Tariffs Are Challenging the Cachet of Luxury Goods From Europe
UBRIQUE, Spain—Europe's luxury brands have long sold pricey handbags based on the mystique of where they're made. Now the trade war is probing the value of producing in places like this sun-kissed town.
Ubrique's workshops have pumped out leather goods for Chanel, Louis Vuitton and other brands for years, employing about a quarter of the town's population of 16,000. A giant statue of the patacabra, a wooden tool used to shape and smooth the leather, rises by the road leading into town.
'We're all basically living off leather here,' said José Antonio Bautista, the town's deputy mayor.
President Trump's tariffs are now shaking the foundations of Ubrique's business model—and that of the broader luxury industry. On Friday, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on goods imported from the European Union.
European brands have long cultivated the image that Old World heritage uniquely positions the continent to create goods for the world's most discerning customers—justifying their eye-watering price tags.
While high margins offer brands some protection from tariffs, Trump's push to shift production to the U.S. has sparked fresh scrutiny of the 'Made in Europe' value proposition. The worry for some brands: Luxury goods produced in America won't carry the same cachet with consumers.
'It wouldn't make sense to me to have Italian Gucci bags made in Texas,' François-Henri Pinault, chief executive of the group that owns Gucci, Saint Laurent and Balenciaga, told French lawmakers earlier this month. 'It doesn't make sense to my clients. I can't explain that.'
The allure of European provenance is already being questioned in the industry's second-biggest market: China. After Trump announced his tariffs, a wave of videos flooded TikTok, purporting to reveal the true cost of luxury by showing how a range of high-end handbags—including the Hermès Birkin, which sell for more than $10,000—can be cheaply counterfeited in a Chinese factory.
The scrutiny has shone a spotlight on places like Ubrique, where first-year trainees start on the equivalent of around $30 a day, and the most experienced workers earn a daily wage of roughly $57, according to a local labor agreement.
Shifting production to the U.S., however, is easier said than done. Louis Vuitton opened a leather-goods workshop in Alvarado, Texas, in 2019 as part of a push to diversify manufacturing and meet growing demand in its largest market. But scaling up has proven difficult.
The site has faced growing pains as Louis Vuitton struggled to recruit and train local artisans. LVMH MC -1.26%decrease; red down pointing triangle CEO Bernard Arnault said he planned to hire a thousand staff at the plant when it initially opened, but years later the facility only employs around 300 people—a slower-than-expected expansion that the company partly attributes to the pandemic.
Still, Arnault recently said the group would 'inevitably be forced to increase its American production' if the EU fails to reach a deal to avert Trump's tariffs.
Spain quietly plays a central role in the global luxury supply chain—especially in leather goods.
Nowhere is that more evident than in Ubrique, where leather craftsmanship took off in the 19th century—helped by the town's abundant water supply, crucial for softening hides and dyeing leather.
The area's isolation and poverty played a role too. Families raised livestock while women began sewing and finishing leather goods at home. By the 1970s, Ubrique had become a byword for craftsmanship, drawing brands like Dior and Loewe.
Today, handbag makers rely on Ubrique's extensive network of suppliers, specialized machinery makers, tanneries and logistics hubs that have developed together over decades.
Their close proximity enables speed and flexibility, which are crucial in an industry that is constantly working on new designs. Workshops often work hand-in-hand with brands to develop prototypes and refine products. Longstanding relationships have fostered trust and discretion, helping protect sourcing strategies and unreleased designs.
Chanel purses are made in a discreet workshop with no signage, while Louis Vuitton relies on a longstanding supplier with several sites across town to produce pieces including a $3,000 hobo-style bag.
Ubrique's rich industrial ecosystem would be difficult, and take years, to replicate elsewhere. Similar tightknit luxury clusters can be found in Tuscany for leather goods, La Chaux-de-Fonds for Swiss watches and the French town of Grasse for perfume.
Economic forces have threatened Ubrique before. During the 2008 financial crisis, many luxury brands moved production to lower-cost countries like China. The result: factory closures, job losses and economic pain.
'You'd see people who had nothing to eat coming here asking for help,' said Bautista, the deputy mayor.
But just a few years later the brands were back. Factories in China proved susceptible to counterfeiters. When design specifications or materials were leaked, copycat producers could flood the market with knockoffs.
Throughout Ubrique, the tap tap of the patacabra rings out from behind workshop walls.
At many of the town's factories, workers arrive before dawn, stow their phones in lockers and wait for a 6.55 a.m. alarm. When it sounds, they head to their benches and work—mostly on their feet—until 3 p.m., broken only by a 20-minute break.
Luxury brands often promote the image of a single in-house artisan meticulously crafting a handbag from start to finish. In reality, production is more industrial, broken down into a series of repetitive, specialized tasks that require less training—in theory making it easier to shift manufacturing elsewhere.
Yet making luxury leather goods still involves a sequence of precise, hands-on steps that require a high level of skill. Leather must be inspected and cut, then thinned, reinforced, stitched and assembled—often using techniques that machines can't easily replicate. Edges are finished by hand and hardware is carefully fitted.
More experienced workers are assigned to the most technically demanding tasks. At one factory, employees said men's backpacks were the hardest to make—not just because of the number of components, but also the precision needed to fit the panels, handles and zips.
'Finding qualified people is tough,' said Manuel Fernández, owner of the Don Puro workshop, which supplies several luxury brands. 'Out of every three new hires, you might only keep one. The others just don't work out.'
While businesspeople in Ubrique say they're yet to feel the impact of Trump's tariffs, the uncertainty is leading to heightened concerns in the town.
A broad luxury slowdown has already hit Ubrique's producers. While much of the slack has been taken up by Polène, a fast-growing French brand that makes all of its handbags in the town, some workshops are feeling the pain as clients cut back on orders.
Marcos Obando, who works for a local employers' association, is hopeful big luxury brands will keep investing in Ubrique, even if tariffs do add to costs. He argues the town should double down on quality, since it can't compete on price—not even with lower-cost neighbors like Portugal or countries in Eastern Europe.
'There is a reason why all the brands have been working here for decades—why this town has been focused on this for many, many years,' he said.
Write to Nick Kostov at nick.kostov@dowjones.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
20 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Case for Rate Cuts Is Growing
President Trump's tariffs present the Federal Reserve with two conflicting challenges. First, they raise prices, which weakens the case for cutting interest rates. Second, they sap confidence and demand, which strengthens the case. To date, the Fed has focused on the first risk, keeping its interest rate target between 4.25% and 4.5% since December. It might soon have to pivot to the second. Evidence is accumulating that inflation, despite tariffs, has been milder than feared, while the labor market might be deteriorating.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Regulation Around the World: What Every Crypto Enthusiast Needs to Know
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. If you've been in the crypto space for a while, you've probably noticed something big happening: governments everywhere are finally getting serious about regulating digital assets. Gone are the days when crypto felt like the Wild West. Today, from Washington to Brussels to Tokyo, lawmakers are crafting rules that will shape how we buy, sell, and use cryptocurrencies. This shift isn't happening in a vacuum. The collapse of major players like FTX and several crypto-linked bank failures sent shockwaves through traditional finance, pushing regulators to act faster than many expected. While this might feel overwhelming, understanding these changes can actually help you make better decisions as a crypto investor or enthusiast. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Let's take a friendly tour around the world to see what's happening with crypto regulation and what it means for you. The U.S. has been talking a big game about crypto regulation, and in 2023, it looked like we might finally get some clarity. Two important bills made headlines: the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. These bills promised to answer some burning questions that have puzzled crypto users for years: When is a cryptocurrency considered a security versus a commodity? Which government agency is in charge of what? Unfortunately, while these bills were introduced with great fanfare, they've since stalled in Congress. What this means for you: If you're a US-based crypto user, you're still navigating a somewhat uncertain regulatory landscape. The good news? This gives the industry more time to mature and for regulators to better understand the technology before implementing potentially restrictive rules. The European Union deserves credit for being first out of the gate with comprehensive crypto regulation. In May 2023, the EU implemented the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. Here's what MiCA means in practical terms: Licensing requirements: Any company issuing or trading crypto needs an official license Enhanced tracking: Starting in January, all service providers must collect sender and recipient information for every transaction, regardless of amount Wallet verification: If your self-hosted wallet holds more than €1,000 ($1,100), you'll need to verify ownership for transactions Swedish Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson, explained that FTX's collapse highlighted 'the urgent need for imposing rules which will better protect Europeans who have invested in these assets.' What this means for you: If you're trading crypto in Europe, expect more paperwork and verification steps, but also potentially greater consumer protection. The days of completely anonymous transactions are numbered in the EU. Asia presents a fascinating patchwork of crypto regulations, reflecting the diverse attitudes across the region. Japan has been remarkably progressive, recognizing cryptocurrency as both a type of money and legal property. The Financial Services Agency oversees both crypto and yen transactions, giving citizens freedom to own and invest in digital assets. Recently, Japan has tightened rules around information sharing between exchanges to combat money laundering. South Korea enacted the Virtual Asset Users Protection Act in 2023, focusing heavily on protecting everyday users through better record-keeping and transparency requirements. Financial authorities are expected to publish new guidelines for listing virtual assets soon. China remains one of the most restrictive countries, maintaining bans on exchanges, trading, and crypto mining. If you're in China, crypto activities remain largely off-limits. India's journey has been particularly interesting. After banning crypto, the Supreme Court lifted the ban in 2020. Now, a Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill is working its way through parliament, though it has faced delays. What this means for you: Your experience with crypto will vary dramatically depending on which Asian country you're in. Japan and South Korea offer relatively friendly environments, while China remains restrictive. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. Brazil implemented crypto regulation in June 2023, making the central bank the supervisor for crypto assets through the Cryptoassets Act. This move came as Brazil saw cryptocurrency imports rise nearly 45% in the first eight months of 2023, totaling $7.4 billion. Interestingly, Roberto Campos Neto, who was the governor of Brazil's central bank at the time, noted that local demand had shifted toward stablecoins, with people using crypto more for payments rather than solely for investment. What this means for you: Brazil's approach shows how countries are adapting to actual usage patterns. As crypto becomes more of a payment method rather than just a speculative investment, regulations are evolving accordingly. The UK is actively constructing crypto rules with a balanced approach. Any company offering digital currency services must be authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority, regardless of where they're located if they serve UK customers. The Bank of England and FCA have also proposed specific regulations for stablecoins, aiming to 'harness the potential benefits stablecoins could provide to UK consumers and retailers, in particular by making payments faster and cheaper' while maintaining consumer protection. What this means for you: The UK appears to be striking a balance between innovation and protection, potentially creating a model that other countries might follow. Perhaps most importantly, international organizations are recognizing that crypto's borderless nature requires coordinated global approaches. The International Organization of Securities Commissions has issued 18 recommendations for global crypto rules, emphasizing the need for consistency across borders. The World Economic Forum has gone even further, stating that international alignment on crypto rules is 'not just desirable but necessary.' As someone interested in crypto, here are the key takeaways: Expect more structure: The days of completely unregulated crypto markets are ending. This isn't necessarily bad – clearer rules can mean greater mainstream adoption and institutional investment. Prepare for more paperwork: Whether it's KYC requirements, transaction reporting, or wallet verification, expect to provide more information about your crypto activities. Geographic differences matter: Where you live will significantly impact your crypto experience. Consider this when making investment decisions or choosing platforms. Compliance is becoming crucial: Choose exchanges and services that prioritize regulatory compliance. They're more likely to survive and thrive in this new environment. Innovation continues: Despite increased regulation, innovation in the crypto space continues. Regulations often lag behind technology, leaving room for new developments. The regulatory landscape might seem daunting, but remember that clearer rules often lead to greater mainstream adoption, institutional investment, and ultimately, a more mature and stable crypto ecosystem. While we're still in the early stages of this regulatory evolution, staying informed about these changes will help you navigate the crypto world more confidently. The key is to stay adaptable and informed. Regulations will continue evolving as governments learn more about this technology and its applications. By understanding these trends, you're better positioned to make smart decisions in your crypto journey. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Crypto Regulation Around the World: What Every Crypto Enthusiast Needs to Know originally appeared on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Amazon Goes Before EU Court in Attempt to Shed Very Large Online Provider Designation
Amazon wants the EU to stop the VLOP. That is to say, the e-commerce giant went before a European court to ask that its status as a very large online provider (VLOP) under the Digital Services Act (DSA) be rescinded. More from Sourcing Journal Rebag Expands Access to Pre-loved Luxury Goods With New Amazon Collaboration Amazon Reportedly Tests Humanoid Robots for Parcel Delivery Are Amazon's Warehouses Facing an 'Injury Crisis'? The DSA went into general effect in 2024, and it's aimed at creating better transparency, tamping illegal digital activity and creating a safer internet for citizens of the European Union. Under the law, platforms and service engines can be designated as VLOPs, subjecting them to more stringent provisions of the DSA. For that reason, DSA regulations began in 2023 for companies designated that way. EU regulators designated Amazon as a VLOP in April 2023; the DSA states that platforms that accrue at least 45 million monthly users are eligible to be designated as such. Other VLOPs include Google, Meta, Shein, Temu and Zalando. These companies, among more than a dozen others, are required to 'have user-friendly terms and conditions,' 'be transparent as regards advertising, recommender systems or content moderation decisions' and more. They also must look deeper into their business models to identify risks surrounding illegal content, minors' protection and the mental and physical wellbeing of consumers. Not long after its designation, Amazon made it clear that it would appeal its status as a VLOP, primarily with the argument that retail platforms should be exempt from such a categorization because they don't pose the same risk as, for instance, social media platforms. Zalando has made a similar argument. According to Reuters, Amazon's lawyer Robert Spano appeared in Luxembourg-based General Court to continue arguing with that same principle on Thursday. 'Online marketplaces like the Amazon Store do not pose systemic risks. Second, the VLOP rules do not and cannot rationally assist in preventing the dissemination of illegal or counterfeit goods,' Spano reportedly said. 'The VLOP rules therefore make no sense when applied to online marketplaces.' An Amazon spokesperson told Sourcing Journal via email that it believes the VLOP designation is meant for companies 'with advertising as their primary revenue and that distribute speech and information.' With that framework, the spokesperson said, Amazon 'doesn't fit the description of…a VLOP under the DSA and should not have been designated as such.' 'The Amazon Store, as an online marketplace, does not pose any such systemic risks; it only sells goods, and it doesn't disseminate or amplify information, views or opinions,' the spokesperson said via email. According to Reuters, Spano argued in Luxembourg that risk is not pervasive but rather isolated to individual customers and noted that the company already complies with existing product safety regulations. He went on to say that regulators should not cast further scrutiny on companies like Amazon solely because of the number of users or consumers they have managed to amass. Zalando has made a similar argument, noting that each company calculates the number of users it has differently. 'When it comes to marketplaces like the Amazon Store, size does not multiply risk. It is an arbitrary, disproportionate and discriminatory metric,' Spano said, according to Reuters. The Amazon spokesperson said it believes its designation as a VLOP doesn't provide any tangible upside for its consumers. 'The VLOP designation also forces Amazon to meet onerous administrative obligations that don't provide any benefit for EU consumers,' they said in the email. The court that heard Amazon's arguments is expected to rule about the company's VLOP status in the coming months.