Trump flails as Epstein storm rages around his government
It's a new twist for the president, being at odds with the loudest and most conspiratorial faction of his MAGA movement.
For once, he's becoming the victim of an out-of-control conspiracy, not the initiator of one. He looks like the insider covering up, not the ultimate outsider and deep-state destroyer.
Some of MAGA's most visible personalities are speaking up. Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene warned Monday of 'significant' reverberations in the movement over what some Trump supporters see as a cover-up. 'It's just a red line that it crosses for many people,' she told CNN's Manu Raju.
Tensions boiling between Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and Patel's deputy, Dan Bongino, are rekindling memories of the chaos and dysfunction that scarred Trump's first term but have been less obvious in his more prolific second presidency.
If anyone ought to know that the government can't issue statements of reassurance and make conspiracy theories disappear, it's Trump. He spun some of the most notorious fake intrigues in the history of American politics, from the racist fantasy about President Barack Obama's birthplace to the democracy-corroding tale that he won the 2020 election — which helped vault him back to power in 2024.
But Trump's mastery of the conspiratorial didn't help attempts to squelch the Epstein drama. The Justice Department last week issued a memo insisting that there was no evidence the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender kept a client list or that he was murdered in prison. But as the president could have told Bondi, telling people there is no there there only lights the fire of conspiracy.
That left the president in a worse spot Monday, as CNN reported he was increasingly frustrated about a controversy that has now gone on for almost a week and is overshadowing what the White House sees as a growing list of wins at home and abroad.
The political fallout
One big question is whether Trump risks damage in his own political coalition if he can't quiet the furor over the Justice Department's Epstein memo.
Trump has for a decade been the most dynamic right-wing figure in the country. He's built a brand by tearing things down and crushing Washington rules. But if even he can't end a MAGA media revolt, perhaps he's entering a rocky period with a force that has long sustained him.
Still, it would be unwise to underestimate his power.
Trump transformed the GOP in his populist, nationalist image. Lawmakers who challenge him are often excommunicated. At Trump campaign rallies, the trust and devotion he inspired among his followers was palpable.
MAGA media influencers who criticize him seem to understand that their status in the movement relies on the reflected glory of its megastar: Before Trump's recent strikes on Iran, many of them warned that he risked splitting his base by launching foreign wars — but most fell back into line when the bombs started falling.
Supporters hold signs as they attend a Trump campaign in Duluth, Georgia, on October 23, 2024.
Elijah Nouvelage/Reuters
'Donald Trump has a very significant hold on the Republican Party, and I think anybody that thinks that this is the end of Donald Trump's hold on the GOP is wrong,' Kristen Soltis Anderson, a Republican strategist and CNN contributor, told Kasie Hunt on 'The Arena' on Monday. Still, Anderson added that this flap could be more problematic for Trump than the ideological battles that he's forced on the GOP because it involves the issue of trust with his supporters and his outsider status.
But in next year's midterm elections, when Trump won't be on the ballot, any falloff in enthusiasm among grassroots Republicans could have an impact.
Steve Bannon, a Trump first-term political adviser who now presents the 'War Room' podcast, argued at the Turning Point USA conference on Friday that it wouldn't take much erosion in the MAGA base to have a dramatic effect. He said that if 10% of the movement was disaffected, the party could lose 40 House seats. That would mean a Democratic majority.
What will Trump do next?
It's worth watching to see whether Trump senses he's under pressure. If so, a president who is an expert at distraction may seek to stage-manage new controversies.
Trump has often returned to the issue embedded in the DNA of the MAGA movement — hardline positions on immigration — to bring the gang back together. So it was not surprising to see border czar Tom Homan and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem talking tough on Sunday news shows. But those MAGA administration favorites still couldn't disguise the rumblings over Epstein, which intensified all weekend.
Those rumblings were initiated in the first place by Bondi hinting earlier this year on Fox News that there could be a big reveal in the case. Trump has made strong show of support for his AG in recent days, including appearing with her at the FIFA Club World Cup Final on Sunday. She is also valuable to him and has transformed her department into a de facto personal legal firm for the president.
Trump gives a thumbs up to Attorney General Pam Bondi, far right, and her partner, John Wakefield, in East Rutherford, New Jersey, on Sunday.
Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images
Still, if she can't quell the noise from the political base, there will be more whispers in Trump's ear about her performance. The president has soured on his Cabinet picks in such circumstances in the past.
Trump wrote on social media over the weekend that Bondi was 'great' and should be allowed to do her job.
But loyalty usually only works one way in the Trump administration. And one way of getting on the right side of the story would be for the president to distance himself from Bondi.
CNN's White House team reported, meanwhile, that while the president doesn't want to lose Bongino over this issue because it would make his Cabinet look split, some expect the deputy FBI director will not remain in his job long term.
House Speaker Mike Johnson told Raju on Monday that he still had faith in Bondi and that he trusted the president to do the right thing about the Epstein issue. The fact that the Louisiana Republican is prepared to entertain such questions shows the attorney general is under pressure.
The conspiracist-in-chief
True to form, Trump sought to extricate himself from the mess by starting new conspiracy theories blaming Democrats for failing to release the files years ago. This has often worked in the past to bind his coalition together. But it's not working this time.
The president merely opened the way for Democrats to heap scrutiny on his decisions.
'The American people deserve to know the truth, the whole trust and nothing but the truth as it relates to this whole sordid Jeffrey Epstein matter,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Monday as he tried to widen MAGA splits. 'This was a conspiracy theory that Donald Trump, Pam Bondi and these MAGA extremists have been fanning the flames of for the last several years, and now the chickens are coming home to roost.'
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, DC, on Monday.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Top conservative influencers at the Turning Point conference and on Monday podcasts continued to demand answers about Epstein, where he got his money, who he was linked to and who was covering for him.
All this shows that the Epstein controversy is unlikely to go away quickly.
One reason why is that it's become central to an argument that Trump and his aides promoted for years that the United States is under the control of a 'deep state' of intelligence agencies, billionaire financiers and shady political forces that are orchestrating events behind the scenes.
Trump tapped into this false mythology to build his own power — portraying himself as a victim of CIA and FBI plots and weaponized justice because he was the avatar of the hopes of MAGA followers across the country.
Now it looks like he's siding with such supposedly rotten institutions, not bringing them down.
How the Epstein storm could hurt the country
But this is not just about the president and his movement.
Given his position, and the chaos gripping the Justice Department, there are implications for the country.
The controversy is offering a damning insight into modern politics and the contribution of a fractured media environment to the shattering of the concept of truth.
The refusal of MAGA media personalities to accept that the facts do not support a cover-up around Epstein's alleged client list and his death in prison reflects an extreme version of a powerful trend — the desire of increasing numbers of citizens to choose curated truths that support what they want to believe. Trump has done more than any other politician to promote this.
The corrosive nature of Trump's conspiracy-consumed government also threatens to damage the Justice Department and FBI. Vitriol ricocheting through the management suite risks detracting from the core missions of the DOJ and the bureau — which include the fair administration of justice and the protection of Americans against violent crime and terrorism. It also shows that when the purpose of such agencies is tainted by politics — as it has been under Trump — the ramifications can sometimes spin out of control.
And no one in MAGA media is talking about one key issue.
Many of those who voted for Trump in his more-diverse-than-usual Republican coalition last year weren't hardcore MAGA conspiracists. They were Americans frustrated with the cost-of-living crisis: the price of groceries, rent, child care and education.
How is this political saga over a wild conspiracy about a dead and accused sex offender going over with them?
It seems unlikely it will be top of mind when they show up at the polls next November to decide the fate of Republican congressional majorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
7 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
20 killed in crush at Israeli and US-backed aid site in Gaza, group says
CNN — At least 20 people were killed in a crowd crush at an aid distribution site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the controversial Israeli- and US-backed organization said Wednesday, the first time it has acknowledged deaths at one of its sites. According to the GHF, the people died in a 'chaotic and dangerous surge,' which it said was 'driven by agitators in the crowd.' The aid group said 19 people were trampled and one person was stabbed in the crowd crush. The GHF alleged that individuals who were 'armed and affiliated with Hamas' deliberately instigated the chaos. 'For the first time since operations began, GHF personnel identified multiple firearms in the crowd, one of which was confiscated,' it said. Hamas' Government Media Office (GMO) blamed the GHF for the incident, claiming the group called on Palestinians to receive aid at the site in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, then 'proceeded to lock the iron gates after herding thousands of starving people into narrow iron corridors.' The Palestinian health ministry said 21 people were killed in the incident, 15 of whom died from suffocation after tear gas was fired at a crowd of people awaiting aid, triggering a crowd crush. The other six people were shot in the upper body by Israeli forces, it said. When asked about the alleged shootings, the Israeli military referred CNN to GHF's previous statement on the incident. One eyewitness, Yahya Al Sousi, told CNN that he was 'running to get aid' when 'the Americans closed the gates in front of us.' 'We went through an opened small gate and they started spraying us with pepper spray. Many suffocated and were run over by people, and all those who were on the floor are martyrs,' he said. Mohammad Shatat, another eyewitness, described a similar situation. After 'the Americans' closed the gates, people 'started running towards' one of them, Shatat said. 'When the Americans saw this, they opened the gate and sprayed us with pepper spray,' he said. 'People fell on each other and everyone who was behind was stepping on the people in the front,' he said, adding that 'people were suffocating and dying.' US security contractors operate inside the GHF's aid sites, and the Israeli military is usually positioned outside. CNN has approached the Israeli military for comment on the latest incident. Members of a private US security company, contracted by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), direct displaced Palestinians as they gather to receive relief supplies at a distribution center in the central Gaza Strip on June 8, 2025. Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty Images Hundreds of people have been killed while trying to access aid in Gaza since the GHF began operating in the Strip, according to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Nearly 800 people were killed in this way between late May and July 7, it said, 615 of whom were killed near GHF sites. Palestinian officials and witnesses have said the Israeli military is responsible for most of those deaths. The military has acknowledged firing warning shots towards crowds in some instances, and denied responsibility for other incidents. In late June, the military said it had 'reorganized' the approach routes to aid sites to minimize 'friction with the population.' On Saturday, the Palestinian health ministry said 27 people were killed and many more injured when Israeli troops opened fire on people trying to obtain aid from a distribution site run by the GHF near southern Rafah. The GHF denied the claim, saying 'there were no incidents at or in the immediate vicinity of our sites' on Saturday. The Israeli military also denied that anyone was injured by gunfire from its troops in the vicinity of the site but said it continued to review the reports. It told CNN Sunday it had no further comment. A scathing US government assessment of the GHF reported on by CNN last week shows that USAID officials raised 'critical concerns' about the group's ability to protect Palestinians and to deliver them food. The assessment flagged a range of concerns, from an overall plan missing 'even basic details' to a proposal to potentially distribute powdered baby formula in an area that lacks clean water to prepare it. A GHF spokesperson defended the organization's work in Gaza and described the USAID assessment as normal for a funding application. In its statement released Wednesday, the Palestinian health ministry said that 'the Israeli occupation and the American establishment are deliberately committing massacres in a systematic manner and using various methods against the starving people.'
Egypt Independent
7 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
A party resolution accusing Israel of genocide divides Democrats in a key swing state
CNN — When the executive committee of North Carolina's Democratic Party passed a resolution in June calling for an immediate arms embargo on Israel, it set off another episode in the party's ongoing struggles with how it addresses the Israel-Hamas war. Some Jewish Democrats in North Carolina said the resolution was consistent with their support of Palestinian human rights while others characterized it as divisive. The resolution's backers are talking to Democrats in other states who want to take the same stand. And top state leaders – notably the party chair and North Carolina's Democratic governor – have declined to comment. The Israel-Hamas war still divides the party as it did before the November election, when Democratic nominee Kamala Harris faced protests and boycott threats from parts of the base before eventually losing to President Donald Trump. In North Carolina, where Sen. Thom Tillis' retirement opened an opportunity for Democrats to flip a Republican-held seat, some in the party are worried the disunity will make it harder to compete in a race they almost certainly have to win next year to regain Senate control. Sen. Thom Tillis listens during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on June 18 in Washington, DC.'This is an issue that's going to divide Democrats at a time when Democrats need to be working together on the issues that voters actually care about, the kitchen table issues,' said Kathy Manning, who chairs the Board of Directors for the advocacy group Democratic Majority for Israel. Alan Smith, a lead sponsor of the resolution and a member of the state party's progressive caucus, sees it differently. Passing the resolution, he argues, shows the party is responsive to the will of Democratic voters. 'I think it's only going to help the Democratic Party. It's going to get people to come back,' Smith said. According to a May survey from the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Democrats younger than 45 are far less likely than their older partisan peers to favor the US supporting Israel militarily, with only 38% saying they favor military support until the hostages are returned, compared with 48% support among older Democrats. Disputes over the war have shaped other Democratic races, notably the New York mayoral primary, where Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist and strident critic of Israel, scored an upset victory despite criticism from some Jewish groups that he hadn't sufficiently denounced antisemitism. And in Michigan, where Democrats hope to retain control of an open Senate seat next year, the main candidates in the primary have taken sharply different positions on the war. Trump flipped Michigan in 2024 in part by capitalizing on anger in both Jewish and Arab American communities. How the resolution passed Though other Democratic state parties, in Wisconsin and Washington, have recently passed resolutions critical of Israel since the country launched its war against Hamas following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, the language passed by North Carolina Democrats is the only example that explicitly calls for an embargo on military aid and weapons transfers and accuses the state of committing genocide and apartheid. 'The military resources that have been made available to Israel through annual and emergency military aid have been used to commit the crime of genocide and other war crimes in Gaza,' it reads. 'The North Carolina Democratic Party supports an immediate embargo on all military aid, weapons shipments and military logistical support to Israel,' it continues. The resolution also won the support of NCDP's African American Caucus, the Arab Caucus, the LGBTQ+ Caucus, the Association of Teen Democrats, the Jewish Democrats and various other groups within the state party. Israel rejects claims that its war against Hamas, which killed 1,200 people in the Oct. 7 attack and still holds Israeli hostages, constitutes a genocide. It also rejects allegations that its treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank is akin to apartheid. Earlier this month the Gaza Health Ministry reported the Palestinian death toll had passed 58,000, with the most recent rounds of casualties taking place near food distribution sites. Lightning strikes over Gaza City following an Israeli bombardment on October 9, 2023. Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images Manning says Democratic Majority for Israel is in conversations with Democratic voters across the state and helping them to make their displeasure with the resolution known to state party leadership. The resolution's advocates worked over a multiyear process to get the statement passed, starting at the local precinct level, on to the county convention, then through the congressional district convention, the platform resolutions committee and ultimately the party's state executive committee. 'We see it as an issue of unity and an issue that is local, because we want taxpayer dollars to be invested here, and we believe that speaking up for human lives, including Palestinian lives, is actually a local issue and is a reminder that when grassroots groups come together, that they can accomplish the things that they wish to see within their party,' said Reem Subei, chair of the party's Arab Caucus. Since the resolution's passage, Subei says those engaged with their state-level executive committees have reached out to her asking how they could mirror this effort, including organizers in Texas, Oklahoma and Minnesota. Lisa Jewel, president of the state Democratic party's Jewish Caucus, condemned the resolution as divisive and leaned on leadership to block the effort. 'Our leadership needs to call these extremists out. They need to take a strong stand against antisemitism. By placating these extremists, it helps raise the drum beat that leads to violence,' said Jewel, arguing that state Democrats should be focused on cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, women's reproductive health, the cost of housing, gerrymandering, and other consensus-driven issues. She also voiced fear in the wake of threats against her own synagogue. The Jewish Caucus was created last year in response to what Jewel described as growing antisemitism in the Democratic party and across North Carolina. This is not to be confused with the state party's Jewish Democrats, a separate group that supported the resolution. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrives for a meeting at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on July 9. Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images For a long time, party leadership resisted religious groups creating their own caucuses and wanted the groups to all fall within the Interfaith Caucus out of fear of these very types of disputes, but Jewel says some Jews did not feel welcome in the interfaith group and insisted they would go out on their own. 'It is not feasible for us to disconnect our Judaism from Israel, regardless of the politics that are happening there. It's just part of who we are,' said Jewel. Mark Bochkis, who leads communications for the Jewish Democrats, said he moved to Greensboro as a child from the former Soviet Union and that his extended family lives in Israel. 'We have to take a look at what wins statewide, and we cannot ignore the will of Democratic voters or their values. And their values right now are saying we care about Palestinian human rights,' Bochkis said. 'This is the new North Carolina Democratic Party. This is the way forward. I think the Jewish Caucus represents kind of a view that we're moving past,' he added. The next flashpoint will be if or when the resolution is ultimately adopted into the party platform. Its supporters believe they have cleared all the necessary procedural hurdles and that it will eventually be a part of the party's mission statement, but its opponents argue party leadership can still block that from happening. The timeline for when the platform will be voted on is unclear. Many state party leaders have stayed silent There is no readily available record of who supported the measure and no video or even mention of the proceeding on the state Democratic Party's website, though proponents of the resolution say it passed 161-151. According to people who attended the vote, party chair Anderson Clayton and other party officers abstained. Clayton has not commented publicly in local press in the weeks since the resolution passed and declined to speak to CNN. Gov. Josh Stein, the state's first Jewish governor, and his predecessor, Roy Cooper, who many state and national Democrats are pushing to run for Tillis' open Senate seat, also declined requests for comment. An adviser to Cooper told CNN that he generally does not opine on party resolutions. Former US Rep. Wiley Nickel speaks to a crowd after winning the Democratic primary for the 13th congressional district of North Carolina on May 17, 2022, in Raleigh, North US Rep. Wiley Nickel, who is already running for Tillis' seat, dismissed the resolution as one-sided but also criticized the Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'In an issue as complex as this, nuance is essential, and that's something politics often overlooks. You can look at my record and see I'm a staunch supporter of Israel as a key U.S. ally, but I also care deeply about the suffering of innocent civilians in Gaza. The current approach by Trump and Netanyahu is not leading us toward peace or a two-state solution. Instead, their policies are fueling division and perpetuating violence, making a two-state solution seem more out of reach than ever,' said Nickel in a statement to CNN. And Rep. Don Davis, a Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee who could also mount a Senate run, reaffirmed his commitment to Israel as an ally of the United States. 'I believe that providing support to our allies, including Israel, is essential in our commitment to countering the threats posed by the Iranian regime and its associated terrorist proxies,' said Davis in a statement to CNN.
Egypt Independent
7 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump's pledge on resolving the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dispute: A hope for Egypt?
Whether you like him or not, gratitude is due to US President Donald Trump for his stance on Egypt's historic right to Nile River waters. Don't be surprised—it is, by divine will, that this issue was articulated by Trump, while previous US presidents remained silent on a matter primarily concerning 'the right to life,' as the Nile waters are the source of life for Egyptians. Trump continued a path he charted during his first term, with an agreement facilitated by the US Treasury Department. This agreement aimed to bring the three riparian countries—Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia—to a consensus. The draft agreement, a legally binding document for operating the Ethiopian dam in accordance with historical agreements, sits in the White House archives. However, the Ethiopian delegation, followed by the Sudanese delegation, withdrew just before signing, which utterly frustrated Trump – a frustration he kept to himself. Trump believes, and we also believe, that an agreement is close, especially since he has foreseen it and spoken about it globally. The US president is determined to achieve it and is pressing hard for it – and if Trump decides something, expect a response. Trump is the 'bully' of the new world, and what cannot be achieved through willing consent will be achieved by force. Ethiopia persists in its defiance, resisting and provoking, needing to see a 'red eye' to be deterred come to its senses, and abandon its stubbornness, which has cost us 13 years of negotiations culminating in the dam's completion. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed proudly declares its official inauguration next September, despite our objections. 'I think we'll come to a resolution on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) and the Nile River issue,' Trump stated confidently, and we trust his promise. These are optimistic predictions: the agreement will be signed before the dam's inauguration, with the dam's opening contingent on the solution Trump is eager to achieve. In a world dominated by the powerful, just causes require strength to support them; the justice of the cause alone is not enough to win. Unfortunately, global public opinion is completely muddled, and I fear it is oblivious to the fairness of Egypt's position, while the Ethiopia markets its development project globally at the expense of Egyptians. Surprisingly, Trump spoke on behalf of Egyptians during a press conference from the White House on Monday with the current NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte. The US President expressed complete astonishment at the stance of successive US administrations: 'Egyptians' lives depend on the water in the Nile. I don't know how we funded the Renaissance Dam before resolving the crisis between Egypt and Ethiopia, and we will work towards a solution between Egypt and Ethiopia.' This isn't the first time Trump has spoken about America's 'historically foolish' involvement in funding the dam. Last month, he discussed the dam crisis in a social media post, asserting that he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize for successfully brokering peace between Egypt and Ethiopia, despite the latter building a massive dam that reduces Nile water flow to the downstream nations of Sudan and Egypt (as he put it). He understands the extent of American involvement in the dam's construction. In a tweet published on June 21st, Trump stated that the 'building of the dam was funded by American money,' a move he described as 'stupid.' We are cautiously betting on Trump's intelligence, encouraging his efforts, and thanking him nonetheless. What bolsters Egypt's position, even before Trump's enthusiasm, is the justice of its cause and the Egyptian administration's rational approach to the dam issue. A diplomacy of 'beautiful patience,' combined with rationality and credibility, will yield its impact.
