
'Worst possible way to die' found as archaeologists unearth sinister skeleton
A skeleton unearthed by archaeologists shows the brutal and agonising torture that was inflicted upon the man before he was 'clumsily' beheaded in a horrifying discovery
History is littered with horrific deaths that would undoubtedly disturb most individuals today. Yet, from all the brutal and bizarre ways to die, one of the most excruciating has come to light through a recent archaeological discovery.
Published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, archaeologists at the University of Milan have uncovered the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed after suffering a notoriously painful torture technique followed by an unsuccessful execution by beheading.
The unfortunate youth met his demise between the ages of 17 and 20 during the 13th century and was buried in proximity to a cathedral in Milan, Italy.
Initial examination of his remains indicated that he had sustained injuries across his arms and legs that were symmetrically inflicted, indicating intentional harm. Based on historical accounts, the researchers propose that the man underwent a form of torture known as "the wheel," identified also as the "breaking wheel" or "Catharine wheel".
The wheel was a ghastly method of capital punishment employed broadly throughout Europe into the beginning of the early modern era, around the 16th century, reports the Irish Star.
Accounts on the execution of this device differ according to period and place but commonly involved the progressive smashing and fracturing of a person's limbs, concluded by additional injury caused by the wheel itself.
In some accounts, torturers would start by dropping the heavy wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and working their way up. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the broken limbs would be woven in and out of the wheel spokes or tightly fastened to it using a rope.
Further injuries were then inflicted – using either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was mounted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for some time, perhaps days or weeks, until they eventually died or were mercifully executed.
This brutal torture technique was most often used against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was found, this kind of torture was usually reserved for persons suspected of spreading the plague.
"The victim of the wheel could have been considered as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have been the cause of his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an angry crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write.
As if this wasn't enough, forensic analysis of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers say, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation."
If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world.
One thing is for certain, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
9 hours ago
- Daily Record
'Worst possible way to die' found as archaeologists unearth sinister skeleton
A skeleton unearthed by archaeologists shows the brutal and agonising torture that was inflicted upon the man before he was 'clumsily' beheaded in a horrifying discovery History is littered with horrific deaths that would undoubtedly disturb most individuals today. Yet, from all the brutal and bizarre ways to die, one of the most excruciating has come to light through a recent archaeological discovery. Published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, archaeologists at the University of Milan have uncovered the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed after suffering a notoriously painful torture technique followed by an unsuccessful execution by beheading. The unfortunate youth met his demise between the ages of 17 and 20 during the 13th century and was buried in proximity to a cathedral in Milan, Italy. Initial examination of his remains indicated that he had sustained injuries across his arms and legs that were symmetrically inflicted, indicating intentional harm. Based on historical accounts, the researchers propose that the man underwent a form of torture known as "the wheel," identified also as the "breaking wheel" or "Catharine wheel". The wheel was a ghastly method of capital punishment employed broadly throughout Europe into the beginning of the early modern era, around the 16th century, reports the Irish Star. Accounts on the execution of this device differ according to period and place but commonly involved the progressive smashing and fracturing of a person's limbs, concluded by additional injury caused by the wheel itself. In some accounts, torturers would start by dropping the heavy wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and working their way up. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the broken limbs would be woven in and out of the wheel spokes or tightly fastened to it using a rope. Further injuries were then inflicted – using either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was mounted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for some time, perhaps days or weeks, until they eventually died or were mercifully executed. This brutal torture technique was most often used against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was found, this kind of torture was usually reserved for persons suspected of spreading the plague. "The victim of the wheel could have been considered as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have been the cause of his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an angry crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write. As if this wasn't enough, forensic analysis of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers say, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation." If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world. One thing is for certain, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.


Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Unearthed skeleton shows 'worst possible way to die' after gruesome torture
Archaeologists in Italy have discovered the skeleton of a man who suffered a brutal and agonising death sometime during the 13th century, after being tortured and beheaded The annals of history are filled with gruesome deaths that would send shivers down the spines of most people today. However, among the numerous brutal and unusual ways to meet one's demise, few are as excruciating as the one discovered in a recently unearthed skeleton. As reported in the Journal of Archaeological Science, archaeologists from the University of Milan have uncovered the Medieval remains of a young man who appears to have succumbed to a notoriously agonizing torture method and a botched beheading. The individual met his untimely end between the ages of 17 and 20, sometime during the 13th century, and was laid to rest near a cathedral in Milan, northern Italy. Initial examination of his skeleton revealed symmetrically placed wounds on his arms and legs, indicating deliberate injury. Drawing on historical records, the researchers hypothesized that the man had been subjected to torture using "the wheel," also known as the "breaking wheel" or the "Catharine wheel". The wheel was a torture device employed for public executions throughout much of European history until the dawn of the early modern era (c. 1500), reports the Irish Star. Accounts of how this device was used vary depending on time and place, but it typically involved the systematic crushing and breaking of limbs, followed by inflicting additional wheel-based trauma. In some accounts, tormentors would start by dropping the hefty wooden wheel onto people's limbs, beginning with the shin bones and gradually moving upwards. Once the body was sufficiently battered, the shattered limbs would be threaded through the wheel spokes or tightly bound to it using a rope. Further injuries were then inflicted – utilising either blades, blunt objects, fire, whips, or red-hot pincers – after which the wheel was hoisted on a pole and displayed like a flag. The nearly dead victim would hang here for an extended period, possibly days or weeks, until they eventually succumbed or were mercifully put to death. This brutal torture technique was most often employed against those accused of heinous crimes, but in northern Italy, where this body was discovered, this type of torture was typically reserved for individuals suspected of spreading the plague. "The victim of the wheel could have been viewed as different by his contemporaries, and possibly this discrimination may have led to his final conviction, as he could have been sacrificed, being a "freak", by an irate crowd, as a plague spreader," the researchers write. As if this wasn't enough, forensic examination of his skeleton also revealed unusual linear fractures at the base of his skull. This was most likely, the researchers suggest, the result of a sharp force trauma from a heavy weapon during a "clumsy decapitation." If this theory of wheel torture is accurate, the researchers will have documented the first archaeological evidence of a human being tortured by the wheel, certainly in medieval northern Italy, if not the world. One thing is for sure, this unfortunate individual did not have a pleasant last few days on Earth.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Medieval cold case is SOLVED: Vengeful noblewoman had her priest lover murdered after 'betrayal' that forced her to do Game of Thrones-style walk of shame, study reveals
The facts are worthy of a 21st century crime novel: an ungodly priest murdered by an aristocrat seeking revenge; and a jury too scared to identify the perpetrators. But this is what happened nearly 700 years ago, when churchman John Forde had his throat cut in London 's most prominent Medieval 'murder' hotspot - near St Paul's Cathedral. Now, records traced by an expert criminologist suggest the priest's murder was a revenge killing orchestrated by a noblewoman who is believed to have been his lover. Aristocrat Ela Fitzpayne allegedly directed four men - including her own brother - to cut down Forde in the belief that he betrayed her to the Archbishop of Canterbury. A letter sent in 1332 by the Archbishop, then Simon Mepham, accused her of having sexual liaisons with 'knights and others, single and married, and even with clerics in holy orders.' She was ordered to do a Game of Thrones-style walk of shame in bare feet the length of Salisbury Cathedral. Before their drastic falling out, Fitzpayne had Forde had also been partners in crime along with her husband; with the trio having raided a monastery together. The research was carried out by leading criminologist Professor Manuel Eisner, the leader of Cambridge University's pioneering Murder Maps project. The interactive database - which features Forde's murder - catalogues hundreds of unnatural deaths in London, Oxford and York in the 14th century. Digital copies of the coroner report in the Forde case, along with letters, have been published for the first time on Cambridge University's website. Professor Eisner said: 'We are looking at a murder commissioned by a leading figure of the English aristocracy. 'It is planned and cold-blooded, with a family member and close associates carrying it out, all of which suggests a revenge motive,' said Eisner. 'Attempts to publicly humiliate Ela Fitzpayne may have been part of a political game, as the church used morality to stamp its authority on the nobility, with John Forde caught between masters,' he said. 'Taken together, these records suggest a tale of shakedowns, sex and vengeance that expose tensions between the church and England's elites, culminating in a mafia-style assassination of a fallen man of god by a gang of medieval hitmen.' Forde was murdered as he walked up Cheapside near St Paul's on May 3, 1337. A fellow priest, Hasculph Neville, distracted him with 'pleasant conversation' and then four other men - including his lover's brother, Hugh Lovell - launched a frenzied attack. Lovell used a 12-inch dagger to slit open Forde's throat and then two other men - Hugh Colne and John Strong - stabbed Forde in his belly. Although the jury identified all the assassins, they claimed to be ignorant of where they could be found. Jurors also noted that the Fitzpaynes had been in a longstanding feud with Forde. Professor Eisner said it was unlikely that jurors really did not know where to find the murderers. 'Despite naming the killers and clear knowledge of the instigator, when it comes to pursuing the perpetrators the jury turn a blind eye,' the expert said. 'A household of the highest nobility, and apparently no one knows where they are to bring them to trial. 'They claim Ela's brother has no belongings to confiscate. All implausible. This was typical of the class-based justice of the day.' Former Fitzpayne servant Colne was eventually indicted for the crime five years later in 1342, and imprisoned in Newgate – the only charge brought in the case. The area of Westcheap, where Forde was slain, was London's most prominent medieval murder 'hot spot', according to the latest research. Home to numerous markets, taverns and alehouses, and many powerful guilds, such as the goldsmiths and saddlers, it was a centre of trade and revelry and events could get out of hand . Triggers for violence in the area included quarrels between merchants or artisans and group fights between guild apprentices akin to turf wars between gangs. Records also show the area was the scene of several other premeditated revenge killings. Among the new evidence in the case of Forde's murder was the discovery of a letter from the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Simon Mepham, to the Bishop of Winchester. Written in January 1332, it claimed Ella Fitzpayne had sexual liaisons with 'knights and others, single and married, and even with clerics in holy orders'. She was punished by being banned from wearing gold, pearls or precious stones and had to pay large sums of money to monastic orders and the poor. But Fitzpayne also had to carry out a walk of shame in bare feet along the length of Salisbury Cathedral - which had the longest nave in England - while carrying a four-pound wax candle to the altar. The humiliation was made worse by the fact she had to repeat the walk every autumn for seven years. It echoes the distressing sequence in hit book and TV series Game of Thrones, when leading character Cersei Lannister is stripped naked and forced to traipse through the streets as a form of public humiliation and atonement for her sins. Archbishop Mepham's letter also stated that Fitzpayne was led by a 'spirit of pride' and had abandoned her husband. A further letter sent in April 1332 claimed she was hiding in Rotherhithe and had been excommunicated. Only Forde was named in the letters as being her lover, suggesting his involvement in alerting the Archbishop to Fitzpayne's misdeeds. At the time of his death, Forde was the rector of the church of Okeford Fitzpaine, a village on the Fitzpayne family's Dorset estate. 'The archbishop imposed heavy, shameful public penance on Ela, which she seems not to have complied with, but may have sparked a thirst for vengeance,' Professor Eisner said. 'Not least as John Forde appears to have escaped punishment by the church.' Other records show that Fitzpayne, her husband Sir Robert and Forde had been indicted by a royal commission for raiding a Benedictine priory in 1321. The crew smashed gates and buildings, felled trees and robbed the quarry, seizing up to 18 oxen, along with 30 pigs and some 200 sheep and lambs and driving them back to the Fitzpayne castle, Stogursey. The priory had been an outpost of a French abbey and so was particularly vulnerable at a time of heightened tensions between England and France. Professor Eisner believes Forde may have had split loyalties - to the Fitzpayne family on one side and to the bishops, his bosses in the church. 'We know that Archbishop Mepham was keen to enforce moral discipline among the gentry and nobility, and act against those who displayed moral failings,' Professor Eisner said. 'Taking part in the raid would have shown Forde's loyalty to the Fitzpaynes rather than the church, which would not have gone down well with the Archbishop.' The expert believes Forde - under pressure following the raid - could have confessed his liaison with Fitzpayne. The Archbishop then ordered her humiliating punishment. Professor Eisner added: 'Public humiliation can have poisonous effects, breeding hatred and revenge in humans both today and in the distant past. 'Feeling humiliated motivates wars, extremism, mass killings, and here it's probably a motivation for assassination. 'Humiliation creates emotions of anger and shame in the short term. Over time this can harden into a desire for violence.' Although the Archbishop died in 1333, Fitzpayne waited until four years later before getting her revenge on Forde. 'The public execution style of Forde's killing, in front of crowds in broad daylight, is similar to the political killings we see now in countries like Russia or Mexico. It's designed to be a reminder of who is in control,' Professor Eisner said. 'Where rule of law is weak, we see killings committed by the highest ranks in society, who will take power into their own hands, whether it's today or seven centuries ago.'