Politicians ask questions about services and the Occupied Territories Bill but get few answers
The Department's political director Gerard Keown and legal advisor Declan Smyth appeared before the Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs and fielded questions from TDs and Senators looking for clarity on the bill and what it entails.
But it was an area not covered by the draft legislation that featured most often in the queries put to the two civil servants.
Most questions related to the decision not to include services alongside goods in the bill, but politicians made little ground on the topic as Smyth repeatedly said he would not pre-empt advice from the Attorney General (AG), which both he and Keown said would be delivered to the Department 'as soon as possible'.
Numerous members of the Committee requested that the two officials pass the message onto the Department and the AG that time was of the essence, while also noting that the advice would be needed to inform their work on pre-legislative scrutiny.
Fianna Fáil TD Shay Brennan was one of the members who raised concerns about the 'tight timeline'.
He said that waiting on the AG advice was 'not going to work' while Sinn Féin's Donnachach Ó Laoghaire was also critical of the fact that the Committee was considering the bill without it.
Fianna Fáil TD Seán Ó Fearghaíl also described the situation as 'very frustrating'.
'The attorney is very well aware of the time pressures and of the political priority attached to this bill,' Smyth said.
The AG already provided legal advice about the inclusion of services in the original draft of the Occupied Territories Bill, but Smyth said that because the government is moving ahead with its own version, new advice had been sought.
Advertisement
The reason why services were not included in this new bill was that there is a regulation at EU level that allows member states to make unilateral decisions on the importation of goods from outside the single market, but there is no corresponding one for services.
This, he said, had led to a 'two-track approach' whereby the government is seeking to deal with goods as an individual state and services through diplomacy at the EU level.
US pressure
One question asked by Shay Brennan concerned pressure applied by other countries in response to the government's plans to pass the original Occupied Territories Bill.
Keown said that there was 'contact at official level' from the US government when Joe Biden was president, but he also noted that Tánaiste Simon Harris recently said there has been no such correspondence with the current administration.
Later in the hearing, Senator Garret Ahern asked Keown if that correspondence could be provided to the Committee.
'I'll have to take that back to the Tánaiste,' Keown replied.
The Ditch
reported last year
that the US ambassador at the time, Claire Cronin, had emailed government leaders expressing concern about the bill's impact on US companies and warning of 'consequences' if the bill was passed as it was.
A few days later, then-Tánaiste Micheál Martin
said he was 'not surprised' that the US had concerns.
Keown also told the Committee today that the Department is currently analysing the potential economic consequences for Ireland if the bill passes. This, he said, is because there are a number of states who do not agree with Ireland on the issue.
He also told the Committee that a number of EU member states and countries outside the bloc have been in touch to ask questions about the proposed legislation.
Keown said the hope is that other countries follow Ireland's lead and adopt similar legislation.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Delayed UN meeting to discuss two-state solution
Dozens of ministers will gather at the United Nations for a delayed conference to work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, but the US and Israel are boycotting the event. The 193-member UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025. Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. The conference aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told newspaper La Tribune Dimanche in an interview published yesterday that he will also use the conference this week to push other countries to join France in recognising a Palestinian state. France intends to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said last week. "We will launch an appeal in New York so that other countries join us to initiate an even more ambitious and demanding dynamic that will culminate on September 21," Mr Barrot said, adding that he expected Arab countries by then to condemn Palestinian militants Hamas and call for their disarmament. The conference comes as a 22-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza still rages. The war was triggered on 7 October 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. The US will not attend the conference at the United Nations, said a State Department spokesperson, describing it as "a gift to Hamas, which continues to reject ceasefire proposals accepted by Israel that would lead to the release of hostages and bring calm in Gaza." The State Department spokesperson added that Washington voted against the General Assembly last year calling for the conference and would "not support actions that jeopardise the prospect for a long-term, peaceful resolution to the conflict." Israel is also not taking part in the conference, "which doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages," said Jonathan Harounoff, international spokesperson at Israel's UN mission. The UN has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognised borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighbouring Arab states. The UN General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognising it as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council "reconsider the matter favourably." The resolution garnered 143 votes in favor and nine against. The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full UN member - a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state - after the US vetoed it in the UN Security Council several weeks earlier.
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: War in Gaza is existential for Israel, we should have more nuanced discussion
The editorial and one letter gave credence to Dr Nick Maynard who is on record as stating that, despite extensive evidence to the contrary, he has never seen Hamas operating in his hospital. He has accused the IDF of playing a game whereby it shoots different parts of kids' bodies on different days. How likely is that? One of the first questions we all should ask when listening to evidence is 'cui bono?' or who benefits? In 2014, Hamas released a video instructing journalists and witnesses how to report on events in Gaza. It states 'anyone killed or martyred is to be called a civilian from Gaza or Palestine... Don't forget to always add 'innocent civilian' or 'innocent citizen' in your description of those killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza' In his letter, the usually balanced Rob Sadlier sees similarities between Sarajevo and Gaza. Important differences are that Serbs, unlike Israel, were not attacked. Indeed Israel forcibly removed its settlers from Gaza in 2005; residents of Sarajevo were not holding Serbian hostages; the Serbian armed forces (and the Nato bombing response) did not warn civilians to evacuate areas where bombings were planned. Every Gazan non-combatant killed is a tragedy, but to compare fighting against Hamas with the random bombing of Sarajevo is unfair. I am a long-term supporter of reconciliation and a two-state solution to this issue. I know that conscript armies commit atrocities in war and I am appalled by the statements of Israeli extremists. Since October 7, I have seen a large increase in international references to Éamon De Valera's letter on the death of Adolf Hitler. This issue is harmful for Ireland and I hope we can have a more nuanced discussion that does not feed accusations of antisemitism but also understands that for Israel, this is existential. Frank Devine, Kenilworth, England The Holocaust's lessons are being forgotten and hatred is rising once again The lessons of the Holocaust are searingly relevant today. It is dispiriting that 80 years after the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, hatred and intolerance still lurk in the human heart. Language is used to dehumanise, demoralise and demonise others. People in Gaza are neither alive, nor dead. They are walking skeletons. The heart-wrenching images of children becoming wretched, destitute, with little more than skin covering their bones, should shame the world that prides itself on championing human rights and dignities. We must be fearless in resisting violence. We must never rest in seeking to create a fairer and peaceful world for all without exception. Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London Slaughter of innocents in Gaza shames all of us who watch on and fail to act Nothing disgusts me more than seeing the absolute slaughter of men, women and children in Gaza. Since the Israeli invasion, tens of thousands of people have been killed, 17,000 of them innocent children. Food trucks are only allowed in periodically, and the starving and besieged people are subjected to gunfire as they race to obtain sustenance in order to feed themselves. Recent reports suggest that many young boys appear to have been used as target practice. This is horrendous. As babies appear every night on our television screens looking like skeletons with a haunting look of death and despair on their faces, it should move the coldest of hearts in world leadership roles into action to alleviate their suffering instantly. But no, they talk and talk, but do not intervene in this total barbarism. The people of Palestine are ordinary human beings and as such should be protected by human rights law. Anything else is a dereliction of duty by their fellow human beings. Tom Towey, Cloonacool, Co Sligo President of Uruguay set an incredible example of selflessness and charity I would ike to pay tribute to a president who died a few months ago. President José Mujica of Uruguay held office from 2010 to 2015 and was described as the world's poorest president. He shunned the presidential palace and remained at home on his farm driving his tractor and his beloved Volkswagen Beetle. He shared his salary with the poor. He believed his lifestyle was normal and not exceptional. In his earlier life he opposed the democratically elected government as he firmly believed it was corrupt, clandestine, up to its eyes in backhanders and ultimately authoritarian. For his sins, he was arrested, banged up, shot six times but miraculously lived and was ultimately elected president. Noel Mannion, Clonbur, Co Galway We could secure energy needs for decades – but private profit trumps all I have been trying to avoid the news cycle while on holidays here in Donegal. However, a couple of stories did manage to catch my attention. Firstly the Oireachtas hearings on offshore renewable energy development and government subsidies for improving port infrastructure to facilitate it. Secondly, the upgrades to our national grid, which are to be paid for by a levy on energy consumers. If the Government invested around €10bn in a single, large, publicly owned offshore wind project, then profits from this could be used to upgrade both the grid and our ports. Belfast Port could be used in the interim. Furthermore, this would help secure our energy needs for decades to come and, once the initial investment is recouped, profits could be pumped into a sovereign wealth fund (as the Norwegians do with revenues). But, alas, there are no plans for anything like this. It does not even seem to form part of the discussion. No, just taxpayers' money being used to upgrade ports for the benefit of (oftentimes foreign) private corporations which will, in turn, exploit our natural energy resources. Paddy Sharkey, Kilcar, Co Donegal RTÉ should show due respect to counties in the camogie championship On Saturday evening I listened to the RTÉ Radio news and sport bulletin at 10pm. The lead sports item covered was the transfer of a player to Arsenal football club in Britain. Down the pecking order was a brief report on the Camogie All-Ireland semi finals played in Nowlan Park in Kilkenny. The O'Duffy Cup is the women's equivalent of the Liam MacCarthy Cup and should have been treated as such. Tom Cooper, Templeogue, Dublin
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘They don't want to end this war' – Israeli soldiers turning their backs on Benjamin Netanyahu
Just a few millimetres difference and he would have been killed, like six of his comrades were when they walked into a house in southern Lebanon last October, believing − wrongly − that it had already been checked for terrorists. 'It was a really horrible day,' the 26-year-old said. 'They opened the door, and behind the door were two Hezbollah fighters who immediately started firing with their rifles. Four soldiers died immediately.' Mr Fiener, a captain in Israel's 933rd Nahal Brigade, acquitted himself well, picking himself up and dragging wounded colleagues to safety as the battle raged for five hours. It was his destiny, having dreamt of becoming − like his father − an infantry officer for the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) since he was a child. It is a role which carries elite status in Israel and has been the foundation stone for many a stellar business or political career. But he now chooses a different path. He is refusing to report for another stint of reserve duty and a potential deployment to Gaza, in disgust at the ongoing war that has killed more than 59,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. 'When the bombing of Gaza started again, it became clear to me that our government wants to make this war as long as they can − they don't want to end it. I knew then I can't go back to serving in this war,' he said. Sentenced to 25 days in jail by Israel for refusing to serve, Mr Fiener is believed to be part of a growing wave of young Israeli reservists who feel they can no longer participate in their country's war in Gaza. The majority are not showing up to call-ups, either 'forgetting' to check their emails or pleading medical or family emergencies. Mr Fiener believes the images of starving children inside Gaza will mean fewer soldiers will turn up. Immense pressure has been building on Israel over the dire humanitarian conditions inside the strip, with aid agencies warning of mass malnutrition and widespread hunger. Mr Fiener's opinion on the futility of the conflict appears to be shared by a rising number of serving and retired senior officers who are turning against Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's war. General Assaf Orion, the former head of strategic planning at the IDF, said while there were clear strategic goals in the Israel campaigns against Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon, there was no longer any clear military imperative for the continuation of military operations in Gaza. It has nothing to do with Hamas and everything to do with Netanyahu 'In Gaza, I suspect that the strategic train of ends, ways and means was kidnapped by ulterior motives,' he said. 'I think the main reason for a prolonged war in Gaza is political expediency.' Eran Etzion, a former deputy head of Israel's national security council, was even blunter. He said: 'By now it has long been clear to most Israelis that the main reason the Gaza campaign lingers on is because of Netanyahu's political, personal and judicial interests, and he needs the war to go on in order to sustain and even enhance his grip on power.' Many believe Mr Netanyahu fears his government will collapse if the war ended as ultra-nationalist parties in his coalition would abandon him. 'That's the main reason. It has nothing to do with Hamas and everything to do with Netanyahu,' Mr Etzion added. Many believe Mr Netanyahu fears his government will collapse if the war ended as ultra-nationalist parties in his coalition would abandon him. If even some of the spate of leaks from Israel's security cabinet are to be believed, the scepticism is not confined to retired generals. Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, the IDF's chief of staff, is said to have argued there is little more to be gained by continuing the campaign − particularly without risking the lives of the about 20 remaining living hostages. Although degraded into a series of, in effect, independent guerrilla units, Hamas continues to fight amid the rubble, sending a stream of IDF body bags back to Israel. Mr Netanyahu insists Hamas must not just be broken as a military and governing force, but eradicated entirely, arguing at the same time that the best way to secure a hostage deal is to fight even harder. Israel's negotiating team returned home from Doha empty-handed this weekend, amid widespread pessimism that a deal will be agreed any time soon. Israel's reputation on the international stage is in crisis, with traditional allies such as the UK, France, Canada and Australia queuing up to condemn the escalating reports of starvation. Professional servants of democratically elected leaders, such as Lt Gen Zamir and those under him, are caught in the middle. This was perhaps best demonstrated this month by his opposition to a scheme of Israel Katz, the defence minister, to order the entire civilian population of Gaza into a so-called 'humanitarian city' built on the ruins of the southern city of Rafah. The military chief was reportedly anxious to protect his officers from potential complicity in a war crime, amid outrage that the zone – described by former prime minister Ehud Olmert as resembling a 'concentration camp' – could be a precursor to forced population transfer. It would also put his troops, who would ultimately police the perimeter and facilitate the entry of aid, under significant practical pressure. The military was further worried that Hamas would interpret the humanitarian city as a signal that Israel wanted to restart fighting after the proposed initial 60-day ceasefire, thus threatening a potential deal. The IDF leadership earned the ire of Mr Netanyahu by reporting the project could take a year and cost $4bn (€3.4bn). While the Israeli prime minister demanded a 'shorter, cheaper, more practical' plan, it is not clear whether the initiative will ever take place. The scheme may have been too much for senior generals, who are already deeply unhappy about the position their troops have been placed in under the new US-backed aid system. The UN accuses the IDF of killing more than 1,000 civilians near the new aid distribution sites in Gaza. According to multiple videos and witness testimony, crowd flow in and near these sites is extremely poor, and Israeli soldiers, who provide an outer ring of security for the American contractors, open fire if Palestinians come too close. The IDF has now captured 75pc of the Gaza Strip − the goal when it began Operation Gideon's Chariot, which started in May. Last week, it pushed into the town of Deir Al-Balah, the first time it is thought troops have deliberately sought to seize an area where intelligence indicated a high likelihood hostages are being held. The Gaza war is a long way past its culmination point Mr Netanyahu and his allies argue that leaving even remnants of Hamas intact in the strip would eventually precipitate another October 7-style massacre. They have so far rejected Arab proposals for an interim government to administer the enclave in the event of a permanent ceasefire. Gen Orion said: 'The Gaza war is a long way past its culmination point. 'Every military operation, like many human endeavours, has the rule of diminishing returns. 'At some point, great successes meet growing resistance and lose their efficiency. The costs rise and the benefits are lower. In Gaza, we are way past that point.' Although the true figures are closely guarded, some campaign groups and politicians believe the rate of attendance could be as low as 60pc. The majority are so-called 'grey refusals', who are people who plead medical problems, family issues or who simply go abroad during the call-up window and 'forget' to check their emails. Refusals on explicit political grounds are rarer but increasing, reflected in the growing number of public letters signed by reservists denouncing Mr Netanyahu's conduct of the war, and subsequent reprimands and dismissals. Accounts have emerged of officers frantically reaching out to reservists on social media, begging them to turn up, because their ranks are so depleted. At the same time, the acrimonious issue of Haredi conscription rumbles on, with Mr Netanyahu expected to give in on promises to force ultra-orthodox Jewish young men to turn up for military service. Mr Fiener's jail sentence was considered a relatively harsh penalty for refusal, given the maximum is 30 days. But he only served one night, as the prison was largely evacuated when Iran started firing ballistic missiles at Israel in June. Waiting to see if he will be recalled to jail, he believes the pictures and videos of what is happening in Gaza will further decrease the rate of call-up response. 'There are always a lot of people who are not sure if they are willing to go and every little thing can affect them,' he said.
