Decision time as plastic pollution treaty talks begin
Three years of negotiations hit the wall in South Korea in December when a group of oil-producing states blocked a consensus.
Since the failure in Busan, countries have been working behind the scenes and are giving it another go in Geneva, in talks at the United Nations.
Key figures steering the negotiations said they were not expecting an easy ride this time round, but insisted a deal remained within reach.
"There's been extensive diplomacy from Busan till now," UN Environment Programme executive director Inger Andersen told AFP.
UNEP is hosting the talks, and Andersen said conversations across, between and among different regions and interest groups had generated momentum.
"Most countries, actually, that I have spoken with have said: 'We're coming to Geneva to strike the deal'.
"Will it be easy? No. Will it be straightforward? No. Is there a pathway for a deal? Absolutely."
- Human bodies riddled -
Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024.
However, the supposedly final round of negotiations on a legally-binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the seas, flopped in Busan.
One group of countries sought an ambitious deal to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals.
But a clutch of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus more narrowly on treating waste.
Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso, chairing the talks process, said an effective, fair and ambitious agreement was now within reach.
"Our paths and positions might differ; our destination is the same," he said Monday.
"We are all here because we believe in a shared cause: a world free of plastic pollution."
- 'Plastic-free future' -
More than 600 non-governmental organisations are attending the Geneva talks.
Valdivieso said lessons had been learned from Busan, and NGOs and civil society would now have access to the discussions tackling the thorniest points, such as banning certain chemicals and capping production.
"To solve the plastic pollution crisis, we have to stop making so much plastic," Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes told AFP.
The group and its allies want a treaty "that cuts plastic production, eliminates toxic chemicals, and provides the financing that's going to be required to transition to a fossil fuel, plastic-free future", he said.
"The fossil fuel industry is here in force," he noted, adding: "We cannot let a few countries determine humanity's future when it comes to plastic pollution."
- Dumped, burned and trashed -
Well over 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items.
While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled.
Nearly half, 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter.
A report in The Lancet medical journal warned Monday that plastic pollution was a "grave, growing and under-recognised danger" to health, costing the world at least $1.5 trillion a year in health-related economic losses.
The new review of existing evidence, conducted by leading health researchers and doctors, compared plastic to air pollution and lead, saying its impact on health could be mitigated by laws and policies.
To hammer home the message, a replica outside the UN of Auguste Rodin's famous sculpture "The Thinker" will be slowly submerged in mounting plastic rubbish during the talks.
The artwork, entitled "The Thinker's Burden", is being constructed by the Canadian artist and activist Benjamin Von Wong.
"If you want to protect health, then we need to think about the toxic chemicals that are entering our environment," he told AFP.
But Matthew Kastner, spokesman for the American Chemistry Council, said the plastics industry and the products it makes were "vital to public health", notably through medical devices, surgical masks, child safety seats, helmets and pipes delivering clean water.
rjm-im-bur/gv/tc
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Kaitlan Collins presses energy secretary on championing report written by climate change contrarians
CNN's Kaitlan Collins questions President Donald Trump's energy secretary Chris Wright about his support for a report authored by 5 skeptics of climate change that seeks to downplay the role human activity plays in changing Earth's climate.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
UN Chief Says Fossil Fuels Are On The Way Out—Are They?
In a recent speech, António Guterres, the UN General Secretary, claimed that the world is 'on the cusp of a new era' in global energy. 'Fossil fuels,' he said are finally 'running out of road.' This is a weighty statement by an influential voice and so needs some critical assessment. If correct, it tells us a massive transformation has occurred or is in progress. If not, it tells us something about problems of perception and representation regarding energy reality. Guterres' speech announced the release of a new UN report, 'Seizing the Moment of Opportunity: Supercharging the New Era of Renewables, Efficiency, and Electrification.' His main message has several parts: 1) the energy transition has reached a point where a non-carbon future is 'no longer a promise [but]Energy Sources The World Uses And What This Means In 2024, world energy use was 76.4% from oil, coal, and natural gas, in that order, with another 6% from traditional biomass, or 82.4% from carbon sources. This compares to 6.1% for solar and wind. If we add other renewables like hydro, the non-carbon total rises to 13%, and with nuclear to 18%. This is only a few percent less than natural gas, at 22%. Trend-wise, global energy consumption has been increasing at an accelerated rate since 2022, with fossil sources growing slowly, hydro and nuclear stable, and solar and wind rapidly increasing. The best interpretation from this and other trends is that renewables are replacing fossil sources in meeting new energy demand but haven't started to displace them on a global basis. Their overall role is still small but significantly elevated when viewed as part of the non-carbon share. Real change is thus underway, but there are no clear signs of a massive transformation. The idea that the era of fossil fuels is at an end is difficult to square with reality. Electricity Is The Future, But It Will Not Be Simple The UN message focuses on electricity, which makes sense as this form of energy is expanding into new sectors like transportation, industry, and services. Electricity is the future in an ever-more digitized world, and demand for power is growing everywhere. The claim that solar and wind are far cheaper than fossil fuels and nuclear and will thus win out in every case is not a simple one. Added to the material and construction costs for these sources are those needed to integrate their fluctuating power levels into a grid system and to back them up when they fall below demand for extended periods. Backup typically comes from other sources, including natural gas, and increasingly storage technologies, especially batteries. Costs for battery storage are dropping as technology and manufacturing improve, but batteries can only supply power for hours, not weeks. Are solar/wind displacing fossil fuels in key regions? In Europe, yes. Wind supplied more total power to the continent in 2024 than either gas or coal, which have fallen by 50% or more in the past two decades. Non-carbon sources, including nuclear and hydro, now account for more than 60% of Europe's electricity, a figure certain to rise. In the U.S., however, a major drop in coal use has been overwhelmingly due to a surge in cheap natural gas. China presents a more complex case. Coal continues to exceed all other sources combined, but non-carbon electricity has grown to more than 40%. To date, wind, solar, hydro, and nuclear have taken the place of more coal use but now seem to be displacing existing consumption as well. Solar and wind are the fastest growing by far, yet hydro and nuclear are rapidly increasing, too. Beijing has plans for these sources to lower coal dependency and peak its carbon emissions by 2030. Rapid build out of solar and wind, however, has brought challenges. Grid integration has not been able to keep place, leading to curtailment of actual power produced. The large land demands of these sources have created environmental and local political problems. At the same time, 2024 saw construction of new coal plants at a decade high. Global Energy Monitor's coal plant tracker shows a large number of future plants have been permitted with others under construction. Continuing rise in China's total demand for power has meant that coal use has kept increasing even while its share decreases. The Energy Security Issue Is Crucial But Has More Than One Answer In his speech, the UN chief tells us there are 'no price spikes for sunlight' and 'no embargoes on wind.' However true, it is not nature but the technologies that harness it and the critical minerals they need which matter. And these have had their role in the trade 'wars' between China and the European Union and U.S. There is no realistic scenario where solar and wind become the simple solution to the entangling economic and geopolitical challenges regarding energy security. Concerns today over import dependency do not vanish just because a foreign energy technology is cheap; indeed, they increase. We've seen this repeatedly directed at Chinese exports of solar and wind technology. This brings up another truth. When it comes to security, countries tend to favor their own natural resources. These include sun, wind, and flowing water but also coal, oil, natural gas, and uranium. China is hardly the only country that has a coal culture. So do many of the world's most rapidly developing nations, like India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Turkey. Reality Checks About Global Energy Are Often Needed These are only a few reality checks that readily present themselves. They assure us that global energy trends are complex and evolving. They are complex, moreover, for reasons that go well beyond costs. Fossil fuels still run the greater part of the world and will not run out of road soon. At the present time, in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and its shakeup of oil and gas markets, there is a struggle for many nations between securing supplies for immediate, short-term energy needs and pursuing policies driven by climate concerns. This is happening in an era of fractured international order and trade disruption, enhanced by the Trump Administration's weaponized use of tariffs in foreign policy. There is every sign, in other words, that global realities will continue to resist simple solutions well into the future.

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Russia Drops Self-Imposed Restrictions on Intermediate-Ranged Missile Deployments
Russia will no longer abide by self-imposed restrictions on the deployment of intermediate-ranged missiles, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced on Aug. 4. Until 2019, both Russia and the United States had been party to the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which prohibited either party from having ground-launched nuclear and non-nuclear missiles that can travel between 310 and 3,400 miles.