
I grew up poor. Making rich friends changed my life
Here in Britain, class has long been seen as the great divide when it comes to earning potential and aspiration. But these days, studies show there's an easy way to get ahead – hang around with rich friends, and start early. It certainly inspired me.
My childhood in the Seventies was what you'd call 'Bohemian middle class'. My mum was a playwright, my dad worked for the BBC, and they were very young. We lived in a Manchester suburb, first in terraced houses, then in a three-bed Thirties semi until I was nine. We went on annual holidays to North Wales with my grandparents, and my dad's cars (when he had one) were generally held together with bits of string and optimism.
I came from a long line of immigrant shopkeepers, clerks and postmistresses. But while we were always a bit skint, my family was also clever. We were never short of books (or blues LPs, in my dad's case). I spent my primary years being sent to work with the top class, which made me both stressed and unpopular with the children in my class. Aged eight, I passed the exam for a very academic private girls' day school, and my grandparents generously helped my mum and dad scrape the fees together.
That was when I met rich people for the first time. Of course, we didn't think in terms of 'rich' at that age, but I was very aware that when I went to birthday parties, other girls lived in big detached houses with landscaped gardens and banks of shiny cars in the drive. Several had ponies, in contrast to our beloved scruffy cats who covered my school uniform in orange fur. Some of my new friends would spend half-terms skiing, and summer holidays in Florida or the South of France.
My best friend had five siblings and her home life was equally bookish and normal, so it took a while for me to notice the gulf in income between me and my classmates. Nobody mentioned it, it simply existed. I didn't feel jealous so much as curious. Their parents seemed to be lawyers or doctors, dentists or tech entrepreneurs. After school, they'd all board the bus and head to mansions in deepest Cheshire, while I wandered home past the newsagents to our red-brick semi.
I sometimes wondered how their families earned so much money, forgetting that most parents were a good 15 years older than my own (and some had inherited it). At 17, most passed their driving tests and were gifted cars. One girl got a sports car. I carried on catching the number 41 bus into town.
None of this affected our friendships – on the whole, they were kind, clever, funny girls, even if Nadia did wear Armani jeans at the weekend, and I wore Fifties frocks from a vintage emporium. Still, passing round a forbidden copy of the Shirley Conran novel Lace at lunchtime held the same thrill for all of us.
It wasn't until I went to university in Glasgow that I became truly aware of the rich gap. My two flatmates both came from families far better off than mine. They had grown up down south (one had gone to boarding school) and, for them, dropping student loan money on designer clothes and hair-salon visits or buying 'good' wine was entirely normal.
I shopped at Oxfam and bought Bulgarian Country White. My hair was a nest. Again, it wasn't that it mattered – they never showed off or mocked me; we just had different attitudes to money. They didn't fret about their finances like I did, or desperately compete for minimum-wage jobs in the holidays (I worked on the Co-op meat counter for one unpleasant summer).
But when I left to start my journalism career, I swiftly found myself pregnant at just 21 and finally felt the burn of aspiration. I wanted security for my child; I didn't want to feel that queasy uncertainty about money that ran through my family history. As a result I worked so hard as a freelance writer, I was a blur. I saved madly for a mortgage and bought a five-bedroom house with my new husband, who had three children, when I was 28. I didn't care about cars, but I did care about eating out, holidays – we went to America, the South of France, Majorca – and well-dressed children.
It was subconscious but, looking back, my school days were instrumental in this. And this experience is not unique to me: according to a recent study from global research consultancy BIT, children who mix with better-off friends go on to earn an extra £5,100 a year.
I wanted my children to have what the well-off children had, I wanted them not to worry about money in the same way I had worried. Only an unexpected tax bill derailed me (I had grown up with a work ethic and the desire to earn money, but no one had taught me about the proper administration of it). But I was the breadwinner, so I picked myself up.
Working so hard meant I was missing out on time with my family, and by 34, I was burned out. I opened a vintage shop, and went part-time as a writer. I earned less and, once again, my friends were generally better off – our closest friends lived in a huge house, drove a Porsche, and went to Antigua on holiday.
Now, I'm remarried, and we live in a two-bedroom cottage in the Scottish Highlands. I write novels, and buy fancy vet-approved food for our two dogs and the cat. We haven't had a holiday in five years – but we are not poor. I suspect, deep down, that the phrase 'You have to see it to be it' is true. I was spurred on to work hard enough to buy a large house, provide for my son and step-children, pay for holidays and gifts and treats, partly because I'd seen what a well-funded life looked like. More importantly, I'd understood how it felt for my friends not to worry about money, because there was always enough of it. I wanted that feeling too.
Do I still have friends who are better off than me? Yes, absolutely. Am I determined to write that bestseller and go on holiday somewhere fancy again? Also, yes, absolutely – the inspiration that started in childhood never stops.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Fire breaks out at fish and chips shop in Brown Edge
Fire crews have been battling a blaze at a fish and chip shop. Flames broke out at Sandy Lane Fish and Chips in Brown Edge, Staffordshire, on Sunday a post on X shortly after 15:30 BST, Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service said four crews were sent to the scene on Sandy Lane, and urged people to avoid the area.A fire service spokesperson told the BBC nobody was hurt and it was believed the blaze started accidentally, although a cause had not been identified. Firefighters had since left the scene, the spokesperson added. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
20 hours ago
- BBC News
Trump deploys National Guard after clashes in LA
Manage consent settings on AMP pages These settings apply to AMP pages only. You may be asked to set these preferences again when you visit non-AMP BBC pages. The lightweight mobile page you have visited has been built using Google AMP technology. Strictly necessary data collection To make our web pages work, we store some limited information on your device without your consent. Read more about the essential information we store on your device to make our web pages work. We use local storage to store your consent preferences on your device. Optional data collection When you consent to data collection on AMP pages you are consenting to allow us to display personalised ads that are relevant to you when you are outside of the UK. Read more about how we personalise ads in the BBC and our advertising partners. You can choose not to receive personalised ads by clicking 'Reject data collection and continue' below. Please note that you will still see advertising, but it will not be personalised to you. You can change these settings by clicking 'Ad Choices / Do not sell my info' in the footer at any time.


Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Prince Harry's plan for kids' future 'makes no sense', says royal expert
A Royal expert has questioned Harry and Meghan's plan for their children's futures. The Sussex family may no longer be active as royals or carry out duties for the King Charles. But despite their controversial withdrawal from the royal family, they reportedly are open to their children playing their part in the monarchy. Sources close to the Sussexes have said that the pair do in fact want Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, who just turned four, to retain their royal titles, so they will be able to choose to become working royals if they want to when they reach adulthood. It comes after the source claimed Harry and Meghan feared passports for their children were being held up due to the use of their HRH titles. It was claimed that the Sussexes were left frustrated as they waited months for British passports to arrive, and reportedly believed it was due to the fact they included their children's royal titles on the application. But former BBC royal expert Jennie Bond has questioned why Harry and Meghan appear so keen to cling onto titles for their children - even though they have previously hit out against the institution of monarchy. The expert told the Mirror: "I really don't understand why, having extricated themselves from a life they did not enjoy and in which Harry has publicly spoken of 'feeling trapped', they want to give their children the option of re-joining. It makes no sense. "Who knows what's going to happen in the future? But it's very hard to see how two children who are clearly now more American than British would want to change their whole way of life and become working members of the royal family." Archie and Lilibet were given prince and princess titles when their grandfather King Charles became monarch in 2022. The first time their titles were formally announced was after Lilibet's christening in March 2023. It is said that the passport delay caused Harry to approach the possibility of changing his family surname to Spencer in a nod to his late mother, Princess Diana. And Jennie added: "I think Harry has always been more Spencer than Windsor, so if he was ever going to change his name, it would be to Spencer. "But this would be a final nail in the coffin of his relationship with his father and his brother. It would amount to a public declaration that he no longer saw himself as part of the royal family." There has been continued controversy over the Sussexes' HRH titles since the pair quit their royal roles five years ago. As part of their Megxit negotiations with the Palace, Meghan and the Duke of Sussex agreed to stop using 'Her Royal Highness' and 'His Royal Highness' at the end of March 2020. They still retain the styles, with Harry having had his since birth, but they are essentially held in abeyance, and so are not in active use. However, earlier this year, it emerged that Meghan had used her HRH style on a gift basket sent to make-up entrepreneur Jamie Kern Lima last year, with a monogrammed card reading: 'With Compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Kern Lima showed an image of the present in footage of her podcast interview with Meghan. It contained a jar of Meghan's jam which she has started selling as part of her As Ever lifestyle business brand. A source described the basket as a 'personal gift'. The duchess's representatives denied that the couple used their royal titles, but a source later said that the Sussexes did not use HRH publicly, but retained the style, and did not use it for commercial purposes. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.