‘What's Windex for': Bizarre search after murders of Salim, Toufic Hamze
Teenage gangster Salim Hamze and his tradie dad Toufik Hamze, 64, were shot dead as they sat in a red ute outside the family's Guildford home on October 20, 2021.
A court heard on Thursday that a gunman unloaded a full round of ammunition into their car before more shots were fired as a getaway vehicle sped off.
They died at the height of a feud between the Hamzy (or Hamze) and Alameddine crime networks, with Salim believed to have played a pivotal role in other shootings.
Two men charged over roles in the aftermath of the father and son's murders, Suliman Hamza and SH, faced sentence in court on Thursday.
Hamza, 23, pleaded guilty to two counts of accessory after the fact to murder, two counts of receiving stolen property – being a silver Lexus and Ford Mustang used as getaway cars – and one of disposing stolen property, the Mustang.
SH, who was 16 at the time, pleaded guilty to two counts of being an accessory after the fact to a serious indictable offence.
Neither were accused of having any involvement in the shootings, nor knowledge of what was about to unfold.
At a hearing last week, Crown prosecutor Mitchell Paish told the Downing Centre District Court that SH had displayed 'some sorrow' for the elder Hamze's death but not for 18-year-old Salim.
'He thinks that the death of this young man is just part of this game that he willingly joined himself,' Mr Paish said.
Mr Paish argued that SH's involvement was an example of how gangs outsourced tasks to young associates 'to distance the assassins and those who hire them'.
'These matters are becoming more rife … yes he's seen that he's been used, but he still wants to associate with these people,' he said.
'They're part of his community.'
The court heard on Thursday that Hamza organised for the Lexus and Ford, both of which were previously stolen, to be moved between different locations in western Sydney in the weeks before the murders.
Judge Sharon Harris said that on the night of October 19, 2021, SH was directed by Hamza to leave the grey Ford Mustang parked on a Guildford street with its key on a tyre.
'When are they picking it up cuz,' SH asked Hamza via messages.
'Right now,' he replied.
The next day, after it was used as a getaway car in the shooting, the grey Mustang was dropped at a co-accused's home and Hamza said he would move it.
He texted the associate, 'we're gonna bleach and Windex everything before it's moved', but not before he looked up 'what's windex used for'.
Police seized the Mustang at the co-accused's home in Guildford on October 22, and found Windex in the garage.
The silver Lexus was used in the shooting itself and was burnt out by the assassins.
Hamza's barrister, Avni Djemal SC, last week told the court his client's phone searches for how to use Windex showed he was a 'novice'
Mr Djemal said Hamza, then 19, had 'no idea' the cars were to be used in a murder when he initially agreed to store them.
Judge Harris said Hamza's actions after the murders were motivated by 'misguided loyalty and self-preservation'.
She revealed he was then dealing with drug use issues and asked to be paid in cocaine instead of cash for storing the cars.
SH was 'impulsive and immature' but also influenced by criminal connections, the judge said.
As recently as last month SH told a psychologist he remained close to known criminals who were in what he called 'the game', the court heard.
SH said letting them down 'was not an option', according to Judge Harris.
Hamza, the court heard, told a psychologist the manner in which the Hamzes died 'still haunts him and he wished he played no part'.
Judge Harris sentenced Hamza to four years in prison, with a non-parole period of two years and 11 months. With time served he will be eligible for parole in October.
SH was sentenced to a two-year intensive correction order and told he could be taken into custody if he breached conditions, including not to interact with criminal associates.
The man who police suspect shot Salim and Toufik Hamze, identified as Zaid Abdelhafez, remains at large and is believed to have fled overseas.
An arrest warrant has been issued for Mr Abdelhafez, 22, while Alameddine clan leader Rafat Alameddine and associate John Bayssari are also wanted by police over the murders.
Mr Alameddine and Mr Bayssari are also believed to be living offshore.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
30 minutes ago
- ABC News
Australian activists back home after being detained by Israel
Two Australians on board an aid ship bound for Gaza said they were "brutalised psychologically in every way" while being detained in Israel.
ABC News
30 minutes ago
- ABC News
Search for missing 26-year-old Gach Top west of Alice Springs enters fourth day
The search for missing Alice Springs man Gach Top has entered its fourth day, with police continuing to hold serious concerns for his welfare amid near-freezing temperatures in the Red Centre overnight. There was an eerie quiet at the search camp west of the town on Thursday as Mr Top's loved ones climbed out of their cars, hoping for news of their partner, son, brother and friend. The 26-year-old went missing on Monday before his car was found abandoned 14.5 kilometres west of John Flynn's Grave Historical Reserve on the outskirts of Alice Springs the next morning. Mr Top has not been seen or heard from since Monday night. Police and emergency services have so far scoured more than 500 square kilometres of rugged, grassy landscape in their aerial and ground search, in helicopters, by foot and in all-terrain vehicles. Mr Top's father, David Kong, along with members of his family, have been at the centre of search efforts, about 20 kilometres west of Alice Springs. "I actually got the message from his partner midnight on Monday that he didn't show up at work," Mr Kong said. "Then the whole family started panicking, there was no answer when we called [him]. Mr Kong said his son had recently become a father to his own four-week-old child. While Mr Top had previously explored Simpsons Gap with his sister, Mr Kong said, the father was not sure whether he was much of a bushwalker. Acting Sergeant Chris Grotherr said the surrounding MacDonnell Ranges made it "a bit easier in some senses" to focus search efforts. "The area between the range area is quite flat so that is helpful as well, however it is populated by knee-high grass which does make it difficult for ground search teams to locate certain items," he said. The search effort has included more than 50 people from local and Darwin police units, fire and rescue teams and ranger groups. Mr Kong said his family was grateful to everyone who had been searching for his "caring" son. "The whole community, I'm really thankful for the hard work they've been doing for the last few days," he said. Police have described Mr Top as "a six-foot-tall male of Sudanese appearance", with a lean build and short curly hair. He was last seen wearing a red or orange puffer jacket, cream-coloured tracksuit pants and dark-coloured runners. His family and police are urging anyone who may have seen him near Larapinta Drive, Standley Chasm or Simpsons Gap on Monday evening, or who may know his whereabouts, to make contact.
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
I worked in childcare, and these are the red flags parents can spot
I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack.
