
3 Safe Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stocks -- Sporting an Average Yield of 11.35% -- That Make for No-Brainer Buys in June
There are a lot of strategies investors can employ on Wall Street to grow their wealth. With thousands of publicly traded companies and more than 3,000 exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to choose from, there's bound to be one or more securities that can help you meet your investment goals.
But among these countless strategies, buying and holding high-quality dividend stocks delivers some of the most robust returns over long periods.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
Companies that pay a regular dividend to their shareholders are often profitable on a recurring basis, capable of providing transparent long-term growth outlooks, and have, in many instances, demonstrated their ability to navigate an economic downturn. This time-tested aspect of dividend stocks helps to lure income seekers.
However, the most intriguing characteristic of dividend stocks is their long-term outperformance. In The Power of Dividends: Past, Present, and Future, the researchers at Hartford Funds, in collaboration with Ned Davis Research, compared the annualized return of dividend stocks to non-payers over a 51-year period (1973-2024). Not only did the dividend stocks more than double up the annualized return of non-payers (9.2% vs. 4.31%), but they did so while being considerably less volatile.
The challenge for income seekers is balancing yield and risk. The higher the yield, the higher probability of things being too good to be true. Since yield is a function of payout relative to share price, a struggling business with a plunging share price can trap investors with a high but unsustainable yield.
The good news is that safe ultra-high-yield dividend stocks, with yields that are at least four times higher than the average yield of the benchmark S&P 500 (1.31%, as of May 30), do exist, and can make investors richer over time.
What follows are three ultra-high-yield dividend stocks, sporting an average yield of 11.35%, which make for no-brainer buys in June.
Annaly Capital Management: 14.78% yield
The first supercharged income stock that makes for a compelling buy in June comes from an industry that Wall Street analysts have almost universally disliked since this decade began: mortgage real estate investment trusts (REITs). I'm talking about Wall Street's leading mortgage REIT, Annaly Capital Management (NYSE: NLY).
Recently, Annaly's board increased its quarterly distribution to $0.70 per share, which marks the first time since 2011 that the company has increased its dividend. While a nearly 15% yield might sound unsustainable, Annaly has averaged a roughly 10% annual yield over the last two decades.
The reason Wall Street has generally avoided mortgage REITs is because they're highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Companies like Annaly typically don't perform well when the Federal Reserve is rapidly increasing interest rates, as well as when the Treasury yield curve is inverted. This results in higher short-term borrowing costs for Annaly and its peers and reduces net interest margin.
But when things seem their bleakest for mortgage REITs is when it's often the best time to buy. The steep yield-curve inversion that had worked against Annaly and its peers is no longer inverted (albeit by a small amount).
Additionally, the nation's central bank is in the midst of a well-telegraphed rate-easing cycle. A falling rate environment has historically been when mortgage REITs thrive. Short-term borrowing costs begin to fall, but still allow companies like Annaly to increase the average yield on the mortgage-backed securities they're buying and holding.
Best of all, $75 billion of Annaly Capital Management's $84.9 billion asset portfolio is in highly liquid agency securities. An "agency" asset is backed by the federal government in the unlikely event of default. This added protection affords Annaly the ability to lever its investments to maximize its profits and dividend.
With Annaly trading ever-so-slightly below its book value -- mortgage REITs often trade close to their respective book value -- and industry variables now working in its favor, the time to buy this income colossus has arrived.
Pfizer: 7.32% yield
A second ultra-high-yield dividend stock that makes for a no-brainer buy in June is none other than pharmaceutical giant Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), which is yielding north of 7.3% for its shareholders.
The weakness in Pfizer's stock over the last three years can best be described as the company being a victim of its own success. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Pfizer's vaccine (Comirnaty) and oral therapy (Paxlovid) generated more than $56 billion in combined sales in 2022. Last year, sales shrank to about $11 billion on a combined basis and will likely fall further in 2025 on weaker Paxlovid sales.
Though Pfizer has lost tens of billions in COVID-19 therapy sales, perspective also shows that Comirnaty and Paxlovid are generating north of $1 billion in combined quarterly sales when no sales existed at the end of 2020 from this area of focus. Pfizer's revenue, including acquisitions, has grown by more than 50% over the last four years. In short, it's a stronger and more diverse company today than it was at the end of 2020 -- but it's not being treated like one due to recent sales weakness in its COVID-19 therapies.
One of the many reasons Pfizer can thrive moving forward is the December 2023 acquisition of cancer-drug developer Seagen for $43 billion. Aside from recognizing billions of dollars in immediate revenue, Seagen vastly expands Pfizer's oncology pipeline, which can benefit from strong pricing power and patients gaining earlier access to cancer-screening tools.
Furthermore, cost synergies directly tied to this buyout, coupled with Pfizer's ongoing cost realignment program, should result in approximately $4.5 billion in net-cost savings by the end of this year. Reduced costs should be a positive for the company's margins.
Investors should also consider that healthcare is an incredibly defensive sector. Regardless of how well or poorly the U.S. economy and stock market perform, people will continue to need prescription medicines. Though Pfizer isn't going to knock anyone's socks off with its growth rate, its cash flow tends to be highly predictable.
Pfizer stock is trading at less than 8 times forecast earnings per share for 2025, which makes this an ideal time for opportunistic income seekers to pounce.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital: 11.94% yield
The third high-octane dividend stock income investors can purchase with confidence in June is small-cap business development company (BDC) PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE: PFLT). Unlike Annaly Capital Management and Pfizer, PennantPark pays its dividend on a monthly basis and is currently yielding close to 12%.
A BDC is a type of business that invests in middle-market companies -- i.e., unproven small- and micro-cap companies. At the end of March, PennantPark held almost $240 million in various preferred and common stock in middle market companies, along with $2.1 billion in first lien secured debt. This makes it a predominantly debt-focused BDC.
Focusing on debt offers a huge advantage when dealing with middle-market companies. Since these businesses often lack access to basic financial services, PennantPark can typically net a higher yield on its loans. As of March 31, its weighted average yield on debt investments was a scorching-hot 10.5%, which is more than double the yield you'll find on U.S. Treasury bonds.
But the company's biggest advantage might just be that approximately 100% of its debt investments sport variable rates. When the Fed aggressively fought back against rapidly rising inflation in 2022 and 2023, it sent PennantPark's weighted average yield on debt investments notably higher. Even with the nation's central bank in a rate-easing cycle, rate cuts are being addressed slowly. This is allowing PennantPark to continue to facilitate high-interest loans.
Something else to note about PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is that delinquencies are minimal. Despite dealing with unproven businesses, only four companies, representing 2.2% of its portfolio on a cost basis, are currently delinquent. This is a testament to the vetting process by PennantPark's team.
Further, management has done an excellent job of protecting the company's invested principal. Including its preferred and common stock holdings, PennantPark has an average investment of $14.7 million spread across 159 companies. No single investment is large enough to compromise profitability or rock the boat.
To build on this point, all but $4.4 million of its $2.1 billion in debt investments is first-lien secured debt. First-lien secured debtholders find themselves at the front of the line for repayment in the event that a borrower seeks bankruptcy protection.
Similar to Annaly, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital tends to trade very close to its book value. With shares currently trading at a 7% discount to book, opportunistic investors can nab a fantastic company at a bargain price.
Should you invest $1,000 in Annaly Capital Management right now?
Before you buy stock in Annaly Capital Management, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Annaly Capital Management wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
28 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney faces pressure to retaliate against Trump's steel, aluminum tariffs
Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing increasing pressure from premiers, industry, labour and business organizations to retaliate against U.S. President Donald Trump's doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs. But even as he called the tariffs 'unlawful, unjustified and illogical,' Mr. Carney said Canada will take its time responding, citing broader talks with the U.S. that he said are progressing. Mr. Trump initially imposed tariffs of 25 per cent on the metals in March but doubled them to 50 per cent as of Wednesday. The tariffs apply to all foreign suppliers, but they will disproportionately hit Canada, which is the largest supplier of steel and aluminum to the U.S. Ottawa imposed retaliatory tariffs in March, but Mr. Carney lifted many of those in April over concerns that they would drive up prices for Canadian consumers. Mr. Carney, who won the spring election on a campaign to fight against U.S. tariffs, including through retaliation, said Canada wouldn't hit back against the increased tariffs just yet. 'We are in intensive negotiations with the Americans and in parallel, preparing reprisals if those negotiations do not succeed,' Mr. Carney said during Question Period on Wednesday. Ontario Premier Doug Ford urged immediate retaliation. He told reporters he had spoken with Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who is leading the U.S.-Canada file, to make the case. The Canadian Labour Congress, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities joined together to demand government action. The three groups rarely share a stage, but did so Wednesday to make a point, said Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress. 'This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. We need to defend our jobs. We need to invest in our industries, and we need to protect our communities that built this country, labour, business, municipalities and government.' She urged reprisal, but said she also wants the government to take other steps, including reforms to employment insurance to assist affected workers and legislated commitments to use Canadian steel in national projects. Industry, billionaire tycoon Barry Zekelman urge government action on steel dumping Ms. Bruske said there are 23,000 steel industry jobs in the country that could be affected 'within the next couple of days,' plus 9,500 aluminum jobs, and then all the spin-off jobs created by both industries. The Prime Minister's hesitation on retaliation is a contrast with the approach of then-prime minister Justin Trudeau, who immediately imposed tariffs on the U.S., both earlier this year and in 2018, during Mr. Trump's previous trade war with Canada. In March, Mr. Ford also moved quickly to levy a 25-per-cent surcharge on electricity that Ontario sends to 1.5 million homes in three U.S. states. He cancelled the measure within a day after Mr. Trump threatened to double steel and aluminum tariffs in response. But Mr. Ford said his understanding is that a Canada-U.S. deal is close, and so for now he is not reinstating the surcharge. Mr. Carney is pushing for a deal between the two countries covering both trade and national security, including the border and defence. The CEO of Algoma Steel Group Inc., Michael Garcia, said Ottawa should immediately bring in tariffs on imports of foreign steel to address dumping in Canada from places such as Turkey, Vietnam and the Middle East. Mr. Garcia said that unless the price of steel skyrockets, the company's U.S. business isn't viable anymore. 'I am advocating for Section 53 tariffs not as a retaliatory measure against the U.S., but as a prudent move to protect a vital strategic industry,' he said in an interview. Under Canada's Customs Tariff law, Section 53 tariffs can be imposed by Ottawa in cases in which unfair trade practices are occurring that are harming domestic trade. An estimate by Oxford Economics, a consultancy firm, found that more than half of U.S. steel imported into Canada is currently exempt from tariffs. The Aluminium Association of Canada said the tariff increase would destroy demand across the continent, no matter whether the metal is made in Canada or the U.S., and disrupt key sectors, including defence, construction and automotive. Steel prices in the U.S. have already risen by 16 per cent since Mr. Trump took office in January, and his higher tariffs risk causing inflation for American consumers by making products built with steel more expensive. At a committee hearing on Wednesday, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the administration's goal is not to get other countries to simply lower trade barriers but to ensure that those countries stop exporting certain products to the U.S., a position that would appear to complicate Mr. Carney's efforts to land a deal that includes removing U.S. tariffs. Mr. Lutnick said under questioning from Senator John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, that he did not know the name of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the legislation under which the U.S. has imposed steel, aluminum and auto tariffs. He also said he was not familiar with a principle called the 'major questions doctrine,' which was central to a legal decision overturning a different series of Mr. Trump's tariffs. Mr. Lutnick is the member of the President's cabinet with top authority on trade policy. Mr. Kennedy's grilling of Mr. Lutnick could indicate a fracture in Republican support for Mr. Trump's agenda. While the party traditionally supported free trade, it has largely fallen in line behind the President's protectionism since he returned to office. Meanwhile, in Ottawa, the opposition Conservatives and the New Democrats all castigated Mr. Carney Wednesday for campaigning in the recent election on having a plan to push back against Mr. Trump, but still not having a deal to end the tariff dispute. Mining giants Alcoa, Rio Tinto and Aluminerie Alouette operate nine plants in Canada, eight of them in Quebec. This amps up the political pressure on the minority Liberal government from the Bloc Québécois. At a White House meeting last month, Mr. Trump said there was nothing Mr. Carney could say that would make him change his mind on tariffs, but the Prime Minister has remained insistent that such a deal would include the U.S. lifting its levies on Canada. With reports from Niall McGee and Nicolas Van Praet


CTV News
29 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. cabinet minister reiterates provincial opposition to north coast pipeline
B.C. Minister of Energy and Climate Solutions Adrian Dix speaks in Delta on Jan. 24, 2025. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck) Locked in a trade war with the United States, many Canadian leaders see a potential new pipeline to British Columbia's north coast as a way to diversify the national economy – but the provincial government is not on board. B.C. Premier David Eby quickly voiced his opposition to the plan, and that position was reiterated by Energy and Climate Solutions Minister Adrian Dix on Wednesday. 'That idea doesn't make sense to us,' said Dix, at an unrelated news conference. The province has been down this road before and it proved very controversial. Starting in the early 2000s, Enbridge proposed the Northern Gateway pipeline to carry Alberta bitumen to an export terminal in Kitimat, just south of Prince Rupert. In 2016, then-prime minister Justin Trudeau and the newly-elected federal Liberals banned oil tankers on B.C.'s north coast, essentially sinking the project. With Canada's place in a shifting geopolitical landscape uncertain, Alta. Premier Danielle Smith thinks the idea deserves another look. 'We've got to work with where we think we'll have the most success,' she said at a First Ministers meeting in Saskatoon earlier this week. 'And where I think we'll have the most success right now is working on a corridor between Hudson Bay and the Port of Prince Rupert.' With a new prime minister at the helm promising to fast-track projects deemed in the national interest, conditional federal support appears to be on the table. 'The world is certainly more divided and dangerous and the imperative of making Canada an energy superpower in all respects has never been greater,' Mark Carney said in Saskatoon. Pointing to the cost overruns and delays of the recently completed Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion, Dix doesn't think there's an economic case for another new pipeline. 'This would be a colossally expensive and not economic proposal,' he said. 'It's a political proposal – and fair enough – but we have a different view. The premier has expressed very clearly his view of non-support for that." With other premiers, including Ontario's Doug Ford, already voicing their support, B.C.'s NDP government is an outlier this time. If a deep-pocketed company steps forward offering to take the pricey project on, there may be little the province can do to stop it.


CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
Smith says she sees a ‘breakthrough' in talks with Americans on energy
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith poses for a photo at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Kelly Geraldine Malone WASHINGTON — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Wednesday there's been a 'breakthrough' in conversations with Americans on Canada's role in the United States' quest for energy dominance as President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to cause uncertainty for the bilateral relationship. 'We've managed to make a breakthrough on the discussion about energy dominance and how Canada can lend itself to that, whether its our oil, our gas, critical minerals, uranium from Saskatchewan, electricity from many of our provinces,' Smith said in an interview with The Canadian Press at the embassy in Washington, D.C. 'I feel like there's a real understanding of that.' Trump returned to the White House set on boosting America's energy production. Smith said that while the energy argument has seen success, conversations around other industries are ongoing. The Alberta premier was in the United States capital for meetings and a forum on energy this week as Trump doubled his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Canada is a major supplier to the U.S. and Canadian industry says 50 per cent levies will be devastating. Smith said she had conversations with American counterparts and explained that, particularly for aluminum tariffs, they are 'the very definition of a tariff being its own punishment.' The United States imports about 60 per cent of its aluminum from Canada. The Canadian industry largely uses hydroelectricity to make the high energy costs connected to smelting more affordable. Smith said the U.S. doesn't have the ability to develop a homegrown industry to fill the gaps. 'We just have to make sure we are able to make that same (energy) argument on everything else, on the integrated food market, the integrated manufacturing market,' Smith said, also pointing to timber. '(We) haven't had a full breakthrough on all of that but I think the conversations I have are always very positive.' Despite conversations at home about Western alienation and Alberta separatism, Smith said that issue has not come up in Washington. The premier, however, said it's important to take the issue seriously. Trump set his sights on Canada early in his return to the White House and his tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles have upended Canadian industries. The president has repeatedly said he doesn't need anything from Canada but his actions have shown signs that he still values trade with America's northern neighbour. Trump slapped Canada with economywide duties in March, only to walk back the tariffs on imports complaint with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, called CUSMA, a few days later. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was asked during a U.S. Senate hearing Wednesday about tariffs on Canada. Lutnick pointed to the trilateral agreement and said imports that are compliant with CUSMA remain tariff-free. CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration and was up for a mandatory review next year. Smith said it remains unclear when CUSMA negotiations might start but there is 'encouragement or expectation that we might get some kind of detente or interim agreement by the time we have the G7.' It's unclear whether that will be commitments on CUSMA or a separate agreement on the current tariffs. Carney has said Canada will negotiate a new economic and security agreement with the United States. Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who met with Lutnick in Washington Tuesday, said he's 'hopeful that we can get to the best outcome for Canadians.' Carney and Trump will join leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union from June 15 to 17 for the G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has also been invited to attend. Smith said it 'just makes so much sense for Canada and the U.S. to get to an agreement fast.' She said Americans have 'bigger fish to fry' on other major policy priorities. Smith was optimistic about Carney's relationship with Trump. While the president recently brought back comments on making Canada a U.S. state, Trump has also spoken about a good relationship with Carney and calls him prime minister and not the 'governor' title he used to taunt former prime minister Justin Trudeau. It also marks a change in tone for the Alberta premier, who had an icy relationship with Ottawa under Trudeau. Smith has long been critical of the governing Liberal's policies around energy which she says micromanaged Alberta's priorities and hindered industry. She said federal policies stopped Alberta from developing foreign markets that would be critical for many Canadian industries as Trump tries to realign global trade through tariffs. Following the First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon earlier this week, Smith said she is 'hoping that we are having a breakthrough with the Liberals way of seeing things.' Smith had proposed a bitumen pipeline to B.C.'s northern coast coupled with support for a project on decarbonization. She said 'if we can work together on developing new markets then I think it will be good for everyone.' B.C. deputy premier Niki Sharma has pushed back on Smith's proposal, saying the province is focusing on 'shovel-ready projects, not theoretical projects with no proponents.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press