Hungary's Orban says he will not back EU budget unless funds released
The nationalist leader has for years clashed with Brussels over issues including migration, LGBTQ rights, and what critics see as eroding democracy in Hungary. The EU has suspended billions of euros earmarked for Hungary while a rule-of-law dispute drags on.
"The approval of the new seven-year budget requires unanimity and until we get the remaining (frozen) funds, there won't be a new EU budget either," Orbán said in a speech at a summer university in the Romanian town of Baile Tusnad.
The European Commission has proposed a €2 trillion EU budget for 2028-2034, with a focus on economic competitiveness and defence.
Orbán also criticised the EU for supporting Ukraine and accused Brussels of planning to install a "pro-Ukraine and pro-Brussels government" in Hungary at next year's vote.
He also accused EU leaders of risking a trade war with US President Donald Trump's administration that Europe "cannot win."
"The current leadership of the EU will always be the last to sign deals with the United States and always the worst deals," Orbán added, urging a change in the bloc's leadership.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen will meet Trump on Sunday in Scotland in search of a trade deal.
Orbán, who has dominated the past four national elections, faces a tough new opposition challenger Peter Maygar. His centre-right Tisza party has a firm lead over the ruling Fidesz in most polls at a time of economic stagnation.
Magyar told a rally on Saturday that Hungary must be firmly anchored in the EU and NATO military alliance, and promised to secure all suspended EU funds if his party wins in 2026.
"Hungary is an EU member and our relations as allies cannot be built on a political style of putting a spoke in the wheel," Magyar said, adding that while Tisza cannot support the proposed EU budget in its current form, it would be open to negotiations.
"We need to make a clear and firm decision that our place has been and will be in Europe," Magyar said, criticising Orbán's close relations with Russia.
(de)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Farmer protests could justify import bans under new EU-Ukraine deal
A revised trade deal between Brussels and Kyiv opens the door to legalising food import bans imposed by some EU countries, according to the legal text of the agreement. Details of the updated EU–Ukraine trade arrangement were published this week, more than a month after Brussels announced a deal had been reached – without releasing any accompanying documents at the time. The agreement grants Ukraine greater market access for certain agricultural products but stops short of the temporary full liberalisation offered in 2022 and extended into 2025 as part of the EU's economic support for the country after Russia's full-scale invasion. The EU is Ukraine's largest agricultural trading partner, absorbing more than half of its farm exports. The Ukrainian agribusiness estimates that losing tariff-free access could cost the country up to €3.5 billion annually. Crucially, the text allows either side to trigger safeguard measures if imports cause 'serious economic, societal, or environmental difficulties' at a regional or sectoral level. For the EU, such measures can be requested even if the disruption affects only one member state. In practice, this means farmer protests could be cited as a 'societal difficulty' to justify triggering the safeguards. Vague, vulnerable agreement Ukraine's agricultural sector, represented by UCAB, denounced the criteria as 'extremely vague' and 'vulnerable to political manipulation by protectionist farmer organizations and populist politicians.' 'Essentially, any member state can effectively suspend the agreement, most likely on its own territory,' said Nazar Bobitski, head of UCAB Brussels, in comments to Euractiv. He added that, de facto, the arrangement 'legalises unilateral import embargoes' which remain in place in Poland, Slovakia and Hungary. 'This spells a very bad omen for any other EU trading partner, as it shows that the EU Internal Market is to a great extent an illusion,' he stressed. The European Commission did not provide comment at the time of publication. The measures, however, are not automatic. The text requires both sides to engage in consultations for up to one month to seek a 'mutually acceptable solution.' If talks fail, safeguards can be imposed. Another clause allows for immediate action in 'exceptional circumstances,' skipping consultations altogether. Increased agricultural imports from Ukraine – a global farming powerhouse – have fuelled discontent across several EU countries, particularly those bordering the war-torn nation, with farmers staging protests, claiming the influx is undercutting local prices and threatening their livelihoods. In Brussels, the Commission delayed finalising the agreement until after Poland's pivotal presidential election, which resulted in a far-right victory regardless of the outcome. The deal still needs to be ratified by a qualified majority of member states in the Council. (adm, aw)
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Commission publishes full list of AI companies signed up to Code of Practice
The Commission has published the full list of signatories to the EU's generative AI Code of Practice initiative so far – aka the Code of Practice for General Purpose AIs (GPAIs). Signing the Code is not a requirement under the bloc's AI Act but companies that commit to it voluntarily will be considered compliant with the legally binding rulebook, per the Commission. Several major AI developers had already made their approach to the Code public in the weeks after publication. But, per the (updatable) list published today, Amazon is also signing, along with a number of smaller AI providers. Notably absent at the time of writing are any Chinese AI companies, such as Alibaba, Baidu or Deepseek. It remains to be seen if that will change. But one refusenik is certain: US social media giant Meta previously publicly announced that it would not sign. Companies that do not sign the Code will still have to follow all the rules of the AI Act. And the Commission has already warned that they may face more scrutiny than those who agree to abide by the Code. France's Mistral and Germany's Aleph Alpha both previously announced they would sign up, as have US-based OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Microsoft. Elon Musk's xAI took a third option by announcing it will only sign the chapter on safety – decrying the rest of the Code as 'profoundly detrimental to innovation'. (The Code's three chapters cover commitments on transparency, copyright, and safety.) In the end, almost all major AI companies from the US and EU have signed up to the Code. That marks a victory for the Commission – but it will not end discussion about the EU's approach to regulating artificial intelligence. Microsoft, for example, pushed for the EU to simplify the AI Act when it announced that it would sign the Code. The Commission has also previously said its upcoming digital omnibus package will include the AI Act – though not to what extent. Unsurprisingly, given the sprawling range of interests around AI, the Code itself faced a lengthy and complicated drafting process, with more than a thousand participants involved. It was only finally presented by the Commission at the beginning of July, more than two months after the original deadline for publication. The Commission took until today, Friday August 1, to confirm that the Code satisfies its own requirements. (nl)
Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
EU Commission let ‘Pfizergate' texts disappear
The European Commission allowed key text messages between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer's CEO to vanish during COVID-19 vaccine talks, a letter to the New York Times reveals. The messages – central to the so-called 'Pfizergate' scandal – were exchanged in early 2021 between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, during negotiations over the bloc's largest vaccine deal. The New York Times has been requesting access to the messages since 2022 and won a court case against the Commission for refusing to release them. In its new answer, sent on July 28, the Commission continued to deny access to documents, the media revealed. According to the letter, Von der Leyen's chief of cabinet, Björn Seibert, read the messages 'in summer 2021' on the President's phone and decided not to retain them in a manner that would make them publicly accessible, the document shows. He established the texts were solely intended to schedule calls during the pandemic. Seibert's decision occurred specifically after the Commission was asked for transparency in a first May 2021 request for access to the texts issued by journalist Alexander Fanta. The Commission's letter also reveals that the messages have been missing since at least July 2023. Von der Leyen's phone was "replaced several times" without transferring any data, while older devices were wiped and recycled – meaning the Commission claims it can no longer retrieve the texts. Lack of transparency The controversy goes beyond the missing texts. At stake is the Commission's broader lack of transparency around the EU's largest vaccine deal. Key details, on the negotiation process but also on financial terms, remain undisclosed. Critics – including judges at the General Court of the European Court of Justice – argued that the decision to block access to the texts breached transparency obligations. In their May 2025 ruling, the judges specifically noted that the Commission must 'provide credible explanations enabling the public and the Court to understand why those documents cannot be found,' particularly given the scale the EU's largest-ever contract. The Commission did not appeal the ruling but instead chose to build up a more solid legal reasoning to justify its renewed refusal to share the texts. The New York Times could challenge the Commission's decision in court again and wait a few more years to see if EU judges challenge it again. In the meantime, the texts are still nowhere to be found at the Commission. A Commission spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (cs)
