Social media's impact: Driving business strategies from marketing to ROI
What started in a Harvard dorm room in 2003 as a tool for social networking has since evolved into a powerful driver of commerce, marketing, and consumer engagement. Facebook alone has grown from 1 million users in South Africa to an estimated 28–30 million today.
Clara de Wet, CEO of Uppe Marketing says social media has moved from a social connection to a business necessity
I remember when social media first appeared in my life. I was 14, and a friend introduced me to this thing called Facebook.
At the time, I was more consumed with playing The Sims on our desktop, making careful selections at Musica to purchase a single CD with my favourite songs, and using Encarta CDs for assignments.
The highlight of my week was a DVD night, and my second-hand Samsung D600 was the ultimate cool gadget.
Who could have imagined that 17 years later, social media would revolutionise the world?
Gen Zs now navigate life with iPhones, generate TikTok content daily, and consult ChatGPT for instant answers. The landscape has changed drastically, far removed from my Millennial teenage reality.
What was once a luxury for businesses is now an existential necessity.
Consumer insights and the power of personalisation
Consumer behaviour drives marketing decisions.
The rapid digital shift forced brands to engage with consumers where they spend most of their time—on social media.
This shift provided access to unprecedented consumer insights, transforming marketing into a data-driven science.
Today, generic messaging no longer works.
Consumers demand personalisation, expecting brands to cater to their specific needs and preferences.
User experience (UX) has extended beyond digital interactions to physical products and services.
A handwritten note from Yuppiechef with every order placed online, for example, adds a personal touch that sets it apart from competitors who send only a bland, impersonal receipt.
The numbers speak for themselves
Access to real-time data and analytics has redefined Return on Investment (ROI).
Success is no longer measured solely by sales figures but also by engagement metrics, conversion rates, and behavioural patterns.
A/B testing has become a crucial tool, allowing businesses to refine their messaging and optimise content for specific target audiences.
The algorithm advantage
Imagine standing on a stage before a diverse audience, with just 30 seconds to deliver a compelling message.
Traditional advertising often felt like this—a broad, unfocused effort to capture attention.
Social media changed the game, allowing businesses to segment audiences into highly targeted groups.
Targeted advertising has had significant financial implications, making marketing efforts more cost-effective and measurable.
With precise audience targeting, companies can allocate budgets efficiently, justify ad spend, and adjust campaigns in real time based on
performance data.
The path forward
While the benefits of social media are undeniable, businesses must navigate this landscape responsibly.
Ethical considerations, data privacy, and consumer trust should be at the forefront of every strategy.
The fundamental principles of consumerism remain unchanged - people seek connection, affirmation, and belonging.
As marketers, we must remember that we are also consumers.
The same curiosity that led me to explore Facebook years ago now drives my approach to leveraging its evolving features for business success.
My advice? Evolve responsibly. Stay (highly) informed, adapt strategically, and ensure that social media works for you and your business - not the other way around.
All rights reserved. © 2022. Bizcommunity.com Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
10 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Germany plans to tax Google, Facebook
Germany's Culture Ministry is planning to bring a law to tax the American online giants like Alphabet of Google and Meta of Facebook. The rate of taxation is to be 10 per cent. The grounds on which taxation is to be imposed are interesting and even new. German Culture Minister Wolfram Weimer told the magazine, Stern, 'These corporations do billions in business in Germany with extremely high profit margins and benefit enormously from the country's media and cultural output as well as its infrastructure – but they pay hardly any taxes, invest too little, and give far too little back to the country.' There is more than an element of truth in Weimer's statement. Google and Facebook thrive much from the media content that populates their platforms, which is one of the reasons that millions of Net users throng them, to get the news in a jiffy as it were. Both Google and Facebook do not create an iota of their own content. They thrive on what they take from others, either directly or through their own users. Australia overcame the problem by giving in to the demand of newspapers and other old media, that Google should pay them for using their content. Weimer is stating the fact that the online platforms are using cultural output of the country – whether it be music, films, art – and they do not do anything to sustain the cultural events. Similarly, the Internet penetration in the country and the infrastructure that sustains it is what enables millions of Germans to use Google and Facebook, and it is on the large number of users that these online companies earn their revenues. It is but reasonable that the online companies should be made to pay taxes of some kind. Weimer has even suggested voluntary contribution on the part of Google and Facebook. But this may be impracticable. No company will be willing to make voluntary contribution in lieu of taxes. The American online platforms have an advantage over national players because they have worldwide footprint because of the investments they made in the search engines reaching the ends of the globe as it were. They are indeed reaping benefits from it. But do they have an obligation to the regions and countries in which they operate? Google and Facebook can argue that they have built the cyber bridges to connect the different places, and they are allowing a free use of it. The owners of these platforms would not let these sites remain free if they were not earning enough revenue in billions of dollars. If they did not make money, they would have imposed some user-charges from the thousands of millions who use them around the globe. They can say that they have boosted other businesses through the space they have opened up for other businesses. These arguments do not however discredit the demand for tax payments from national governments. That these online payers use national airwaves is a fact. It can be argued that it is the telecom companies in these countries which have the right to charge these companies. But the search engines with enormous Cloud or memory power which sustain these platforms do cost enough money, but the revenue generated by advertisers outstrips the investment and costs of maintenance. National governments have a legitimate right to demand tax from the online platforms because they operate within the sovereign territory of a country. Facebook and the Google do not have the solidity of an iPhone, but they are at the same time cyber-products. They can be treated as taxable products or services. The rate of taxation should remain flexible enough so that the thriving business of connecting people is not affected or dampened.
Al Etihad
a day ago
- Al Etihad
Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser
30 May 2025 23:15 Washington (AFP) Google on Friday urged a US judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online attorneys made their final arguments before US District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering "remedies" to impose after making a landmark decision last year that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in government attorneys have called on Mehta to order Google divest itself of Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the also want Google barred from agreements with partners such as Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet weeks of testimony ended early in May, with Friday devoted to rival sides parsing points of law and making their arguments before Mehta in a courtroom in Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Mehta that there was no evidence presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine if no exclusivity deals had been in noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones even though the US telecom titan owned Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said "if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing" search engine from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. 'More flexibility' Department of Justice (DoJ) attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, "repeatedly asked for more flexibility" but was denied by contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system."Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston."It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products."The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. Kneecap Google? Testimony at trial included Apple vice president of services Eddy Cue revealing that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined in April for the first time in over two testified that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and pressed rival attorneys regarding the potential for Google to share data as proposed by the DoJ in its recommended remedies."We're not looking to kneecap Google," DoJ attorney Adam Severt told the judge."But, we are looking to make sure someone can compete with Google."Schmidtlein contended that the data Google is being asked to share contains much more than just information about people's online searches, saying it would be tantamount to handing over the fruit of investments made over the course of decades."There are countless algorithms that Google engineers have invented that have nothing to do with click and query data," Schmidtlein said. "Their remedy says we want to be on par with all of your ingenuity, and, respectfully your honor, that is not proportional to the conduct of this case.
Campaign ME
a day ago
- Campaign ME
Emirates, Mbappe, Bellingham and Diaz link up to inspire a ‘choice for excellence'
Emirates has launched a new campaign in partnership with Real Madrid, featuring footballers Kylian Mbappe, Jude Bellingham and Brahim Diaz alongside the Emirates cabin crew. The campaign is is currently playing on Real Madrid and Emirates social media platforms across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube channels. The two global brands, shared one standard – excellence. The campaign aims to inspire fans to strive for excellence and 'choose better' whether in the skies or on the pitch, and invites fans to experience the power of sport and travel with brands that share the same values of excellence, passion and ambition. The digital and social campaign highlights what it means to 'fly better' with Emirates: ultimate comfort, world-class products and superior travel experiences to more than 140 destinations via Dubai. 'Choosing to support one of the best football clubs in the world means backing a club defined by greatness and a lasting legacy, on and off the pitch,' the airline brand shared in a statement. 'With a shared vision that 'excellence is not a destination, it's a continuous journey' – the ad seamlessly weaves in striking visuals from both worlds, drawing powerful parallels of commitment, drive, and successes. Together, Emirates and Real Madrid continue to raise the bar and redefine what 'excellence' truly means,' the brand's official statement read. Emirates has partnered with Real Madrid since 2011 and became the club's jersey sponsor in 2013. The airline will remain as the official main sponsor of the Spanish club until 2026 – making it the longest jersey sponsorship in La Liga history. Earlier this year, the airline unveiled a special livery on one of its Boeing 777 aircraft featuring some of the club's top players including Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Junior, Luka Modric, Jude Bellingham, Lucas Vazquez and Federico Valverde.
