Uncovered Long-Hidden U.S. Resource Reserve In Resurfaced Presentation from Former White House Advisor That Could Quietly Reshape Trump's Economic Playbook
Rickards, a veteran advisor to the CIA and Treasury Department, points to a massive store of untapped wealth resting beneath federally owned land—assets that have remained restricted for decades, but may now be on the verge of being unlocked.
'This land… it's held on deposit across all 50 states,' Rickards explains. '$516 billion in the Salton Sea area of California… $3.1 trillion in Nome, Alaska. And $7.35 trillion in Midland, Texas…'
The Untapped Engine of U.S. Growth
According to the presentation, these lands contain key minerals and raw materials critical to the development of next-generation technology, infrastructure, and energy systems. And while their value has steadily grown, access has remained sealed off—until now.
'The nature of this 'trust' – as I call it – is such that politicians haven't been able to raid it… which has allowed it to grow untouched… for decades' .
'It's not some kind of government program like those COVID relief checks,' Rickards says. 'But it is a chance for the average American to become richer than they ever imagined'.
Could This Be the Missing Piece in Trump's Fiscal Agenda?
Although President Trump has not publicly linked these federal lands to his economic renewal efforts, Rickards believes they align perfectly with the spirit of the administration's goals: reduce dependence on foreign nations, revive American industry, and rebuild with domestic resources.
'Trump is re-opening our mineral-rich Federal Lands. And fast-tracking companies that could recover trillions of dollars' worth of resources, right here in America' .
'We have everything we need right under our feet… and now we may finally have the clearance to access it' .
A Century-Old Resource, a 21st Century Solution
Many of the resource zones outlined in the presentation have been trapped in bureaucratic limbo for decades: 'Resolution Copper Mine… sitting for 29 years'
'Pebble Mine… mothballed since 1990
'Thacker Pass Lithium Mine… stalled since 1978'
Rickards contends that unlocking even a fraction of these projects could ease pressure on taxpayers and deliver the material resources needed for infrastructure, defense, and energy independence.
'We know exactly where these minerals are. We know they're worth trillions of dollars. And now—for the first time in half a century—we can go get them' .
'The Asset Is Already Ours'
Unlike stimulus checks or bond-funded bailouts, Rickards emphasizes that this is not about redistribution—but reclamation.
'It's not earmarked for any specific individual,' he notes. 'I'm just trying to use terminology that will make the most sense to viewers'.
'This is different. Very different'.
With major fiscal battles looming in Congress, the presentation offers a new way of thinking about national wealth—not as something to borrow, but something to unearth.
About Jim Rickards
Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the White House, CIA, Pentagon, and U.S. Treasury. He helped craft the Petrodollar Accord, has counseled top-level officials through multiple global financial threats, and is the New York Times bestselling author of seven books. He currently provides strategic insight on economic preparedness and national resilience.
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump got $170 billion for immigration. Now he has to enact it.
And as illegal border crossings decline, ICE must look within the country to reach its arrest quota — a goal of 3,000 daily apprehensions in recent weeks. But an increase in arrests in the months ahead doesn't automatically result in more deportations, as it will take time for the administration to build out a 'logistical pipeline all over the country,' said Ken Cuccinelli, who served as deputy secretary of Homeland Security during Trump's first term. 'It's a whole lot of little contracts with state and local officials. It's building more facilities. It's reopening the ones they already have. And all you need is one choke point in the logistics — every convoy is as fast as the slowest ship,' Cuccinelli said. 'You've got to have the planes, the vehicles, the manpower, the security, in all the right places.' The domestic policy bill also includes over $1 billion for the immigration court system to hire more judges and staff, but it's unclear how quickly the administration can build out the courts, and whether it can move at a rate that can keep up with an increased pace of ICE arrests — or if the effort will ultimately result in longer detention time. The Trump administration's efforts to work around the immigration courts have been met with legal challenges. And the case backlog is substantial: roughly 700 immigration judges are coping with a 3.5 million case pile-up. The funding for immigration judges is 'important as well, because the system is backlogged,' said Michael Hough, director of federal relations at NumbersUSA, a group that works to reduce both legal and illegal immigration. 'Just because you detain these people, especially people who have been here for a while, they need hearings — you've got to get them in front of an immigration judge.' While the White House celebrates the bill's passage, political pressure is already growing for congressional Republicans to enact new policy. Immigration hawks say the money is crucial, but the party also has to look to legislation that will make permanent changes to the immigration system — such as reviving talks around border security and asylum law from the party's legislation from last year, known as H.R.2. 'There are other legislative changes that Republicans campaigned on, and that we're going to continue to be looking to them to move things forward and not just sit on their hands now that they've passed the Big Beautiful Bill Act,' said a person close to the Trump administration, granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'No, this is a budget reconciliation bill … it's infused a ton of money into this effort, but there's still some policy changes that the administration has talked about and wants to pursue.'
Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump To Issue Major Tariff Update
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump said he has signed letters to 12 countries, outlining the various tariff levels they will face on goods they export to the United States. The president made the remarks to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey on Friday night. He declined to identify the countries, but said it would be made public on Monday. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably 12," Trump said. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs and somewhat different statements." File photo: Donald Trump greets guests on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. File photo: Donald Trump greets guests on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, It Matters Trump in April announced a 10-percent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, including some as high as 50 percent. But, after the announcement prompted a market meltdown, the president hit pause for 90 days to allow time for negotiations with individual counties, although high taxes were left in place on imports from China. Trump had initially promised to make "90 deals in 90 days," but few agreements have been finalized with just days until the pause ends on July 9. The president said last week that he was not planning to extend the 90-day pause and his administration would be notifying counties about the tariffs that will take effect unless deals are in place with the U.S. What To Know Asked if he may reach a deal with the European Union, Trump spoke about the difficulty of negotiating the deals. "I think the letters are better for us; I've said that all along," he said. "Because you have hundreds of countries, you know, you have over 200 countries and you can't sit down with 200 countries. I think the letters are better." Trump earlier on Friday told reporters at Joint Base Andrews in Prince George's County, Maryland, that some of the tariffs could be as high as 70 percent. "They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70 percent tariffs to 10 and 20 percent tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow," Trump said. "We've done the final form, and it's basically going to explain what the countries are going to be paying in tariffs." What People Are Saying Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an appearance on CNBC on Thursday that more deals could be struck before the July 9 deadline: "Of course, everyone waits till the last minute. They think that they can get the best deal. And as I've warned when I've done other media, these countries should be careful because their rate could boomerang back to their April 2 rate." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said during a news conference on Thursday: "Indeed what we are aiming at is an agreement in principle, because [with] such a volume, in 90 days, an agreement in detail, it's impossible … That is also what the U.K. did." What Happens Next Trump has said the tariffs are set to go into effect on August 1. He did not say whether any other trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. "The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.' ___ Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Seung Min Kim, The Associated Press
