logo
72% of Young Adults Take Action to Improve their Financial Health, finds BofA Better Money Habits Study

72% of Young Adults Take Action to Improve their Financial Health, finds BofA Better Money Habits Study

FF News7 days ago
Gen Z (ages 18-28) is finding adulthood more expensive than expected. Facing this, nearly three quarters of them are taking action to improve their financial health, according to Bank of America's 2025 Better Money Habits® financial education study (PDF), published today.
Gen Z is challenging the stereotype when it comes to young people and their finances,' said Holly O'Neill, president of Consumer, Retail and Preferred Banking at Bank of America. 'Even though they're facing economic barriers and high everyday costs, they are working hard to become financially independent and take control of their money.'
Key findings from the study include: Over the last 12 months, 72% took steps to improve their financial health, such as putting money toward savings (51%) or paying down debt (24%).
Nearly two-thirds (64%) focused on reducing expenses – 41% cut back on dining out and 23% shopped at more affordable grocery stores.
And more are going it alone. While 39% receive financial support from parents and other family members, this is down from 46% a year ago. And they are getting less money – 22% receive $1,000 or more per month compared to 32% a year ago, and 54% receive less than $500 per month compared to 44% a year ago.
When it comes to their romantic lives, many Gen Z aren't spending money on dates – with roughly half of men (53%) and women (54%) spending $0 a month, and 25% of men and 30% of women spending less than $100 per month.
According to the study, about half (51%) of Gen Z surveyed say the high cost of living is a barrier to financial success. Total monthly spending is higher than they thought it would be for 35%, especially for everyday expenses including groceries (63%), rent and utilities (47%) and dining out (42%).
The study found that Gen Z feel a lack of income is a problem as well, with over half (53%) not feeling they make enough money to live the life they want, and many are struggling to save consistently. In fact, 55% don't have enough emergency savings to cover three months of expenses.
While Gen Z knows that saving for the future is important, they struggle to do so, with close to half (43%) saying they are not on track to actively save for retirement in the next five years, though they'd like to be. Many see saving for retirement and investing as symbols of financial independence (42% and 35% respectively). However, only a quarter (25%) contributed to a retirement account in the last year and one-in-five (21%) invested in the stock market, up slightly from recent years.
Despite a lack of income, Gen Z finds ways to enjoy the little things, whether celebrating a win or trying to help turn around a bad day: 57% buy themselves a small 'treat' at least once a week. Unfortunately for over half (59%), this leads to overspending, making little treats a slippery slope.
And, according to data from Bank of America Institute (PDF), while there are signs of some pressures on younger generations, the median deposit level of Gen Z and Millennials remains elevated compared to 2019 levels – showing that these generations do not appear to be running down their savings in the face of higher costs.
A third (33%) of Gen Z are stressed about their finances, and of those, 52% say economic instability is a root cause. When stressed about their finances, many (90%) are likely to take action, including checking their bank account balance (69%), making a budget (64%), getting ahead on paying bills (46%) or other smart money moves. But for some, stress leads to avoidance or splurges: 33% of Gen Z are likely to avoid thinking about or taking positive actions on their finances when they're feeling stressed financially; 30% are likely to treat themselves to a purchase when worried about money.
Gen Z understands the importance of financial health, and they value being transparent with friends about money. Consistent with findings in prior years, two-thirds (66%) of Gen Z don't feel pressured by their friends to spend beyond their means, and 42% feel comfortable declining social activities and letting their friends know it's because they can't afford them.
Financial health also matters in romantic relationships for Gen Z – with nearly four out of five (78%) saying that financial responsibility is an important attribute when choosing a significant other.
This survey was conducted online from April 4 – 25, 2025, by Ipsos. This study is based on national samples of 1,069 general population adults (age 18 or older), 915 general population Gen Z adults (age 18-28). The survey was conducted both in English and Spanish and utilized samples from both opt-in sources and the Ipsos KnowledgePanel®, the largest and most well-established online probability-based panel that is representative of the adult US population. The margin of sampling error for the general population sample is +/- 3.1 percentage points and for the general population Gen Z sample is +/- 3.5 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Takeaways from AP's report on Alaska Natives' response to oil and mining proposals
Takeaways from AP's report on Alaska Natives' response to oil and mining proposals

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Takeaways from AP's report on Alaska Natives' response to oil and mining proposals

President Donald Trump 's administration and its allies have pushed aggressively for drilling, mining and logging in Alaska. This has intensified long-standing debate over extraction projects in the nation's largest state, particularly within Alaska Native communities. Some view such projects as key to jobs and economic development. Others see them posing environmental risks as they've already faced severe fishing restrictions on the state's longest rivers due to a collapse in the salmon population. Scientists are unsure of the causes of the salmon collapse — which possibly include warming waters and commercial fishing — but opponents of extraction say its possible impacts could be similar in terms of endangering subsistence traditions and food sources. They say this risks, in turn, damaging their sacred connections to the land and to cultural traditions tied to fishing and hunting. How has the administration pushed for extraction projects? Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office in January seeking to 'maximize the development and production of the natural resources' in the state. Congress, in its recent budget bill, authorized an unprecedented four new sales of oil and gas leases in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeast Alaska. It also authorized more sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska in the northern part of the state. Extraction proposals take years to become reality, if ever. Previous lease sales have generated limited interest, and the extent of oil reserves in the Arctic refuge remains uncertain. Members of Trump's Cabinet visited Alaska in June. They called for doubling the amount of oil coursing through its vast pipeline system and building a massive natural gas pipeline as its 'big, beautiful twin.' The administration is also boosting the proposed Ambler Mining District Industrial Access Project, which would include construction of a 200-mile road in wilderness areas and open the way for more mines. Private corporations are pursuing projects, some in collaboration with Alaska Native corporations — which sometimes are in conflict with their Indigenous shareholders — and landowners. One is an oil exploration project in the Yukon Flats. Another is a proposed major gold mine in southwestern Alaska, which would require a massive dam to contain millions of tons of chemical and mineral waste. Project proponents say the dam will be safely built, incorporating the surrounding geology and state-of-the-art design. Trump's policy shifts came even as he removed one of the most prominent Alaska Native names from the official map. He returned the federal name of 'Mount McKinley' to the largest mountain in Alaska and North America. For all their disputes over extraction, Native and Alaska political leaders were largely united in wanting to keep its traditional Athabascan name of Denali, which translates to 'the high one.' What are the views of Alaska Natives favoring such projects? They say the projects can be done safely and bring much-needed jobs and economic development. They say this enables Native communities to fund services while retaining their subsistence hunting, fishing and other cultural traditions. 'We find that balance,' said PJ Simon, first chief of the Allakaket Tribal Council. 'We don't want handouts by the federal government. We want to stand on our own two feet.' Regional and local Native-run corporations, with the mandate of pursuing economic development for the benefit of Native shareholders, are actively involved in extraction proposals. In some cases, they own land and mineral rights in areas eyed for drilling or mining. What about Alaska Natives opposing such projects? They fear large-scale drilling and mining will overwhelm their ancient subsistence traditions. They say any short-term profits will precede a long-term legacy of environmental impacts to rivers, tundra and hunting grounds. 'Our people have been stewards of this land for millennia, and we've taken that relationship seriously because we have to sustain our resources,' said Gloria Simeon of Bethel, a small regional hub in southwestern Alaska, and a member of the environmental advocacy group Mother Kuskokwim Tribal Coalition. Already, tribes are struggling with severe fishing restrictions on their longest rivers, the Yukon and Kuskokwim, because of a collapse in salmon populations, which they have relied on for generations. The salmon collapse has been blamed on such factors as commercial overfishing and climate change. But many fear that extractive industries will create similar and permanent damage to caribou, salmon and other traditional food sources. 'We're already dealing with salmon problems,' said Chief Brian Ridley of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, a Fairbanks-based coalition of Athabascan tribes across Interior Alaska that oppose proposed drilling projects and the Ambler road project. 'The concern is if we start going down this path anywhere along the Yukon or any of the rivers and there's a spill, would that completely eliminate all the salmon stocks?' He said it's not just theoretical. A mine disaster in Canada last year caused a massive release of cyanide-laced debris, which caused fears that contamination might spread. Such a mining accident in the Yukon watershed could 'really take all the gains that we've gotten of trying to get the fish stocks back and really put us back to zero,' Ridley said. Why are subsistence hunting and fishing so important? Alaska Native people have relied for generations on hunting and fishing to survive the brutal winters — and in modern times, as a healthier alternative to expensive groceries. Fish camps and caribou hunts are closely interwoven with cultural traditions, where elders transmit skills and stories to younger generations. 'Protecting the river and the land and the Earth is part of the partnership and the relationship that we have as caregivers,' said Simeon. Who are Alaska Natives? Alaska Natives consist of diverse cultural and language groups in the state, among them the Aleut, Athabascan, Iñupiat, Tlingit and Yup'ik. They widely share a history in the region dating back thousands of years. They also share cultural and spiritual traditions, including those closely associated with subsistence hunting, and a belief in a sacred connection to the land, water and wildlife. Specific practices vary, and many follow both traditional and Christian practices. More than 1 in 5 Alaskans identify as Alaska Native or American Indian alone or in combination with another racial group, the highest ratio of any state, according to 2020 U.S. Census figures. The 1971 Alaska Claims Settlement Act, which resolved long-standing land claims with the federal government, resulted in establishment of regional and local for-profit corporations run by Native leaders for the benefit of Native shareholders. In some cases, such corporations are involved in extraction projects that tribal coalitions from the same area oppose. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Cost of electronics expected to rise as Trump announces 100% tariff on computer chips
Cost of electronics expected to rise as Trump announces 100% tariff on computer chips

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Cost of electronics expected to rise as Trump announces 100% tariff on computer chips

Donald Trump has said he will impose a 100% tariff on computer chips, likely resulting in the costs of electronic goods and household appliances rising. Speaking in the Oval Office on Wednesday (6 August) during a meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook, the US president said that companies which make chips in the US would be spared the import tax. 'So, 100% tariff on all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States. But if you've made a commitment to build or if you're in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff," Trump said. The levy on all foreign computer chips is set to be officially announced next week and is expected to apply to all countries and companies.

What the Bank of England's interest rate cut to 4% means for your money
What the Bank of England's interest rate cut to 4% means for your money

Daily Mail​

time19 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

What the Bank of England's interest rate cut to 4% means for your money

The Bank of England cut interest rates today from 4.25 per cent to 4 per cent. While 0.25 percentage point cut was widely predicted by financial analysts, the Bank of England's Monetary Police Committee was split, taking two rounds of voting to make the decision for the first time. In the second round, five members voted for the cut and four to keep the rate at 4.25 per cent. In the first round, member Alan Taylor voted for a bigger cut to 3.75 per cent, but then changed his vote to favour a 4.25 per cent. While it might spell good news for mortgage borrowers, it won't be received well by savers, as it might bring bank and building society savings rates down. Today's cut is the fifth since August 2024, with interest rates having fallen 1.25 percentage points from their 5.25 per cent peak. The last decision, on 19 June, was a hold. The next decision is on 18 September. We explain what the Bank of England's decision to cut rates to 4 per cent means for your mortgage and savings - and whether rates will be cut again soon. What does this mean for mortgage borrowers? Today's decision to cut the base rate to 4 per cent will be music to mortgage borrowers' ears, as a trend of falling interest rates tends to bring down mortgage rates over time. Those on tracker mortgages which move with the base rate will see an immediate cut in line with the 0.25 per cent reduction. But while we are likely to see some small fixed rate reductions in the coming days, the decision won't lead to big mortgage rate falls straight away for fixed-rate customers. This is because lenders usually base their mortgage pricing on the longer-term trajectory of interest rates, rather than reacting to individual base rate decisions. In addition, most borrowers are locked in to fixed-rate deals of two, three or five years, during which time their payments will not change. Between July and the end of December this year, an estimated 900,000 households will reach the end of their existing fixed rate term, according to UK Finance data. Many of those coming to the end of five-year fixes will have enjoyed mortgage rates between 1 and 2 per cent, taken at a time when interest rates were at rock bottom in the post-pandemic housing boom. Now, they face the prospect of remortgaging to a rate of around 4 per cent or more. Ravesh Patel, director and senior mortgage consultant at broker Reside Mortgages says: 'Lenders have largely priced in this decision in recent weeks, especially across two and five-year fixed mortgages. 'That said, the confirmation of a cut could improve market sentiment and lead to some modest reductions in fixed rates around 0.2 percentage points over the coming weeks as lenders compete for new business. 'Tracker mortgages will benefit straight away, with monthly repayments falling in line with the base rate cut. 'This may encourage some borrowers to consider tracker options again, especially if they believe further cuts are on the horizon.' Nicholas Mendes, mortgage technical manager at John Charcol also thinks the cut may give lenders more confidence to lower rates further. 'A quarter-point cut won't move the mortgage market dramatically, but it does keep the downward momentum going,' said Mendes. 'Lenders are likely to trim rates further to stay competitive, especially with some already pricing in another cut before the end of the year.' Markets are currently forecasting one further cut by the Bank of England before the end of the year, which could mean interest rates reach 3.75 per cent by Christmas. What next for mortgage rates? Mortgage rates have been trundling down of late. For those with the biggest deposits or equity, the lowest two-year fix is now 3.73 per cent while the lowest five-year fixed deal is 3.86 per cent. Someone buying with a 15 per cent deposit can now get a mortgage rate of 3.99 per cent and a £999 fee if they fix for two years with Nationwide Building Society. On a £200,000 mortgage being repaid over 25 years, that would equate to paying £1,054 a month. Borrowers wishing to know the future direction of mortgage rates may want to look at interest rate forecasts. Yesterday, Barclays said it thinks that the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee split will carry on with a 25 basis point rate cut once every three months until it settles at 3.5 per cent in February. There are some forecasts that suggest interest rates will fall further. HSBC and UBS for instance are forecasting that interest rates will fall to 3 per cent by the end of 2026. There are also some that think interest rates will stay higher. Analysts at Pantheon have forecast that interest rates will finish 2026 at 4 per cent. Fixed-rate mortgage pricing is largely based on Sonia swap rates - the inter-bank lending rate, based on future interest rate expectations. When Sonia swaps rise sufficiently it often results in fixed mortgage rates going up, and vice versa when they fall. Since the start of June five-year and two-year swaps have drifted downwards. Two-year swaps are now at 3.57 per cent and five-year swaps are at 3.61 per cent. 'While we could see best-buy rates dropping closer to 3.5 per cent in the months ahead, nothing is guaranteed,' says Mendes. 'A lot depends on inflation, labour market data, and wider global pressures. We've been here before and then seen things shift quickly. 'If inflation behaves, the base rate could fall to 3.5 per cent by early 2026, but the Bank has made it clear it won't rush.' What does this mean for savers? Now that the base rate has been cut to 4 per cent, it is all but certain savers will see the best savings rates plummet. The base rate affects how much interest savers can earn on their money. In general, savings rates rise when the base rate is rising, and fall when it is falling. Those who keep their cash in easy-access accounts are most at risk of rate cuts. CMC Invest* has already cut its three month bonus of 0.85 per cent on its easy-access cash Isa, bringing the underlying rate down to 4.59 per cent from a best-buy 5.44 per cent. The best easy-access accounts currently pay around 4.6 per cent while some accounts with restrictions pay up to 5 per cent. Andrew Hagger of website MoneyComms says: 'Easy-access deals will take a hit - maybe not falling by a full 0.25 per cent in all cases. 'The best buys may be trimmed by only 0.1 per cent to 0.15 per cent in some cases to say near the top of the tables.' When it comes to fixed rate bonds the August cut has probably already been priced in - 'but banks will be looking for clues in the Bank of England commentary as to if and when rates will fall further this year,' says Hagger. What next for savings rates? If the base rate falls to 3.75 per by the end of this year, as markets are currently predicting, it is forecast that easy-access rates will fall below 4 per cent for the first time since the summer of 2023 and fixed-rate bonds will fall to just above 4 per cent. The best one-year fixed-rate bond currently pays 4.5 per cent. This is down from a high of 6.2 per cent in October 2023. Andrew Hagger says: 'I think there's slight a chance we may see one further 0.25 per cent cut in November or December - leaving the base rate at 3.75 per cent.' 'If this is the case, then come the end of 2025 I think the top easy access accounts, without restrictions, will be paying in the region of 3.8 per cent to 3.9 per cent with the best fixed rates around 4 per cent to 4.1 per cent for one year.' What should savers do now? People should keep a close eye on their savings, whether they are stashed in an easy-access account, fixed-rate account or an Isa. If your money is not working hard enough for you or earning interest at a rate of less than the rate of consumer price inflation, 3.6 per cent, you should consider moving it to an account paying a better rate. Rachel Springall says: 'It is essential that savers do not wait around for too long to snap up the top rates on the market, particularly if they use their pots to supplement their monthly income. 'Cash Isas remain an attractive choice for savers, but in bad news the rates have taken a hit over the past year, with the average easy access Isa rate falling by 0.46 per cent, a similar drop to its non-Isa counterpart.' While Andrew Hagger says: 'If you've got some spare cash that you don't need for a year or two, then locking some away in a fixed rate bond makes sense as fixed rates are unlikely to increase from their current levels for a good while yet.' Best savings rates and how to find them The best easy-access savings accounts with no restrictions pay around 4.6 per cent. Atom Bank is offering a market-leading easy-access deal paying 4.6 per cent. Someone putting £10,000 in this account could expect to earn £460 in interest after a year, if the rate remains the same. Those with cash they won't immediately need over the next year or two should consider fixed-rate savings. The best one-year deal is offered by Vanquis Bank paying 4.5 per cent. A saver putting £10,000 in this account will earn a guaranteed £450 interest over one year. It comes with full protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme up to £85,000 per person. Union Bank of India is offering 4.47 per cent, while Stream Bank if paying 4.41 per cent. All offer FSCS protection. The best two-year bond pays 4.48 per cent and comes from JN Bank. This provider also offers the best three and five-year bonds which both pay 4.45 and 4.52 per cent espectively. Savers should also strongly consider using a cash Isa to protect the interest they earn from being taxed. Trading 212* is now offering a market-leading 4.89 per cent on its easy-access cash Isa for new customers. How to find a new mortgage Borrowers who need a mortgage because their current fixed rate deal is ending, or they are buying a home, should explore their options as soon as possible. Buy-to-let landlords should also act as soon as they can. Quick mortgage finder links with This is Money's partner L&C > Mortgage rates calculator > Find the right mortgage for you What if I need to remortgage? Borrowers should compare rates, speak to a mortgage broker and be prepared to act. Homeowners can lock in to a new deal six to nine months in advance, often with no obligation to take it. Most mortgage deals allow fees to be added to the loan and only be charged when it is taken out. This means borrowers can secure a rate without paying expensive arrangement fees. Keep in mind that by doing this and not clearing the fee on completion, interest will be paid on the fee amount over the entire term of the loan, so this may not be the best option for everyone. What if I am buying a home? Those with home purchases agreed should also aim to secure rates as soon as possible, so they know exactly what their monthly payments will be. Buyers should avoid overstretching and be aware that house prices may fall, as higher mortgage rates limit people's borrowing ability and buying power. What about buy-to-let landlords Buy-to-let landlords with interest-only mortgages will see a greater jump in monthly costs than homeowners on residential mortgages. This makes remortgaging in plenty of time essential and our partner L&C can help with buy-to-let mortgages too. How to compare mortgage costs The best way to compare mortgage costs and find the right deal for you is to speak to a broker. This is Money has a long-standing partnership with fee-free broker L&C, to provide you with fee-free expert mortgage advice. Interested in seeing today's best mortgage rates? Use This is Money and L&Cs best mortgage rates calculator to show deals matching your home value, mortgage size, term and fixed rate needs. If you're ready to find your next mortgage, why not use L&C's online Mortgage Finder. It will search 1,000's of deals from more than 90 different lenders to discover the best deal for you. > Find your best mortgage deal with This is Money and L&C Be aware that rates can change quickly, however, and so if you need a mortgage or want to compare rates, speak to L&C as soon as possible, so they can help you find the right mortgage for you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store