now focus on. I particularly emphasise this because while, as an economist, technicalities matter to me, narratives matter more. The Irish independence movement in the early 20th century never clearly defined what an independent Ireland would look like before achieving its goal. That was unfortunate, because the civil war developed soon after London had agreed to grant Ireland its freedom, and this must be avoided in the case of Scotland. However, my point is that without discussion on a currency, or any other technicality, the case for independence in Ireland was primarily shaped by the narratives that the Irish independence movement created for itself. Through the poetry of Yeats, the plays of Synge, stories from the west of Ireland, and tales of the persecution that had happened, plus the promotion of cultural centres such as the Abbey Theatre in Dublin, a narrative was created that captured the popular imagination not just in Ireland, but also of sympathetic people elsewhere. I think this is essential and I am not sure I am seeing or hearing enough of it in Scotland. Now, I readily admit I live in England and so it would be easy for me to miss this, but there again, people outside Ireland in the early 20th century could not have missed the intellectual and literary momentum that promoted the politics of independence at that time. So, much as I think that technical issues around currency, taxation, and other such matters will have to be resolved before independence can happen, I am also of the opinion that the popular resolve to create an independent Scotland cannot be achieved without more storytelling. That storytelling has to build on genuine, and not fabricated, Scottish tradition. It has to emphasise that the reality of Scottish life can be improved. And what it needs to do is be clear that there is sufficient cohesion within Scotland for a strong and proud nation that does more than support its rugby, football and curling teams, but which wants to be independent as well. Emphasising Scottish modern culture will also be key. In that regard, I was heartened to see Scottish performers proudly displaying the Saltire at Glastonbury. That makes a difference, as does the championing of the cause by people such as actor David Tennant. All that being said, though, there is still a story to tell, and when it is, I think that the critical breakthrough will happen. I also happen to think The National will be part of that story, which is why an annual subscription for £20 will definitely be worth the money.
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
Sign of a bright energy future – but for whom?
I saw John Swinney visiting Eyemouth last week and singing the praises of the Neart na Gaoithe wind farm in the Firth of Forth. For sure, the First Minister was right, it is a wonder of engineering and a sign of a bright energy future. But for whom? Almost all the benefits are passing Scotland by, just as they did in the first great energy bounty, when oil was discovered in the North Sea. Oil's still there and still being drilled for, though not as much as it should be, and it's only weeks since the Grangemouth oil refinery closed. Of course, there's a nice shiny new office block on Eyemouth pier for NnG, as it is referred to. The jobs there are few but welcome all the same. But where's the real work going – and, more importantly, who owns and profits? READ MORE: Man arrested for 'carrying a placard calling Donald Trump an offensive word' NnG might lie between Lothians and Fife but ownership lies abroad and a clue's in the name. Neart na Gaoithe is Gaelic but the Irish version, the reason being that the wind farm is owned not just by EDF, the state energy company of France but also ESB, the Republic of Ireland's state electricity company. The Irish consul general told me it is the single biggest investment ESB has ever made outwith the island of Ireland. All this means that profits from the wonder Swinney saw are going to Paris and Dublin and not to Edinburgh. But it's far worse than that: not one turbine for it is being manufactured in Scotland, despite Methil being visible from it, never mind other ports and yards in Scotland being available which are crying out for work. Even if the excuse is a lack of capacity here in turbine manufacturing – which itself is lamentable and indicative of a shameful lack of an industrial strategy – what about other works such as subsea cabling, the laying of pipeline and the assembly of the units, along with the ship contracts? As with ownership, they've gone abroad, with firms from Italy, Belgium and far beyond winning out and Scotland languishing without. Even the jobs that are coming to Scotland are limited. Beyond the smaller vessels at Eyemouth, there was hope for work for maritime crews providing for the major construction and cabling work from Montrose. So thought a former constituent of mine who left the deep-sea tankers for a job closer to home. Within a few days he and the rest of the UK crew had been laid off and replaced by South Asian labour. When you're working beyond territorial waters – and that's where NnG lies – UK employment law doesn't apply. What a rip-off. And the NnG tragedy won't be alone as it's not the only Scottish offshore wind farm owned by foreign state companies; China, Norway, Sweden and the UAE also have sites. There's a double whammy here, and not just in the work and contracts being frittered away. When the ScotWind auction took place – under the auspices and control of the Scottish not UK Government – offshore sites were sold off for a song. The £800 million raised was trumpeted as a triumph by the then first minister Nicola Sturgeon. Yet within a matter of weeks that was shown to be a paltry sum. Less than 25% of what had been auctioned off in Scotland was sold in the US by New York State for a site off Long Island and for somewhere in the region of $4.3 billion. And believe me, the European energy market, of which Scotland is a critical part, is larger than the US's. But we were told all's well as we'd be getting the supply jobs. Well, where are they? A few jobs at Eyemouth and a few ribs going out of that port aren't what we were led to believe we'd get, and are probably less that Ireland will have from just NnG alone. What a waste and what a letdown. The Scottish tragedy is being repeated but when it was oil and gas we had no Parliament. Now we have Holyrood and, shamefully, it is being complicit as well as supine. Yes, energy is largely reserved but the ScotWind sell-off was wholly down to [[Holyrood]]. This is our great opportunity, as the First Minister said, but it has to actually happen, not just be empty rhetoric. While Swinney was at Eyemouth harbour, I was at the funeral of an independence stalwart and was reminded by the eulogy of his role in the anti-poll tax campaign. Back then, he and his compadre, who sat next to me in the chapel, painted 'Pay No Poll Tax' on the bridges along the M8. No easy task but much appreciated by many. Things should be better and easier for us now, but as well as failures there's been a dampening of the spirit. Radicalism, let alone political actions, have been decried, as shown over the genocide in Palestine. We need some competency in our Government, but we also require some fire back in our movement.
