What it's like being a criminal lawyer in the true-crime boom
In the hours and days after Patterson was found guilty on three counts of murder, a flurry of follow-up content was revealed. ABC announced a drama Toxic, based on the case; Nine announced they already had a one-hour documentary titled Murder by Mushroom, ready for airing. This is in addition to a Stan doco, announced back in February, months before the case went to trial.
This obsession with true-crime content — be it fact-based or fictionalised — is not new, nor is it localised to Australia. The Australian's Teacher's Pet podcast has been credited with bringing attention to Chris Dawson's crimes, but experts warned the attention threatened his right to a fair trial. In the US, Ryan Murphy's Monster series on the Menendez brothers brought attention to the pair's parole pleas, despite their family claiming it was 'riddled with mistruths'.
The flood of content presents a peculiar conundrum for criminal lawyers, who find themselves in the middle of the media melee while also trying to give their clients the fairest treatment possible.
Lauren Cassimatis is the founder and principal lawyer at Melbourne's Gallant Law, with more than 20 years' experience practising criminal law. We spoke to her about what it's like to be a criminal defence lawyer in the era of trial by entertainment.
We have a lot of media approaching us wanting to talk about cases. There'll be some lawyers that attempt to get in the media and make that commentary, and they need to really think about how it might affect their clients and breach confidentiality obligations.
The other thing is that we're all human, so the media might even skew us in terms of our thoughts or perspectives.
So we need to detach from what's being put out there and just really focus on what we're trained to do, which is analyse the strengths and weaknesses of a case, develop a sound case theory, take into account our clients' instructions, and direct that strategy.
You gotta turn your mind off from publications and portrayals and just really focus on trusting your instincts as a lawyer, and your intuition, and just focusing on the case at hand.
I think that's what our ethical obligation is. We can't get caught up in the drama and the glamour of it all. We can't throw our clients under the bus for a bit of media.
I am, and I'm also surprised by the fascination with the case. I don't know what it is.
There've been plenty of murder cases I've been involved in that have been just as interesting. I don't know what it is. It almost feels comical, like we're being entertained by it, rather than [it being] seen as educational.
I think so — there are some offenders out there that, whether they're found guilty or not, they become celebrities. People are fascinated by them because, for some reason, people have been entertained by them.
In terms of it compromising the right to a fair trial, especially from a victim's perspective, I think it's dangerous. What does their future hold for them?
I'm a big advocate for supporting reintegration into society and supporting offenders' rehabilitation; I think everyone deserves a second chance.
Why are some people not given that second chance?
I don't think it takes much, to be honest, because I think most people have the mentality that where there's smoke there's fire. So, if the perpetrator has already been charged, it's hard to get people to detach and focus on the weaknesses of the case, while also trying to get them to understand that there might be more to a case than what is presented in the media.
I had a client where it was very high-profile in the media leading up to the trial, and the jury were directed to not do their own research, but they still decided to do it on their own time because they were fascinated by being part of this "Whodunnit?" case.
As soon as this was revealed, the whole trial was aborted and we had to start again with a brand new jury.
Another example, I represented a lady charged with manslaughter against her husband. She was a true victim of domestic violence by him. She came into court, very timid, very broken about what happened — but the media love a 'Black Widow' story.
So there were drawings of her looking very sexy, very glamorous, nothing like what she looked like in reality. [There were] articles about her trying to steal the land he owned and murdering him for money. That definitely was an issue for us in the trial. We had to address that to the jury because it was all over the media.
It depends which side of the fence you're on. If the offender is portrayed as a victim, in terms of some history and background to what happened, it could have a negative impact on the community, [especially] if they feel that the experience of the victim is being undermined and not appreciating the gravity of offending.
But, on the other hand, if you're a defence lawyer like me, or if you've got someone in your family that's been accused of a crime or been through the justice system, sometimes if the offender is being portrayed sympathetically, it helps you see things from a position of empathy.
So I think it could be detrimental in terms of really creating a mockery of whoever's involved in it, whether it's the victim or the offender.
It definitely gives the wrong idea of how the justice system operates, the court procedure, the criminal procedure and process. It gives people false hopes about avenues open to them and timing.
For example, shows like NCIS, where they get results back from the lab instantly: it just does not happen in reality. You've got forensic centres that the police rely on that could spend months, even years, trying to analyse evidence, whether it's technological devices or DNA.
Also, the way trials are run, the way barristers jump up and down at the bar table, that rarely happens in reality. In fact, what we know is barristers that exercise polite persuasion in court get further than the ones that put on a performance, especially aggressive performances.
The same with "approaching the bench", which happens often in American shows — it doesn't happen here in Australia. So clients often expect you to have a moment with the judge at the bench.
It's a really hard one, because the law states that the public can have access to a trial. The public ought to know what's going on in the courtroom. So you can't necessarily stop the media from reporting on a case. The public needs to know what's happening.
There are select cases where you can successfully apply for suppression orders, especially when someone's safety is at risk, but I don't think you can stop it.
I think people are so enthralled by true crime, I don't think we'll ever be able to stop it or contain it.
It's just a matter of educating people to appreciate that what you see in the media isn't necessarily reality. I'll read media reports about my own cases later, and I laugh because I go, "OK, yeah, that's right, that fits, true," but then there's some other bits that are missing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Group 1-winning jockey Noel Callow under investigation over racist videos in Darwin
A racially-charged video has emerged of Group 1 jockey Noel Callow ridiculing an Indigenous man. This masthead has confirmed a street talk-style exchange, understood to be recorded in Darwin this time last year, is currently under review from Queensland Racing Integrity Commission officials. 'A video was recently brought to the attention of the Commission,' a QRIC spokesperson said. 'It is presently the subject of an investigation.' This masthead has contacted Callow for comment. A second video has also been circulated, however, Callow is only heard not pictured in the frame. In the 17-second clip, Callow, riding a bicycle on the footpath with a jockey whip in the left hand, fired extremely offensive racist four-letter slurs at pedestrians after inaudible verballing. The leaked videos were initially shared privately but have since been circulated more widely. Callow is again in Darwin to reunite with out-of-sorts Bear Story in the $200,000 Darwin Cup on Monday. Callow last year placed third on then favourite Bear Story in the Northern Territory feature. The 50-year-old also has two rides in Darwin on Saturday. The Queensland-licensed ex-Victorian made a winning return to the races on Wednesday in Darwin. Callow has only just completed a two-month suspension for a physical altercation with another rider in the jockeys' room during a race meet at Doomben on May 28. The street talk video has a playful start, 'what's doing crackers', with the Indigenous man and then escalated. Callow: 'Have you showered? F--- you stink like F---.' Man: 'Nah, I haven't got a job (inaudible)'. Callow: 'You stink like f---. Have some pizza. Take the pizza. Eat. Eat the pizza.' Man: 'I don't want to eat.' Callow: 'Have a shower then, do me a favour. Have a shower. You stink like f---.' Man: '(inaudible) I sleep on the street.' Callow: 'So you don't want a pizza … what do you want?' Man: 'I want a beer.' Callow: 'You want a beer … if you have a shower, I'll buy you a beer.' Man: '(inaudible) I don't have a shower. There's no shower in the friggin area.' Callow: 'Well jump in the f---ing creek … for f--- sake man.' The conversation continued with an inaudible exchange before Callow said: 'Good to have you on the show. What's your name?' Unable to understand the name after two attempts, Callow made up his own version before going with 'Yothu Yindi! Yothi, that's you, Yotha, ole Yotha'. The man responded to Callow with 'what's wrong with you?' after the jockey started singing Treaty, the famous Yothu Yindi anthem. Callow ended the clip with 'Good to have you on the show, man'. The exact timing of the videos is unclear, other than separate night and day interactions. The daylight racially-fuelled clip started with Callow riding a bicycle up behind pedestrians. 'Look at these c--ts,' Callow said. After an inaudible exchange, a pedestrian shouts 'watch out where you're riding your bike'. Callow fired back with venom. 'Stop walking on the f---ing footpath, you f---ing c--ns,' Callow said. 'Get up the c--ns.'

News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘What's Windex for': Bizarre search after murders of Salim, Toufic Hamze
A man who asked to be paid in cocaine for storing two cars used in an infamous Sydney double murder searched 'what's Windex used for' as he organised for one to be cleaned. Teenage gangster Salim Hamze and his tradie dad Toufik Hamze, 64, were shot dead as they sat in a red ute outside the family's Guildford home on October 20, 2021. A court heard on Thursday that a gunman unloaded a full round of ammunition into their car before more shots were fired as a getaway vehicle sped off. They died at the height of a feud between the Hamzy (or Hamze) and Alameddine crime networks, with Salim believed to have played a pivotal role in other shootings. Two men charged over roles in the aftermath of the father and son's murders, Suliman Hamza and SH, faced sentence in court on Thursday. Hamza, 23, pleaded guilty to two counts of accessory after the fact to murder, two counts of receiving stolen property – being a silver Lexus and Ford Mustang used as getaway cars – and one of disposing stolen property, the Mustang. SH, who was 16 at the time, pleaded guilty to two counts of being an accessory after the fact to a serious indictable offence. Neither were accused of having any involvement in the shootings, nor knowledge of what was about to unfold. At a hearing last week, Crown prosecutor Mitchell Paish told the Downing Centre District Court that SH had displayed 'some sorrow' for the elder Hamze's death but not for 18-year-old Salim. 'He thinks that the death of this young man is just part of this game that he willingly joined himself,' Mr Paish said. Mr Paish argued that SH's involvement was an example of how gangs outsourced tasks to young associates 'to distance the assassins and those who hire them'. 'These matters are becoming more rife … yes he's seen that he's been used, but he still wants to associate with these people,' he said. 'They're part of his community.' The court heard on Thursday that Hamza organised for the Lexus and Ford, both of which were previously stolen, to be moved between different locations in western Sydney in the weeks before the murders. Judge Sharon Harris said that on the night of October 19, 2021, SH was directed by Hamza to leave the grey Ford Mustang parked on a Guildford street with its key on a tyre. 'When are they picking it up cuz,' SH asked Hamza via messages. 'Right now,' he replied. The next day, after it was used as a getaway car in the shooting, the grey Mustang was dropped at a co-accused's home and Hamza said he would move it. He texted the associate, 'we're gonna bleach and Windex everything before it's moved', but not before he looked up 'what's windex used for'. Police seized the Mustang at the co-accused's home in Guildford on October 22, and found Windex in the garage. The silver Lexus was used in the shooting itself and was burnt out by the assassins. Hamza's barrister, Avni Djemal SC, last week told the court his client's phone searches for how to use Windex showed he was a 'novice' Mr Djemal said Hamza, then 19, had 'no idea' the cars were to be used in a murder when he initially agreed to store them. Judge Harris said Hamza's actions after the murders were motivated by 'misguided loyalty and self-preservation'. She revealed he was then dealing with drug use issues and asked to be paid in cocaine instead of cash for storing the cars. SH was 'impulsive and immature' but also influenced by criminal connections, the judge said. As recently as last month SH told a psychologist he remained close to known criminals who were in what he called 'the game', the court heard. SH said letting them down 'was not an option', according to Judge Harris. Hamza, the court heard, told a psychologist the manner in which the Hamzes died 'still haunts him and he wished he played no part'. Judge Harris sentenced Hamza to four years in prison, with a non-parole period of two years and 11 months. With time served he will be eligible for parole in October. SH was sentenced to a two-year intensive correction order and told he could be taken into custody if he breached conditions, including not to interact with criminal associates. The man who police suspect shot Salim and Toufik Hamze, identified as Zaid Abdelhafez, remains at large and is believed to have fled overseas. An arrest warrant has been issued for Mr Abdelhafez, 22, while Alameddine clan leader Rafat Alameddine and associate John Bayssari are also wanted by police over the murders. Mr Alameddine and Mr Bayssari are also believed to be living offshore.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Geraldton mother Monique Burton to be sentenced over newborn baby's body in freezer
WARNING: This story contains distressing details. A woman who secretly gave birth on her lounge room floor put her newborn baby boy in a plastic bag before her partner stored the infant's body in a freezer, a Perth court has been told. Monique Ellen Burton, 35, denied being pregnant and told friends she had a terminal illness, which saw her raise thousands of dollars via a GoFundMe page. The mother, from Geraldton, is set to be sentenced in Perth tomorrow — and her appearance in the Perth District Court today unveiled the horrific circumstances surrounding the baby's birth. The court heard Burton gave birth at home in August 2022 before putting the baby in a plastic garbage bag and hiding it behind the couch. She claims it was stillborn, but police have not been able to determine when or how the baby died. Methamphetamine was detected in the baby's system, the court was told. Burton managed to conceal the fact she had just given birth from her partner Shaun Bradley Balaam, who took her to hospital because she was visibly ill. Once there, she denied giving birth, telling staff she had been menstruating, prosecutor Jehna Winter told the court. When he got home, Balaam found the garbage bag containing the baby — though he said he did not look inside. He told police he suspected it may have been a baby as he knew Burton had a history of concealing pregnancies, and had felt what he suspected was a head when picking up the bag. He put the bag in a chest freezer, under a bag of dog food, the court was told. Burton was meanwhile transferred to King Edward Memorial Hospital in Perth, where she was "repeatedly asked" about giving birth, but continued to deny she'd been pregnant. A friend then set up a GoFundMe on her behalf claiming she had been diagnosed with terminal liver cancer. Burton had made a minor liver issue "seem worse than it was", and got more than $3,000 in donations, the court heard. However, she was "never diagnosed with a terminal illness," Ms Winter said, and had never undergone dialysis Police became involved once Burton finally revealed to a social worker that the baby was "in the freezer on the back verandah", claiming it had been stillborn. Officers visited the house and found the body of the baby boy, with his legs were crossed, "arms close to his chest" and the umbilical cord still attached. The prosecutor said investigations "couldn't determine cause of death or whether it had taken a first breath". Ms Winter told the court that the boy was "anatomically normal" but methylamphetamine was detected in his system. The court heard Burton could not say why she did not reveal the pregnancy. Her lawyer Anthony Elliott described the concealment as 'amateurish'and said it was 'unlikely there was any sinister intention.' Mr Elliott said she suffered from 'depressive episodes' due to trauma, but "In terms of moral culpability, this is towards the lower end of the scale." Burton had pleaded guilty to interfering with a corpse with intent to prevent an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death, and multiple counts of fraud related to the GoFundMe. Earlier, her partner Balaam received a 12-month community based order in Geraldton after admitting improper interference with a corpse. Burton is set to be sentenced on Friday.