What it's like being a criminal lawyer in the true-crime boom
In the hours and days after Patterson was found guilty on three counts of murder, a flurry of follow-up content was revealed. ABC announced a drama Toxic, based on the case; Nine announced they already had a one-hour documentary titled Murder by Mushroom, ready for airing. This is in addition to a Stan doco, announced back in February, months before the case went to trial.
This obsession with true-crime content — be it fact-based or fictionalised — is not new, nor is it localised to Australia. The Australian's Teacher's Pet podcast has been credited with bringing attention to Chris Dawson's crimes, but experts warned the attention threatened his right to a fair trial. In the US, Ryan Murphy's Monster series on the Menendez brothers brought attention to the pair's parole pleas, despite their family claiming it was 'riddled with mistruths'.
The flood of content presents a peculiar conundrum for criminal lawyers, who find themselves in the middle of the media melee while also trying to give their clients the fairest treatment possible.
Lauren Cassimatis is the founder and principal lawyer at Melbourne's Gallant Law, with more than 20 years' experience practising criminal law. We spoke to her about what it's like to be a criminal defence lawyer in the era of trial by entertainment.
We have a lot of media approaching us wanting to talk about cases. There'll be some lawyers that attempt to get in the media and make that commentary, and they need to really think about how it might affect their clients and breach confidentiality obligations.
The other thing is that we're all human, so the media might even skew us in terms of our thoughts or perspectives.
So we need to detach from what's being put out there and just really focus on what we're trained to do, which is analyse the strengths and weaknesses of a case, develop a sound case theory, take into account our clients' instructions, and direct that strategy.
You gotta turn your mind off from publications and portrayals and just really focus on trusting your instincts as a lawyer, and your intuition, and just focusing on the case at hand.
I think that's what our ethical obligation is. We can't get caught up in the drama and the glamour of it all. We can't throw our clients under the bus for a bit of media.
I am, and I'm also surprised by the fascination with the case. I don't know what it is.
There've been plenty of murder cases I've been involved in that have been just as interesting. I don't know what it is. It almost feels comical, like we're being entertained by it, rather than [it being] seen as educational.
I think so — there are some offenders out there that, whether they're found guilty or not, they become celebrities. People are fascinated by them because, for some reason, people have been entertained by them.
In terms of it compromising the right to a fair trial, especially from a victim's perspective, I think it's dangerous. What does their future hold for them?
I'm a big advocate for supporting reintegration into society and supporting offenders' rehabilitation; I think everyone deserves a second chance.
Why are some people not given that second chance?
I don't think it takes much, to be honest, because I think most people have the mentality that where there's smoke there's fire. So, if the perpetrator has already been charged, it's hard to get people to detach and focus on the weaknesses of the case, while also trying to get them to understand that there might be more to a case than what is presented in the media.
I had a client where it was very high-profile in the media leading up to the trial, and the jury were directed to not do their own research, but they still decided to do it on their own time because they were fascinated by being part of this "Whodunnit?" case.
As soon as this was revealed, the whole trial was aborted and we had to start again with a brand new jury.
Another example, I represented a lady charged with manslaughter against her husband. She was a true victim of domestic violence by him. She came into court, very timid, very broken about what happened — but the media love a 'Black Widow' story.
So there were drawings of her looking very sexy, very glamorous, nothing like what she looked like in reality. [There were] articles about her trying to steal the land he owned and murdering him for money. That definitely was an issue for us in the trial. We had to address that to the jury because it was all over the media.
It depends which side of the fence you're on. If the offender is portrayed as a victim, in terms of some history and background to what happened, it could have a negative impact on the community, [especially] if they feel that the experience of the victim is being undermined and not appreciating the gravity of offending.
But, on the other hand, if you're a defence lawyer like me, or if you've got someone in your family that's been accused of a crime or been through the justice system, sometimes if the offender is being portrayed sympathetically, it helps you see things from a position of empathy.
So I think it could be detrimental in terms of really creating a mockery of whoever's involved in it, whether it's the victim or the offender.
It definitely gives the wrong idea of how the justice system operates, the court procedure, the criminal procedure and process. It gives people false hopes about avenues open to them and timing.
For example, shows like NCIS, where they get results back from the lab instantly: it just does not happen in reality. You've got forensic centres that the police rely on that could spend months, even years, trying to analyse evidence, whether it's technological devices or DNA.
Also, the way trials are run, the way barristers jump up and down at the bar table, that rarely happens in reality. In fact, what we know is barristers that exercise polite persuasion in court get further than the ones that put on a performance, especially aggressive performances.
The same with "approaching the bench", which happens often in American shows — it doesn't happen here in Australia. So clients often expect you to have a moment with the judge at the bench.
It's a really hard one, because the law states that the public can have access to a trial. The public ought to know what's going on in the courtroom. So you can't necessarily stop the media from reporting on a case. The public needs to know what's happening.
There are select cases where you can successfully apply for suppression orders, especially when someone's safety is at risk, but I don't think you can stop it.
I think people are so enthralled by true crime, I don't think we'll ever be able to stop it or contain it.
It's just a matter of educating people to appreciate that what you see in the media isn't necessarily reality. I'll read media reports about my own cases later, and I laugh because I go, "OK, yeah, that's right, that fits, true," but then there's some other bits that are missing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Man jailed for raping 7-year-old girl at wife's daycare centre
*Content warning: Contains content that some may find distressing* The husband of a daycare owner has been sentenced to 15 years in jail for the repeated rape of a seven-year-old girl inside his wife's daycare centre. The now 50-year-old offender, who cannot be named, was found guilty of repeatedly sexually assaulting the child between February 2021 and August 2022 inside the daycare, which was run out of the couple's home in Point Cook, southwest of Melbourne. The abuse happened in the loungeroom of the home after school and on weekends, when she attended the daycare, according to the Herald Sun. The little girl later told police she was 'scared' and 'tricked' by the man who she claimed had a 'weird smile'. The girl is now scared of the dark, suffers nightmares, asks to have a camera in her room for safety, and has difficulties at school. She had been attending the home childcare since she was two-years-old. The assaults came to light in November 2022 after the girl complained to her older sister about pain in her genital region. She was then taken to the doctor the following day where she shared what had happened to her. She was then referred to the Royal Children's Hospital and Victoria Police were contacted. While CCTV was located, which filmed the loungeroom where the abuse occurred, no recordings from the exact period of the offences had been kept. The daycare at the residence is now banned to prevent further risks, a Department of Education spokesman confirmed. It is unknown whether or not the abuser, who is originally from the Philippines and emigrated in 2002, had a working with children's check. It is also not known how many other children he cared for and whether other parents had been notified. The girl's mother says she's now in a constant state of guilt. 'I blame myself for what happened … The anxiety, the helplessness, the fear that I failed her is like running a marathon I never signed up for. And it never ends,' she told the court, as per the publication. The man will spend a minimum of nine years and nine months in jail and will be required to do a sex offenders treatment program. He will also appear on the sex offenders registry for the rest of his life. The Melbourne suburb has been in the headlines recently after the alleged daycare abuses of Joshua Dale Brown, 26. Brown, a childcare worker, was charged in May with more than 70 offences including sexual activity in presence of a child under 16, sexual assault of a child under 16 and possessing child abuse material. STI testing is underway of about 2000 children as part of the police investigation.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Doctor accused of filming colleagues in Melbourne hospital toilets recorded at least 460 people, police allege
A trainee surgeon accused of secretly snapping intimate images of unsuspecting colleagues in hospital toilets allegedly ranked the photos and videos, according to court documents. Warning: This story contains details some readers may find distressing. Ryan Cho, 27, appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Friday where he was denied bail after being slugged with several more charges including producing intimate images, using an optical surveillance device and failing to assist police. He was also charged with stalking earlier this month. Court documents revealed police have accused Dr Cho of capturing about 4,500 intimate videos of at least 460 alleged victims at three major hospitals in Melbourne — the Austin, the Royal Melbourne and the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre — while they used toilets or showers. "All these files depict the genital or anal regions of the victims in vulnerable positions," police alleged in court documents. "The majority of victims depicted in these videos appear to be female doctors, nurses, paramedics and staff members of medical facilities the accused has worked at since 2021." Dr Cho is contesting the charges against him. Dr Cho worked as a trainee surgeon at the Austin Hospital but has since been stood down. His medical registration has also been suspended by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), preventing him from practicing as a doctor in Australia. The ABC understands the 27-year-old worked at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between February 2024 and February 2025. Court documents alleged Dr Cho was seen "loitering" around the emergency department on a number of occasions despite his shift not starting for some time or while he was not rostered on. The documents alleged that in early July a nurse at the Austin Hospital, who was using a staff toilet, found a mesh bag with a mobile phone that they believed to be recording and reported the incident to management. The nurse alleged that several days later, the same bag was discovered by hospital security and police were called. Police later arrested Dr Cho and seized two mobile phones, a laptop, a hard drive, several white mesh bags and removable hooks. They alleged he refused to give them passwords to the devices. "The mesh bags and removable hooks seized … are of the likeness of the ones used in the commission of his [alleged] offending at the Austin Hospital," police alleged in court documents. Police alleged that cybercrime analysis of one of the mobile phones showed it had recorded three hours of video footage. Analysis of the footage also allegedly showed Dr Cho setting up the phone and more than an hour of vision showing the intimate regions of three women. Court documents further alleged that police analysis of one of the laptop hard drives showed it had 10,374 videos and images that were organised into sub folders separated by hospitals, wards and the names of dozens of alleged victims. The documents also alleged images and videos were separated into a "ranking" — "Tier 1" and "Tier 2". "The accused [allegedly] named at least 460 female victims in total, categorising the intimate videos into folders associated with names and workplaces," the documents alleged. "investigators have received reports from staff and management that they are suffering trauma ... and are fearful of using the hospital facilities," police alleged in court documents. "Staff are no longer feeling safe in their workplace," the documents read. On Friday, police opposed bail and alleged Dr Cho, who graduated from Monash University in 2022, was a flight risk because he had no ties to Victoria. He was denied bail and will return to the Melbourne Magistrates' Court in November.

News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
New details of dad's lies to cops after son allegedly crashed Mercedes, killing two
It was late on a Friday night when a group of young men — one sporting a cut across his face — urgently knocked on the front door of a southwestern Sydney home, according to court documents. 'It's an emergency,' one of the men declared. Just a short drive away, an empty Mercedes lay flipped on its side, metres away from a severely damaged and smoking Toyota Echo, the bodies of 24-year-old Alina Kauffman and her teenage brother Ernesto inside, according to court documents. Johnson Kokozian, 22, allegedly drove the Mercedes nearly 60km/h above the speed limit before colliding head-on with the Toyota Echo in Heckenberg on September 1, 2023, the two siblings dying following the horror crash. Johnson and his friends allegedly climbed out of the wreckage through the sunroof of the luxury car and showed up at his dad's door, who then proceeded to lie to police and falsely report the Mercedes as stolen. Among the charges Johnson faces are two counts of dangerous driving occasioning death. He has not yet entered any pleas. His father, Kagadour Hanna Kokozian, pleaded guilty to hindering an investigation and concealing the offence of another person. New details revealed in the agreed facts of Kagadour's case describe the events that unfolded in the aftermath of the crash, including the lies the 63-year-old father told police to protect his son. According to the facts sheet, seen by NewsWire, the Mercedes — which Johnson had only collected earlier that day — reached speeds of up to 109km/h in a 50km/h zone before the collision. A witness driving a Volkswagen in the area told police the Mercedes got so close to his car at one stage the headlights 'disappeared' from the view of his rear view mirror, the court documents stated. The Mercedes allegedly accelerated before crossing to the wrong side of the road and crashing head on with the Toyota Echo, killing Ms Kauffman and her younger brother and hitting a parked Rav-4, according to court documents. Johnson and his friends allegedly climbed out of the Mercedes – now flipped on its side – through the sunroof, screaming at the driver of the Volkswagen to take them to the hospital before instead directing him to the home of Johnson's father, according to court documents. Knocking on the door and telling Kagadour 'it's an emergency', the father was told the car had been crashed and his son was the alleged driver. Kagadour asked to be taken to the scene by one of his son's friends, remarking 'it's really bad' upon arriving, court documents reveal. Kagadour later told police he asked his son what was happening over the phone from the scene of the crash 'because people were saying two people were dead'. 'He asked his son if he was involved but his son closed the phone,' court documents stated. Kagadour was then driven to the home of his son's fiancee, Tiana Savignano, where Johnson and one of the passengers of the Mercedes, Cruz Davis-Tuka, were also located. There, Ms Savignano called police and told them she'd been shopping with her father-in-law when his car was stolen, court documents state. Kagadour also spoke, telling the operator that he had 'heard the noise and they took the car' after he came back from shopping with his son. 'We bought the car today and we went shopping and my son and we come back, I'm a little bit sick, I'm inside and I come out, no car so I don't know what happened. I heard the noise and they took the car,' Kagadour told the operator. The following afternoon police attended his home for a second time and to raise concerns his son was involved in the fatal crash, to which Kagadour told officers: 'The car was parked here. When I came back it was stolen.' His son was arrested that afternoon, and Kagadour told police that he wanted to change his statement later that night. 'I'm not saying that, uh, my son innocent or I'm innocent, but I want to make sure everything OK … I don't want to get, uh, involved in, like, you know what I mean. I'm 62 years old, I'm sick …' Kagadour said, according to court documents. He told police he'd returned home, saw the car's key on the table and thought the Mercedes had been stolen. Kagadour also said he'd been taken to the scene of the accident, but he didn't know who had been driving the car. 'Somebody took me to see the car accident, but I don't know it was that car in the accident,' Mr Kokozian said. Kagadour then told police everything he'd said in his original statement was right, but he also wasn't sure if the car was stolen. Kagadour was arrested days later on September 6 and in a recorded police interview admitted to lying to the triple-0 operator about the car being stolen. It is not alleged Mr Kokozian was aware of the manner of his son's alleged driving, the documents state. Mr Kokozian's son, Johnson, faces charges including manslaughter, two counts of dangerous driving occasioning death, two counts of aggravated dangerous driving causing death, and one count of negligent driving occasioning death. He is also accused of failing to stop and assist after the crash, driving while disqualified and exceeding the speed limit by more than 45km. Ms Savignano and Mr Davis-Tuka were both charged with conceal a serious indictable offence and hinder police in their investigation into the crash. All three are yet to enter pleas. Kagadour is expected to be sentenced in October.