Russia Notches Long-Awaited Win in Fight Against Inflation
While the annual inflation rate remains at 9%, well above the central bank's 4% target, current price growth now aligns with that goal after decelerating from the previous month, according to data from the Bank of Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P 500 sinks 1.6%, its worst drop since May, following surprisingly weak hiring numbers and Trump's tariff rollout
NEW YORK (AP) — S&P 500 sinks 1.6%, its worst drop since May, following surprisingly weak hiring numbers and Trump's tariff rollout. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kugler to step down from Fed board on Aug. 8, allowing Trump to fill her seat early
Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler said Friday she will resign from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors effective Aug. 8, meaning President Trump could have a replacement in her seat earlier than expected. The term of Kugler, who was appointed by President Biden, was due to expire on Jan. 31. "It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,' Kugler wrote in a resignation letter to Fed Chair Jerome Powell. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market.' Kugler was not present at this week's meeting of the Fed's Federal Open Market Committee, due to what was described by the Fed as "personal matter." The Fed voted at that meeting to keep rates unchanged and two Fed governors dissented from that decision — the first time that has happened since 1993. Kugler, who has served as a Fed governor since Sept. 13, 2023, also submitted her letter of resignation to Trump. She will return to Georgetown University as a professor this fall. 'I appreciate Dr. Kugler's service on the Board and wish her very well in her future endeavors,' said Powell. 'She brought impressive experience and academic insights to her work on the Board.' Trump and the White House have been considering candidates to replace Powell as chair once the chairman's term ends next May, and one of those names could be appointed to fill Kugler's seat as a prelude to becoming chair. The people that have Trump have considered include National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. One sitting Fed governor, Fed governor Christopher Waller, is also considered among the possible choices to replace Powell eventually. Bessent, who is leading the search for Powell's replacement, has already sketched out a scenario where the White House appoints someone to fill Kugler's seat and that person can then be in the running to succeed Powell next May. The White House also hopes that Powell decides to leave the Fed Board of Governors when his chairmanship is up, which would open up a second seat that Trump can fill. Powell has not yet said whether he intends to do that; his term as a Fed governor is up not up until 2028. The opportunity for the White House to fill Kugler's seat earlier than expected comes as Trump applies pressure on Powell and the Fed board to lower rates by as many as 3 percentage points. Trump said in a social media post Friday that the Federal Reserve Board should 'ASSUME CONTROL." The president urged the Fed board, which Powell chairs, to "DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE' if Powell won't support lower interest rates. Waller and Michelle Bowman, the two Fed governors who argued for a quarter percentage point rate reduction at the Fed's last meeting on Wednesday, explained Friday in statements why they broke with Powell. Both cited worries about the labor market as a reason to start cutting again. 'I believe that the wait and see approach is overly cautious, and, in my opinion, does not properly balance the risks to the outlook and could lead to policy falling behind the curve,' Waller said in his statement. The statements from Waller and Bowman came just 30 minutes before July's jobs report released Friday morning, which showed the US economy added fewer jobs than expected last month. Traders raised their odds of a rate cut at the Fed's September meeting to 80% following the release of that weaker-than-expected labor reading, after lowering them below 40% on Thursday. Trump seemed to praise the Fed governors after their statements were released, adding in a separate Truth Social post: 'STRONG DISSENTS ON FED BOARD. IT WILL ONLY GET STRONGER!' There are seven seats on the Fed Board of Governors and all seven hold spots on the FOMC, the powerful body that decides whether rates go up or down. Another five spots on the FOMC are held on a rotating basis by regional Fed presidents who are based around the country. Whoever is US president gets to nominate all Fed governors, who then need Senate approval to be confirmed, and serve 14-year terms while the regional Fed presidents are picked by banks in their districts. Trump spent much of Friday criticizing Powell on social media, even mentioning him in a post about firing the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics following a weak July jobs report. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put 'out to pasture,'' Trump said. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's tariffs are doing just what his critics feared
The latest economic numbers have come at an awkward time for the Trump administration. It has spent weeks touting a strong economy and proclaiming victory over inflation. It has savaged Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell (a 'moron') for continuing the fight against it. The administration has also maintained that the economy vindicates President Donald Trump's tariffs. Vice President JD Vance says predictions of tariff-induced inflation have proved so wrong as to cast doubt on the economics profession. Free traders are now due for some retaliatory gloating. On Thursday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that last month, one measure of prices — personal consumption expenditures, excluding the volatile categories of food and energy — rose at a higher than 3 percent annual rate. That's the measure that Powell and his colleagues monitor most closely, and they want it at 2 percent. The number has now risen three months in a row. One day later, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that job growth has been much weaker than previously thought. Both the jobs and inflation trends are worrisome. Inflation has, however, assumed an outsize importance in the debate about tariffs. Politicians opposed to them have emphasized the potential for higher inflation because Americans have recent unpleasant experience with it. Economists tend to talk about other downsides of tariffs — because the truth is that tariffs don't necessarily cause inflation, and they can harm economies even if they don't. Tariffs obviously raise some prices. That's how they're supposed to work. Protectionists seek to change patterns of consumption and production by altering prices. Tariffs make imported steel more expensive, so U.S. consumers (including companies that use steel) buy more domestically produced steel. U.S. steelmakers can then increase their prices, too, drawing more investment. But raising some prices need not mean raising the overall price level. Maybe consumers will spend more on products with steel in them and less on everything else, with prices going down in other sectors. Or maybe a monetary contraction will pull prices down. That's what happened in the early years of the Great Depression, when a spike in tariffs happened alongside deflation. That said, there are two ways tariffs can raise price levels more broadly across the economy. Especially when inflation has recently been unsettled, tariffs can cause people to expect higher inflation and then act in a way that brings it about. Consumers can move purchases forward, for example, to get ahead of rising prices. But that's an effect that a central bank can, in principle, prevent through tighter money and the threat of it. Tariffs can also reduce how much the economy produces, in which case the economy gets bitten by the tail end of 'too much money chasing too few goods.' In that case, the tariffs are stagflationary: We get fewer goods at a higher price. The early evidence is consistent with both price-raising trends: higher inflation expectations and supply-driven price hikes. Economic growth has slowed down — it has run at an annual rate of 1.25 percent in the past two quarters — and inflation has picked up. But even these preliminary results don't clinch the case against the tariffs. If these costs were part of a transition to making America great — if they really promised a manufacturing revival, a Rust Belt renaissance, plentiful high-wage jobs — then a short-term increase in prices and reduced output in the first phase of this transformation might be worth it. There are, of course, many reasons to be skeptical about all of that, to fear instead that the tariffs will reduce our productivity growth over the long run and the lost opportunities will silently compound. That's the biggest potential downside of the tariffs. It's just not an argument that Trump's opponents can make stick in a 30-second spot. His allies have sometimes flirted with making the 'short-term pain, long-term gain' argument for the tariffs. Mostly, though, they have preferred to act as though tariffs have no possible downside. Even after the new inflation numbers came out, the White House promoted a column celebrating its trade war and ridiculing the notion that it would raise prices. 'Inflation remains on track,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted. It doesn't. Trump reacted to the jobs report by throwing a tantrum, suggesting that the agency was faking statistics to make him look bad (after making him look good in previous months for some unexplained reason). This economic news might be embarrassing for the administration. But this isn't an administration that embarrasses easily.
