'No political space in sight for PTI'
Political space for opposition parties, particularly the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), may have further shrunk after the establishment bolstered its ties with the West, as analysts suggest that the beleaguered party's chances of making a political comeback during the current regime were virtually nonexistent.
However, they caution that the budding relationship with the Trump administration could be a volatile, double-edged sword for the powers that be.
Former Punjab caretaker chief minister and senior political analyst Hasan Askari said that PTI has no political future under the current dispensation, which he described as being firmly controlled by a powerful establishment.
According to him, the establishment has only grown stronger in the wake of two mini-wars in the region.
'This setup will not cede any space to PTI, as it would mark the beginning of their own undoing. They cannot afford for PTI to do politicking on the streets. As long as they have power, they will keep Imran behind bars,' Askari said.
He further noted that no government since Benazir Bhutto's first stint in power had ceded this much ground to the military as the current one has.
Askari said that the current setup, which derives its strength "from the very top," could last for a considerable period. However, when it falls, 'it will go down like a house of cards'. He added that PTI will likely outlive this regime and will 'rise from the ruins' the moment it is granted political space.
Regarding Pakistan's relations with the US, he said that Islamabad's 'relations with America will last for as long as their interests and ours are aligned'. Pakistan may benefit in the short term, he added, but this relationship is contextual. 'Tomorrow, when our utility diminishes, so will the warmth in the relationship.'
Another political analyst, Rasool Bakhsh Rais, said that while PTI may currently be in a bind, it was rapidly regaining ground. 'PML-N and PPP are steadily losing what little public legitimacy they had,' he said.
Rais pointed to the Supreme Court's recent decision to hand over PTI's reserved seats to PML-N and PPP, saying it 'has exposed the underbelly of this hybrid-plus regime'.
He said that the West has a long history of supporting dictatorships and autocratic regimes when it suits its interests. 'Even in our case, American support for the establishment is only delegitimising the political government. The system might have gained strength, but constitutionally it has become frail.'
He added that PTI founder Imran Khan would not buckle under pressure and would stand his ground. 'Imran Khan is a beacon of hope for Pakistan's political system. His stand is in the interest of the country,' Rais said.
He noted that while the current dispensation may ignore public perception for now, 'soon they will understand what the opinion of a common man is worth'.
Another analyst, Salman Abid, agreed that cordial ties with the US come at a price. He described the US-Pakistan relationship as purely transactional.
'America has significant strategic interests in this region, and it sees Pakistan as crucial to achieving those goals,' he said, adding that this friendship would not come as a 'free lunch".
Abid expressed concern that Pakistan's growing closeness with the US could distance it from its long-time ally, China. 'This system has no political weight, and it will continue to function only so long as it has wind in its sails,' he said.
He warned that such power structures in Pakistan have a long history of failing spectacularly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
'No political space in sight for PTI'
Political space for opposition parties, particularly the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), may have further shrunk after the establishment bolstered its ties with the West, as analysts suggest that the beleaguered party's chances of making a political comeback during the current regime were virtually nonexistent. However, they caution that the budding relationship with the Trump administration could be a volatile, double-edged sword for the powers that be. Former Punjab caretaker chief minister and senior political analyst Hasan Askari said that PTI has no political future under the current dispensation, which he described as being firmly controlled by a powerful establishment. According to him, the establishment has only grown stronger in the wake of two mini-wars in the region. 'This setup will not cede any space to PTI, as it would mark the beginning of their own undoing. They cannot afford for PTI to do politicking on the streets. As long as they have power, they will keep Imran behind bars,' Askari said. He further noted that no government since Benazir Bhutto's first stint in power had ceded this much ground to the military as the current one has. Askari said that the current setup, which derives its strength "from the very top," could last for a considerable period. However, when it falls, 'it will go down like a house of cards'. He added that PTI will likely outlive this regime and will 'rise from the ruins' the moment it is granted political space. Regarding Pakistan's relations with the US, he said that Islamabad's 'relations with America will last for as long as their interests and ours are aligned'. Pakistan may benefit in the short term, he added, but this relationship is contextual. 'Tomorrow, when our utility diminishes, so will the warmth in the relationship.' Another political analyst, Rasool Bakhsh Rais, said that while PTI may currently be in a bind, it was rapidly regaining ground. 'PML-N and PPP are steadily losing what little public legitimacy they had,' he said. Rais pointed to the Supreme Court's recent decision to hand over PTI's reserved seats to PML-N and PPP, saying it 'has exposed the underbelly of this hybrid-plus regime'. He said that the West has a long history of supporting dictatorships and autocratic regimes when it suits its interests. 'Even in our case, American support for the establishment is only delegitimising the political government. The system might have gained strength, but constitutionally it has become frail.' He added that PTI founder Imran Khan would not buckle under pressure and would stand his ground. 'Imran Khan is a beacon of hope for Pakistan's political system. His stand is in the interest of the country,' Rais said. He noted that while the current dispensation may ignore public perception for now, 'soon they will understand what the opinion of a common man is worth'. Another analyst, Salman Abid, agreed that cordial ties with the US come at a price. He described the US-Pakistan relationship as purely transactional. 'America has significant strategic interests in this region, and it sees Pakistan as crucial to achieving those goals,' he said, adding that this friendship would not come as a 'free lunch". Abid expressed concern that Pakistan's growing closeness with the US could distance it from its long-time ally, China. 'This system has no political weight, and it will continue to function only so long as it has wind in its sails,' he said. He warned that such power structures in Pakistan have a long history of failing spectacularly.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Lessons for India, Israel and Pakistan
Listen to article Should India draw any lessons from the latest fiasco that an arrogant Israel suffered? Technological superiority can guarantee defence but it can hardly enforce total submission by a nation that prides itself on thousands of years of nationhood – also gelled by a common religious belief. Let us first glance through the Indian conduct post Pahalgam. It unilaterally suspended the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and dared to establish a neo-normal by sending drones and missiles deep inside Pakistan between May 7 and 10. Regardless of who did it and whether the entire episode was somehow multilaterally scripted, the Indian government's narrative evoked both negativity as well as skepticism at home and abroad. Officials mostly hid behind ambiguity, pretending innocence wrapped in a self-righteousness. Not many abroad bought the Indian projection of being a victim of Pakistan-driven terrorism after the May 7 strikes deep inside Pakistan. The consternation caused in Tehran by India's explicit support for Israel – no condemnation at all – its refrain from calling out Israel for its aggression, and its refusal to sign off the SCO statement during the conflict that called out Israel for the violence against Iran has had its impact too. India endured more isolation – if not insult – at the SCO Defence Ministers/Security Advisors huddle at Qingdao, China (June 26) when the joint communiqué made a reference to "militant activities in Balochistan", but made no mention of the April 22 attack in Kashmir. In protest, India refused to endorse the statement, accusing it of disproportionately highlighting Balochistan-related terrorism while downplaying or ignoring attacks affecting India - a stance seen as favouring Pakistan. The toll such self-serving posturing – during the Iran-Israel conflict and at the SCO security officials conference – took became evident in a statement by the Iranian Embassy in New Delhi; it thanked "all honourable people and political parties of India" for standing by Iran. Surprisingly, the only glaring omission from this was the Indian government – no mention of it at all – an expression presumably of the Iranian displeasure over the duplicitous attitude of India, a non-aligned country that touts democratic credentials. More similar setbacks await Indian diplomacy in coming weeks and months unless the Modi cohorts enforce a review of the country's policies. In contrast, the Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan, Reza Amiri Moghaddam, expressed deep gratitude to the people and government of Pakistan, saying, "The Iranian nation will never forget the brotherly support extended by the Pakistani people and the government." This duplicity is not lost on China or Russia either – both of whom seem to be reconnecting with Iran, stand firm with Pakistan and subtly snubbing India, albeit in a diplomatic offensive. These countries also watch as India now has put Bangladesh on notice for renegotiating the Ganga Waters Treaty (GWT) that had been signed on December 12, 1996. India, according to an NDTV report, has conveyed to Dhaka its desire for a new 10-15 year duration treaty on the pretext that it requires more water to meet its developmental needs – as if there is no such need for the lower riparian Bangladesh. "Before Pahalgam, we were inclined to extend the treaty for another 30 years, but the situation changed drastically afterward," the report quoted a Ministry of External Affairs official as saying. Again a very self-serving approach – premised in the Pahalgam incident – by the upper riparian India, unlike China which as the upper riparian for India always insists on dialogue and warns against actions that may harm the neighbour. As for Israel, it overlooked the fact that Iran was well-prepared for dealing with the Israeli assault because of the perennial state-of-conflict and the shadow wars through proxies between the two states. The carte-blanche for the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza – that Israel got from the US and key NATO allies after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack – apparently obscured the Israeli assessment of the Iranian missile capacity. A unified and unflinching Tehran – the clergy led by the Ayatollah, the IRGC and the Iranian People at large – also surprised the cold-blooded, self-righteous Israeli warmongers. Israel had to eventually swallow the bitter pill i.e. acceptance of a face-saving ceasefire – as "commanded" by the US President. India had apparently taken cue from the Israeli high-handedness vis a vis the helpless Palestinians and the Lebanese when it decided to launch trans-boundary attacks on Pakistan. Both seemed to over-rely on their technological prowess – assuming the adversary would melt away once subjected to kinetic attacks. Both India and Israel simply underestimated the Iranian and the Pakistani national resolve. They also forgot one critical element: technological superiority can inflict damage on the rivals but is no guarantee for defeating the national resolve – more so in the case of Iran which boasts history and culture spanned over thousands of years. Common religious faith of the majority – the Shia school of thought – only further solidified the cultural pride in the face of the Israeli aggression. Armed with nuclear weapons and fully backed by the time-trusted friend China, Pakistan too blunted the Indian belligerence and the diplomatic/communications offensive. Israeli and Indian aggressive posturing has enforced fresh strategic realignment. Finally, the unravelling of a massive Mossad-led espionage network in Tehran and elsewhere in the country must raise alarm in Pakistan too. Such networks are the key to kinetic and cyber invasions which can compromise national security. And hence the need for urgent closer cooperation among the SCO nations to guard against such hazards.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Netanyahu denies military ordered troops to fire on Gaza aid seekers
Netanyahu rejects report claiming Israeli commanders ordered troops to fire at Palestinians seeking aid in Listen to article Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday rejected a report that the country's military commanders ordered their soldiers to fire at Palestinians seeking humanitarian aid in Gaza. Left-leaning daily Haaretz earlier quoted unnamed soldiers as saying commanders ordered troops to shoot at crowds near aid distribution centres to disperse them even when they posed no threat. The allegations followed repeated reports by eyewitnesses and local authorities over recent weeks of deadly incidents around aid distribution centres in the territory, where Israeli forces are battling Hamas. Haaretz said the military advocate general, the force's top legal authority, had instructed the force to investigate 'suspected war crimes' at aid sites. When asked by AFP, the Israeli military declined to comment on that particular claim Netanyahu said in a joint statement with Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israel 'absolutely rejects the contemptible blood libels' and 'malicious falsehoods' in the Haaretz article. The military said in a separate statement that it 'did not instruct the forces to deliberately shoot at civilians, including those approaching the distribution centres'. It added that Israeli military 'directives prohibit deliberate attacks on civilians.' After more than 20 months of devastating conflict, rights groups say Gaza's population of more than two million faces famine-like conditions. The health ministry in Hamas-ruled Gaza says more than 500 people have been killed near aid centres since late May, when a new US- and Israeli-backed foundation began distributing aid. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation denies that deadly incidents have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points. Netanyahu and Katz added in their statement: 'The soldiers of the (Israeli military) receive clear orders to avoid harming innocents – and operate accordingly.'
