
The West is recycling rare earths to escape China's grip — but it's not enough
BEIJING — As China tightens its grip on the global supply of key minerals, the West is working to reduce its dependence on Chinese rare earth.
This includes finding alternative sources of rare earth minerals, developing technologies to reduce reliance, and recovering existing stockpiles through recycling products that are reaching the end of their shelf life.
"You cannot build a modern car without rare earths," said consulting firm AlixPartners, noting how Chinese companies have come to dominate the supply chain for the minerals.
In September 2024, the U.S. Department of Defense invested $4.2 million in Rare Earth Salts, a startup that aims to extract the oxides from domestic recycled products such as fluorescent light bulbs. Japan's Toyota has also been investing in technologies to reduce the use of rare earth elements.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey, China controlled 69% of rare earth mine production in 2024, and nearly half of the world's reserves.
Analysts from AlixPartners estimate that a typical single-motor battery electric vehicle includes around 550 grams (1.21 pounds) of components containing rare earths, unlike gasoline-powered cars, which only use 140 grams of rare earths, or about 5 ounces.
More than half of the new passenger cars sold in China are battery-only and hybrid-powered cars, unlike the U.S., where they are still mostly gasoline-powered.
"With slowing EV uptake (in the U.S.) and mandates to convert from ICE to EV formats receding into the future, the imperative for replacing Chinese-sourced materials in EVs is declining," said Christopher Ecclestone, principal and mining strategist at Hallgarten & Company.
"Pretty soon, the first generation of EVs will be up for recycling themselves, creating a pool of ex-China material that will be under the control of the West," he said.
Only 7.5% of new U.S. vehicle sales in the first quarter were electric, a modest increase from a year ago, according to Cox Automotive. It pointed out that around two-thirds of EVs sold in the U.S. last year were assembled locally, but manufacturers still rely on imports for the parts.
"The current, full-blown trade war with China, the world's leading supplier of EV battery materials, will distort the market even more."
Of the 1.7 kilograms (3.74 pounds) of components containing rare earths found in a typical single-motor battery electric car, 550 grams (1.2 pounds) are rare earths. About the same amount, 510 grams, is used in hybrid-powered vehicles using lithium-ion batteries.
In early April, China announced export controls on seven rare earths. Those restrictions included terbium, 9 grams of which is typically used in a single-motor EV, AlixPartners data showed.
None of the six other targeted rare earths are significantly used in cars, according to the data. But April's list is not the only one. A separate Chinese list of metal controls that took effect in December restricts exports of cerium, 50 grams of which AlixPartners said is used on average in a single-motor EV.
The controls mean that Chinese companies handling the minerals must get government approval to sell them overseas. Caixin, a Chinese business news outlet, reported on May 15, just days after a U.S.-China trade truce, that three leading Chinese rare earth magnet companies have received export licenses from the commerce ministry to ship to North America and Europe.
What's concerning for international business is that there are barely any alternatives to China for obtaining the rare earths. Mines can take years to get operating approval, while processing plants also take time and expertise to establish.
"Today, China controls over 90% of the global refined supply for the four magnet rare earth elements (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb), which are used to make permanent magnets for EV motors," the International Energy Agency said in a statement. That refers to neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium.
For the less commonly used nickel metal hydride batteries in hybrid cars, the amount of rare earths goes up to 4.45 kilograms, or nearly 10 pounds, according to AlixPartners. That's largely because that kind of battery uses 3.5 kilograms of lanthanum.
"I estimate that around 70% of the over 200 kilograms of minerals in an EV goes through China, but it varies by vehicle and manufacturer. It's hard to put a definitive figure on it," said Henry Sanderson, associate fellow at The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security.
However, there are limits to recycling, which remains challenging, energy-intensive and time-consuming. And even if adoption of EVs in the U.S. slows, the minerals are used in far larger quantities in defense.
For example, the F-35 fighter jet contains over 900 pounds of rare earths, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, based in Washington, D.C.
China's rare earths restrictions also go beyond the closely watched list released on April 4.
In the last two years, China has increased its control over a broader category of metals known as critical minerals. In the summer of 2023, China said it would restrict exports of gallium and germanium, both used in chipmaking. About a year later, it announced restrictions on antimony, used to strengthen other metals and a significant component in bullets, nuclear weapons production and lead-acid batteries.
The State Council, the country's top executive body, in October released an entire policy for strengthening controls of exports, including minerals, that might have dual-use properties, or be used for military and civilian purposes.
One restriction that caught many in the industry by surprise was on tungsten, a U.S.-designated critical mineral but not a rare earth. The extremely hard metal is used in weapons, cutting tools, semiconductors and car batteries.
China produced about 80% of the global tungsten supply in 2024, and the U.S. imports 27% of tungsten from China, data from the U.S. Geological Survey showed.
About 2 kilograms of tungsten is typically used in each electric car battery, said Michael Dornhofer, founder of metals consulting firm Independent Supply Business Partner. He pointed out that this tungsten is not able to return to the recycling chain for at least seven years, and its low levels of use might not even make it reusable.
"50% of the world's tungsten is consumed by China, so they have business as usual," Lewis Black, CEO of tungsten mining company Almonty, said in an interview last month. "It's the other 40% that's produced (in China) that comes into the West that doesn't exist."
He said when the company's forthcoming tungsten mine in South Korea reopens this year, it would mean there would be enough non-China supply of the metal to satisfy U.S., Europe and South Korean needs for defense.
But for autos, medical and aerospace, "we just don't have enough."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Trade Vision Prevails Despite China's Deceptions
(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump accused China on Friday of breaking a short-term trade deal with the U.S. Earlier this month, the two countries reached a 90-day deal to reduce high tariffs on trade between the world's two largest economies. The global superpowers agreed to slash tariffs that had been so high that nearly all trade between the two nations stopped. The U.S. reduced its tariffs on China from 145% to 30% while the two nations continued to talk. China cut its levies on U.S. imports from 125% to 10%. 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. U.S. markets retreated on the news in what has been a challenging month for investors. Trump also lashed out at the three judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade who unanimously ruled on Wednesday that Congress did not give tariff authority to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. That court voided most of Trump's tariffs, but the administration appealed the decision to a higher court, which paused the Court of International Trade ruling for now. 'Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America?' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be?' The Court of International Trade said the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 didn't give Trump 'unbounded' authority to set tariffs. The ruling was a setback for Trump's foreign and domestic policy agenda, which is underpinned by tariffs. 'Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs do not comply with the limitations Congress imposed upon the President's power to respond to balance-of-payments deficits,' the Court of International Trade judges wrote. 'The President's assertion of tariff-making authority in the instant case, unbounded as it is by any limitation in duration or scope, exceeds any tariff authority delegated to the President under IEEPA.' On Thursday, the Trump administration filed an emergency motion asking for a stay. 'The injunction threatens to unwind months of foreign policy decision-making and sensitive diplomatic negotiations, at the expense of the Nation's economic well-being and national security,' DOJ attorneys wrote. The appeals court granted the stay Thursday afternoon. 'The ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade is so wrong, and so political!' Trump wrote. 'Hopefully, the Supreme Court will reverse this horrible, Country threatening decision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY. Backroom 'hustlers' must not be allowed to destroy our Nation!' Trump made it clear he didn't want to work with Congress on tariffs. 'The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs. In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly,' Trump wrote. 'If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power – The Presidency would never be the same!'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FinTech Chain Full Year 2025 Earnings: CN¥0.007 loss per share (vs CN¥0.007 loss in FY 2024)
Revenue: CN¥55.9m (up 24% from FY 2024). Net loss: CN¥4.51m (loss narrowed by 4.5% from FY 2024). CN¥0.007 loss per share (in line with FY 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period FinTech Chain shares are up 50% from a week ago. It's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with FinTech Chain, and understanding these should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Errore nel recupero dei dati Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati Errore nel recupero dei dati
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jensen Huang Just Delivered a Startling Message About Nvidia's Future in China
The Nvidia CEO spoke about the company's future in China during the company's recent earnings report. It currently faces a halt on sales to the country that made up 13% of its revenue last year. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › To use an old saying, the world was Nvidia's (NASDAQ: NVDA) oyster. The company reached out to global markets as it wished, selling its top artificial intelligence (AI) chips and generating explosive growth. But in more recent times, the U.S. -- beginning with the administration of former President Joe Biden and continuing with current President Donald Trump -- has put in place certain restrictions. The Biden administration in 2022 launched export controls, limiting the types of AI chips that could be sold to the major market of China, then earlier this year issued the AI Diffusion Rule to further strengthen that position. The Trump administration recently revoked the diffusion rule, but said it would replace it with other guidelines soon. Meanwhile, Nvidia received notice several weeks ago that it could no longer sell its previously approved H20 chips to the Chinese market due to a U.S. government rule, and this resulted in a billions-dollar charge for the company. It's important to remember that in the last fiscal year -- the 12 months ended Jan. 26, 2025 -- China represented 13% of Nvidia's revenue, so if the restrictions continue at this level, they will weigh on growth. That's why investors have paid close attention to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's comments and plans regarding the situation. And he just delivered a startling message during the recent earnings call. Let's take a look at what it could mean for the stock. Nvidia had specifically designed the H20 AI chip, based on its Hopper architecture, to respect the U.S. government's guidelines and had earned approval to export it. But, back in April, it received word from the government that it couldn't export the H20 without a license. The U.S. hasn't yet issued such licenses to chip companies. As a result, Nvidia was left with H20s it was unable to export, and it announced a $5.5 billion charge linked to that. In the company's earnings report this week, it lowered this to $4.5 billion as it was able to repurpose certain H20 materials. Nvidia's market share in China also has progressively declined from 95% about four years ago to 50% today. Now, let's consider Huang's startling message about Nvidia's future in China. "China is one of the world's largest AI markets and a springboard to global success," Huang said. "Today, however, the $50 billion China market is effectively closed to U.S. industry. We are exploring limited ways to compete, but Hopper is no longer an option." The company's chief financial officer, Colette Kress, also said that the potential loss of China's AI accelerator market would have "a material adverse impact on our business." Now, let's consider what this could mean for Nvidia. It's true that in the worst-case scenario, the company would completely lose access to China permanently, and this could weigh on its ability to grow. But two elements make me optimistic this scenario won't play out. First, it's important to note that Huang generally is very resourceful and proactive. After all, he quickly led Nvidia's development of the H20 to respect guidelines and maintain a presence in China. So, it's clear he and his team are prioritizing this problem and may find ways to limit the damage. Second, Huang hasn't tried to minimize the potential impact of closing the door to the Chinese market. He's sounding the alarm bell in a pretty loud way and clearly explaining how extremely restrictive policies could harm U.S. companies. This could encourage the Trump administration, as it considers new guidelines, to turn things around and allow U.S. companies such as Nvidia some access to the market. Meanwhile, it's important to note that through the latest fiscal year, the U.S. is by far the company's biggest market, generating $61 billion in revenue out of the company's total of $130 billion. And revenue from companies with billing addresses in all other geographic regions has climbed significantly. So, though a complete halt to China sales clearly would hurt Nvidia's growth, the company still continues to advance -- and lead -- in other areas throughout the world. What might this mean for the stock? If the worst-case scenario happened, it likely would weigh on stock performance, at least in the short term. On a brighter note, I don't think this is a situation that would destroy Nvidia's long-term value considering the company's leadership in AI throughout the rest of the world. But, as mentioned, I'm optimistic a middle-of-the-road solution may be found, allowing Nvidia at least some opportunity in China, and if this happens, Nvidia shares could soar. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025 Adria Cimino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Jensen Huang Just Delivered a Startling Message About Nvidia's Future in China was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data