‘Down the Tubes': Trump rages against MSNBC over tariff criticism
US president Donald Trump lashed out at MSNBC on Friday after watching a segment that questioned the effectiveness of his global tariff plan. Trump accused the network of committing a 'major campaign violation' and acting as a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The outburst, shared on his Truth Social account, targeted host Stephanie Ruhle and threatened financial scrutiny for MSNBC's parent company, Comcast.
Trump called Ruhle 'highly neurotic' and claimed she was spreading 'lies' about tariffs. Ruhle, NBC's senior business analyst, had said that Trump may soon walk back the tariffs due to growing signs of economic trouble.
Trump further accused MSNBC of being a political tool of the Democratic Party and suggested that it should face tax penalties.
He also aimed at Comcast CEO Brian Roberts, saying the media group should be 'forced to tell the truth.'
At the centre of the criticism was Ruhle's remark that Trump's tariff strategy was causing fear among business leaders and port operators. She warned that unless reversed, the plan could trigger a 'Covid-like supply chain crisis' within a week.
The president, however, insists that his tariffs would bring economic victory, claim that many economists and analysts dispute. 'We're going to make a fortune with tariffs, only smart people understand that, and Stephanie was never known as a 'High IQ' person,' he wrote.
Trump also claimed the network's ratings were 'down the tubes' and accused them of lying to avoid giving him credit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
36 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Indians have high confidence in Trump, US image declines globally: Pew study
Indians have higher confidence in United States President Donald Trump than those in several other countries surveyed by the Pew Research Centre, the think tank said in its findings published on Wednesday. This came even as favourable views about the US declined in 15 of the 24 countries where the survey was conducted. There was no significant change in the views about the US in six countries including India, the survey found. The views about the US had become more favourable in three countries: Israel, Nigeria and Turkey. Among the surveyed countries, the median level of confidence in Trump as a world leader was 34% and no confidence was 62%. However, in India, 52% of the respondents expressed confidence in Trump and 23% said that they were not confident, the Washington-based think tank found. Israel, Nigeria, Hungary and Kenya were the other countries where Trump enjoyed high confidence. In India, 54% of the Hindu respondents said that they were confident about Trump, as compared to 39% Muslims. India, Kenya and Nigeria were the only countries where at least half of the adult respondents said that they found Trump to be honest. Respondents in less than one-third of the surveyed countries said that 'honest' does not describe the US president. A median of 80% respondents – and majorities in almost every country surveyed – perceived Trump to be 'arrogant'. A median of 65% respondents viewed him as 'dangerous'. Across a range of characteristics, including 'able to understand complex problems', 'strong leader', 'well-qualified to be president', 'diplomatic' and 'honest', men tended to have more positive views about Trump's leadership qualities than women. In India and five other countries, the confidence in Trump to do the right thing in world affairs was higher than that in his predecessor Joe Biden. The confidence in Trump to handle major global issues such as Russia's war on Ukraine and climate change was low in most polled countries. However, the trust among Indian respondents on such matters was higher than the global average. Forty-five percent of the Indian respondents said that they had confidence in Trump on the matter of US immigration policies. The Trump administration has tightened immigration regulations. One thousand and eighty Indians have been deported from the US since January, when Trump's second term in office began. Forty-five percent of the respondents from India also said that they were confident about Trump dealing with the Russia-Ukraine war, 41% about US-China relations, 50% on global economic problems, 42% on Israel's war on Gaza and Tel Aviv's tensions with other West Asian countries, and 53% when it comes to climate change. More than 28,300 respondents in 24 countries participated in the survey conducted between January 8 and April 26. Fieldwork in all countries except Indonesia began after Trump assumed office on January 20, the think tank said. The surveyed countries were: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Take it or leave it': Donald Trump may extend July 8 tariff deadline; going to send trade letters out soon
Donald Trump (AP) US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he's open to extending the July 8 deadline for trade talks before higher tariffs kick in, but added that an extension probably won't be "a necessity. " Speaking to reporters ahead of a performance at the Kennedy Center Trump said, "We're rocking in terms of deals. We're dealing with quite a few countries and they all want to make a deal with us." Despite being open to some flexibility, Trump stressed that he didn't see an extension would be "a necessity." Trump told the reporters that the discussions were ongoing with about 15 countries, including South Korea, Japan, and the European Union , according to Reuters report. "We're dealing with Japan. We're dealing with South Korea. We're dealing with a lot of them. We're dealing with about 15 countries. But as you know, we have about 150-plus, and you can't [make a deal with all of them]. So we're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries and telling them what the deal is." Trump further continued that the United States will soon send letters outlining final trade deal terms to dozens of countries. "At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out ... saying, 'This is the deal. You can take it, or you can leave it,'" Trump said. "So at a certain point we'll do that. We're not quite ready," he added. Currently, only one deal, with the United Kingdom has been finalised, while about 17 others are still under negotiation. A 90-day pause on Trump's sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs is set to expire on July 8, putting pressure on countries to reach agreements. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking to lawmakers, said the deadline could be extended for some nations. Bessent explained to the House Ways and Means Committee that, "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations." "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent added. Bessent's comments marked the first time a Trump administration official suggested there could be flexibility on the tariff pause deadline. Trump echoed this sentiment, saying, "They do want to negotiate." Earlier on Tuesday (local time), Trump has confirmed that a new trade deal with China is "done," pending final approval from both him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Under the agreement, the US will impose a 55% tariff on Chinese imports, while China will apply a 10% tariff on American goods. "We made a great deal with China. We're very happy with it," Trump told reporters at the Kennedy Center, further adding that, "We have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are, too." Trump revealed that China will supply the US with magnets and rare earth materials as part of the deal. In return, Chinese students will be allowed to continue studying at American universities—a reversal from Trump's earlier restrictions on their presence at US institutions. Trump posted on Truth Social, "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with president xi and me. full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!" "Adding to the China readout, President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade. This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!," Trump said in separate post. The backdrop to these developments is Trump's abrupt announcement on April 9 of a pause in his aggressive tariff plans, which had shocked global markets a week earlier when he unveiled sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on nearly all major trading partners. The move sent the S&P 500 Index tumbling over 12% in just four days, its worst drop since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Even US Treasury bonds were hit, with yields spiking and the dollar sinking. Markets only began to stabilise on April 9, when Trump unexpectedly paused the tariff rollout. Optimism returned in May as the administration scaled back aggressive tariff plans, especially against China. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
The tariff truce with China is live again. What it means for the Big Picture.
The latest trade 'deal" between the U.S. and China underscores two uncomfortable realities for the economy and markets: Tariffs aren't going away and uncertainty is here to stay. President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post that negotiators in London had reached an agreement to restore last month's trade cease-fire, unblocking exports of Chinese rare earths, pending final approval from himself and his counterpart, Xi Jinping. Indications from elsewhere pointed to less certainty. Beijing said the two sides 'agreed in principle" to a framework for implementing the consensus the two leaders discussed last week. Responding to questions in front of Congress about details for the latest framework, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he had just flown back at 4 a.m. and that 'We are in the midst of constructing it." That wasn't lost on those trying to assess what comes next for the U.S.-China tariffs and what the deal outline means for negotiations with other countries. Details of what exactly was agreed upon in London were still unclear. The Treasury and the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Citing people familiar with the matter, The Wall Street Journal reported that once both leaders have approved the deal, China will immediately grant export licenses for rare earths, such as those needed to make magnets used for autos and elsewhere in industry, but only for six months. The U.S. agreed to lift export controls on jet engines and ethane it implemented following the Geneva agreement, the newspaper said. Export controls—especially those by the U.S. in recent years to restrict China's access to critical technology and China's use of its dominance in critical mineral production and processing—have been tripwires in negotiations. 'If military or defense industrial end users are getting some licenses, this would indicate that Beijing is willing to give the Trump administration more time to consider even further rollbacks of U.S. export controls, including those implemented in the last few weeks of the Biden administration," says Paul Triolo, partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group. 'The Trump team could spin any pullback of some subset of these measures as part of a review of Biden era rules." But Beijing may be wary of signs the U.S. is willing to refrain from further export controls making concessions, given the 'frantic response" of U.S. officials seeking to restore the flow of rare earths, Triolo says. The back and forth with China reinforces the view that uncertainty over trade is unlikely to be resolved. It could reduce the U.S.'s leverage by making the government appear more in need of striking other accords. But analysts recommend mentally separating the China conversations, where export controls and other issues are front and center, from talks with other countries, where tariffs are a bigger focus. Another differentiation: Other countries don't have the same leverage to stand their ground as China. Henrietta Treyz, director of economic policy research at Veda Partners, expects a handful of 'deals," with China, because the U.S. needs critical minerals. She also sees a possibility of a phased-in deal with India, which would allow the U.S. to avoid raising tariffs on Indian goods to 26%, given that the country could be an important alternative to China. Tariffs would likely remain at 10%. Bessent told a House committee on Wednesday that the administration was working on agreements with 18 important trading partners and could possibly extend the July 9 deadline for deals 'to continue good faith negotiations." Treyz expects a baseline of tariffs to stay for most countries, even if there is progress in reducing sectoral tariffs—like those on aluminum and steel—as part of broader negotiations. Other industries could see higher levies at any time, she says, as the administration targets areas such as pharmaceuticals, aircraft, and semiconductors. Her forecast is for 'small agreements, continued tariffs and more uncertainty going forward." She expects about 150 countries, representing half a trillion dollars worth of imports to the U.S., to get notices that set a tariff rate of 10% to 25%. About 45 other countries representing $2.5 trillion of U.S. imports could see their current 10% tariff rate extended under agreements 'in principle" as negotiations continue. That doesn't mean countries can relax. If the administration feels trading partners haven't made enough concessions by the July 9 deadline, officials could 'send a message by imposing tariffs on a significant trading partner to prove the tariff threat is credible and gain leverage in negotiations moving forward," says Dan McCarthy, a former official in the office of the U.S. Trade Representative who now runs McCarthy Consulting. Which major trading partner could end up in that spot isn't clear. Write to Reshma Kapadia at
