Smith says she sees a ‘breakthrough' in talks with Americans on energy
WASHINGTON — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Wednesday there's been a 'breakthrough' in conversations with Americans on Canada's role in the United States' quest for energy dominance as President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to cause uncertainty for the bilateral relationship.
'We've managed to make a breakthrough on the discussion about energy dominance and how Canada can lend itself to that, whether its our oil, our gas, critical minerals, uranium from Saskatchewan, electricity from many of our provinces,' Smith said in an interview with The Canadian Press at the embassy in Washington, D.C.
'I feel like there's a real understanding of that.'
Trump returned to the White House set on boosting America's energy production. Smith said that while the energy argument has seen success, conversations around other industries are ongoing.
The Alberta premier was in the United States capital for meetings and a forum on energy this week as Trump doubled his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Canada is a major supplier to the U.S. and Canadian industry says 50 per cent levies will be devastating.
Smith said she had conversations with American counterparts and explained that, particularly for aluminum tariffs, they are 'the very definition of a tariff being its own punishment.'
The United States imports about 60 per cent of its aluminum from Canada. The Canadian industry largely uses hydroelectricity to make the high energy costs connected to smelting more affordable. Smith said the U.S. doesn't have the ability to develop a homegrown industry to fill the gaps.
'We just have to make sure we are able to make that same (energy) argument on everything else, on the integrated food market, the integrated manufacturing market,' Smith said, also pointing to timber. '(We) haven't had a full breakthrough on all of that but I think the conversations I have are always very positive.'
Despite conversations at home about Western alienation and Alberta separatism, Smith said that issue has not come up in Washington. The premier, however, said it's important to take the issue seriously.
Trump set his sights on Canada early in his return to the White House and his tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles have upended Canadian industries. The president has repeatedly said he doesn't need anything from Canada but his actions have shown signs that he still values trade with America's northern neighbour.
Trump slapped Canada with economywide duties in March, only to walk back the tariffs on imports complaint with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, called CUSMA, a few days later.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was asked during a U.S. Senate hearing Wednesday about tariffs on Canada. Lutnick pointed to the trilateral agreement and said imports that are compliant with CUSMA remain tariff-free.
CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration and was up for a mandatory review next year.
Smith said it remains unclear when CUSMA negotiations might start but there is 'encouragement or expectation that we might get some kind of detente or interim agreement by the time we have the G7.'
It's unclear whether that will be commitments on CUSMA or a separate agreement on the current tariffs. Carney has said Canada will negotiate a new economic and security agreement with the United States.
Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who met with Lutnick in Washington Tuesday, said he's 'hopeful that we can get to the best outcome for Canadians.'
Carney and Trump will join leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union from June 15 to 17 for the G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has also been invited to attend.
Smith said it 'just makes so much sense for Canada and the U.S. to get to an agreement fast.' She said Americans have 'bigger fish to fry' on other major policy priorities.
Smith was optimistic about Carney's relationship with Trump. While the president recently brought back comments on making Canada a U.S. state, Trump has also spoken about a good relationship with Carney and calls him prime minister and not the 'governor' title he used to taunt former prime minister Justin Trudeau.
It also marks a change in tone for the Alberta premier, who had an icy relationship with Ottawa under Trudeau.
Smith has long been critical of the governing Liberal's policies around energy which she says micromanaged Alberta's priorities and hindered industry. She said federal policies stopped Alberta from developing foreign markets that would be critical for many Canadian industries as Trump tries to realign global trade through tariffs.
Following the First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon earlier this week, Smith said she is 'hoping that we are having a breakthrough with the Liberals way of seeing things.'
Smith had proposed a bitumen pipeline to B.C.'s northern coast coupled with support for a project on decarbonization. She said 'if we can work together on developing new markets then I think it will be good for everyone.'
B.C. deputy premier Niki Sharma has pushed back on Smith's proposal, saying the province is focusing on 'shovel-ready projects, not theoretical projects with no proponents.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025.
Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
32 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Prediction: Dogecoin Will Be Worth $0.40 in 1 Year
Key Points Dogecoin's price has dropped more than 70% from its all-time high. New ETFs, pro-crypto regulations, and lower interest rates could drive it higher. Big purchases by whales suggest that brighter days are ahead. 10 stocks we like better than Dogecoin › Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE), which was created as a meme-based parody of Bitcoin in 2013, has gone on a wild ride since its market debut. It started trading at about $0.0002, surged to a record high of $0.74 in May 2021, but now trades at about $0.21. A $100 investment made back then would have briefly grown to $370,000 before shrinking to $100,000. A 1,000-bagger gain in less than 12 years is still incredible, but it might struggle to replicate those gains during the next decade. However, I think that doubling its price to $0.40 within the next 12 months remains a realistic target for five simple reasons. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » 1. The approvals for Dogecoin's spot price ETFs Several major crypto firms -- including Grayscale, Bitwise, and 21Shares -- submitted their applications for Dogecoin spot price exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier this year. Those ETFs could boost Dogecoin's price by attracting more retail and institutional investors. They would also make Dogecoin more comparable to Bitcoin and Ethereum, which were both cleared for their spot price ETFs last year. 2. The Trump administration's crypto-friendly policies The Trump administration is embracing cryptocurrencies with its planned launch of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile, and its appointment of Paul Atkins -- a strong supporter of the crypto industry -- as the new SEC chairman could clear the way for Dogecoin's ETFs. President Donald Trump has also been urging the Federal Reserve, which hasn't cut its benchmark rates this year, to accelerate its rate cuts to spur economic growth. If the Fed finally starts cutting rates again, many investors will rotate back toward riskier assets like Dogecoin. 3. Social media buzz and celebrity endorsements A lot of Dogecoin's early growth was driven by big endorsements from celebrities like Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, and Snoop Dogg. Musk sparked big rallies with his unpredictable tweets about Dogecoin, had Tesla start accepting Dogecoin payments for some of its products in late 2021, and X (formerly Twitter) recently integrated Dogecoin payments into its platform. His creation and brief leadership of the controversial Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Trump administration generated even more buzz for the meme coin. Dogecoin's huge social media presence -- which includes 2.7 million subreddit members on Reddit and 11.2 billion related views on TikTok -- amplified those gains. That support from celebrities and social media users could drive Dogecoin's price a lot higher on any positive developments. 4. The expansion of its developer ecosystem Dogecoin is mined with the same energy-intensive proof-of-work mechanism as Bitcoin. But unlike Bitcoin, which has a maximum supply of 21 million tokens, Dogecoin is an inflationary token with nearly 150 billion coins in circulation and no maximum supply. Therefore, it can't be valued by its scarcity like Bitcoin or other deflationary tokens. Dogecoin also doesn't support smart contracts, which are used to develop decentralized apps (dApps) and other crypto assets. That limitation is preventing it from becoming a major developer platform like Ethereum or Solana. The bears often argue that Dogecoin's lack of a developer ecosystem will inhibit its growth potential. But that could change as Dogecoin, an official Layer 2 blockchain built on Polygon, tethers more dApps and crypto assets to its cryptocurrency. 5. The whales are accumulating Dogecoin During the past year, some big anonymous investors -- known as whales -- ramped up their purchase of Dogecoin even as retail investors backed off. That more favorable sentiment isn't surprising, since ETF approvals, interest rate cuts, Musk's support, and the gradual expansion of Dogecoin's developer ecosystem could drive its price a lot higher. Considering that Dogecoin traded as high as $0.48 last December, a flurry of positive developments should easily drive it back to at least $0.40. I'm not saying it's a great long-term investment yet, but I wouldn't be too surprised if it doubles within the next year. Should you invest $1,000 in Dogecoin right now? Before you buy stock in Dogecoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Dogecoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $635,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,099,758!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,046% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Polygon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Takeaways from the Trump-Putin meeting: No agreement, no questions but lots of pomp
WASHINGTON (AP) — The much-anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin began with a warm welcome and a flyover by screaming jets at a U.S. military base in Alaska but ended with a thud Friday after they conceded that they had failed to reach any agreements on how to end the Russia-Ukraine war. After about 2 1/2 hours of talks at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, the two men appeared before reporters for what had been billed as a joint news conference — but they took no questions. 'We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to, there are just a very few that are left,' Trump said. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' Putin, welcomed into the U.S. after being shunned by Western allies since early 2022 for ordering the invasion of Ukraine, thanked Trump for hosting the meeting and suggested with a chuckle that the next time the two sit down it could be in Moscow. Here are key takeaways from the summit: A warm welcome underscoring the friendly Trump-Putin relationship Putin got a red carpet welcome and even rode in Trump's presidential limousine from the tarmac to the summit venue. There, the pair were joined by two of their top aides: Secretary of State and national security adviser Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff for Trump and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and national security adviser Yuri Ushakov for Putin. Putin, who spoke first after the meeting concluded, lauded the historical relationship between the United States, Russia and the former Soviet Union, recalling joint missions conducted by the two countries during World War II. He said the U.S. and Russia share values, a standard talking point for Russian officials when trying to woo Trump and his aides. Putin also noted that Trump has frequently said the Ukraine war wouldn't have happened had he won the 2020 election. 'I think that would have been the case,' the Russian leader said, a comment sure to please Trump. However, there is no indication and no way to prove that Moscow would have acted differently toward Ukraine had Democrat Joe Biden not been elected. Trump touts progress but concedes there was no deal Trump had gone into the meeting hoping to get Putin to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine — or at least a commitment from Russia to enter into negotiations to reach one. Instead, Trump conceded that 'we haven't quite got there' and said he would be conferring with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO leaders about next steps. Trump said he and Putin had made some significant progress toward the goal of ending the conflict but gave no details on what that entailed and had to acknowledge that they had been unable to bridge substantial gaps. 'I believe we had a very productive meeting,' Trump said. 'We haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal.' In a subsequent conversation with Sean Hannity of Fox News Channel, Trump again offered no details on his discussions with Putin. With diplomatic progress creeping along, time is on Putin's side Amid drawn-out diplomatic moves to end the war, time is appears to be on Putin's side. That gives a leg up to Russian forces, who have used their larger numbers to slowly grind down defenses in eastern Ukraine 3 1/2 years into the conflict. Putin got a pleasant reception from the leader of the free world on U.S. soil and walked away hours later without either providing details on what they discussed, whether a ceasefire was any closer to reality or what the next steps would be. Putin praised Trump for the 'friendly' tone of the talks — Trump said nothing publicly about the killing of Ukrainian civilians in Moscow's attacks — and for 'understanding that Russia has its own national interests.' Putin said Moscow and Washington should 'turn the page,' with relations having sunk to the lowest point since the Cold War. Putin appearing in the U.S. for the first time in 10 years was celebrated as a sign that Moscow was no longer a pariah on the global stage. In a social media post, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told followers that the Western press would be on the verge of 'losing their minds.' 'For three years, they talked about Russia's isolation, and today they saw the red carpet being rolled out to greet the Russian president in the United States,' she said. There were no details and no questions Both men said the talks were 'productive' but the lack of any announcement of solid achievements was revealing. The news conference ended up being less than 15 minutes of rather standard diplomatic comments — and gave no indication that any concrete results were achieved — and offered little departure from their previous comments on the war in Ukraine. Trump has made it a feature of his second term to parry questions from reporters in front of world leaders, but in the clearest sign of his disappointment, the president abruptly cut short his plans to take questions. Trump had gone into the summit saying here was a 25% chance that the summit would fail and that it was meant to be a 'feel-out meeting,' but he had also floated the idea of bringing Zelenskyy to Alaska for a subsequent, three-way meeting if things went well. It's unclear what comes next. ___ Associated Press writers Katie Marie Davies, Dasha Litvinova and Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
