Musk's AI firm awarded US government contracts of up to $200m
Mr Musk's company is one of multiple leading US artificial intelligence firms to be awarded the contracts, including Anthropic, Google and OpenAI.
Each individual contract will have a ceiling of $200 million and will be aimed at scaling up adoption of advanced AI capabilities within the department of defence (DoD).
The contracts will allow the agency 'to leverage the technology and talent of US frontier AI companies to develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas,' it said.
It comes as the Tesla billionaire's AI company faces intense scrutiny over anti-Semitic posts made by its 'Grok' chatbot on X.
The chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in some responses on the platform, denounced 'anti-white hate,' and described Jewish representation in Hollywood as 'disproportionate'.
xAI apologised for the extremist and offensive messages, and said it had corrected the instructions that led to the incidents.
Days later Grok 4, the latest chatbot version, was met with further scrutiny after it appeared to consult Mr Musk's positions on some questions it was asked before responding.
AI to address national security challenges
The new government contracts will help the DoD use AI to address critical national security challenges, the department's chief digital and artificial intelligence office said.
'The adoption of AI is transforming the (DoD's) ability to support our war fighters and maintain strategic advantage over our adversaries,' Doug Matty, chief digital and AI officer, said.
The award to xAI comes despite an ongoing public feud between Mr Musk and Donald Trump following the billionaire's departure from the White House.
The former Doge head and the president turned on each other after Mr Musk came out against the administration's sweeping tax bill, dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill'.
Mr Trump then threatened to take away Mr Musk's government contracts and even said he would 'take a look' at deporting the billionaire.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The full, untold story of Trump's U-turn on Ukraine
It was early morning on July 4 when Gen Keith Kellogg's phone was illuminated with a call from Poland. On the other end of the line was Radoslaw Sikorski, Poland's foreign minister, with what could be one of the defining interventions of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Overnight, the Polish consulate in central Kyiv had been damaged in a barrage of Russian missiles and drones. 'Putin is mocking your peace efforts,' Mr Sikorski told Gen Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general who serves as Donald Trump's lead Ukraine envoy. 'Please restore supplies of anti-aircraft ammunition to Ukraine,' he added. Weapon deliveries had suddenly been frozen two days before, leading many to believe the Trump administration was once again abandoning Ukraine. During the phone call, it was the heads-up about the embassy strike that appeared to resonate most with Gen Kellogg. As a retired three-star general, he knew this was the type of incident that leads to wars escalating and eventually spiralling out of control. What happened next can be seen as the first in a series of events which ushered in Mr Trump's pivot on Ukraine. Almost immediately after ending his call with Mr Sikorski, Gen Kellogg dialled the president's number. Mr Trump answered almost straight away. After the July 4 well-wishes and congratulations for the ' one, big, beautiful bill ', the pair got down to the business of Ukraine. Overnight, Kyiv had been pummelled with 11 missiles and 539 drones, in what was at the time the largest Russian barrage against the Ukrainian capital since the war began. More crucially, the strikes came hours after Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and Mr Trump had spoken on the telephone to discuss ending the war. It was already known that the US president had grown frustrated with his Russian counterpart's refusal to halt strikes on Ukrainian cities while dismissing an American offer of a ceasefire. Gen Kellogg briefed his boss on the latest attack and how Nato ally Poland's embassy had been caught up in the strikes. The envoy then used the call to promote a resumption of Patriot air-defence missiles being sent to Ukraine. There were discussions on the potential risks and rewards of increasing Kyiv's access to the American-made surface-to-air batteries and the interceptors fired from them. Mr Trump's response was swift: tell the Pentagon to release some of the Pac-3 systems that had been caught up in a temporary freeze on US aid while officials assessed American stockpiles. He also ordered Gen Kellogg to contact Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, to resume deliveries to Kyiv. Mr Trump had been blindsided previously after Mr Hegseth authorised a pause in aid to Ukraine without informing the White House or Congress of his decision, it later emerged. The likes of Gen Kellogg and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state and national security adviser, only learnt about his decision from press reports. But this time would be different – and Gen Kellogg made sure of that. When he called Mr Hegseth, he told him of the president's decision to resume shipments of Patriot missiles to Ukraine. He told Mr Hegseth that if he did not believe him, he should call Mr Trump himself. It was also on July 4 that the US president promised Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, that he would finally assist with Kyiv's air defence needs. Privately, amongst Washington's most hawkish Ukraine supporters, this decision was seen as the first time Mr Trump had realised the significance of using American might to strengthen Kyiv's hand as a potential route to a peace deal. However, it took the Pentagon at least four days to get the first batch of Patriot missiles on the move. There had been 40 Pac-3 interceptors ordered by former president Joe Biden's administration in Poland en route to Ukraine. A dozen of them were eventually released following Mr Trump's call with Gen Kellogg. This volte face was then leapt on by European capitals confident of tempting the US president to go further in support of Kyiv. Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor, started offering to buy Patriot systems that would be sent to boost the war-torn nation's defences. Mark Rutte, Nato's secretary-general, went further, offering Mr Trump the opportunity to be reimbursed by European allies and Canada to the tune of billions of dollars in American-made weapons shipped to Ukraine. It was a deal lapped up by the US president, who had been quietly lobbied by advisers, like Gen Kellogg, that having European nations pay for American weapons shipped to Europe was a demonstration of his 'Make America Great Again' principles. Those weapons would not only convince Putin to come to the negotiating table, but also exhibit the effectiveness of American weapons during a European attempt to rearm itself through domestic production. It took Mr Trump just nine more days to announce, alongside Mr Rutte, his $10bn aid pipeline on July 13, as well as the prospect of crippling trade tariffs on Russia and any country that bought its fossil fuels. By the end of that week, a Patriot air-defence system and more interceptors had already arrived in Ukraine, thanks to a deal with Germany. The Pentagon and the White House used that move to try to convince European nations to take risks by sending their available stocks to Kyiv while waiting for America to backfill them. However, it is a tough ask for some countries, given that their Patriots will not be replaced until early next year. Earlier this week, Berlin announced an agreement with Washington to donate a further five batteries to Ukraine. Germany will provide funds for two of the systems, while Norway has promised to pay for a third. The replacements are expected to come from orders once promised to Switzerland. Bern last week revealed it had been told by Washington that deliveries destined for the neutral nation were being diverted to support Kyiv. Mr Trump was advised that diverting the Swiss order would help free up the systems necessary to support Ukraine. In 2022, Switzerland ordered five Patriot systems, with the expectation that deliveries would start in 2026 and end two years later.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The real winners from Trump's ‘AI action plan'? Tech companies
Donald Trump's AI summit in Washington this week was a fanfare-filled event catered to the tech elite. The president took the stage on Wednesday evening, as the song God Bless the USA piped over the loudspeakers, and then he decreed: 'America must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with a green light, not strangled with red tape, so they can't move, so they can't breathe.' The message was clear – the tech regulatory environment that was once the focus of federal lawmakers is no longer. 'I've been watching for many years,' Trump continued. 'I've watched regulation. I've been a victim of regulation.' As Trump spoke to the crowd, he addressed them as 'the group of smart ones … the brain power'. In front of him were tech leaders, venture capitalists and billionaires, including Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang and Palantir's chief technology officer Shyam Sankar. The Hill and Valley Forum, an influential tech industry interest group, co-hosted the confab, along with the Silicon Valley All-in Podcast, which is hosted by White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks. Dubbed 'Winning the AI Race', the forum was an opportunity for the president to deliver what he called the 'AI action plan', which aims to loosen restrictions on the development and deployment of artificial intelligence. The cornerstone of that plan are three executive orders that Trump said will turn the US into an 'AI export powerhouse' and roll back some of the rules put in place by the Biden administration, which included guardrails around safe and secure AI development. 'Winning the AI race will demand a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley – and long beyond Silicon Valley,' Trump said. One executive order targets what the White House calls 'woke' AI and requires any company receiving federal funding to maintain AI models free from 'ideological dogmas such as DEI'. But the other two focus on deregulation, a major demand of American tech leaders who have taken an increasingly bullish stand on government oversight. One of those promotes the export of 'American AI' to other countries and the other eases environmental rules and expedites federal permitting for power-hungry data centers. To get to this moment, tech companies have been forging a friendly relationship with Trump. The CEOs of Alphabet, Meta, Amazon and Apple donated to the president's inauguration fund and met with him at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT, has become a close ally of Trump, and Nvidia's Huang has also cozied up with the president with promises of investing $500bn in AI infrastructure in the US over the next four years. 'The reality is that big tech companies are still spending tens of millions of dollars to curry favor with lawmakers and shape tech legislation,' said Alix Fraser, the vice-president of advocacy for the nonprofit Issue One. In a report released on Tuesday, Issue One looked at lobbying spending in 2025 and found that the tech industry has spent record-breaking sums. Eight of the largest tech companies spent a combined $36m – that's an average of about $320,000 per day when Congress is in session, according to Issue One. Meta spent the most, $13.8m, and has hired 86 lobbyists this year, according to the report. And Nvidia and OpenAI saw the biggest increases, with Nvidia spending 388% more than the same time last year, and OpenAI spending 44% more. In the lead-up to Trump's unveiling of his AI plan, more than 100 prominent labor, environmental, civil rights and academic groups countered the president and signed a 'People's AI action plan'. In a statement, the groups stressed the need for 'relief from the tech monopolies' that they say 'sacrifice the interests of everyday people for their own profits'. 'We can't let big tech and big oil lobbyists write the rules for AI and our economy at the expense of our freedom and equality, workers and families' wellbeing, even the air we breathe and the water we drink – all of which are affected by the unrestrained and unaccountable rollout of AI,' the groups wrote. Meanwhile, tech companies and industry groups celebrated the executive orders. Microsoft, IBM, Dell, Meta, Palantir, Nvidia, Anthropic, xAI and others praised the plan. James Czerniawski, the head of emerging technology policy at the Consumer Choice Center, a pro-business lobbying group, heralded Trump's AI plan as a 'bold vision'. 'This is a world of difference from the hostile regulatory approach of the Biden administration,' Czerniawski concluded.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Australia and UK sign 50-year defence treaty despite US wavering on Aukus submarine deal
Australia and the UK will sign a 50-year treaty to cement the Aukus submarine pact, even as the major partner in the Aukus agreement, the US, wavers on the deal. The new treaty will be announced by foreign minister Penny Wong and defence minister Richard Marles — alongside British foreign and defence secretaries David Lammy and John Healey — in the wake of the annual Aukmin talks in Sydney today. The US is not a party to the new treaty, which will be signed on Saturday. While negotiations over the Australia-UK defence treaty were flagged before US President Donald Trump took power, the document's inking re-affirms UK and Australia ties in the face of American tariffs and the Pentagon's yet-to-be-completed Aukus review. While the details of the treaty have not yet been announced, it is expected to cover a wide breadth of cooperation between the UK and Australia in developing the Aukus nuclear-powered submarine — the first of which will be built in the UK, before manufacturing begins in Adelaide. 'The UK-Australia relationship is like no other, and in our increasingly volatile and dangerous world, our anchoring friendship has real impact in the protection of global peace and prosperity,' the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, said. The bilateral treaty will facilitate greater economic co-operation between the two nations by improving both countries' industrial capacity. As part of the existing defence agreement, Australia will pay about $4.6bn to support British industry to design and produce nuclear reactors to power the future Aukus-class submarines. In a joint statement, Marles and Wong said the Australia-UK ministerial talks were critical to the nations' shared interests. 'We take the world as it is – but together, we are working to shape it for the better,' Wong said. Under the $368bn Aukus program, Australia is scheduled to buy at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the US from the early 2030s. The new Aukus-class nuclear submarines will be built first in the UK: Australia's first Aukus boat, to be built in Adelaide, is expected to be in the water in the early 2040s. But the planned sale of US-built boats has been thrown into doubt by the Trump administration launching a review into the deal to examine whether it aligns with his 'America first' agenda. The review is being headed by the Pentagon's undersecretary of defense for policy, Elbridge Colby, who has previously declared himself 'sceptical' about the deal, fearing it could leave US sailors exposed and under-resourced. The Aukus agreement mandates that before any submarine can be sold to Australia, the US commander-in-chief – the president of the day – must certify that America relinquishing a submarine will not diminish the US navy's undersea capability. Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion The US's submarine fleet numbers are a quarter below their target and the country is producing boats at half the rate it needs to service its own needs, US government figures show. Defence analysts believe the US is likely to re-commit to Aukus, but have speculated the review could demand further financial contributions – or political commitments such as avowed support for the US in a conflict with China over Taiwan – from Australia in exchange for the sale of nuclear submarines and transfer of nuclear technology. The UK's carrier strike group, led by the Royal Navy flagship HMS Prince of Wales, arrived in Darwin on Wednesday during Talisman Sabre multi-nation military exercises hosted by Australia. It's the first UK carrier strike group to visit Australia since 1997. The international task group includes five core ships, 24 jets and 17 helicopters, centred on the flagship aircraft carrier. Marles and Wong will on Sunday join their UK counterparts in Darwin to observe the group in action. UK High Commissioner to Australia, Sarah MacIntosh, said the strike group's arrival was a demonstration of commitment to the region and the strong relationship with Canberra. 'This is an anchor relationship in a contested world,' she said.
