logo
Britain's largest power generator slashes renewables investment over Trump energy fears

Britain's largest power generator slashes renewables investment over Trump energy fears

Telegraph21-03-2025

Britain's largest power generator is to slash investment in green energy amid uncertainty generated by Donald Trump's cutbacks to net zero policies.
RWE, which produces about 15pc of the UK's power, warned its profits would be lower than expected this year and will cut planned investments by €10bn (£8.4bn) over the next five years.
The German company said it was currently 'impossible to predict' what changes in US energy policy would mean for the global expansion of low carbon energy. RWE is the world's second largest developer of offshore wind farms.
About half of RWE's installed renewable capacity is based in the United States, where Mr Trump has taken aim at offshore wind technology, an area where the company is exposed through early-stage projects.
RWE said it expected its 2025 net income to be between €1.3bn and €1.8bn, down from €2.3bn last year.
Markus Krebber, the chief executive of RWE, said: 'Given greater uncertainties, it is all the more important that we are even more cautious.'
The move underlines the impact of rising geopolitical risks, supply chain constraints and lower returns across the industry.
Denmark's Orsted has decided to cut its 2030 investment program by 25pc, as it grapples with rising costs and supply chain issues. BP has also sold off its wind assets and announced it will refocus largely on oil and gas.
RWE's UK gas-fired power stations have a capacity of about seven gigawatts – enough for 7m to 8m homes – with long-term plans to convert them to run on green hydrogen or fit them with carbon capture and storage (CCS).
However, investment in these plants may now face delays.
This year RWE announced plans to retrofit its Staythorpe Power Station near Newark, Nottinghamshire, with CCS technology, enabling the capture of up to 3.7m tonnes of CO2 annually, equivalent to removing 800,000 petrol cars from the road.
The scheme would run alongside three other CCS initiatives located at its existing power stations in Pembroke and Great Yarmouth, in addition to a potential new-build generating plant in Stallingbrough, also equipped with carbon capture technology.
RWE still has a long way to go on decarbonisation, with coal the source of about 30pc of all the power it generated worldwide last year.
It has seven power stations in the Rhenish mining region to the west of Cologne, with a capacity of about six gigawatts – enough for several million homes – that burn the fuel on a huge scale.
These were responsible for much of the 75m tonnes of CO2 emitted by RWE last year.
The impact of RWE's investment slowdown on UK decarbonisation projects remains uncertain but the company is also under pressure from some investors to spend more on share buybacks.
Brokerage Morningstar and investor Enkraft, a long-time critic of RWE's strategy, both urged the group to expand the share buyback programme as a way to raise value.
'RWE lacks the credibility to generate the targeted returns with its investments. When this trust is restored, investors will also make capital available to RWE,' Enkraft said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump will not say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran
Trump will not say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

Powys County Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Trump will not say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

President Donald Trump would not say whether he has decided to order a US strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation if it happens. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Mr Trump said in an exchange with reporters at the White House. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Mr Trump added that it is not 'too late' for Iran to give up its nuclear programme as he continues to weigh direct US involvement in Israel's military operations aimed at crushing Tehran's options. 'Nothing's too late,' Mr Trump said. 'I can tell you this. Iran's got a lot of trouble.' 'Nothing is finished until it is finished,' Mr Trump added. But 'the next week is going to be very big — maybe less than a week'. Mr Trump also offered a terse response to Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's refusal to heed to his call for Iran to submit to an unconditional surrender. 'I say good luck,' Mr Trump said. Mr Khamenei earlier warned that any United States strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them' and that his country would not bow to Mr Trump's call for surrender. Mr Trump said on Tuesday the US knows where Iran's Mr Khamenei is hiding as the the Israel-Iran conflict escalates but does not want him killed — 'for now'. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' Mr Trump said. In a video address to Israelis, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed appreciation for Mr Trump's support, calling him 'a great friend of Israel' and praising US help defending Israel's skies. 'We speak constantly, including last night,' Mr Netanyahu said on Wednesday. 'We had a very warm conversation.' Mr Trump's increasingly muscular comments toward the Iranian government come after he urged Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his participation in an international summit earlier this week to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team. Mr Trump said that the Iranian officials continue to reach out to the White House as they are 'getting the hell beaten out of them' by Israel. But he added there is a 'big difference between now and a week ago' in Tehran's negotiating position. 'They've suggested that they come to the White House — that's, you know, courageous,' Mr Trump said. Iran's mission to the United Nations refuted Mr Trump's claim in a statement on social media. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader.' Vladimir Putin offered on Wednesday to help mediate an end to the conflict, suggesting Moscow could help negotiate a settlement that could allow Tehran to pursue a peaceful atomic programme while assuaging Israeli security concerns. The Russian president noted that 'it's a delicate issue' but added that 'in my view, a solution could be found'. He said he had shared Moscow's proposals with Iran, Israel and the US. His comments follow a mediation offer he made in a call with Mr Trump last weekend. Mr Trump said he told Mr Putin to keep focused on finding a solution to his own conflict with Ukraine. 'I said, 'Do me a favour, mediate your own',' Mr Trump said he told Mr Putin. 'I said, 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later'.' The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Mr Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to US intelligence findings.

Trump taps Kentucky lawyer for judgeship after scrapped Biden nomination
Trump taps Kentucky lawyer for judgeship after scrapped Biden nomination

Reuters

time34 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump taps Kentucky lawyer for judgeship after scrapped Biden nomination

WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced his intent to nominate Chad Meredith to serve as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. He described Meredith, who previously served as Kentucky's solicitor general and has worked as a litigation attorney in Ohio since 2021, as "highly experienced and well qualified." "Chad is a courageous Patriot who knows what is required to uphold the Rule of Law, and protect our Constitution," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Meredith has held various roles in the legal field in Kentucky, including chief deputy general counsel for the state's governor. He also clerked for a judge serving on the same circuit he's being nominated to, according to his LinkedIn page. U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell, who represents Kentucky, praised Trump's decision to nominate Meredith to the bench. He called him "an outstanding choice" with a stellar resume and distinguished record of public service. During his first administration, Trump vetted Meredith for a judicial nomination but later dropped him from consideration, according to The Courier-Journal. Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump as president, also considered nominating Meredith, who has defended abortion restrictions, but he decided against doing so after progressives and abortion-rights supporters came out strongly against the nominee. Trump has so far announced 12 judicial nominees in his second term, after securing Senate confirmation in his first term of 234 judicial nominees.

The Australia-US alliance is facing a decisive test, and not just over the Middle East
The Australia-US alliance is facing a decisive test, and not just over the Middle East

The Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Australia-US alliance is facing a decisive test, and not just over the Middle East

Would Australia go to war to support the United States in conflict with China over Taiwan – or elsewhere? The government avoids discussing the question, let alone answering it, by dismissing it as hypothetical. But it will not go away, for two reasons. First, the possibility of us going to war over Taiwan looms over the whole debate about our military preparedness and defence spending, and gives it urgency. That is because choosing to fight China alongside the US is a scenario in which Australia would find itself drawn into a major conflict. Surely we should be talking about that choice now, in advance, rather than wait till a crisis breaks? But the other reason the question won't go away is that Washington wants it answered, and soon. Today, of course, all eyes are on the Middle East as Donald Trump ponders whether to join Israel's apparently open-ended war with Iran. Until recently that would almost certainly mean Australia too was faced with a choice as to whether to follow the US into yet another Middle East war. But things are different now. The defence minister, Richard Marles, has dismissed any Australian involvement, saying on Tuesday: 'We are not a part of this conflict.' That is because, despite Iran and Gaza, China's epochal challenge to the US makes the Taiwan question, not the Middle East, the decisive test of our US alliance. Trump's isolationism means the risk of a US-China war over Taiwan is lower now than it was under Joe Biden. But it remains the US military's key concern, as the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, made clear in Singapore. Australia's commitment in such a conflict has become a touchstone of our seriousness as an ally at a time when ever-closer enmeshment with Washington under Aukus has become the core of the Albanese government's foreign and defence policies. It goes to the heart of whether Aukus really is in US interests, and thus whether Aukus will survive. It will be a central question in the Pentagon's review of the pact. That is because under Aukus the US is supposed to be passing some of its vital and scarce Virginia-class submarines to Australia. It makes no sense to do that unless it is sure that we would send them to join the US fleet in a war. The same is true of the buildup of US combat forces, including long-range bombers, at Australian bases. That too makes no sense unless we guarantee in advance that those forces can be used in a war against China. So for the Pentagon the question of Australia's stance in a US-China war is not remotely hypothetical. All this no doubt explains why Marles edged closer to engaging on the issue on Monday at a defence conference in Canberra. He did not say, as one breathless headline had it, 'US-China war: we would be involved.' But he did drop two plain hints to Washington. He said: 'Australia's geography today is more relevant to great power contest than it has been … arguably at any point in our history.' This conveyed to Washington that the government understands how central Australia has become to the US military contest with China, and how much US planning for war with China now assumes Australian support. A few moments later he said: 'The defence of Australia is intimately connected with the peace and stability of the Pacific, the peace and stability of south-east Asia, of north-east Asia, of the north-east Indian Ocean.' He went on: 'The geography of our national security, it lies much less along the coastline of the continent, as it does further afield.' This conveys that the government's military posture is focused on fighting alongside the US far from our shores in places like the Taiwan Strait, rather than defending the continent itself. Others speaking at the conference went further, with one former senior official saying: 'We would be involved.' This seems to reflect the broader consensus of the Canberra bureaucracy. But do Anthony Albanese and his senior minsters agree? Do Marles' comments reflect anything more than a desire to placate Washington without really answering a question they would prefer to leave in the too-hard basket, hoping it will go away? If so, they are making a big mistake. It is time for Australia to have a serious conversation about our involvement. Two questions should be uppermost. First, what would be our aims in taking part in a conflict? The obvious ones are to help defend Taiwan's democracy, to help preserve the US position as the leading power in Asia and stop China taking its place, and to 'pay our dues' as a US ally. Second, how likely are we to achieve these aims? The short answer is very unlikely. With or without Australia's support, the US has no serious chance of winning a war with China over Taiwan. That means Taiwan would not be saved, the US position in Asia would be not preserved, and Australia's value as an ally would disappear. Like Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, we would have followed Washington into a war that achieved neither its objectives nor ours but this time at unimaginably greater cost. That being so, we should give Washington a plain answer to its Taiwan question. The answer should be no. Hugh White is emeritus professor of strategic studies at ANU. His Quarterly Essay Hard New World: Our Post-American Future was published this month

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store