
From coverage to crisis? How Trump's tax package could strip millions of Medicaid benefit
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Safety-Net Shake-Up: Medicaid in the Crosshairs
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Mandated Work Requirements and Eligibility Checks
Changes to Medicaid Financing: States to Feel the Pinch
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Republican Defense: Work for Welfare
Consumer Watchdogs Worry About Mounting Medical Debt
A Step Backward from Universal Healthcare?
FAQs
What does the new law say about Medicaid?
How many people could lose health coverage because of this bill?
Millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid are set to face significant changes as the U.S. Congress approved President Donald Trump's expansive tax and spending package this week. While the bill extends key components of Trump's tax cuts, it also includes deep reductions in federal healthcare support—prompting growing anxiety among health policy experts and consumer advocates.The newly passed legislation, which cleared the U.S. Senate on July 1 and the House of Representatives on July 3, is expected to reduce federal healthcare expenditures by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. A substantial portion of these cuts target Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance exchanges.According to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law will result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage, with an additional 5 million affected by the discontinuation of pandemic-era tax credits that had subsidized ACA plans.Medicaid, which provided health insurance to 78.6 million low-income Americans as of March 2025, will now come under stricter eligibility surveillance, including job verification requirements and reduced financial leeway for states to fund their share of the programme.A defining element of the bill is its imposition of work requirements on certain Medicaid recipients. Beginning in 2027, states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA must verify twice a year that "able-bodied" beneficiaries are employed for at least 80 hours per month or meet exemption criteria—such as being a caregiver, student, or disabled.Parents of children above 13 years will also be subjected to these checks. States will be obligated to set up systems for regular job verification, though the Department of Health and Human Services can grant implementation delays through waivers for those acting in "good faith."During Trump's first term, 13 states sought similar waivers. Only Arkansas implemented them before a federal court halted the programme, which had disenrolled 18,000 people within seven months. Currently, Georgia operates the only state-approved Medicaid work requirement scheme, known as "Georgia Pathways," with fewer than 7,500 people enrolled.Beyond eligibility criteria, the bill also reforms how states can finance Medicaid. Many states have used 'provider taxes'—fees on hospitals and other healthcare providers—to boost their federal Medicaid match. The new law freezes the current tax limit and then, beginning in 2028, lowers the allowable rate from 6% to 3.5%, as per a report by USA Today.Health policy analysts believe this reduction could pressure states to reduce healthcare services or reconsider their expansion commitments under the ACA.'States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes,' said Jennifer Tolbert, Deputy Director at KFF's Medicaid and Uninsured Program.While critics describe the bill as a rollback of Obama-era healthcare reforms, Republican lawmakers argue that the overhaul is a necessary realignment of federal assistance programmes.Speaker Mike Johnson, speaking before the House vote, defended the inclusion of work requirements, stating that they aim to 'restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer-funded benefits.'The bill also aligns with Trump's broader campaign promise to extend his 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and ramp up border security—creating a sweeping fiscal package that redefines government spending priorities.Consumer advocacy groups warn that the new law could lead to a rise in medical debt, particularly among vulnerable populations who lose insurance coverage.Medical debt already constitutes more than half of all debt in collections, as per a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). A Biden-era rule intended to ban medical debt from credit reports is now at risk, as the GOP-led bill includes funding cuts to the CFPB, potentially weakening its ability to implement consumer protections.'The combination of reduced healthcare access and a weakened consumer watchdog agency is a double blow,' said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. 'Consumers are going to pay—and patients are going to pay big time.'Health policy researchers view the legislation as a significant departure from the universal coverage ambitions of the Obama-era ACA.'This is a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy,' said Joan Alker, Executive Director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families.With Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules—and how millions of Americans adjust to a potentially leaner public health safety net.The newly passed legislation includes nearly $1 trillion in federal healthcare cuts over the next decade, with a significant portion targeting Medicaid. The law introduces work requirements, tighter eligibility checks, and limits on how states fund Medicaid.According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 11.8 million Americans are projected to lose health insurance coverage due to the Medicaid reductions and the expiration of pandemic-era tax credits for ACA plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Hamas Says It's Ready to ‘Immediately' Enter Ceasefire Talks
Hamas said it is ready to 'immediately' start negotiations with Israel on a proposal by US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. A deal on the framework would see Hamas return half of the 50 hostages it still holds and pursue mediated talks with Israel to end the war. The proposal, accepted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, will be one of the major topics during his visit to Washington where he will meet with Trump on Monday. 'The Hamas movement has completed its internal consultations and discussions with Palestinian factions and forces regarding the latest proposal put forward by the mediators,' the group said in a statement. 'The movement has submitted its response to the brothers mediators, characterized by a positive spirit.' An agreement would pause, if not end, a war between Iran-backed Hamas and Israel that's raged since October 2023, killing tens of thousands of Palestinians, devastating Gaza and destabilizing the wider Middle East. Trump said late Friday that 'there could be a Gaza deal next week,' and he was 'very optimistic but it changes day to day.' While Netanyahu's government weeks ago agreed to the US proposal, Washington and the other main mediators — Qatar and Egypt — couldn't get the sides to overcome key sticking points. Hamas had said any ceasefire must end the war and also refused Israel's demands to disarm and remove itself from power in Gaza. Israel has intensified military operations even as it agreed to talks. The army ordered tens of thousands of people to leave the outskirts of Gaza City since Tuesday and stepped up air strikes and incursions in the northern city, leading to an increase in the number of fatalities. With assistance from Dan Williams. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Big, beautiful bill: US pulls back on solar, wind, EVs as China races ahead
US President Donald Trump has signed the Congress-approved 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Act (OBBBA), which marks a sharp break from his predecessor Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that drove billions into clean energy investments – from solar and wind to electric vehicles (EVs). Instead, the OBBBA accelerates the phaseout of federal incentives for these clean technologies, slashes royalty rates for domestic fossil fuel drilling, and expands oil and gas leasing through new provisions. The US House of Representatives passed the bill on July 3 without altering the Senate-approved version received earlier this week. While the final text modestly tones down the House's more aggressive cuts in support for hydrogen production and batteries, it still rolls back key benefits for solar and wind energy, as well as for both commercial and passenger EVs. Experts warn the legislation could drive up household energy bills over the next decade, slow the deployment of clean technologies on the US power grid, and – most importantly – cement China's dominance in the global clean energy race. The provisions of the OBBBA legislation signed by Trump are likely to push household energy bills by 2-7 per cent – an increase of $95-250 – in 2035, according to the New York-headquartered Rhodium Group. 'Most of this increase is driven by fewer electric vehicles on the road, leading to higher motor gasoline consumption and prices,' the think tank said in a note on July 2. Prior to the OBBBA, provisions under the IRA provided tax credits for purchase of new commercial and passenger EVs through 2032. Now, the benefits will end on September 30 later this year. To be eligible for clean electricity tax credits, wind and solar projects will now have to come online by the end of 2027. While the Senate also considered a new excise tax on upcoming wind and solar facilities with inadequate domestic content, the provision was removed from the final draft. 'Given that we expect far fewer EVs on the road and a meaningful reduction in clean energy deployment on the grid, there are also still considerable questions around the viability of new clean energy manufacturing in the US… lower levels of domestic demand for batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles could threaten the economic case for a number of manufacturing facilities that have been announced or, in some cases, that are already operating,' Rhodium said. As expected, the oil and gas industry – long a key backer of Trump's presidential campaigns – welcomed the OBBBA's push to expand fossil fuel production. But critics argue that US shale remains costlier than renewables, and that leaning on fossil fuels to meet rising electricity demand is both economically and practically unviable. In a statement on the legislation, David Widawsky, director of the World Resources Institute (WRI), US, said, 'Fossil fuels alone won't meet the skyrocketing energy demand from manufacturing, AI, electrification, and increasingly frequent and intense heat waves that prompt more AC usage. But America can create a more flexible, agile, and resilient power system with renewables and grid upgrades. Clean energy sources are better positioned to come online quickly to meet growing electricity needs and spur economic growth.' The final OBBBA text, while broadly scaling back clean energy support, is still less severe than the House version originally sent to the Senate. It gives clean hydrogen projects until end-2027 to qualify for tax credits – two years more than earlier proposed – and retains incentives for carbon capture, nuclear power, and clean fuels. Energy storage systems tied to solar or wind can also access full investment benefits through 2032, avoiding a sharper phaseout of benefits. Across the Pacific, China has ramped up thermal power to meet rising industrial demand – but a steady pivot to clean technologies remains central to its energy strategy. For instance, in 2024, while it started construction to add around 100 GW of coal power capacity, it added a whopping 420 GW of solar and wind. In comparison, the US added less than 55 GW in 2024, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Moreover, Rhodium estimates that China's push to electrify its vehicle fleet, particularly in trucking, is already displacing around 1 million barrels of oil per day – roughly equivalent to Oman's daily output. The perceived American retreat from solar, wind, and EVs will further strengthen Chinese dominance in these sectors.


Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
HC stays trial proceedings against Shivakumar
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Friday granted interim relief to Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar by staying the trial court proceedings in a criminal defamation case filed against him by the State BJP unit over 'corruption rate card' ads. The court also extended similar relief to the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC), which is a co-accused in the matter. Justice S R Krishna Kumar, who presided over the matter, issued notice to the respondent and made it returnable on July 29, effectively pausing the ongoing proceedings until further directions. he defamation case arose after a series of controversial advertisements titled 'Corruption Rate Card' were issued by the Congress party in the run-up to the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections. The BJP has alleged that these advertisements falsely accused it of institutionalising corruption while in power, claiming that appointments and transfers in government departments came with fixed 'rates' and 'commissions.' According to the BJP, the advertisements--published in local newspapers and promoted online--damaged the party's public image. The BJP has termed the Congress's claims as entirely fabricated and 'born out of fanciful imagination.' Of particular contention is the Congress party's reference to the then BJP-led state government as a 'trouble engine Sarkar', a wordplay on the BJP or NDA's self-description as a 'double engine Sarkar.' The BJP has argued that this was a deliberate attempt to ridicule and tarnish the party's image ahead of crucial polls. The complaint specifically names D K Shivakumar, in his capacity as KPCC President, and Siddaramaiah, then the Leader of Opposition, as the individuals responsible for commissioning and approving the advertisements. It also claims that Rahul Gandhi amplified the alleged defamatory content by posting it on his 'X' (formerly Twitter) account