logo
What did Nicola Willis's cost-of-butter meeting with Fonterra actually achieve?

What did Nicola Willis's cost-of-butter meeting with Fonterra actually achieve?

The Spinoff23-07-2025
The butter price crisis prompted a high-profile meeting at the Beehive – but global markets, not politicians, are still calling the shots, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin.
Was the butter meeting a damp squib?
Finance minister Nicola Willis says she was surprised by 'the almost breathless excitement' around her Tuesday evening meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell, reflecting a week of coverage perhaps more suited to a major sporting event than a wonky meeting about dairy economics. The Post dubbed it 'the butter meeting heard round the country' while news sites ran red breaking news banners as Hurrell and Willis sat down to talk. With 500g blocks of butter topping $11 in some supermarkets, the stakes, at least symbolically, were high.
Willis said the conversation covered many topics, but she did ask Hurrell to clarify how butter is priced and why New Zealanders often pay more than overseas consumers. The main outcome, according to the Herald's Thomas Coughlan? A suggestion that Hurrell will publicly explain the breakdown of butter pricing later this week. 'He was so good at communicating about [butter prices], I have encouraged him to provide that information to New Zealanders,' Willis said.
Labour smells spin
The political optics of the meeting have raised eyebrows, particularly given Willis's own six-year stint in senior roles at Fonterra, reports Bridie Witton in Stuff. Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds questioned whether the meeting was more about performance than policy, arguing Willis should already understand how butter is priced. Willis pushed back, saying she worked in government relations and environmental strategy – not pricing – and refused to 'pre-judge' Fonterra's explanations. Her office also noted she meets with the dairy giant regularly, and the discussion this week wasn't solely about butter.
Still, the intense buildup and media framing gave the impression of a high-level intervention, when in fact the levers to influence pricing remain limited. 'The lesson here is that performance politics doesn't work,' Newstalk ZB's Heather du Plessis-Allan said. 'In fact … it runs the risk of backfiring, which is exactly what's happening here.'
So why is butter so expensive?
As Blayne Slabbert explains in The Press (paywalled), 95% of our dairy products are exported and domestic prices reflect what those products earn overseas – a model known as export parity pricing. Recent Stats NZ data shows butter prices, driven by the global market, have surged 46.5% in a year, reaching an average of $8.60 per 500g.
While world dairy prices dipped slightly in July, they remain far above historical levels. Global supply is tight, and demand – especially in China and Southeast Asia – continues to climb. 'You get to the situation we're in now where butter is at extraordinary heights and everyone wants their butter on toast,' High Ground Dairy consultant Stu Davison tells Newstalk ZB's Michael Sergel. 'We don't see it running right back to where we were five years ago.' That international appetite for grass-fed butter benefits our farmers and boosts export revenues, but leaves local consumers squeezed at the checkout.
A changing role for Fonterra
As butter becomes a lightning rod for public frustration at the cost of groceries, Fonterra may soon exit the retail fray altogether. The co-operative plans to sell off consumer-facing brands like Anchor and Mainland, focusing instead on its business-to-business operations. Writing in The Conversation, agribusiness professors Alan Renwick and David Dean say the move makes commercial sense. While some fear an overseas owner could lead to higher prices for consumers, they think it could help disrupt the current 'cosy' relationship between Fonterra and the supermarkets – potentially even bringing prices down.
In the Herald, Clive Elliott, a barrister specialising in intellectual property, argues that the sell-off is a strategic error. 'Our prosperity and ability to remain a first-world economy depends on our ability to add value,' Elliott warns, arguing Fonterra is abandoning decades of brand equity. Regardless of who ends up owning the dairy brands, the butter pricing system is unlikely to shift dramatically. For now, New Zealanders will have to settle for an unsatisfying explanation rather than meaningfully lower costs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand's largest infrastructure event begins
New Zealand's largest infrastructure event begins

NZ Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

New Zealand's largest infrastructure event begins

Close to 1000 delegates are expected, making this one of the largest events in the summit's near two decades' history. ANZ chief executive Antonia Watson will give the opening address, followed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis speaking for the Government. ANZ chief executive Antonia Watson. Photo / Mark Mitchell All eyes will be focused on Minister for Infrastructure, Housing, RMA Reform and Transport Chris Bishop who will speak to the Government's vision for delivering a 'resilient, future-ready infrastructure system'. He will share insights on long-term planning, funding priorities, and the critical policy shifts needed to drive delivery and improve outcomes across the country. The first international keynote speaker, Andrew Tan, will talk to one of New Zealand's most pressing issues — how to build a bipartisan vision to drive infrastructure investment. A former Temasek International managing director with a prior three-decades career spanning high-profile roles in Singapore's senior administrative service, Tan will explore how bipartisan approaches can unlock long-term investment, accelerate delivery and lift national productivity. The keynote address is billed as challenging delegates to think beyond political cycles and focus on the partnerships, policies, and funding strategies that can transform infrastructure outcomes for generations to come. 'As a nation, we have always viewed infrastructure as strategic to the country's economic growth, prosperity and well-being,' says Tan. 'This cuts across the political spectrum. 'There is broad-based recognition that sustained investment in core infrastructure such as roads, ports, airport and public housing have been an essential element of Singapore's competitive advantage. 'Singaporeans themselves expect no less.' Bishop and Labour's Infrastructure spokesperson, Kieran McAnulty, will later take the conference inside the in-depth discussions on cross-party collaboration taking place, which are critical to unlocking long-term infrastructure progress. On the international front, Tan will be tomorrow by followed by former Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of Ireland Leo Varadkar, who will take the stage to talk on excellence in delivery and ensuring equitable outcomes. He is billed as bringing a global perspective on how governments can deliver major infrastructure projects that not only meet performance targets but also ensure fairness and equity for communities. Leo Varadkar, former Taoiseach of Ireland Varadkar served as Taoiseach from 2017 to 2020 and from 2022 to 2024. Through the Project Ireland 2040 plan, investment in public infrastructure budget more than doubled during his time as Prime Minister from under €6b a year to more than €12b a year with major investments in transport, rural broadband, energy, climate action, healthcare and education. Other sessions will include presentations from Regional Development Minister Shane Jones and Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Infrastructure New Zealand's Strategy and Engagement Manager Katie Bradford, who is also the summit's MC, will host a range of panels throughout the two days. Bradford notes the symposium is an opportunity to explore practical, systems-based thinking for sustainable growth. 'Building Nations provides a platform for the industry to engage in and explore how we can do things differently, using our existing infrastructure more effectively and investing in the right assets to achieve a coherent vision for Aotearoa's infrastructure.' The 2025 programme also includes focused sessions on Treaty partnership, regional collaboration, and community inclusion. Panels will examine how the infrastructure sector can work in true partnership with Māori, unlock the potential of local government, and embed diversity and accessibility into infrastructure planning. Winners of the Building Nations Impact awards will be announced at a gala dinner tonight. ● Programme is at Singapore keeps its infrastructure in good health Andrew Tan has a message: 'Singapore transformed itself from a Third World to First World country by putting in place a first-class infrastructure that enhances our global hub status and connectivity with rest of the world, including our region.' The city state lacks both natural resources and a natural hinterland. The upshot is the Singaporean Government takes a long-term view towards infrastructure, starting with optimal land use to balance the needs of current versus future generations. 'We have developed long-term concept plans and master plans for the whole island, taking a 30-40 years' timeframe down to actionable five-year timeframes,' says Tan. 'The beauty is not in the planning but having a process that allows close co-ordination across government departments along with consultations with the private sector and civil society, to the final execution of these plans. This requires trust and confidence in the process, transparency and open communications, especially in land sales/allocation, bidding for projects and their evaluation.' Andrew Tan was formerly managing director with Temasek International; a global investment firm headquartered in Singapore. He joined as an operating partner in the Enterprise Development Group, and later as managing director of the new Strategy Office.' Singapore looks after its infrastructure. Photo / 123rf Prior to joining Temasek, Tan spent nearly three decades with the Singapore Administrative Service in senior positions across key agencies across defence and foreign affairs, environment and water resources and transport. He also served in the Prime Minister's Office as the principal private secretary to Senior Minister/Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew. He later became CEO of the National Environment Agency and founding director of the Centre for Liveable Cities, He was also CEO of the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA). These days he holds a number or private sector roles. Tan makes the point the bulk of the funding for basic infrastructure in Singapore comes from the Government's budget. 'Over the decades, the Government has been able to generate surpluses as well as maintain healthy reserves. This allows government agencies responsible for key infrastructure as public housing, transport, schools/universities and hospitals and other social facilities to be upkept,' he explains. 'It has been a central tenet of the Government not to allow any public infrastructure to deteriorate beyond its normal lifespan. It is a reflection of the state of the country and how well it is run. Further, the upgrading of existing infrastructure, such as public housing has led to their values rising over the years for homeowners.' Andrew Tan speaking in Auckland in 2023. It has been a central tenet of the Government not to allow any public infrastructure to deteriorate beyond its normal lifespan. Andrew Tan He says in recent years, the Singaporean Government has also undertaken several private-public sector projects on a design-build-own-operate basis (DBOO) as well as leveraged on bonds to finance major infrastructure projects such as transport network and public utilities, eg desalination water plants and waste-to-energy plants. Notably, as part of Singapore's climate change and green transition efforts, the public sector will take the lead to issue green bonds of up to S$35 billion of green bonds by 2030. This will serve as a reference for the corporate green bond market, deepen market liquidity as well as attract issuers, capital and investors for green financing. Tan adds, beyond public infrastructure, through the Government Land Sales (GLS) Programme, land is also sold to the private sector for various development purposes. Rather than simply outright sales of land, the GLS allows the Government to shape the developments in line with its strategic objectives based on various planning parameters and built-in incentives. 'It has been used for urban renewal after our independence, later, positioning Singapore as a tourism hub, and business and financial hub in the 2000s, as well as heritage and conservation needs. This ensures that other than receiving revenues from land sales, land is optimised for the greater well-being of the country.' Through the Long-Term Planning Review (LTPR) led by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), the Singapore Government engages the private sector and civil society to define the key features of how they envision Singapore in the future. In the recent review, for example, four themes emerged from public consultations - a Singapore that is Inclusive; Adaptable and Resilient; Sustainable, and Distinctive & Endearing. This feeds into the overall long-term strategies. Tan says the URA has also partnered community and business groups to support ground-up ideas for local precincts and neighbourhoods such as for mixed-use developments involving the Singapore River Precinct, Tanjong Pagar, Marina Central and Raffles Place to create more buzz and vibrancy. 'That said, private developers are always keen to provide inputs to the plans and the Government is equally open to new ideas while balancing the greater needs of society and reconciling short versus long-term gains. It is an ongoing, open-ended dialogue with all stakeholders. The enhancements to the Government Land Sales Programme is one such example of continuous feedback and improvement.'

Tāmaki Makaurau's byelection is really about Willie Jackson and John Tamihere
Tāmaki Makaurau's byelection is really about Willie Jackson and John Tamihere

NZ Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

Tāmaki Makaurau's byelection is really about Willie Jackson and John Tamihere

The byelection was called after the sudden death of Te Pāti Māori's Takutai Moana Tarsh Kemp in July after a battle with kidney disease. Labour list MP and grandson of Sir James Henare, Peeni Henare. Henare is a great orator and is considered, along with New Zealand First's Shane Jones and Te Pāti Māori's Rawiri Waititi, the best te reo Māori speakers in Parliament. He comes from distinguished political lineage and won the Tāmaki Makaurau seat in 2014, 2017 and 2020, only to lose it in 2023. His grandfather Sir James Henare stood for the National Party in five elections between 1946 and 1963 and his father Erima Henare was head of the Māori Language Commission. Henare's mum Te Hemo Ata Henare was a master weaver and his uncle, Māori activist Dun Mihaka, bared his buttocks to Queen Elizabeth II at Waitangi in 1986. While Kaipara doesn't have the same political whakapapa, she can hold her own in the te reo world, having been brought up in the Kura Kaupapa and Wharekura movements. Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara. She was afforded the privilege to go total immersion, unlike many whānau of her parents' age who were punished for speaking the language. This byelection will not be one of full-frontal attacks – much to the disappointment of the Government, who would rather see Labour and Te Pāti Māori going toe-to-toe at each other. The byelection will be won by the party that can tap into the disillusioned among Māori. At the ballot box in 2023, of the 43,755 registered, only 27,038 actually voted. If Labour is to win, it must call on its strong ground game, door-knocking throughout the electorate and hitting the weekend markets in Avondale, Ōtara, Manukau and Manurewa. Tāmaki Makaurau has the biggest concentration of Māori in New Zealand. No doubt, Te Pāti Māori will also be on the ground but the party's edge comes in its multi-platform social media channels, which connect it to the younger cohort. Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke in Parliament during the debate on the Treaty Principles Bill. Photo / RNZ, Samuel Rillstone Waikato-Tainui MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke has more than 60,000 Facebook followers and 225,000 on Instagram – far exceeding anything Labour can match. Depending on how Jackson and Tamihere pull those levers will determine whether Te Pāti Māori keeps six MPs or Labour increases its number from 34 to 35. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

New Zealand will be worse off than its competitors under new US 15% tariff regime, international business group warns
New Zealand will be worse off than its competitors under new US 15% tariff regime, international business group warns

NZ Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

New Zealand will be worse off than its competitors under new US 15% tariff regime, international business group warns

'What people have been talking about a lot is the competitive disadvantage relative to other partners because this is, to quote Stephen Jacobi, not about running faster than the bear, it's about running faster than the person next to you. 'All along, the idea has been to run faster than the guy next to us, who in this case is Australia, Uruguay, Argentina, if you're in beef, or Chile if you're in wine.' Importers typically pay tariffs through customs agents when they pick up goods. 'But basically, people have contracts and that tariff is sometimes shared, sometimes passed back to the exporter, and sometimes the importer will absorb it and pass it on to the consumer. 'So it's a little bit case-by-case, but that doesn't take away from the fact that it makes our goods globally less competitive,' Roxburgh said. 'We do sell very high-quality goods into a wealthy market, so only time will tell whether that's going to hold up and whether we'll be able to pass that price on to the consumer and whether the consumer will be willing to pay more.' Roxburgh said the US move would help reinforce New Zealand's trade ties with other countries. 'The important point here is we have a good network of free trade agreements and tariff-free access to a diverse range of countries, and that's an opportunity for us. 'But by the same token, you don't invent or temporarily pivot to new markets overnight. 'Exporters spend a lot of time in finding the right partners, finding the right supply chains, distributors and on marketing infrastructure. 'The idea of diversification has been around for a long time and exporters are well aware of that, but the US is a premium market for our goods.' Some New Zealand exporters already pay a MFN (most favoured nation) tariff, sometimes of about 2% or 3%. 'If you're now taking 15%, some are getting up close to 20%, which is real commercial pain, so the 15% is additional to what some were already paying.' The NZIBF represents some of New Zealand's biggest exporters, with a combined turnover of $30b. Fonterra, the country's biggest exporter, said the higher tariff was disappointing. 'However, global demand for dairy remains strong and Fonterra's size, scale and broad product portfolio and market mix means we are well positioned to navigate changes in market dynamics,' Simon Tucker, the co-op's group director global external affairs, said. The US is among Fonterra's top five export destinations. For Fisher and Paykel Healthcare (FPH), which counts the US as a key export market, the revised tariff regime is expected to have a small impact on its bottom line. The company makes about 45% of its volume in Mexico and 55% in New Zealand, with about 43% of its revenue coming from the US. About 60% of US volumes are supplied from the company's Mexico manufacturing facilities. In March, the US enacted a 25% tariff on products imported from Mexico that are not compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Almost all FPH products imported into the US from Mexico are USMCA-compliant. Forsyth Barr senior analyst Matt Montgomerie said the market had been modelling its forecasts for FPH on a 10% tariff on US-bound hospital products out of New Zealand only. Montgomerie said a 15% tariff equated to a 1% to 1.5% hit to the broker's earnings forecasts over the next few years. 'It obviously is an additional cost, but I don't think it would result in any dramatic changes in how they operate the business or the supply chain and the earnings impact, versus the 10%, is relatively small.' ASB economists said New Zealand would be put at a 'slight' disadvantage to Australia. 'But, as Canada's position shows, it could have been worse: punching back at the US only seems to work if you have some rare metals tucked in your boxing gloves. 'New Zealand will have to adjust to upwards of $1.4b of potential trade costs, which is the tariff bill US importers will need to pick up on the current value of NZ's goods exports,' the bank said. 'Whether it is lost sales or thinner margins, a proportion of that bill will impact New Zealand exporters, unless US consumers prove to have unwavering appetites for New Zealand products,' the bank said. Jamie Gray is an Auckland-based journalist, covering the financial markets and the primary sector. He joined the Herald in 2011.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store