US considers stake in Intel to boost chip industry, reports say
Intel's shares surged over 7% in regular trading and then another 2.6% after the bell.
The plan stems from a meeting this week between President Donald Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, according to the report.
The meeting came days after Trump publicly demanded the resignation of Tan over his investments in Chinese tech companies, some linked to the Chinese military.
Intel declined to comment on the report but said it was deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership.
'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai.
The details of the stake and price are still being discussed, according to the report.
Any agreement and potential cash infusion will help the years-long efforts to turn around the company's fortunes. Once the undisputed leader in chip manufacturing, Intel has lost its position in recent years.
The chipmaker's stock market value has plummeted to $104 billion from $288 billion in 2020.
Intel's profit margins - once the envy of the industry - are also at about half their historical highs.
Tan has been tasked to undo years of missteps that left Intel struggling to make inroads in the booming AI chip industry dominated by Nvidia, while investment-heavy contract manufacturing ambitions led to heavy losses.
Any agreement would likely help Intel build out its planned chip complex in Ohio, Bloomberg reported.
Intel's planned $28 billion chip fabrication plants in Ohio have been delayed, with the first unit now slated for completion in 2030 and operations to begin between 2030 and 2031, pushing the timeline back by at least five years.
NATIONAL SECURITY
Taking a stake in Intel would mark the latest move by Trump, a Republican, to deepen the government's involvement in the U.S. chip industry, seen as a vital security interest to the country.
Earlier this week, Trump made a deal with Nvidia to pay the U.S. government a cut of its sales in exchange for resuming exports of banned AI chips to China. - Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
33 minutes ago
- The Star
Chinese-built Ethiopian Airlines headquarters building tops out
ADDIS ABABA, Aug. 18 (Xinhua) -- The new Ethiopian Airlines Group headquarters building, which is under construction in Addis Ababa, the East African country's capital, has topped out, marking completion of its main structural works. The topping-out ceremony of the 45-meter-high structure was held on Monday, attended by representatives from the Ethiopian Airlines Group and China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC). Mesfin Tasew, chief executive officer (CEO) of Ethiopian Airlines Group, expressed confidence that the project will be completed on schedule, meeting the long-awaited desire of the airline. "We want this headquarters to be completed as soon as possible. It is our expectation that this headquarters will be completed with the highest level of quality," said Tasew. Built by the CCECC on a total land area of over 33,560 square meters, the project consists of six different buildings with multiple facilities, including commercial, corporate, and customer services. Noting that Chinese construction companies have successfully accomplished different projects for the airline, Tasew expressed confidence in the CCECC to deliver the project to the airline's satisfaction. "Our decision to engage with CCECC shows our trust and confidence in the company to construct and deliver state-of-the-art facilities," the CEO reiterated. Chen Sichang, general manager of CCECC, vowed to deliver the project on time and with top quality. "Now, the main structure has been completed, our commitment to engineering excellence does not stop here. We pledge to our client and all stakeholders that we will continue to uphold our corporate motto of diligence, integrity, and perseverance," Chen said. Launched on Aug. 30, 2023, the Ethiopian Airlines Group headquarters building project is set to be completed in August 2026. Recently, Ethiopian Airlines, the flagship carrier of Ethiopia, has launched the construction of a new mega airport near Bishoftu town, about 42 km east of Addis Ababa. During the topping-out ceremony, the CEO invited CCECC to participate in the construction of the new mega airport.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Hong Kong arrests two over suspected US$6.7mil water scam
HONG KONG: Hong Kong police said Monday they had arrested two people over a suspected scam involving a water supplier that may have cheated the government in a contract worth nearly US$7 million. A company named Xin Ding Xin won a deal in June to provide 1.88 million bottles of water for dispensers in some government offices – the first time such a contract went to a Chinese brand, according to local media. But police said the firm was found to have relied on false documents during the tender process, claiming to source its water from another mainland Chinese supplier when in fact they had no business ties. Officers arrested a 61-year-old man and a 57-year-old woman for fraud on Sunday, seizing around 2,600 bottles of water in a warehouse along with documents and electronic devices. The arrests have prompted water-cooler discussions across the Chinese finance hub on how bureaucrats missed the tell-tale signs of a scam when awarding a 36-month contract worth HK$52.9 million (US$6.77 million). Payment for the delivered batches has not yet been settled, according to police. The Government Logistics Department said on Monday that it had terminated its bottled water supply contract with Xin Ding Xin, as well as "three other contracts for the supply of chemicals which were affiliated with XDX's owner." Christopher Hui, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, set up a dedicated task force following an urgent meeting on Sunday. Hui also ordered "remedial actions" and invited the Audit Commission to review the tender exercise. "The incident has raised concerns among government colleagues and drawn extensive attention from the public," he said in a press release. Aside from the two arrests on Sunday, one mainland Chinese man remains at large, police said.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump's data war risks creating false calm
POLITICAL pressure on government statisticians and private forecasters risks sending markets down a rabbit hole, which could suppress volatility today but lead to seismic reality checks in the future. United States President Donald Trump has side-swiped both private and public sector economists this month, firing the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) boss for what he described as "rigged" jobs data and then lambasting Goldman Sachs for tariff-related research he didn't agree with. These moves seem alarming, even if there are some mitigating factors. Trump is hardly the first person to criticise BLS payrolls data. It has been under scrutiny for years, not because of fears of bias, but because of low survey response rates and delays, which have often resulted in large changes to past data. The most recent report contained one of the biggest downward revisions in decades. The BLS can argue that it has suffered from years of underfunding, but it's still not a good look. What's more, similar questions about data collection have been lobbed at the BLS regarding its compilation of monthly consumer and producer price reports, which are critical now in assessing the impact of Trump's tariff rises on inflation. These statistics, along with the US employment report, are the most important monthly updates for financial markets, mainly because they play a pivotal role in Federal Reserve thinking, given its dual mandate to maintain maximum employment and stable prices. Trump last week appointed Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni — a contributor to the controversial Project 2025 wishlist of policies for a second Trump term — to run the BLS. Antoni recently suggested suspending the monthly payrolls report until data problems were fixed, which could result in long data gaps at a critical moment for the US economy, monetary policy and markets. Importantly though, the White House and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have pushed back on that idea. But then came last Tuesday's attack on Goldman boss David Solomon, with calls for him to appoint a new chief economist following the release of a report on Sunday by his colleague Jan Hatzius. The report estimated US consumers had so far borne less than a quarter of the cost of tariffs but could see that rise to two-thirds over time. This may simply be nothing more than Trump complaining about a forecast he doesn't like, but it's still a move that risks tinkering with one of the most basic market tenets: the plurality of views. There's an obvious concern that — intentionally or not — these public attacks could cause economic data, research and forecasts to become more pro-government or lead to self-censorship by those keen to avoid seeing their business or careers damaged by presidential opprobrium. To its credit, Goldman said it would keep doing its job regardless of the political pressure. But it would hardly say otherwise. Perhaps more telling was the lack of public outcry from other economists who might reasonably be concerned that Trump's attacks on unflattering forecasts represent a worrying trend for their profession and market transparency overall. Of course, they or their institutions may simply have thought it best to stay quiet, assuming the issue would blow over soon. Does any of this matter long term? To be sure, economic forecasting can hardly be held up as a sacred cow if accuracy is what matters. A University of California, Berkeley study late last year looked at more than 16,000 forecasts by banks and large firms and concluded that while 53 per cent of forecasters were confident in their predictions, they were correct only 23 per cent of the time. Of course, if there were a consensus that official data was likely to be biased to flatter the government, then the process of forecasting those official numbers may just be to mechanically move in that direction. But that would undoubtedly create confusion. To better capture what's really going on, investors may be more inclined to commission private economic data. If political bias in official data and forecasting were to emerge in the current environment, one might expect to see firmer job creation and softer inflation readouts. That could keep markets calm in the short term. But any weakness in the real economy would emerge eventually, likely resulting in a rude awakening for many, no matter what the official data says.
