Parliament study pushes to bring AI liability law back from the dead
The legislative proposal lays down rules on who would have to pay up if an AI system harms someone – and also make AI providers responsible for proving their systems complied with liability rules, instead of putting the burden of proof on people who suffered harm to prove that an AI system had failed.
But all that became moot in February when the Commission announced it would withdraw the proposal, causing consternation among MEPs working on their negotiating position for the file.
Council and big tech lobbies, on the other hand, welcomed the Commission bid to can the law as part of an ongoing regulatory simplification drive. But that's the wrong way to think about it, per the study commissioned by Parliament and penned by Andrea Bertolini, a law professor at the University of Pisa.
Without an EU law, member countries will just make their own rules – as Germany is a doing for automated driving and Italy is contemplating – the study warns. This would then lead to overregulation by fragmentation, is the concern. 'Ultimately, the only way to avoid excessive regulatory burdens is to adopt efficient legal norms,' Bertolini argues.
The study suggests both reviving the AI Liability proposal but also revising it to clarify its scope and rules. It also advocates for opting for a Regulation (rather than the proposed Directive) – so it would be directly applicable in the whole EU – to 'deliver the highest degree of harmonization, efficiency, and user protection'.
A prior study, released by Parliament last year, had also recommended the AI Liability law should be a Regulation too.
Sergey Lagodinsky, Green shadow rapporteur on the file, said the latest study confirms the legal affairs committee's call for a harmonised European framework.
Tiemo Wölken – a substitute member of the committee who is currently suing the Commission over the file's withdrawal – said the analysis offers a 'stark warning' against leaving AI liability unregulated.
'Simply withdrawing the AI Liability Directive, as the Commission intends, is clearly not a viable option,' he also told Euractiv.
The Commission has been contacted for comment
(nl)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Commission chief urges Zelenskyy to ‘preserve' independence of anti-corruption bodies
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to safeguard the independence of two key anti-corruption bodies, after a bill that would have placed them under presidential control sparked heavy backlash. Ukraine must " preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law," v on der Leyen wrote on X following her conversation with the Ukrainian leader. The warning comes after Ukraine's parliament on Tuesday approved amendments to a bill that would have placed two Ukrainian anti-corruption agencies under the supervision of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. These changes have sparked domestic protests and drawn criticism from key allies, including European leaders. In a statement on Wednesday, the Commission said von der Leyen had "strong concerns" about the legislation. By Thursday, Zelenskyy had announced a reversal of the proposed changes, after thousands took to the streets in protest. The rule of law and independence of these bodies are central to the country's accession to the EU. "Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations" Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos wrote on X following Tuesday's parliamentary vote. French President Emmanuel Macron also weighed in a post on X on Sunday, stressing the importance of safeguarding the independence of both bodies as a key step toward Ukraine's EU accession. Ukraine has " achieved a lot on its European path" von der Leyen added. "It must build on these solid foundations." (de)
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Germany unlikely to fall foul of EU deficit rules
The European Commission will probably not impose a so-called excessive deficit procedure on Germany for breaching the EU's budget deficit cap this year, EU Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told the Financial Times. Germany's new conservative-led coalition government has said it does not expect a planned spending spree, including on defence, to be found in breach of EU rules that cap budget deficits at 3% of GDP. Berlin's budget deficit is expected to come in at 3.3% of GDP this year, but since defence spending fully accounts for the amount over 3%, Germany "is likely not to end up in (the) excessive deficit procedure" Dombrovskis was quoted as saying in the FT interview published Sunday. An excessive deficit procedure allows the Commission and EU finance ministers to issue recommendations on setting a corrective course to bring a member state's deficit back within the 3% limit. A country's failure to do so can in principle eventually lead to a fine. "We have to see the execution, because it's close (but) if everything holds, then it should not be the case for this year's budget," Dombrovskis said, adding that a final assessment would take place in the spring when data for 2025 is available. Under the EU's new fiscal rules, which the previous German government helped negotiate, member states can exclude some defence spending from their deficits. (de)
Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
Hungary's Orban says he will not back EU budget unless funds released
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán threatened on Saturday to torpedo the European Union's new seven-year budget unless Brussels unlocks all suspended EU funds. The nationalist leader has for years clashed with Brussels over issues including migration, LGBTQ rights, and what critics see as eroding democracy in Hungary. The EU has suspended billions of euros earmarked for Hungary while a rule-of-law dispute drags on. "The approval of the new seven-year budget requires unanimity and until we get the remaining (frozen) funds, there won't be a new EU budget either," Orbán said in a speech at a summer university in the Romanian town of Baile Tusnad. The European Commission has proposed a €2 trillion EU budget for 2028-2034, with a focus on economic competitiveness and defence. Orbán also criticised the EU for supporting Ukraine and accused Brussels of planning to install a "pro-Ukraine and pro-Brussels government" in Hungary at next year's vote. He also accused EU leaders of risking a trade war with US President Donald Trump's administration that Europe "cannot win." "The current leadership of the EU will always be the last to sign deals with the United States and always the worst deals," Orbán added, urging a change in the bloc's leadership. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet Trump on Sunday in Scotland in search of a trade deal. Orbán, who has dominated the past four national elections, faces a tough new opposition challenger Peter Maygar. His centre-right Tisza party has a firm lead over the ruling Fidesz in most polls at a time of economic stagnation. Magyar told a rally on Saturday that Hungary must be firmly anchored in the EU and NATO military alliance, and promised to secure all suspended EU funds if his party wins in 2026. "Hungary is an EU member and our relations as allies cannot be built on a political style of putting a spoke in the wheel," Magyar said, adding that while Tisza cannot support the proposed EU budget in its current form, it would be open to negotiations. "We need to make a clear and firm decision that our place has been and will be in Europe," Magyar said, criticising Orbán's close relations with Russia. (de)
