
After 12-year wait, hundreds set to become primary teachers in UP
The case concerns the long-delayed recruitment of 29,334 assistant teachers for mathematics and science subjects, which began in July 2013. Although over 22,000 candidates were initially selected, the state government abruptly halted the process midway. Since then, hundreds of affected candidates have pursued legal recourse—first through the Allahabad high court and eventually the Supreme Court.
Now, more than 1,700 remaining vacancies under this recruitment drive are expected to be filled, according to officials from the state's basic education department.
Following a Supreme Court's directive on January 29, 2025, deputy secretary (basic education) Anand Kumar Singh issued instructions on July 19 to the director general (school education), Kanchan Verma, to proceed with the selection of eligible petitioning candidates in accordance with established norms.
A copy of the order, obtained by Hindustan Times, directs officials to complete the recruitment process as per the Supreme Court's ruling and within the stipulated timeline.
'In compliance with the Supreme Court's order, action will be taken to appoint candidates against the remaining vacancies under the 29,334 assistant teacher recruitment drive. The process has already begun,' confirmed Surendra Kumar Tiwari, secretary, Basic Education Council, Uttar Pradesh.
On January 29, the Supreme Court had directed the basic education department to appoint all candidates who had secured marks above the minimum cutoff and had filed petitions before December 31, 2019.
The recruitment process began on July 11, 2013. After seven rounds of counselling were completed by February 2015, an eighth round was held for candidates who had scored up to 82 marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test, with appointment letters issued in January and February 2016.
Later, in November 2016, a final opportunity was extended to candidates who had undergone counselling but missed joining earlier. However, the process was halted on March 23, 2017, following a change in government.
In response, the affected candidates approached the Allahabad high court, which ordered that the recruitment process be completed within two months. The state government filed a special appeal and a review petition in the Allahabad high court, but both were dismissed. When appointments still did not take place, candidates filed contempt petitions. Subsequently, in May 2019, the government filed a special appeal in the Supreme Court.
'I never lost hope'
Alok Chaudhary, 35, from Aligarh's Heerpur village is one of the many candidates who endured a long legal battle. Coming from a farming family, Alok completed his B Ed in 2011. At 23, he cleared the assistant teacher recruitment exam in 2013.
'However, what followed was a long and trying struggle,' he recalled. 'I had to take a loan just to fill in the application form. The prolonged litigation meant frequent travel from my village to Prayagraj and Delhi for court hearings. With no money, I often had to travel in the general compartment, but the hope never died,' he shared.
'I survived by working alongside my father on the farm. Without a job, marriage was out of the question. Now, after all these years, I am finally looking forward to starting the life I had dreamed of—beginning my career as a teacher and settling down,' he said.
'I can now support my family'
Manoj Kumar Patel, 37 from Jhunsi area of Prayagraj cleared the recruitment exam at 25. 'However, what followed was a gruelling struggle,' he recalled. 'I staged protests alongside fellow candidates, met officials and petitioned them repeatedly, consulted lawyers, and pursued the matter in court,' he shared. During this time, Manoj worked as an outsourced employee at a bank to make ends meet.
'Now, I am hopeful that I can finally support my family, live with dignity, and build a career doing what I've always dreamed of—teaching children and shaping their futures,' he said with a smile.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Parliament panel flags ‘slow pace' in setting up of skill labs in schools
A Parliamentary standing committee on Wednesday raised concerns over the 'slow pace' in setting up skill labs in schools under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship's (MSDE) Skill India programme, noting that only 858 labs in schools had been established till March 2025, short of the target to set up 1,200 labs by December 2024, despite all necessary equipment being delivered for 1,194 labs. Students of at a skill lab in a school in Ludhiana. (HT Photo) The Standing Committee on Labour, Textiles, and Skill Development, in its report on the MSDE's response to the 2024–25 budget recommendations, has asked the ministry to regularly follow up with relevant agencies to ensure the remaining 336 labs are set up within the next six months. The committee also asked the MSDE to ensure arrangements for delivery and setting up of equipment for six labs in Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh, which got delayed due to adverse weather conditions. Under its flagship scheme – SANKALP (Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion) – MSDE launched the project in June 2024 to establish two vocational skill labs each in 400 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) and 200 Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRSs) in line with the recommendations of National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. The aim of these labs is to equip students with practical, industry-relevant skills to support their school-to-work transition. A Request for Proposal (RFP) for the supply and installation of equipment was issued by the National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) on the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) portal in June 2024, and the contract was awarded in September 2024. The panel has also flagged concerns over the SANKALP scheme, citing underutilisation of funds, low placement rates, and slow progress on key targets. SANKALP, a World Bank-assisted, centrally sponsored scheme launched in 2018, is aimed at strengthening institutional mechanisms for skill development and enhancing access to quality training across the country. The parliamentary panel flagged key concerns in the implementation of the SANKALP scheme, noting that nearly ₹760 crore out of the ₹1,980 crore sanctioned remained unutilised, with states like Bihar and West Bengal using just 5% of their allocations, resulting in the completion of only 19 of the 65 projects under the national component. The panel also criticised the MSDE for poor placement outcomes – only 40% of trained candidates secured jobs, with some districts faring worse. It called for stronger industry linkages and more market-aligned training. The panel also expressed concern over the slow rollout of Skill India International Centres, with just 2 of the 30 centres announced in Budget 2023–24 made operational, and urged the ministry to fast-track the remaining centres within a set timeframe.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
WBJEE 2025 Results Live Updates: West Bengal Engineering results to be released soon, check details here
WBJEE result 2025 : After weeks of judicial wrangling and administrative recalibration, the West Bengal Joint Entrance Examination Board (WBJEEB) is set to declare the WBJEE 2025 results today, offering long-overdue clarity to over a lakh engineering and pharmacy aspirants. The decision follows a crucial intervention by the Supreme Court of India, which stayed the Calcutta High Court's contentious June 17 order blocking the state's revised Other Backward Classes (OBC) list. The HC ruling had stalled the merit-based ranking system, delaying the entire result and admission process. Judicial gridlock broken by Supreme Court On July 28, a bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria vacated the high court's stay, asserting that the order appeared 'prima facie erroneous.' The apex court's directive allowed the WBJEEB to proceed with the delayed publication of results while incorporating legally verified caste category data. In response, the board reopened its official portal from July 31 to August 2, giving candidates a final opportunity to upload or update their caste certificates, a step deemed essential for recalibrating category-based rankings. WBJEE 2025: A timeline of disruption and resumption Exam held: April 27, 2025 Preliminary answer key released: May 9 OMR response sheets displayed: May 23–25 Expected result date (original): June 6 Judicial stay: June 17 (Calcutta HC) SC intervention: July 28 Result declaration: August 7 Board confirms preparedness for result publication Chairperson Sonali Chakraborty Banerjee affirmed that the board has finished integrating the updated caste data and is fully prepared to release the rank list. 'We are confident that the verification of caste credentials has been completed. Results will be declared on August 7, as scheduled,' Banerjee told reporters. A senior official from the state higher education department added, 'The decision to hold back the results until the legal process concluded was intentional and strategic. We cannot afford to compromise the sanctity of the merit list in a court of law.' Political underpinnings of the delay The crisis began in May 2024, when the Calcutta High Court struck down the inclusion of 77 communities in the OBC list, citing procedural lapses and lack of empirical data. The West Bengal government attempted to correct the course with a revised list, only for it to be challenged and stayed once again. This second stay paralyzed multiple public service exams and halted WBJEE's merit list compilation. The Supreme Court's July verdict not only cleared the path for WBJEE results but also set a precedent for evaluating administrative discretion in state reservation policies. Results to be available online today Students can check their results today by visiting The official rank card will display both the General Merit Rank (GMR) and the Pharmacy Merit Rank (PMR), which are critical for the next stage of the admission process — centralised e-counselling. WBJEE result 2025: Steps to download Candidates can follow the steps mentioned here to download the WBJEE result 2025: Visit the official website Click on the link titled 'Download Rank Card for WBJEE 2025' on the homepage. Enter your application number, password/date of birth, and security pin to log in. View your WBJEE 2025 rank card displaying scores and merit ranks. Download the rank card in PDF format and take a printout for future use. WBJEE result: Counselling process to begin soon The counselling schedule will be issued shortly after the results go live. The process will include: Online registration Choice filling and locking Seat allotment based on rank, category, and preferences Document verification Reporting to the allotted institute The counselling will take into account updated reservation data, meaning candidates must ensure their documents match the latest category details submitted. Institutional readiness and admission window Colleges across West Bengal are expected to begin onboarding students from the last week of August. Institutions have been directed by the higher education department to keep flexible academic calendars this year, in light of the delay caused by the judicial intervention. Admissions will proceed on the basis of WBJEE ranks, institutional cut-offs, and availability of seats, with separate rounds for General, OBC, SC/ST, TFW (Tuition Fee Waiver), and PwD categories.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
SC junks Madras HC order banning use of CM name in schemes
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed the Madras High Court's interim order that restrained the Tamil Nadu government from using Chief Minister M K Stalin's name and image in the 'Ungaludan Stalin' welfare outreach programme. Terming the plea by AIADMK MP C Ve Shanmugam 'totally misconceived' and an abuse of process of law, the apex court imposed a Rs 10 lakh fine on him, to be paid to the state within a week. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, and comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, said the practice of naming welfare schemes after political leaders is common across the country, and selectively challenging one such scheme reflects political motive rather than genuine concern. 'We do not appreciate the anxiety of the petitioner to choose only one political party and one political leader,' the bench observed. 'If the petitioner was so concerned about the misuse of public funds, he could have challenged all such schemes.' The court noted that even during the AIADMK's tenure, many schemes were branded after CM J Jayalalithaa as 'Amma' initiatives. Senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the DMK and the state government respectively, cited similar schemes in support of their case.