Marks and Spencer launches exclusively into David Jones with lingerie line that sells one bra every two seconds
Eager Aussies who have been patiently waiting for products to land into stores (previously M&S has only been available to buy online) can now shop the range in store and online at David Jones.
The first drop to launch in Australia is a curated edit of lingerie, sleepwear and the sought-after Rosie by M&S collection, a viral collab with supermodel Rosie Huntington-Whitely herself.
Expect to find t-shirt bras, lace and strapless lingerie, shapewear, thermals and a variety of briefs with prices starting from as little as $29.99 — plus complimentary lingerie fittings available.
'We're thrilled to welcome Marks & Spencer to David Jones, introducing one of Britain's most iconic retailers to our customers,' says Bridget Veals, Executive General Manager of Womenswear, Footwear & Accessories at David Jones.
'The arrival of M&S marks the beginning of an exciting new chapter for us, as we continue to curate a world-class portfolio of brands that deliver both elevated everyday essentials and exceptional value.'
Gracing our top drawers for over 140 years, Marks and Spencer is known and loved around the world.
Aussies will now be able to experience first-hand the quality, comfort and expert fit M&S lingerie is known for, from everyday basics to luxe lace styles from Rosie Huntington-Whiteley's sought-after collaboration.
With over 2 0 million bras sold annually — that's one every two seconds — the affordable price points and incredible quality make Marks & Spencer the go-to destination for lingerie shoppers.
The launch into the Australian market sets a hugemile stone for Marks & Spencer too.
'We're taking starting steps in Australia; it's a market which has always shared long-standing and strong links with the UK and where brand recognition is high,' says Mark Lemming, Managing Director of International at Marks & Spencer.
'With a shared set of values surrounding quality, innovation and trust, David Jones is the perfect partner as we take our first venture into a partnership in fashion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
11 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Not allowed to complain': Aussies given working from home reality check
A hybrid office worker has divided fellow work-from-home Aussies after claiming that anyone who gets to work remotely isn't allowed to whinge about their job. Christy, a Sydney-based employee in the tech and sales industry, views being able to work from home as a privilege, having previously worked in industries where this wasn't an option. In a recent TikTok, the 26-year-old said if your job allows you to work from home 'even just one day a week', then you are 'not allowed to complain'. 'This is coming from someone that can also work from home,' she said. As she is in a client facing role, Christy typically only gets to work from home one day a week and, while her current job keeps her 'very, very busy', it doesn't compare to when she previously worked in retail, hospitality and real estate where she was always on the go. 'So I am telling you, if you work from home, just be grateful and you are not allowed to complain about your job. If you are complaining, quit. I don't want to hear it,' she said. Speaking to the 26-year-old said none of her previous jobs offered flexibility, noting 'you can't take someone's coffee order or conduct an open house from the comfort of your own home'. Christy is 'extremely grateful' to have the opportunity to do her job remotely, even just one day a week. 'Say I'm working from home on a Friday, that means I can wake up slightly later and do a later gym class because I don't have to factor in time to commute to the office,' she said. 'When I clock off I don't have to then sit in traffic or on a train, I can stand up from my desk and walk over to the kitchen and start cooking dinner instantly. You win an hour back from your day that would have been spent on commuting.' Christy's video garnered a lot of attention, being viewed more than 74,000 times and attracting just under 2000 comments. Many people agreed with the young worker's perspective, sharing their own positive experiences of being able to work remotely. 'I went from a social work job to a work from home job. I'm CHILLING. And my weekends are actually mine. And the appointments I can go to?!' one person said. 'After 20yrs in face-to-face retail, I am ridiculously grateful for my WFH life!' another wrote. A commenter who used to work in a hybrid role and is now having to be in an office five days a week said they missed working from home even one day a week, branding it 'such a game changer'. 'I get to WFH with flexible hours, SO LUCKY & would NEVER complain,' another said. One added: 'I do complain, and then I realise the incredible freedom I have and check myself.' However, not everyone agreed with Christy's take on working from home, with others not happy being told not to complain about their jobs. There were those that pointed out that, even though working from home was a positive, that didn't mean there weren't parts of the jobs that were whinge-worthy. 'Let's normalise being able to complain about work for any reason under any circumstance,' one person said. 'Absolutely not – as someone who worked in retail for 15 years and now works in a hybrid role. I'll complain about whatever I want thanks,' another wrote. Others claimed that then they work from home they are often working longer hours than they would if they were in the office. 'I work from home 5 days a week and logged off today at 10.30pm. I was rostered until 5 and didn't get a lunch break. Not everyone has this extra time and I don't have a moment to do washing,' one said. Another commenter claimed saying WFH staff can't complain is a 'privileged take', noting that being at home doesn't erase 'stress, burnout, toxic management, or financial pressure'. When asked about the divide in the comment section, Christy said she welcomed hearing the different perspectives, noting there is typically 'always going to be a loud minority who love to disagree or challenge you'. However, she thinks there may be a lot of Gen Zers who perhaps haven't experienced 'long hours of standing on your feet all day' in industries like hospitality, trades, healthcare and others and, as a result, take flexible working 'for granted'. 'No employer is obligated to offer WFH arrangements, so I think we should all be appreciative if that's on the table. It certainly wasn't for our parents' generation,' she said. Describing herself as a 'glass half full type of person', Christy said she would rather be grateful for what she has than focus on the negatives. 'While people love to complain about their jobs and work (especially with the rise of the anti-corporate culture), I'm grateful that I get to work, make a living & contribute in a way that I find fulfilling. And throw in a day from home, how can I possibly complain?' she said. 'Especially when I'm sitting on the couch in my sweats while my fiance (who is a tradie) is working a 12 hour day doing manual labour in rain, hail or in a 40 degree roof.'
Canberra Times
41 minutes ago
- Canberra Times
Childcare safety failures are a shock, how we respond shapes us for years to come
Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily! Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am! Be the first to know when news breaks. As it happens Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarExpert, ACM's exclusive motoring partner. Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over. Get the very best journalism from The Canberra Times by signing up to our special reports. As it happens Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday. Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more. Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe. Get the latest property and development news here. We've selected the best reading for your weekend. Join our weekly poll for Canberra Times readers. Your exclusive preview of David Pope's latest cartoon. Going out or staying in? Find out what's on. Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters. Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening. Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation. Don't miss updates on news about the Public Service. As it happens Today's top stories curated by our news team. Also includes evening update. More from Court and Crime Sue Morphet is the former chief executive officer of Pacific Brands and past president of Chief Executive Women. Now, more than ever, Australia needs a robust, universal early childhood education system that supports women's workforce participation, economic and community prosperity, and ensures our children get the best start in life. This progress remains vulnerable and requires ongoing commitment. The gains Australian women have made in workforce participation didn't happen by chance; they resulted from deliberate policy choices that strengthened entire communities. In crisis, the temptation is to abandon what seems broken rather than fix it. But our early learning system is too important to abandon. We need better oversight, routine quality assessments, fairer wages and more support for our dedicated early educators. The overwhelming majority deserve our respect, not suspicion. This system needs serious reform. New powers to strip funding from failing providers must be the beginning, not the end. We must see early childhood education as essential infrastructure, like our schools and hospitals, vital to thriving communities. Real flexibility requires structural reforms: universally accessible paid parental leave shared between partners; targeted tax reforms to reduce effective marginal rates that discourage women from increasing their hours; and most importantly, building a universal early learning system where access isn't determined by postcode or income. Ideas such as replacing early learning support for families with tax deductions might sound like flexibility, but they're a mirage. They disproportionately benefit higher-income families and fail to help those most in need of safe, affordable early education. Nonetheless, we've failed to utilise our single biggest untapped resource: scores of qualified Australian women, over 140,000 of whom still cite early learning costs or availability as barriers to working more. We're leaving this immense talent base on the table at a time we absolutely cannot afford to. Every economist in the country has been warning us about the slump in our national productivity. Our economy is crying out for talent, facing critical skills shortages across every sector. According to the Grattan Institute, even a modest 2 per cent increase in women's workforce participation would inject over $11 billion into our nation's economy. Deloitte notes that achieving gender equality would grow our GDP by over $128 billion. CEW research conducted by Dr Angela Jackson shows that if women participated in our workforce at the same rate as men, we would unlock a million additional workers. Addressing this imbalance is not only fair but economically essential. This paradox is clear in our workforce: around 70 per cent of Australia's part-time roles are filled by women, representing a striking underutilisation of decades of investment in women and girl's education and skills. Yet despite this progress, we still have a very long way to go. Australia ranks 34th globally for women's economic participation, despite having one of the world's most educated female populations . Now, more than ever, Australia needs a robust, universal early childhood education system that supports women's workforce participation. Picture Shutterstock Today, that system enables millions of Australian women to engage in the workforce, benefiting not only individuals but entire communities and our economy. This progress wasn't just awarded to us. Legions of women fought for it. The expansion of access to high-quality early childhood education and care changed that, brick by brick, centre by centre. Too many brilliant women stepped back, their talents lost to our workplaces and economy. Women faced impossible choices: abandon careers they'd spent a lifetime developing or cobble together unreliable care arrangements. I remember starting my career when access to high-quality early learning was virtually non-existent. But we must not let this crisis undo what generations of women fought so hard to build. I understand why many in this moment do not feel confident in our early learning system, and it is clear that major reforms are needed. We're already seeing this pattern emerge, with some calling to abandon the early learning system in favour of subsidising parents to stay home, with everyone understanding that this burden would overwhelmingly fall on women. Societal shocks, as author Naomi Klein has noted, have the potential to be used to roll back progress that takes decades to achieve. Australia now stands at a pivotal moment. The justified rage and anguish families feel is a response to a profound betrayal of our collective trust. All other regional websites in your area The digital version of Today's Paper All articles from our website & app Login or signup to continue reading Subscribe now for unlimited access. Like every Australian, I've watched the early learning safety crisis with heartbreak. Your digital subscription includes access to content from all our websites in your region. Access unlimited news content and The Canberra Times app. Premium subscribers also enjoy interactive puzzles and access to the digital version of our print edition - Today's Paper. Login or create a free account to save this to My Saved List Login or create a free account to save this to My Saved List Login or create a free account to save this to My Saved List
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Alarming salary you now need to afford a home across Australia
Aussies will now need to earn about $200,000 a year to be able to afford a typical house in our capital cities after another explosion in property prices following this year's interest rate cuts. This is the finding of alarming new research, which measured the income required to afford the mortgage repayments on houses priced at the capital city median price. The analysis of PropTrack and ABS loan data exposed a brutal reality for aspiring homeowners, examining the burden repayments at current prices would have on households' finances. It showed about 83 per cent of suburbs across the country are unaffordable for those earning the average pre-tax household income (about $100,000 a year) – a marked change from only a few years ago. The findings suggested the Reserve Bank's moves to cut the cash rate this year – first in February and then in May – have made it harder for new buyers to get into the market by raising prices. National home prices are currently about 5 per cent higher than they were at this time last year. Much of that price growth occurred after the February rate cut as improved borrowing capacity pulled more buyers into the market and, with competition rising, pressured them to make higher offers. insights manager Graham Cooke said even those who were earning what used to be good incomes were now struggling to afford property purchases. 'It's a sobering reality that for many suburbs, even a six-figure income isn't enough to comfortably service a mortgage,' he said. 'If you're a solo buyer – it's even tougher. For many, purchasing property is only possible with a second income or financial support from family. Finder's analysis showed $203,000 was the minimum household income required to buy the average house in our eight capital cities without going into mortgage stress. Mortgage stress was deemed a situation where families were spending more than 30 per cent of their income on repayments, viewed as an unsustainable amount over the long term. Income requirements were even higher in Sydney, with house buyers needing to earn just under $300,000 to afford a house priced at the city median of $1.56 million. Brisbane households needed about $201,000 a year to afford a house at the city median of $1.06 million, while a minimum $185,000 was needed in Melbourne to buy at the city median of $983,000. This assumed the buyer had a 20 per cent deposit, used a 30-year loan with an interest rate of 5.83 per cent – the current industry average – and was an owner occupier. Adelaide houses, once heralded as a refuge from soaring eastern seaboard prices, required an annual household income of nearly $173,000 to be affordable. The Adelaide median is now $916,000. A similar annual household income was required for an average Perth house to be considered affordable: about $174,000. Apartment prices were considerably more accessible – although still above the average national income. A unit at the capital city median price was considered affordable for those on a household income of $131,000 a year. Nationally, the average household income is about $105,000 annually. Buying the average unit in Melbourne, Perth, Canberra and Adelaide required a minimum household income of about $110,000-$120,000 to be affordable. In Brisbane the minimum income needed to afford an average unit was nearly $135,000 a year, while in Sydney it was about $162,000. REA Group economist Anne Flaherty said affordability remained a considerable challenge for buyers across the country. She said the high level of income needed to get into the market was putting something of a brake on the speed of home price rises, but they were nonetheless continuing due to recent interest rate cuts.
