Jenkyns: fracking would save money for taxpayers
The new mayor of Lincolnshire has said she will be meeting with a fracking company to discuss a business case to extract gas from underground in the county.
Dame Andrea Jenkyns said the move would "really save money for the Lincolnshire taxpayers".
She was speaking on the BBC's Politics North show after winning the contest to become the first mayor of Greater Lincolnshire on Thursday. Her party, Reform UK, will also take over the running of the county council from the Conservatives.
In response, the government said it planned to ban fracking to protect current and future generations and "the biggest risk" to energy security was "staying dependent on fossil fuel markets".
Dame Andrea was questioned about her position regarding Reform UK's plans to scrap the country's net zero target and impose a windfall tax on green energy companies.
Tim Iredale, the BBC's political editor for Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, put it to the mayor that this could cost jobs around the Humber estuary.
Dame Andrea said the three main parties had a "homogenized view" on net zero, and that there had been no scrutiny of the plans.
"I will be meeting with a fracking company after the gas find, and put a business argument [forward]," she added. "We should be doing that. That will really save money for the Lincolnshire taxpayers."
In February, a company claimed there was enough gas under an area near Gainsborough to supply the country's energy needs for seven years. However, opponents insist fracking – a technique used to capture a type of gas found deep underground in shale rock – risks water, air and noise pollution.
A government spokesperson told the BBC that it intended to "ban fracking for good and make Britain a clean energy superpower".
"Only by sprinting to clean power by 2030 can the UK take back control of its energy and protect consumers from spiralling energy costs," the spokesperson added.
The Federation of Small Businesses in Lincolnshire has also warned that the net zero agenda should not be "thrown out with the bathwater" because it offered "enormous economic opportunity" in the county.
Keane Duncan, a Conservative councillor and cabinet member for north Yorkshire, and Rachel Maskel, the Labour MP for York, appeared on the programme alongside Dame Andrea.
Duncan said a windfall tax on energy would cost jobs and sacrifice investment. "It will also mean that people's energy bills are going to be higher," he added.
Maskel said it was time to "wake up to the climate challenges" and argued that "the real investment in growth and opportunity for our region sits in the energy sector".
Dame Andrea was also asked on the programme about Reform UK's pledge to scrap diversity officers from local authorities.
Nigel Farage, the leader of the party, has said getting rid of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) officers is at the top of their agenda.
However, when asked by the BBC about such roles, Lincolnshire County Council said it did not have any staff doing those kinds of jobs.
Dame Andrea claimed the diversity roles had been "rebranded now as mentors".
"I think there's lots of these hidden roles, diversity hidden roles, which we need to uncover," she said.
"I'm a meritocrat, and I think this diversity extreme inclusion, it can actually divide people more.
"I'm neurodiverse myself, My son is, it's about creating the right conditions to make sure that people are attracted to these jobs.
"I just want competent people. So I think that we need to do away with roles like this."
Councillor Judith Matthews, of North Lincolnshire Council, appeared live on the programme. She was asked what she wanted Jenkyns to achieve in her role.
The Labour councillor said: "She needs to help the disabled people get back into work that have a lot of skills. And that can be done by working in collaboration with disability groups so that everybody has a fair chance at a good job."
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Reform's Andrea Jenkyns elected Lincolnshire mayor
Why Lincolnshire turned a lighter shade of blue
Gas field discovery 'very exciting', MP says
Energy boss backs gas field to lower bills
Politics North (Yorkshire and Lincolnshire)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: 2025 spending review claims
On Wednesday Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves delivered the Labour Government's first spending review, outlining its spending plans for the next few years. We've taken a look at some of the key claims. How much is spending increasing by? At the start of her speech Ms Reeves announced that 'total departmental budgets will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms'. That headline figure doesn't tell the full story, however. Firstly, 2.3% is the average annual real-terms growth in total departmental budgets between 2023/24 and 2028/29. That means it includes spending changes that have already been implemented, for both the current (2025/26) and previous (2024/25) financial years. The average annual increase between this year and 2028/29 is 1.5%. Therefore, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, 'most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the Parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April'. Secondly, it's worth noting that the 2.3% figure includes both day-to-day (Resource DEL) and investment (Capital DEL) spending. Capital spending (which funds things like infrastructure projects) is increasing by 3.6% a year on average in real terms between 2023/24 and 2029/30, and by 1.8% between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Day-to-day departmental budgets meanwhile are seeing a smaller average annual real-terms increase – of 1.7% between 2023/24 and 2028/29 and 1.2% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. Which departments are the winners and losers? Ms Reeves touted substantial spending increases in some areas (for example, the 3% rise in day-to-day NHS spending in England), but unsurprisingly her statement did not focus on areas where spending will decrease. Changes to Government spending are not uniform across all departments, and alongside increases in spending on things like the NHS, defence and the justice system, a number of Government departments will see their budgets decrease in real terms. Departments facing real-terms reductions in overall and day-to-day spending include the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (this factors in reductions in aid spending announced earlier this year to offset increased defence spending), the Home Office (although the Government says the Home Office's budget grows in real terms if a planned reduction in asylum spending is excluded) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Did the Conservatives leave a '£22 billion black hole'? Ms Reeves made a claim we've heard a number of times since it first surfaced in July 2024 – that the previous Conservative government left a '£22 billion black hole in the public finances'. That figure comes from a Treasury audit that forecast a £22 billion overspend in departmental day-to-day spending in 2024/25, but the extent to which it was unexpected or inherited is disputed. The IFS said last year that some of the pressures the Government claimed contributed to this so-called 'black hole' could have been anticipated, but others did 'indeed seem to be greater than could be discerned from the outside'. An Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) review of its March 2024 forecast found an estimated £9.5 billion of additional spending pressures were known to the Treasury at that point in time, but were not known to the OBR as it prepared its forecast. It's true that this review didn't confirm the £22 billion figure, but it also did not necessarily prove that it was incorrect, because Labour's figure included pressures which were identified after the OBR prepared its forecast and so were beyond the scope of the OBR's review. We've written more about how the Government reached the figure of £22 billion in our explainer on this topic. How big is the increase in NHS appointments? Ms Reeves took the opportunity to congratulate Health Secretary Wes Streeting for delivering 'three-and-a-half million extra' hospital appointments in England. The Government has previously celebrated this as a 'massive increase', particularly in light of its manifesto pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments a year. Ms Reeves' claim was broadly accurate – data published last month shows there were 3.6 million additional appointments between July 2024 and February 2025 compared to the previous year. But importantly that increase is actually smaller than the 4.2 million rise that happened in the equivalent period the year before, under the Conservative government – as data obtained by Full Fact under the Freedom of Information Act and published last month revealed. What do announcements on asylum hotels, policing, nurseries and more mean for the Government's pledges? Ms Reeves made a number of announcements that appear to directly impact the delivery of several pre-existing Labour pledges, many of which we're already monitoring in our Government Tracker. (We'll be updating the tracker to reflect these announcements in due course, and reviewing how we rate progress on pledges as necessary). The Chancellor announced an average increase in 'police spending power' of 2.3% a year in real terms over the course of the review period, which she said was the equivalent of an additional £2 billion. However, as police budgets comprise a mix of central Government funding and local council tax receipts, some of this extra spending is expected to be funded by increases in council tax precepts. Ms Reeves said this funding would help the Government achieve its commitment of 'putting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles in England and Wales', a pledge we're monitoring here. The spending review also includes funding of 'almost £370 million across the next four years to support the Government's commitment to deliver school-based nurseries across England', which Ms Reeves said would help the Government deliver its pledge to have 'a record number of children being school-ready'. The Chancellor also committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament, with an additional £200 million announced to 'accelerate the transformation of the asylum system'. When we looked last month at progress on the Government's pledge to 'end asylum hotels' we said it appeared off track, as figures showed the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels was higher at the end of March 2025 than it was when Labour came into Government.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Business leader says BC Ferries' hiring of Chinese shipyard is ‘informed decision'
VICTORIA - A business leader on ferry-dependent Vancouver Island says BC Ferries made a 'strongly informed decision' in hiring a Chinese shipyard to build four new major vessels. Both the NDP government and B.C. Conservative Opposition have criticized the choice of Chinese state-owned China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards. But Bruce Williams, CEO of the Greater Victoria Chamber of Commerce, says it's in the best interests of all who rely on BC Ferries. He says few companies around the world have the capacity to build vessels of such size, and BC Ferries did 'due diligence' for years in a global procurement process that did not receive any Canadian bids. The B.C. Conservatives have called on Premier David Eby's government to cancel the contract that was announced on Tuesday, while accusing Eby of abandoning Canadian workers. Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth says he raised concern with BC Ferries about the contract, but notes that the operator is an independent company that makes its own operational decisions. The provincial government is the sole preferred shareholder in BC Ferries and it receives public funding, but Williams says the purchase decision is not a government decision. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Syria government says women must wear burkinis at public beaches
Syria's Islamist-led interim government has decreed that women must wear burkinis - a swimsuit that covers the body except for the face, hands and feet - or other "decent" clothes at public beaches and swimming pools. The regulations, issued by the tourism ministry, were "aimed at enhancing public safety standards and preserving public decency", Syrian state news channel Al-Ikhbariyah al-Suriyah reported. Private beaches, clubs and pools, as well as hotels with more than four stars, are exempt, the directive said. Women often dress modestly on public beaches in Syria, but some women do opt for more Western styles of swimwear. The new government previously pledged to govern inclusively. Under the new directive, beachgoers and visitors to public pools must wear "more modest swimwear", specifying "the burkini or swimming clothes that cover more of the body". The decree added that women should wear a cover-up or loose clothing over their swimwear when they move between swimming areas. "Travelling in swimwear outside the beach without appropriate cover is prohibited," it said. Men should also wear a shirt when they are not swimming, and are not allowed to be bare-chested outside swimming areas. The statement said "normal Western swimwear" was generally allowed in exempted places "within the limits of public taste". More generally, people should wear loose clothing that covers the shoulders and knees and "avoid transparent and tight clothing", the decree added. The directive did not say whether those who fail to follow the rules would be penalised or how the rules would be enforced. But it did say lifeguards and supervisors would be appointed to monitor compliance on beaches. It also included other safety regulations around pools and beaches. Reacting to the new rule, one woman from Idlib in the north-west of the country told the BBC's World Service that, while she could see both sides of the argument, "I do think there is a positive to this, from a moral and respectful point of view". Celine said: "Some people and families don't feel comfortable seeing or wearing too much exposed skin and I believe that is a valid perspective." But another woman, Rita, who lives in the capital, Damascus, said she was "not comfortable" with the new rule, "especially as we are not used to such laws". "In the coastal area, different ladies from different religions all have been going there and until now, we wore what we wanted," she said. "Religious people could avoid those in bikinis. But this law makes us scared of where to go." She added: "We have no problem with the burkini itself, but it's a problem with the concept that the government are controlling this." In December last year, Islamist rebel forces led by Ahmed al-Sharaa toppled Bashar al-Assad's regime, bringing years of civil war to an end. Since then, al-Sharaa, now the country's interim president, has promised to run the country in an inclusive way. In an interview with the BBC shortly after he took power, he said he believed in education for women and denied that he wanted to turn Syria into a version of Afghanistan - which has severely curtailed women's rights. In March, Sharaa signed a constitutional declaration covering a five-year transitional period. The document said Islam was the religion of the president, as the previous constitution did, and Islamic jurisprudence was "the main source of legislation", rather than "a main source". The declaration also guaranteed women's rights, freedom of expression and media freedom. Rubio warns Syria could be weeks away from 'full-scale civil war' Trump expected to meet Syrian leader after announcing he will lift sanctions
