Japan will mitigate potential gasoline price spike, prime minister says
TOKYO, June 19 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Thursday the government will act to mitigate any impact from a potential surge in gasoline prices due to the Middle East conflict, implementing a preventative measure starting June 26.
The government will ensure the nationwide gasoline price on average would not exceed around 175 yen ($1.20) per litre, Ishiba said.
Japan already implemented a subsidy aiming to bring down gasoline prices by 10 yen per litre to curb rising energy prices.
The country is among the most vulnerable to any supply disruption in the Middle East as it is resource-poor and relies on imports for most of its crude oil, with over 90% sourced from the Middle East.
Japan maintains a large national reserve of oil to limit any disruption to supplies.
($1 = 145.3300 yen)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How much are YOU overpaying on your energy bills? New calculator reveals how much users could save
Millions of households could be overpaying their energy bills, a new calculator has revealed. The average energy bill for a dual-fuel home paying by direct debit increased from £1,738-a-year to £1,849 from April 1 after a 6.4 per cent increase in Ofgem 's energy price cap. But it is set to decrease by seven per cent on July 1, meaning the UK's 35 million households on a variable tariff will see their monthly gas and electricity payments fall. A typical household will see their annual bill fall from £1,849 to £1,720 from next month. This is £660 (28 per cent) lower than at the height of the energy crisis at the start of 2023 when the Government implemented the energy price guarantee. It will be a welcome drop in costs for millions of struggling Britons who are battling the cost of living crisis. But the predicted drop is slightly less than the previously forecast nine per cent fall following an easing of trade tensions. Now, a new calculator released today can help you work out how much you may have been overpaying on your energy bills. The price cap does not limit total bills because householders still pay for the amount of energy they consume. However, news of a fall in energy costs will come as a relief for households, who suffered through an 'awful April' of bill rises. And prices remain elevated with the upcoming level £152 (10 per cent) higher than the same period last year. The number of customers switching providers plummeted during the 2021-22 energy crisis as the cost of bills shot up, with rates still significantly below pre-crisis levels. Under-pressure households have also been hit with the biggest increase to water bills since at least February 1988, alongside steep rises across bills for council tax, mobile and broadband tariffs, as well as road tax However, experts at household money-saving firm are warning that millions of households who haven't recently switched providers that they're likely to be overpaying. Greg Marsh, household finance expert and CEO of said: 'The vast majority of households are overpaying on their bills – energy included. 'Most of us have no idea how much it's costing us. Energy companies know how hard it is to make sure we're on a fair deal. 'In fact, they hope we don't notice we could be saving and put up with paying more than we need to. It's not fair, and it's exactly why we started Nous. 'We regularly save our customers hundreds of pounds a year on bills because they didn't have the time or headspace to stay on top of things, and didn't realise how much they were wasting.'
South Wales Guardian
12 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government climbdown on welfare Bill marks third U-turn this month
Here, the PA news agency looks at three major policy changes this month. – Welfare reforms The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was put in motion to change who could qualify for certain disability and sickness benefits. The package restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, and cut the health-related element of Universal Credit, in a bid to save £5 billion a year by 2030. But a backbench rebellion of more than 120 Labour MPs forced Sir Keir into a U-turn. In an attempt to appease those MPs, planned cuts will now only affect future applications for benefits, rather than existing claimants. – Winter fuel payment The Government scrapped winter fuel payments for pensioners who do not receive pension credits or other means-tested benefits just weeks after it came to power in July. It was described as a 'necessary and responsible' move by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who argued it would help fill the £22 billion fiscal black hole. The Government said that changing the threshold for the payment would save £1.5 billion each year. But at the start of this month, the Prime Minister announced that the Government would reinstate winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. The Government said the change will cost £1.25 billion. – Grooming gangs Sir Keir has also U-turned on holding a national inquiry into grooming gangs. In January, the Prime Minister accused those calling for an inquiry of 'jumping on a far-right bandwagon' after tech entrepreneur Elon Musk criticised the UK for its lack of action on the issue. But following the recommendations of a report by Baroness Louise Casey into the scale of group-based child sexual abuse, Sir Keir announced in June that there would be a full national statutory inquiry. The Prime Minister had initially only promised five local inquiries in the most prevalent areas for grooming gangs. Asked about the change, Sir Keir said: 'I've never said we should not look again at any issue.'
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former CIA director says people must understand ‘how dangerous a world we live in right now' in the wake of Trump's Iran strike
Leon Panetta, the former director of the CIA during Barack Obama 's first term, has warned that President Donald Trump 's decision to bomb Iran – and the intelligence disputes surrounding it – only serve to emphasize 'how dangerous a world we live in right now.' Panetta, 86, who also served as Bill Clinton 's chief of staff and currently co-hosts the foreign policy podcast One Decision, told The i Paper: 'I don't think there's any alternative but to understand how dangerous a world we live in right now. 'Not only because of the adversaries that are out there – whether it's China, or Russia, or North Korea, or Iran, or terrorism – but also because of the concerns about leadership, and whether or not the U.S. will exercise the right kind of leadership in a dangerous world.' After Israel launched air strikes against Iran on Friday June 13 as part of its Operation Rising Lion offensive, intended to stop Tehran developing a nuclear weapon, Trump initially kept his distance before dropping bunker-busting bombs on three Iranian uranium enrichment sites over the weekend. In the run-up, the president dismissed the significance of his own Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard briefing Congress in March that Iran was not currently advancing its efforts to build a weapon of mass destruction. He also sidelined her from Situation Room meetings discussing the conflict but offered no evidence of his own to contradict her assessment. The president and his administration have since attacked The New York Times and CNN for reporting on a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency assessment that found the damage done to the Fordo, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities was not as severe as Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had indicated. Responding to those tensions, Panetta said: 'There's no question that when the U.S. president makes a statement that our intelligence assessments are wrong and doesn't believe our own intelligence, that creates a very dangerous moment. 'It undermines the work of our intelligence professionals who really are focused on trying to provide the president with the truth. When the president questions their credibility, that certainly undermines their morale, I'm sure. 'But secondly, it also creates a real problem for the president, because if he rejects the intelligence he's receiving, then what will be the basis for the decisions that he makes in the future, and that is a very scary prospect.' The former official added: 'I have always been confident about our intelligence assessments with regards to Iran… The fundamental question is: did they make a decision to proceed with developing a weapon? And I think our intelligence indicates that that still was not the case.' For Panetta, the episode provides the latest example of Trump's 'unpredictability' as a leader, which poses a risk to America's NATO allies, who met this week in the Netherlands, at a time of heightened international unease. 'It really does rest with our European allies to do everything necessary to make sure that NATO is prepared militarily, to be able to respond if necessary,' he said.
