logo
Moms Still Carry The Bulk Of Emotional Labor, Though It's Shifting

Moms Still Carry The Bulk Of Emotional Labor, Though It's Shifting

Yahoo6 days ago
We call it emotional labor, or invisible labor. It's all those little tasks you do that nobody can see, like figuring out what's for supper and whether the ingredients are in the house or need to be picked up, and remembering that your son needs his gym bag for school on Tuesdays.
When you do it at work, your boss calls it by names like 'taking initiative' and 'being on top of things,' and in good workplaces, it's often a key to raises and promotions. In the home, most of it falls on moms, leaving them exhausted and often feeling unappreciated.
As researchers call attention to it, though, families are finally seeing some shifts.
The Gender Imbalance
We can see it anecdotally everywhere, in an overheard conversation between two members of school staff about not expecting a particular parent to know the drop-off system because he's the dad; in social media posts from frustrated men who can't figure out why their wives are too exhausted to focus on them after chasing toddlers and trying to keep the house running all day; from our worn-out fellow moms having crying jags over coffee because they feel like they've failed everyone at once.
As the saying goes, however, the plural of anecdote is not data, which is why researchers have dug in and found the actual data. One such recent study, released earlier this year, examined the emotional labor balance in 415 couples.
The study found that 63% of women report being the primary organizer of childcare and household duties, and over half of men agree that their wives do the bulk of this work. Notably, it found that women are (statistically speaking) frustrated by this arrangement, and men are generally satisfied with it.
This isn't a product of male breadwinners and stay-at-home moms, either — the study specifically examined how much of their employment time parents spent on household responsibilities. It concluded:
'[I]n our sample 41.10% of employed women report frequently thinking about the organization of household activities while at work, compared to only 9.58% of men. For childcare activities, 47.26% of women report doing so, versus 13.51% of men.'
The Numbers Vary, But The Trend Holds
Other studies and surveys produce slightly varying numbers, but a similar picture. One done by Motherly last year found 42% of moms reporting that they're responsible for the invisible labor of running a household. Another, published in the Archives of Women's Health last year, broke down household tasks into categories and found that women, on average, were responsible for about 72% of the cognitive labor in the household (and about 64% of all household physical labor).
Some of the variability may be attributable to specific methods (like breaking down the mental load into different tasks, or asking how much time one spends thinking about childcare tasks during employment hours). Still, there's also a generational difference beginning to show, and we can find some hope in it.
The Young Adults Are Alright (At Least, Some Of Them)
Here's where the stats seem to shift: that same Motherly survey that found 42% of moms handling all the invisible labor found that when you narrow the scope to moms under 30, 59% of them say they share labor equally with their partners.
The same survey also found that over 60% of women overall say they don't get a whole hour to themselves daily, but 53% of Gen Z moms say they get an hour or more.
Meanwhile, the study linked above in Archives of Women's Health found strong links between one person carrying the bulk of the emotional labor and that person suffering negative effects to 'relationship quality, depression, stress, burnout, and overall mental health,' clearly indicating that this shift is much-needed and long overdue.
Fifty-nine percent of couples sharing labor equally shouldn't be groundbreaking, but it's certainly a step in the right direction.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore
Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mother-in-Law Says Grandmas 'Can Do What They Want.' Mom Says She Won't Be Babysitting Anymore

After repeatedly ignoring basic rules with her newborn, one woman says her mother-in-law is no longer welcomed to babysitNEED TO KNOW A mom set clear rules for her newborn, but her mother-in-law had other ideas A simple request turned into a months-long power struggle Now, she's drawing a line, and not everyone in the family agreesA woman looks to the Reddit community for advice following a tense fallout with her mother-in-law over a series of ignored boundaries with her newborn daughter. In a heartfelt post titled 'AITA for not allowing my MIL to babysit anymore?' she shares the details of a situation that has left her feeling disrespected and unheard. 'From the moment my baby was born, I was very clear about the basic boundaries I had with the baby,' the new mom writes. Her requests were simple: no kissing, wash hands before touching the baby and ask before taking the baby from her arms. She describes how she and her husband were living with his mother shortly after their baby girl was born, hoping for some extra support. But instead of feeling supported, she says, her boundaries were crossed 'within the first week after the baby was born.' Despite clearly explaining her expectations, she says her mother-in-law refused to listen. 'She responded with 'I'm the grandma and grandmas can do what they want,' ' the mom reveals, adding that this attitude only continued. She notes that she and her husband both spoke to his mother multiple times, attempting to reinforce the importance of their rules. But instead of improving, the situation escalated as her MIL 'completely disregarded our rules and continued to [ignore] them.' In addition to boundary violations, she says her mother-in-law started referring to the baby in a way that made her deeply uncomfortable. 'She also began to call our child 'her child,' ' she writes, explaining that her MIL would reach for the baby, saying, 'Give me my child.' These moments were not taken lightly by the new mom, who says the behavior 'made me very uncomfortable.' She also shares that each time she and her husband addressed the issue, it 'would continue to become defensive and start big arguments.' Feeling overwhelmed and increasingly isolated, the couple decided to make a major change. 'After our baby turned 2 months old, we moved out of state due to my husband's military assignment,' she explains. But the space didn't end the tension. Soon after the move, her MIL began making plans to visit and babysit, which led to the mom putting her foot down. 'I've told her and my husband that I don't feel comfortable with her babysitting anymore,' she says. Her reasoning was clear: 'Until she can respect the rules and boundaries I've had in place and until she can respect me as a mother, I no longer want her in my home.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The Reddit post ends with a direct question to the community: 'So, AITA for saying these things?' And the comments come pouring in with strong support for her stance. One commenter writes, 'This is just a sign of much worse to come,' warning her not to let her mother-in-law take away precious memories from this time in her life. 'Don't let her rob you of what's supposed to be happy times that you'll never get back.' Another user echoes the sentiment and applauds her strength in taking a stand. 'Not overreacting,' they say. 'I think it's good you are setting these boundaries now.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

How We Avoided World War III
How We Avoided World War III

Bloomberg

time44 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

How We Avoided World War III

The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima 80 years ago this week is something to commemorate but not celebrate. It was also the beginning of a new era: the Atomic Age. Growing up in the latter stages of the Cold War, my generation didn't live with the sense of menace and the Bert the Turtle duck-and-cover drills baby boomers endured. But both cohorts were blessed by the absence of a large-scale war, conventional or nuclear, between the US and the Soviet Union. Which brings up an 80-year-old question: Did the development of atomic weapons keep the peace during the Cold War? And if so, what accounts for this paradoxical result? The simple answer is the unsatisfying one: It's complicated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store