PML-N, PPP lock horns over Indus canals
A fresh war of words erupted between Punjab and Sindh ministers on Saturday, as tensions simmered over the federal government's controversial canals project - just a day after PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari denounced the scheme as "unilateral".
Speaking to the media in Lahore, Punjab Information Minister Azma Bukhari hit back at Bilawal, saying his rally rhetoric offered no real solution.
"If he can make time to huddle with the federal government over provincial budgets," she quipped, "then he should also roll up his sleeves to address the canal issue."
Doubling down, Bukhari pointed out that the project had already crossed the red tape with presidential consent.
"It is documented, it is signed," she stressed, making it clear that the groundwork had official backing.
Accusing the PPP of playing politics with water, she called the move "unfortunate" and questioned Bilawal's choice of stage.
"Bilawal Bhutto shouldn't be speaking about water solutions while standing at rallies," she said. "Before making accusations, check the facts. This is canal politics," she asserted.
Sindh ministers
Meanwhile, Sindh Irrigation Minister Jam Khan Shoro responded strongly to Bukhari's remarks regarding the controversial canal projects.
Speaking to reporters in Karachi, Shoro said, "We are not politicising the issue. The people of Sindh and the PPP have one position: No to the controversial canals. Sindh's people are protesting, and you call it politics?"
He said Bilawal had warned the federal government that if the decision was not reversed, PPP would stand with the people, not with Shehbaz Sharif.
"Azma Bukhari doesn't even understand the ABC of the water issue. Instead of defending the project, the PML-N should bury it permanently," he said.
Shoro said that Sindh was facing acute water shortages, not just for agriculture, but also for drinking water. "Our lands are barren, our farmers worried, and our livestock thirsty."
He urged PM Shehbaz Sharif to reject the controversial canal projects outright and called for an immediate meeting of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) to permanently shelve the plan.
"If the PM does not end this project, the PPP will go to any extent with the people of Sindh to stop it. The entire irrigation system of Sindh depends on the Indus River," he said.
Similarly, reacting to the Punjab minister's remarks, Sindh Senior Minister for Information, Transport and Mass Transit Sharjeel Inam Memon questioned her understanding of the president's constitutional powers.
"Have you [Bokhari] read the Constitution? Do you know how to read the Constitution?" Memon said sharply during a media talk in Karachi.
He further questioned where it was stated in the Constitution that the president had the authority to approve such development projects.
"If the federal government has sent it to the president for approval, then that was an incompetent step," he added.
"It is not his mandate, we are tired of telling you this a 100 times," Memon said, stressing that the federal government had not followed the correct procedural route.
"If you have the documents of approval, then you should be able to bring the fabricated minutes of the meeting," he continued.
Addressing the perception that the PPP had not publicly stated its intention to leave the coalition government if its concerns were not addressed, Memon responded, "When did we say we would announce it on somebody's behest?"
"He [Bilawal] said we are with the people, we are not with the Shehbaz government," Memon said, quoting the PPP chairman.
The Green Pakistan Initiative, with an estimated cost of $3.3 billion, aims to construct six canals to irrigate 1.2 million acres of arid land in southern Punjab. However, the project has met growing resistance - first from Sindhi nationalist groups and now from the PPP itself.
Five of the canals are planned on the Indus River, while the sixth will be built along the Sutlej River, intended to supply around 4,120 cusecs of water to the Cholistan desert region in Punjab.
'Chaos party'
During her talk in Lahore, Bukhari also took a swipe at political opponents, especially PTI, saying, "The YouTubers and the chaos party can't stomach Pakistan's relief. Those who had ties with IPPs and power companies are now making noise."
She added that Punjab's government was grateful to PM Shehbaz for containing the sharp rise in electricity bills.
"The season of good news has begun, and those who once wrote letters to the IMF are the ones disturbed by this progress," Bukhari said in a veiled reference to PTI.
She accused past PTI policies of attempting to derail the IMF programme and "turn the country into Sri Lanka," a plan she said Shehbaz Sharif successfully foiled.
Turning her guns towards Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), Bukhari said, "K-P's massive corruption is no secret, even their own leaders are telling the stories. The YouTubers and media can't ignore the circus of 'chor chor'".
She questioned CM K-P Ali Amin Gandapur's declaration of Rs100 million income while claiming he spent Rs750 million on the party. "Were those illegal funds used for party work?" she asked.
She alleged Rs8.66 billion worth of damage to forests in Chitral, and said KP lacked schools and medicines. "Records show the K-P health department purchased Rs20.8 million worth of gloves, yet they're missing from hospitals. Rs130 million was spent by district health hospitals with no record of it," she said.
She also accused the K-P government of massive corruption in wheat procurement and alleged that Rs2 billion were disbursed to party workers under the guise of mosque funds.
She claimed that Gandapur's position as CM is in danger as "his own party calls him corrupt".
She rejected the notion that a party's internal committee could audit misuse of public funds, stressing only NAB or relevant authorities can do so. "Their own leaders, including Swati, Junaid Akbar and Asad Qaiser, are talking about each other's corruption. Who will answer for it?" she asked.
Bukhari demanded the federal government account for Rs600 billion meant for law and order. "There's no CTD in K-P. Don't issue threatswe're not afraid. First show where the money went before talking NFC," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'No political space in sight for PTI'
Political space for opposition parties, particularly the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), may have further shrunk after the establishment bolstered its ties with the West, as analysts suggest that the beleaguered party's chances of making a political comeback during the current regime were virtually nonexistent. However, they caution that the budding relationship with the Trump administration could be a volatile, double-edged sword for the powers that be. Former Punjab caretaker chief minister and senior political analyst Hasan Askari said that PTI has no political future under the current dispensation, which he described as being firmly controlled by a powerful establishment. According to him, the establishment has only grown stronger in the wake of two mini-wars in the region. 'This setup will not cede any space to PTI, as it would mark the beginning of their own undoing. They cannot afford for PTI to do politicking on the streets. As long as they have power, they will keep Imran behind bars,' Askari said. He further noted that no government since Benazir Bhutto's first stint in power had ceded this much ground to the military as the current one has. Askari said that the current setup, which derives its strength "from the very top," could last for a considerable period. However, when it falls, 'it will go down like a house of cards'. He added that PTI will likely outlive this regime and will 'rise from the ruins' the moment it is granted political space. Regarding Pakistan's relations with the US, he said that Islamabad's 'relations with America will last for as long as their interests and ours are aligned'. Pakistan may benefit in the short term, he added, but this relationship is contextual. 'Tomorrow, when our utility diminishes, so will the warmth in the relationship.' Another political analyst, Rasool Bakhsh Rais, said that while PTI may currently be in a bind, it was rapidly regaining ground. 'PML-N and PPP are steadily losing what little public legitimacy they had,' he said. Rais pointed to the Supreme Court's recent decision to hand over PTI's reserved seats to PML-N and PPP, saying it 'has exposed the underbelly of this hybrid-plus regime'. He said that the West has a long history of supporting dictatorships and autocratic regimes when it suits its interests. 'Even in our case, American support for the establishment is only delegitimising the political government. The system might have gained strength, but constitutionally it has become frail.' He added that PTI founder Imran Khan would not buckle under pressure and would stand his ground. 'Imran Khan is a beacon of hope for Pakistan's political system. His stand is in the interest of the country,' Rais said. He noted that while the current dispensation may ignore public perception for now, 'soon they will understand what the opinion of a common man is worth'. Another analyst, Salman Abid, agreed that cordial ties with the US come at a price. He described the US-Pakistan relationship as purely transactional. 'America has significant strategic interests in this region, and it sees Pakistan as crucial to achieving those goals,' he said, adding that this friendship would not come as a 'free lunch". Abid expressed concern that Pakistan's growing closeness with the US could distance it from its long-time ally, China. 'This system has no political weight, and it will continue to function only so long as it has wind in its sails,' he said. He warned that such power structures in Pakistan have a long history of failing spectacularly.
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Justice Salahuddin Panhwar steps down from bench in reserved seats case
Justice Salahuddin Panhwar recused himself on Friday from the bench hearing the reserved seats case. An 11-member constitiutional bench (CB) led by Justice Aminuddin Khan is currently hearing the case. In its short order on July 12, 2024, eight out of 13 judges concluded that 39 out of 80 MNAs on the list were elected candidates of the PTI, positioning it as the largest party in the National Assembly. However, the National Assembly has not yet implemented the ruling, and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has raised several objections. The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), and the ECP have submitted review petitions challenging the Supreme Court's July 12 decision from last year. The hearing was briefly adjourned for 10 minutes, but the bench has since resumed proceedings. The decision comes after objections were raised regarding his participation in the case. Justice Panhwar, part of an 11-member bench, opted to step down from the case on the grounds of preserving the court's dignity. In his remarks, he mentioned that his past association with the case's key players, including lawyers Faisal Siddiqui and Salman Akram Raja, led to the objections. He emphasised that his recusal was necessary to protect the institution's integrity. But, he clarified, that it should not be seen as an admission of the objections' validity. The decision was met with mixed reactions in the courtroom. Advocate Hamid Khan lauded Justice Panhwar's step, but Justice Aminuddin Khan said that the situation stemmed from the conduct of the involved parties. Justice Jamal Mandokhail echoed this sentiment, highlighting that despite the controversy, Justice Panhwar was given a chance to speak even when two lawyers from the same party are generally not allowed to argue the case. On Thursday, the CB turned down the request by one of PTI's counsels to defer the hearing of the reserved seats case till August, noting that the bench intended to hear the case daily. Earlier, PTI's counsel advocate Salman Akram Raja resumed his arguments in support of the July 12, 2024, majority order of a full SC bench. He referred to the SC judgment in the Sindh High Court Bar case, which, he said, serves as an example of how the SC can intervene for the restoration of the Constitution. Read: CB refuses to adjourn reserved seats case till Aug "After the emergency imposed on November 3, 2007, several actions were taken, but the Supreme Court declared that emergency unconstitutional, and all actions taken in its aftermath were also annulled." "The court had ruled that the judges appointed after the emergency held no legitimate status, and their removal of sitting judges was also declared unlawful; the removed judges were reinstated." During the hearing, Raja also referred to the allocation of reserved seats in the general elections of 2013, 2018 and 2024. He stated that the record shows that in previous elections, the political party that won general seats received reserved seats in roughly the same proportion. "However, the situation is different in the recent general elections. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a party [PTI] that secured 83% of the general seats was allotted zero reserved seats," he said. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail asked Raja as to how the apex court can stop any politician from contesting elections independently. "Suppose Imran Khan, Nawaz Sharif, Asif Zardari, Bilawal Bhutto, or Maulana Fazlur Rehman, being major party leaders, decide to contest independently, how can we prevent them?" he asked. Justice Musarrat Hilali stated that losing an election symbol does not mean the political party's registration is canceled. PTI candidates joined the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), but the SIC was not present in parliament, she said. Justice Mandokhail noted that Raja cited the SHC Bar Association case, but in that case, the facts were undisputed. Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi commented that in the 1985 non-party based elections, a political party called itself the 'Awam Dost' party. "Did you introduce any such term [for the PTI for the polls]?" asked Justice Rizvi. The lawyer responded that the PTI introduced the term "Kaptaan ka Sipahi". Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar observed that there seemed to be a lack of coordination within the PTI. Justice Mandokhail added that it appeared that the 39 members of the Assembly who openly declared their affiliation with the PTI were more sensible." "Either they were more sensible or they had a higher tolerance for pressure," added Justice Hilali. Recalling past political events, SIC's counsel Hamid Khan said the decision in the PTI intra-party election case was announced on the very last day for the allotment of election symbols. "It was a Saturday, a holiday, but the case was heard until 11pm that night. Our candidates kept waiting, wondering what the verdict would be. At midnight, our election symbol was taken away from us, and the deadline for symbol allotment passed. After that, where did we stand? He said the ECP gave more time to the ANP even though the ANP had not even held any elections "We had conducted elections, but the ECP did not accept them. We urged it to fine us, if needed, but it stripped us of our election symbol. On the same day, the ANP and the PTI were treated differently," he said. Justice Mazhar responded that the ANP was being given an opportunity for the first time, while the PTI had already been given several years. "Your party constitution was made more foolproof; we can even say it's better than others," he noted Hamid Khan remarked that it seemed the PTI was punished for drafting a better constitution. The CB also dismissed Hamid Khan's request to defer the case till August. The court will resume hearing at 9.30am today. On January 13, 2024, a three-member SC bench upheld the ECP's December 22, 2023, order declaring the PTI's intra-party polls null and void. As a consequence of the SC verdict and its misinterpretation by the ECP, the PTI candidates had to contest the February 8, 2024, general elections as independents. Eighty such independent candidates reached the National Assembly and later joined the SIC in an apparent bid to claim reserved seats for women and minorities. The ECP, however, refused to allocate the seats to the party, a decision that the SIC challenged in SC.
Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
K-P CM warns Centre of tit-for-tat response
Listen to article Rawalpindi Central Jail authorities on Thursday once again refused to allow key PTI leaders including Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and veteran politician Makhdoom Javed Hashmi to meet PTI founder Imran Khan, who is detained at the prison facility. Talking to the media later, Gandapur expressed his anger at the "unjustified restrictions" imposed on the executive head of a province and vowed to pay the PML-N led federal government in the same coin. Hashmi, who also remained a part of the PTI from 2012 to 2014, also condemned the move. The K-P chief minister stated that they had to meet the former prime minister in order to brief him on the K-P budget but the authorities did not allow this to happen. "The K-P budget approval process has not yet been completed and the budget session is ongoing," he added. Cracks in the former ruling party became more pronounced after the K-P Assembly on Tuesday approved the provincial budget. Some PTI leaders expressed amazement at the provincial government's "haste" with Imran's sisters claiming that the PTI founder was not consulted ahead of the approval. Gandapur said he could respond to refusal by authorities to let them meet their incarcerated leader by imposing restrictions on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during his visit to the K-P. The PTI has been in power in the K-P since 2013. He said Imran, the PTI patron-in-chief, was to give his input before the budget was passed but he, the K-P chief minister, was prevented from meeting him. He said law or the Constitution are being violated; institutions are not functioning and even the judiciary is not independent. "We were told by jail authorities that we could not meet Imran as a precautionary measure, as if we are terrorists. A meeting with the party founder will eventually happen, but the current method is wrong," he said. He said the party has filed a civil miscellaneous application (CMA) in the Supreme Court as well and asked as to what action has been taken on the letters that Imran Khan wrote to the chief justice of Pakistan, Gandapur also asked Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz as to how much authority does the Punjab Home Department actually have in allowing and disallowing a meeting between Imran Khan and his party leaders. He said as a chief minister, it is his right to visit any jail and meet with any prisoner. Makhdoom Javed Hashmi also spoke on the occasion, stating that no one could implement "the minus-Imran formula". He said he had come to Adiala Jail to express solidarity with the PTI founder. Hashmi said he had distanced himself from Imran when he had got closer to the establishment. "Imran does not want freedom, he only demands rule of law," he added.
