
'Aces up the sleeve': Ukraine drone attacks in Russia shake up conflict
Despite being outnumbered and outgunned, Kyiv used inexpensive drones at the weekend to destroy Russian nuclear-capable bombers worth billions of dollars in an operation carried out after months of planning.
"Spider's Web" dealt a blow to Russia more than three years after its invasion of Ukraine, and the operation will now be studied closely by militaries around the world as a new strategy in asymmetric warfare.
Ukraine said it destroyed $7 billion worth of Russian aircraft parked at airbases thousands of kilometers across the border, mainly Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range strategic bombers.
While the attacks at Belaya deep in Siberia and Olenya on the Kola Peninsula in the Arctic circle are unlikely to change to course of the war, they will limit Moscow's ability to launch long-range missile strikes against Ukraine.
Yohann Michel, a researcher at the French university Lyon-3, said the loss of the aircraft was "a serious blow to Russian offensive capabilities."
"The main impact could be felt in several weeks' time with a reduction in the number of sorties by the rest of the fleet" due to difficulties in finding spare parts for the Soviet-era planes, which are no longer in production, he said.
Maxim Starchak, a fellow at the Center for International and Defense Policy at Queen's University in Canada, said it would take Russia a long time to replace the lost aircraft.
"Russia is extremely slow and inefficient in developing new aircraft for its nuclear forces," he said.
New way of waging war
The drones, launched from trucks in the immediate vicinity of air bases deep inside Russia, destroyed or damaged aircraft parked in the open.
Congratulating Ukraine's security service chief Vasyl Malyuk, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said it had taken 18 months of preparation for the 117 drones to be concealed inside trucks close to the airbases, and that all the Ukrainian agents had safely left Russia.
A satellite image shows pre-strike and post-strike images of the Ivanovo Airbase east of Moscow. |
2025 PLANET LABS PBC / via AFP-Jiji
Michael Shurkin, a former CIA officer, said Ukraine's operation was likely to have struck fear into militaries across the world, adding that potential targets for such drone attacks could include refineries, ballistic missile silos or military bases.
"This technology is akin to stealth technology: The threat is difficult to detect both because it emerges near the target and is too small and too low to be picked up by sensors designed to catch aircraft or missiles," said Shurkin, director of global programs for the consultancy 14 North Strategies.
Ukrainian military analyst Oleksii Kopytko said anyone delivering a pizza or driving a horse-drawn cart could present a danger. "The organizers and main perpetrators are essentially untraceable," he said.
A French arms manufacturing executive said Ukraine could even have trained AI algorithms to recognize aircraft or guide the drones in case of jamming.
"New tools are forcing us to completely rethink defense systems and how they are produced," said the executive, who asked not to be named.
"It opens up possibilities that we hadn't even imagined."
Zelenskyy "just proved that he and Ukraine are more than able to pull aces out of their combat fatigue sleeves," said Timothy Ash, an emerging market economist focused on Russia.
'Did not help'
The attacks exposed Russia's air base vulnerabilities, in a massive morale boost for Kyiv after months on the backfoot in the conflict.
"The protection of military air bases does not meet security requirements," said Starchak. "The dispersal of military aircraft across different airfields did not help either."
Russia's vast size is also a disadvantage here.
"Usually, the vastness of Russia's territory is an advantage; you can hide your bombers thousands of kilometers away where they would be safe," said Michel.
"The problem is that this means you have to monitor thousands of square kilometers, which is simply impossible."
The attacks dealt a blow to Moscow's nuclear triad of ground, sea and air-launched missiles, said Starchak.
If it was possible to target an airbase it is also possible to hit bases hosting nuclear submarines, Starchak said.
"An attack on long-range aircraft bases is a potential threat to the entire nuclear triad, which can be easily hit, thereby weakening it to the point that it cannot respond with a nuclear strike."
John Herbst, senior director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Center, said that Ukraine's operation gave U.S. President Donald Trump leverage against Russia's Vladimir Putin in search of a settlement.
"It is a strong counter to the dubious 'common wisdom' that the war is moving inevitably in Moscow's favor," wrote the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
Europe discusses security guarantees if Russia attacks Ukraine after ceasefire
A US media outlet says that European leaders are discussing a security guarantee for Ukraine that would commit its allies to decide within 24 hours whether to provide military support to the country if it is attacked by Russia again after a possible ceasefire deal. Bloomberg said on Wednesday the idea is among a number of options being discussed by European leaders as they try to take advantage of momentum after US President Donald Trump agreed on Monday to back security guarantees for Ukraine. Trump said the US might provide air support for European ground troops. Bloomberg reported that the proposal is being pushed by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and it is recognized that NATO membership for Ukraine is off the table but would still offer a mechanism for collective assistance as the next best option. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters on Monday following his meeting with Trump and European leaders that details of security guarantees would be worked out within the next 10 days. Meanwhile, there has been no easing in daily Russian airstrikes across Ukraine. Ukraine's air force said that Russia conducted airstrikes, involving 40 missiles and 574 drones, from Wednesday night through Thursday morning. Local officials in the western city of Lviv said that the night-time attack killed one person, and caused damage to about 30 houses and other buildings.


Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Online behavior under scrutiny as Russia hunts 'extremists'
Just like his peers, Russian teenager Artyom spends "half his life" online — something that could soon become risky as a ban on searching for "extremist" content comes into force. Since launching its offensive in Ukraine in 2022, Russia has drastically restricted press freedom and online free speech. But the new legislation takes digital surveillance even further. It will slap fines on internet users who search for web pages, books, artwork or music albums that the authorities deem "extremist." The term has a very broad definition and in Russia can refer to terrorist groups and political opponents alike. Browsing information on the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny or on the "international LGBTQ movement," both classified as extremist, could lead to fines of up to 5,000 rubles ($63). Artyom, who spoke in one of Moscow's parks, said he was interested in "the future of our country, the policies of our leaders, those of foreign governments." He suspected his life would "change" after the new law comes into effect in September, forcing him to be careful with every click. Artyom said he would for example stay away from "sites from so-called 'unfriendly' countries," a term often used to refer to Western states. And these sites were "the ones that interest me the most," he said bitterly. Another resident of Moscow, Sergei, said the new law made him "afraid." Like most Russians interviewed for this story, he did not want to give his full name. "Just yesterday, I did some research freely, and tomorrow I could be found guilty," the 33-year-old jewellery designer said. 'Censorship' The new legislation has raised concerns even among Kremlin supporters, drawing rare opposition from around 60 lower house State Duma lawmakers. "Even young pro-government figures oppose this censorship," a history professor at a Moscow university said, speaking on condition of anonymity. A computer security expert who also wanted to remain anonymous said that the law "violates the principle enshrined in the constitution, according to which reading cannot be punishable." "Searching on the Internet is now simply dangerous," he said, adding: "The government wants to make everyone afraid." According to the expert, Russia is inching closer to Chinese levels of surveillance and control. A prominent Russian rights activist, Svetlana Gannushkina, who has been classified by Moscow as a "foreign agent," said the Kremlin's goal was to "sow fear and stifle any will of resistance." She said the conflict in Ukraine "causes natural annoyance" for the authorities which, "are afraid and begin to take these hysterical measures," the 83-year-old said. The law also bans advertising for virtual private networks (VPNs), widely used in Russia to get around state blocks on Western sites and circumvent censorship. YouTube is already only accessible in Russia via VPN, as are the social media platforms of the Meta group: Facebook and Instagram, which are declared extremist. Extremist gardening? Separate legislation, also taking effect in September, will allow an entire online community to be branded as extremist if one of its members has been classified as such. Several communities, particularly those for writing to political prisoners, have already had to close or reorganize in response to the changes. For Natalia, a 50-year-old school administrator, "this law is just stupid." She said an entire group "cannot be held responsible" for the activities of a single member. "So I have to check every time I open my gardening group page to see if one of the grannies has been declared an 'extremist' by any chance?" she said. But the digital security expert pointed out that internet censorship on a national scale "will be difficult to implement." According to him, the law would primarily target individuals who had already been targeted by the authorities for their political views. "We know well that the severity of Russian laws is often mitigated by the possibility of their non-enforcement," the expert said.

Japan Times
13 hours ago
- Japan Times
Russia says talks on Ukraine's security without Moscow are a 'road to nowhere'
Russia said on Wednesday that attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without Moscow's participation were a "road to nowhere," sounding a warning to the West as it scrambles to work out guarantees for Kyiv's future protection. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov particularly criticized the role of European leaders who met U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on Monday to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine that could help end the 3½-year-old war. "We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work," Lavrov told a joint news conference after meeting Jordan's foreign minister. U.S. and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, U.S. officials and sources told Reuters on Tuesday. Lavrov said such discussions without Russia were pointless. "I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere." NATO military leaders holding a video conference on Wednesday had a "great, candid discussion" on the results of recent talks on Ukraine, the chair of the alliance's military committee said. "Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace," Adm. Giuseppe Cavo Dragone wrote in a post on X. A Western official said that a small group of military leaders continued discussions in Washington on security guarantees shortly after the bigger virtual meeting. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow on Wednesday | AFP-JIJI After Polish officials said that an object that crashed in a cornfield in eastern Poland overnight was likely a Russian drone, Poland accused Russia of provoking NATO countries just as efforts to find an end to the war were intensifying. "Once again, we are dealing with a provocation by the Russian Federation, with a Russian drone. We are dealing in a crucial moment, when discussions about peace (in Ukraine) are underway," Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said. Lavrov's comments highlighted Moscow's demand for Western governments to directly engage with it on questions of security concerning Ukraine and Europe, something it says they have so far refused to do. Moscow this week also restated its rejection of "any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine." Lavrov accused the European leaders who met Trump and Zelenskyy of carrying out "a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation, rather clumsy and, in general, unethical attempts to change the position of the Trump administration and the president of the United States personally. ... We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there." Trump said on Monday the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting U.S. troops in Ukraine, but the U.S. might provide air support as part of a deal to end the hostilities. Zelenskyy's chief of staff, speaking after a meeting of national security advisers from Western countries and NATO, said work was proceeding on the military component of the guarantees. "Our teams, above all the military, have already begun active work on the military component of security guarantees," chief of staff Andriy Yermak wrote on social media. Yermak said Ukraine was also working on a plan with its allies on how to proceed "in case the Russian side continues to prolong the war and disrupt agreements on bilateral and trilateral formats of leaders' meetings." Lavrov said Russia was in favor of "truly reliable" guarantees for Ukraine and suggested these could be modeled on a draft accord that was discussed between the warring parties in Istanbul in 2022, in the early weeks of the war. Under the draft discussed then, Ukraine would have received security guarantees from a group of countries including the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — China, Russia, the United States, Britain, and France. At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid.