Ruling alliance partner IPFT gears up as Tripura ADC polls draw nearer, tries to sort out organisational drawbacks
'TTAADC (Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council) polls will be held in 2026. In the 2021 TTAADC polls, the party was defeated due to conspiracies and organisational weaknesses. Now, many who deserted the party have returned. We hope to get good results in the coming polls compared to the past,' said IPFT leader Suklacharan Noatia, who is also the lone minister from IPFT in the state Cabinet.
'We shall continue to follow our party's former supremo N C Debbarma's ideology,' added Noatia.
IPFT president Prem Kumar Reang said they also discussed preparations for observing the 'Tipraland Statehood Day' on August 23.
In the 2021 TTAADC polls, the Pradyot Kishore Manikya Debbarma-led Tipra Motha emerged victorious, winning 18 of 28 seats, the BJP won nine seats, while one seat was won by an Independent candidate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat Confidential: Late Arrival Raises Eyebrows
As the Tiranga Yatra was flagged off in the presence of Minister of State for Home, Harsh Sanghavi, at Vadodara's Navlakhi grounds on Monday morning, Mayor Pinky Soni remained conspicuous by her absence even as elected representatives of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as well as members of the party's city unit were present at the venue. Soni later joined the yatra at Rajmahal Road, walking alongside Sanghavi until the end of the march at Gandhi Nagar Gruh. While the BJP decided to downplay the 'late arrival' of the Mayor, sources within the Vadodara Municipal Corporation (VMC) said that Soni's absence from the main flag-off 'could not be ignored' as some members of the elected wing of the VMC had 'raised objection' to the order in which their names were printed in the list of dignitaries on the invites issued last week by the civic body for the event.
News18
9 minutes ago
- News18
National Guard In DC: What It Is And The Unique Power That Lets A President Deploy It
Last Updated: Donald Trump has ordered 800 National Guard troops into Washington DC. Here's how the force works, who controls it, and why DC's unit answers only to the President US President Donald Trump's announcement that he is placing Washington DC's police under federal control and deploying 800 National Guard troops has again thrust the force into the centre of a political and legal debate. Speaking at the White House alongside Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump said the Guard would help restore 'law, order and public safety" in the capital, despite federal crime statistics showing violent crime in 2024 was at its lowest in three decades. The decision is part of Trump's long-running strategy of using federal authority to intervene in Democrat-led cities, a move supporters call decisive and opponents see as politically motivated. But what exactly is the National Guard, and why is its deployment in Washington DC significant? What Is The National Guard? The United States National Guard is a military reserve force within the US Armed Forces that occupies a unique position in the country's defence and emergency response system. Unlike the regular Army or Air Force, it has a dual mission: it can operate under state control to respond to local crises, and it can be federalised by the President for national security missions or even overseas combat deployments. It is made up of two components: The Guard is present in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and US territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the US Virgin Islands. What Does The National Guard Do? The Guard's missions can be grouped into state-level and federal-level duties: State roles include: Federal roles include: Guard deployments have ranged from Hurricane Katrina relief in 2005, to Covid-19 pandemic logistics, to security during major events like presidential inaugurations. How Many Serve In The National Guard? According to the US Department of Defense, the National Guard had 431,291 members as of 2023: Army National Guard – 326,317 soldiers Air National Guard – 104,974 members Most Guard members serve part-time, holding civilian jobs or attending college. They undergo basic military training, then continue with monthly drills (usually one weekend) and an annual two-week training period. Who Controls The National Guard? The Guard's command structure depends on its activation status: State control: Governors (or territorial leaders) are the Guard's commanders-in-chief when it is activated for local duties such as disaster relief, riot control, or election support. Federal control: The President can 'federalise" the Guard, placing it under the US military chain of command. In most cases, this requires a governor's consent, but Washington DC is an exception. The DC National Guard is the only Guard unit that reports directly to the President at all times, not to a state or territorial leader. This arrangement means Trump can order its deployment without approval from DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. Legal Limits: The Posse Comitatus Act And The Insurrection Act In the United States, there is a long-standing law — the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 — that generally prohibits the federal military from carrying out domestic law enforcement duties, such as policing streets or making arrests. The idea is to keep the armed forces out of civilian life. The National Guard, when under state control, is exempt from this restriction, which is why governors can use it to assist police during emergencies. However, a President can sidestep these limits by using the Insurrection Act of 1807. This law gives the President the power to deploy the military, including a federalised National Guard, inside the country if there is an armed rebellion, widespread unrest, or a breakdown of law and order that local authorities cannot control. When Has The Guard Been Deployed Without A Governor's Approval? While the National Guard is usually activated by a state's governor, there have been moments in US history when the President has stepped in directly, bypassing local authority. 1957 – President Dwight D. Eisenhower federalised the Arkansas National Guard to enforce school desegregation after the Supreme Court's Brown v Board of Education ruling. This was a landmark civil rights decision that struck down racial segregation in US public schools. Arkansas' governor had used the Guard to block Black students from entering a white school, prompting Eisenhower to take control. 1965 – President Lyndon B. Johnson invoked the Insurrection Act to send Guard troops to protect civil rights marchers in Alabama, bypassing segregationist Governor George Wallace. The marchers, led by Martin Luther King Jr, were campaigning for voting rights for African Americans in the face of violent state opposition. 1992 – California Governor Pete Wilson and President George H.W. Bush jointly deployed the Guard to stop the Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict. The riots erupted when four white police officers were acquitted of beating Rodney King, an African American motorist, in a case that had been caught on video, sparking outrage over racial injustice. 2020 – During racial justice protests in Washington DC after the killing of George Floyd in police custody, President Donald Trump ordered the DC Guard to support federal law enforcement. The move was controversial, with critics saying it was aimed at forcefully clearing peaceful demonstrators from areas near the White House. Controversy Over Trump's Move Critics argue that Trump's action is politically driven. Violent crime in DC is currently at a 30-year low, and opponents say his rhetoric, portraying the city as 'overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals", does not match the data. Supporters, including House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, call it a 'bold and necessary action" to restore public safety in the capital. The move also comes after a high-profile attempted carjacking that injured Edward Coristine, a former DOGE employee, which Trump cited as proof of DC's alleged lawlessness. top videos View all In Summary The US National Guard is a centuries-old citizen-soldier force that can serve both local and federal missions. In most places, governors control its deployment for emergencies but in Washington DC, the President alone commands it. Trump's latest use of the Guard, alongside a temporary federal takeover of the city's police, is as much a political flashpoint as a law enforcement action. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump US National Guard washington DC view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 12, 2025, 09:20 IST News explainers National Guard In DC: What It Is And The Unique Power That Lets A President Deploy It Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
9 minutes ago
- News18
Rahul Gandhi's 'Vote Chori' Campaign: Predictable Playbook, Says BJP As Oppn Finds Common Cause
Last Updated: A top BJP source said Gandhi's real aim is not to prove his claims by judicial scrutiny but undermine public trust in institutions Rahul Gandhi has found a new political war cry in 'Vote Chori', but for the BJP, it is the same, painfully predictable political playbook that does not find any fault in his party's election wins in Karnataka or Telangana, but blames it on 'fraud' when the party crashes in Maharashtra or Haryana. For BJP, Gandhi's rhetoric is merely a media campaign with no legal recourse towards courts. A top party source said Gandhi's real aim is to not prove his claims by judicial scrutiny but undermine public trust in institutions. The SIR protest march in Parliament on Monday served another purpose for Gandhi—him bringing together the INDIA bloc for the first time on an issue after the Lok Sabha elections. Gandhi led the march with SP's Akhilesh Yadav, DMK's Kanimozhi, TMC MPs, RJD and the Left in tow. After over a year, the Opposition is finally uniting for a common cause. But, apart from that, Gandhi's strategy fails to look within, say top BJP sources. Like the party's inconsistent organisation or dwindling political cadre footprint across the country that had led to election setbacks. Or the party's weak leadership. The approach towards ECI, instead, gives a new insurance to the party's future losses—that it is just not our fault. Another top BJP source points to other gross inconsistencies in Gandhi's claims. One, narrow wins being termed by him as instances of election fraud. According to the source, narrow wins are part of India's electoral history and there have been two instances of politicians winning by just one vote and umpteen examples of margins below a 1,000 votes or lesser. Phased polling in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls was also nothing out of the ordinary when it comes to Indian elections, the second BJP source mentioned above said. Congress also banks on exit polls to say the real results are quite the opposite (like in Haryana) and hence, cries fraud. But BJP points out how exit polls have been consistently proven wrong. It is also a fact that India's electorate is growing like its population. A 4.4 per cent voter growth in Maharashtra in 2024, which Congress has cited as suspicious, in fact was lower than under UPA in 2004 when it stood at 4.7 per cent, the first BJP source said. In 2024, Karnataka's voter rolls were managed under a Congress state government, which now cries fraud. The top BJP sources, in fact, point to duplicate voters in Congress bastions in Karnataka and claim that BJP has been at the receiving end of such a phenomenon in Malegaon Central, Kerala, Wayanad, Rae Bareli, as well as Diamond Harbour. BJP sources say it was the Bihar SIR exercise which eliminated 'electoral fraud' carrying on in the state for years. Gandhi may not be able to prove his claims of 'vote chori', but for now, his campaign is proving to be the glue for the Opposition which sees the impending cross-country SIR as a 'common enemy". BJP hopes the Bihar result will prove to be the perfect answer to Gandhi's narrative, as the LoP moves from EVMs to 'Vote Chori', hoping desperately that something sticks. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
