Smith says she sees a ‘breakthrough' in talks with Americans on energy
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith poses for a photo at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Kelly Geraldine Malone
WASHINGTON — Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said on Wednesday there's been a 'breakthrough' in conversations with Americans on Canada's role in the United States' quest for energy dominance as President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to cause uncertainty for the bilateral relationship.
'We've managed to make a breakthrough on the discussion about energy dominance and how Canada can lend itself to that, whether its our oil, our gas, critical minerals, uranium from Saskatchewan, electricity from many of our provinces,' Smith said in an interview with The Canadian Press at the embassy in Washington, D.C.
'I feel like there's a real understanding of that.'
Trump returned to the White House set on boosting America's energy production. Smith said that while the energy argument has seen success, conversations around other industries are ongoing.
The Alberta premier was in the United States capital for meetings and a forum on energy this week as Trump doubled his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Canada is a major supplier to the U.S. and Canadian industry says 50 per cent levies will be devastating.
Smith said she had conversations with American counterparts and explained that, particularly for aluminum tariffs, they are 'the very definition of a tariff being its own punishment.'
The United States imports about 60 per cent of its aluminum from Canada. The Canadian industry largely uses hydroelectricity to make the high energy costs connected to smelting more affordable. Smith said the U.S. doesn't have the ability to develop a homegrown industry to fill the gaps.
'We just have to make sure we are able to make that same (energy) argument on everything else, on the integrated food market, the integrated manufacturing market,' Smith said, also pointing to timber. '(We) haven't had a full breakthrough on all of that but I think the conversations I have are always very positive.'
Despite conversations at home about Western alienation and Alberta separatism, Smith said that issue has not come up in Washington. The premier, however, said it's important to take the issue seriously.
Trump set his sights on Canada early in his return to the White House and his tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles have upended Canadian industries. The president has repeatedly said he doesn't need anything from Canada but his actions have shown signs that he still values trade with America's northern neighbour.
Trump slapped Canada with economywide duties in March, only to walk back the tariffs on imports complaint with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, called CUSMA, a few days later.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was asked during a U.S. Senate hearing Wednesday about tariffs on Canada. Lutnick pointed to the trilateral agreement and said imports that are compliant with CUSMA remain tariff-free.
CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration and was up for a mandatory review next year.
Smith said it remains unclear when CUSMA negotiations might start but there is 'encouragement or expectation that we might get some kind of detente or interim agreement by the time we have the G7.'
It's unclear whether that will be commitments on CUSMA or a separate agreement on the current tariffs. Carney has said Canada will negotiate a new economic and security agreement with the United States.
Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, who met with Lutnick in Washington Tuesday, said he's 'hopeful that we can get to the best outcome for Canadians.'
Carney and Trump will join leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union from June 15 to 17 for the G7 leaders summit in Kananaskis. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has also been invited to attend.
Smith said it 'just makes so much sense for Canada and the U.S. to get to an agreement fast.' She said Americans have 'bigger fish to fry' on other major policy priorities.
Smith was optimistic about Carney's relationship with Trump. While the president recently brought back comments on making Canada a U.S. state, Trump has also spoken about a good relationship with Carney and calls him prime minister and not the 'governor' title he used to taunt former prime minister Justin Trudeau.
It also marks a change in tone for the Alberta premier, who had an icy relationship with Ottawa under Trudeau.
Smith has long been critical of the governing Liberal's policies around energy which she says micromanaged Alberta's priorities and hindered industry. She said federal policies stopped Alberta from developing foreign markets that would be critical for many Canadian industries as Trump tries to realign global trade through tariffs.
Following the First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon earlier this week, Smith said she is 'hoping that we are having a breakthrough with the Liberals way of seeing things.'
Smith had proposed a bitumen pipeline to B.C.'s northern coast coupled with support for a project on decarbonization. She said 'if we can work together on developing new markets then I think it will be good for everyone.'
B.C. deputy premier Niki Sharma has pushed back on Smith's proposal, saying the province is focusing on 'shovel-ready projects, not theoretical projects with no proponents.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 4, 2025.
Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
23 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada has an opportunity to reset our relationship with China – and, in a rare twist, on our terms
L. Philippe Rheault is a lawyer and former Canadian diplomat, and the director of the University of Alberta's China Institute, Canada's largest research and policy institute dedicated to China issues. Canada finds itself in a particularly vulnerable position on the world stage. It is more reliant than most countries on international trade for its prosperity – and a large share of that trade, not to mention its security arrangements, is tied to an increasingly unreliable United States, led by a President who seems intent on upending the postwar international order. But it is not the only country reeling from the recent episodes of trade-policy vaudeville emanating from Washington. China is another. Despite putting on a brave face and having made herculean efforts in recent years to reduce commercial reliance on the U.S., China remains severely buffeted by U.S. trade actions. This comes as China's economy already faces lingering headwinds: weak consumer demand, a property slump, overreliance on investment and exports, and the difficulty of pursuing deeper structural reforms. Given all of these challenges, U.S. uncertainty and higher tariffs on manufacturing and exports represent an added strain that Beijing would rather avoid. Its three-month relative tariff truce with Washington belies the continued underlying tensions and protracted challenges China anticipates in its relationship with America going forward. Predictably, China has responded to U.S. actions by seeking to deepen trade ties elsewhere. Already the world's largest trading nation – and the largest trading partner for most countries, including much of Latin America – it has many places to turn to as it works to continue diversifying its trade portfolio. But China's courting of other countries is not only defensive. Beijing also sees opportunity in Washington's current 'everywhere-all-at-once' approach to trade and foreign policy. Whatever one may think of Donald Trump's methods, one thing that does appear certain is that he is serving as a historical accelerant: compelling almost every country, often reluctantly, to reassess its relationship with America and urgently consider new arrangements as a hedge against continued U.S. unpredictability. Aware of this trend, China's diplomats have adopted – somewhat awkwardly but nonetheless emphatically – a more mellifluous tone, working to pull erstwhile U.S. allies and partners further from Washington's orbit. The tone and approach vary by country and circumstance, but recent pronouncements by China's ambassador to Canada, Wang Di, leave little doubt that he too has received similar instructions. Therein lies the opportunity for Canada. We are currently witnessing a moment in time in which China is more willing to engage with Canada than Canada is with it – a divergence from the normal pattern of recent decades. With much scar tissue left to heal from the saga involving Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou and the detention of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, as well as concerns about foreign interference and persistent bilateral irritants such as trade restrictions on canola, Canadians and their government are now viewing China with a more exacting vigilance. For many Canadians, taking a second look at China would likely not be a particularly enticing priority in the absence of recent provocation from Washington. The Decibel podcast: How Canadian businesses are getting caught up in U.S. tariffs on China But that is precisely why China's overtures should be seized upon by Canada as an opportunity to examine gradual re-engagement, on terms that reflect Canadian interests, objectives and potential vulnerabilities. Laying out a comprehensive approach grounded in such principles will require serious and previously neglected domestic homework on the part of the new Carney government – clearly articulating proposed areas of engagement that enhance Canadian prosperity, increase diplomatic leverage by aligning exports to areas of critical Chinese need, and help build Canadian resilience and optionality vis-à-vis the U.S. This would signal a clear departure from the 'engagement for engagement's sake' posture of yesteryear, and could form the guiding axiom of Canadian policy toward China going forward. In line with this thinking, two areas that emerge as clear priority sectors for immediate attention already stand out: energy and agri-food. As a country with critical demand, security and diversification concerns of its own, China will be receptive to proposals for deepened relationships in these areas. Just one year into the expanded Trans Mountain pipeline's operations – and in defiance of many expert predictions – data show China emerging as an avid customer for Canadian energy that reaches Pacific tidewater, willing to pay a significant premium over what the same energy currently fetches in the United States. Similarly, Beijing's strong interest in the soon-to-launch LNG Canada project in Kitimat, B.C., further underscores its desire to diversify and bolster Chinese energy security. The strategic value of this development should not be underestimated: expanded Canadian energy exports could significantly enhance Canada's leverage in the bilateral relationship, potentially allowing us to avoid – or more effectively resolve – future disputes. As a major added benefit, increased diplomatic relevance through energy trade would extend beyond China to Canada's broader network of relationships across the Indo-Pacific. This increased influence should be a central consideration as Canada revisits both the economic and strategic rationale for developing new pipeline and export infrastructure. As the U.S. trade war escalates, LNG Canada is poised to start exports to Asia When it comes to agri-food, despite Beijing's tendency in recent years to target canola or seafood in retaliatory trade actions – or, perhaps more aptly, because of this tendency – Canada should move to seek structured engagement. This could take the form of sectoral trade talks that aim to provide a more predictable framework for agricultural trade. By no means would this make Canada bulletproof against all risk of future coercion or retaliation, but successful negotiations would nevertheless provide an important extra layer of predictability and security to one of Canada's largest and most profitable exports. Given the critical importance of food security to China, we may be surprised how receptive Beijing could be to a potential framework deal with Canada – one that would help diversify its supply base and foster a more predictable relationship with a reliable partner. Myriad other areas will also merit careful attention, such as establishing a clearer investment regime around foreign direct investment, to name only one issue. Clearer guidance would help ensure that sensitive sectors remain off-limits, but that capital aligned with Canada's needs is not deterred by regulatory ambiguity. Likewise, emerging opportunities in critical minerals, green technology and Canadian services exports – where Canadian capabilities and Chinese demand or interests potentially intersect – should not be overlooked. To be clear, this is not a panda-hugging exercise. None of the above precludes working with like-minded partners to strengthen the rules-based international order or, to the extent possible, existing multilateral institutions. Nor does it obviate the need to remain vigilant and push back against egregious Chinese conduct. But the point bears emphasizing: Canada's increased relevance as an important supplier of things China critically needs will enhance its diplomatic standing and traction not just with Beijing, but across diplomatic channels more broadly – providing a welcome fillip to the government's continuing Indo-Pacific strategy. As it moves ahead with this approach, Ottawa will also need to remain acutely aware of how its actions are perceived in Washington. Despite Mr. Trump's continued truculence, the United States remains our primary security partner and top export market – a destination for 20 times more exports than No. 2 customer China – and so almost every major Canadian foreign policy move in these volatile times must include a U.S. calculus. But while Mr. Trump has included several China hawks in his administration, he appears to be more transactional than ideological; his reprieve on Chinese tariffs, among other actions, suggest that he may not be aiming for a full decoupling from China. Canada, therefore, must also prepare for the possibility of a sudden U.S.-China deal that would pay little heed to Canadian interests – leaving Canada adrift between the Scylla of American unpredictability and the Charybdis of Chinese detachment, with few safe harbours in sight. This is not the first time Canada has looked to China to diversify from U.S. overdependence. As recently as 2017, the Trudeau government explored free trade talks with China as a potential hedge during Mr. Trump's first term. The difference eight years later is that Beijing is eager, while Canada now has an opportunity to consider re-engagement on its own, principled terms, focused on Canada's prosperity, resilience, optionality and enhanced diplomatic relevance. Canada faces generational geopolitical challenges, and diplomacy alone will not be a panacea. But a new approach may have the potential to transform some challenges into opportunities, leaving Canada on firmer ground as it responds to continued global change.
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Keynote address from OPEC head to kick off Global Energy Show in Calgary
More than 30,000 people from 100 countries are expected to descend on the white-collar heart of Canada's oil patch next week for the Global Energy Show, which is to kick off with a keynote address from the head of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. OPEC secretary-general Haitham al-Ghais is set to deliver remarks on Tuesday morning, as recent output increases from his group's members and other producers have put pressure on global crude prices. Among the other speakers are 20 chief executives from major Canadian and international energy companies and several political leaders, including Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Energy show organizers say Calgary is expecting a 30-per-cent increase in hotel bookings for the conference and trade show, and that exhibition space has been increased by one fifth year-over year. Nick Samain, senior vice-president at DMG Events, said as of two weeks before the event, pre-registrations were 78 per cent higher than last year. Oil prices headed for rebound this week as Trump and Xi resume trade talks He says the show is seeing a big turnaround since the oil bust of 2015 and the COVID-19 pandemic. 'There's a sense of optimism that the show really hasn't had in a long time,' Samain said in an interview. 'Operationally, we've been going crazy to make sure we've got enough room for everybody.' The exhibition hall in the newly refurbished BMO Centre on the Calgary Stampede grounds is to feature a record 11 country pavilions and 500 company booths. The event was called the Global Petroleum Show until 2020, when it was rebranded to highlight the growing number of non-oil-and-gas participants in the energy space, such as nuclear and renewables firms. Samain said at the trade show, oil and gas makes up about 70 per cent of exhibitors, with other forms of energy making up the rest. The conference comes as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war throws global trade into disarray, raising the prospect of a global downturn that could dampen energy demand. The trade strife has driven calls for Canada to diversify its export markets for its energy products beyond its biggest customer, the United States, and remove some of the logjams that have prevented infrastructure from being built over the past several years. Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to speed up and simplify the regulatory process for projects deemed in the national interest. Samain said the show is an opportunity for people to hash out competing views about Canada's energy future. 'We're just big proponents of people meeting face to face,' he said. 'We find when people get together at an event like this, it really does [give] the opportunity for people maybe to see a different perspective.' A week after the Global Energy Show, another major event drawing dignitaries from abroad is to take place in a popular recreation area in the Rocky Mountains an hour west of Calgary. Canada is to host leaders from the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union at the G7 summit from June 15 to 17 in Kananaskis.
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
By alienating women, America's military is undermining itself
Mellissa Fung is a journalist and the author of Between Good and Evil: The Stolen Girls of Boko Haram. In late April, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth 'proudly' announced on X that he had ended the U.S. military's Women, Peace and Security (WPS) framework, which aims to leverage women's meaningful participation in all aspects of conflict, whether that's in the theatre of war or at the negotiating table for peacemaking and reconstruction. 'WPS is yet another woke divisive/social justice/Biden initiative that overburdens our commanders and troops – distracting from our core task: WAR-FIGHTING,' he declared. But he got it all wrong. Not just about the president who signed it into law – that was his current boss Donald Trump in 2017, who further expanded it in 2019 – but because dismissing WPS as mere 'wokeness' overlooks the program's profound significance both on and off the battlefield. '[Hegseth's view] is a narrow interpretation of military effectiveness, which is lethality,' says Stéfanie von Hlatky, the Canada Research Chair in Gender, Security and the Armed Forces at Queen's University. 'It's surprising for [someone] who's had experience in Iraq, to not understand … that this was a whole-of-society fight, and that you need to leverage everything.' The WPS agenda, which was initiated by United Nations Resolution 1325 in 2000, recognizes that women and children are almost always disproportionately affected by conflict, through sexual and gender-based violence and disruption to their lives. And it's based on an inalienable truth: when women are at the table, peace lasts longer and communities recover faster. 'There is a plethora of data and evidence of every kind that shows how women in peace and security operations contribute to operational effectiveness, contribute to making us stronger in terms of security,' Melanne Verveer tells me. She was the first U.S. ambassador-at-large for global women's issues, a job created under Barack Obama, and she now heads the Institute for Women, Peace and Security at Georgetown University – and I can hear the frustration in her voice over the phone from Washington. 'It's undermining what we know that we need. … What happens when you cut off half of your talent, half of your resources, and half your experience from participating in military operations? You undermine those operations. You're making yourself less effective.' Women bring an invaluable soft power to war, says Barbara Faulkenberry, who knows that well from her time as a major-general and vice-commander of the U.S. 18th Air Force. She's seen firsthand how important it is to ensure 'a place at the table from the women's point of view, and to incorporate that at all levels, whether it's the tactical level or [the community level],' she tells me from her home in Colorado. 'It's important to see from the other 50-per-cent's perspective.' In Myanmar, women are leading the fight for justice and democracy She recalls having to negotiate with other commanders during the U.S.'s surge in Afghanistan under Mr. Obama in 2009. 'I used my feminine leadership attributes when I went to the commander of whichever base. And I said, 'I'm sincerely sorry for the challenges that this is providing, but let's figure out together how we can make this work.' ' The despair in her voice is particularly evident when she talks about how the Trump administration is removing women from top posts across the armed forces. 'You and I have been to places where the potential of the nation is just capped because they don't allow women to contribute. They take 50 per cent of their brain power, and they leave it in the home. And a nation cannot be good with this kind of philosophy.' Nowhere do we see more devastating results when we do not engage women in postconflict negotiations than in Afghanistan, she says, where half the population now lives under what most experts agree is gender apartheid. It is sad to see America now finding itself engaging in social discrimination by gender. But even as they lament the fact that the U.S. has abdicated its leadership role on WPS, both Ms. Faulkenberry and Ms. Verveer are looking to Canada and other countries to fill the vacuum. Ms. Verveer points to the Elsie Initiative, which aimed to increase women's meaningful participation in peacekeeping operations, and praises the work Jacqueline O'Neill did as Canada's ambassador for women, peace and security. 'The training piece is really important,' she says. 'So much of WPS work internationally was in partnership, the kind of partnerships that Canada was making with other governments, whether it was in the Global South or whether it was north, those were important strategic efforts.' Canada's current action plan on WPS, including the Elsie Initiative, has been renewed through 2027. Ms. von Hlatky, the academic at Queen's University, is hoping the new Liberal government will carve out space to advance the agenda in spite of the current focus on the trade war with the United States. 'Canada's learned a lot from the past, having an active national action plan since 2011. I think that as these visions get renewed, they grow more and more ambitious in terms of what they can accomplish, building on the successes of the past and the lessons learned.' To that end, she and the others hope the Carney government will name a successor to Ms. O'Neill, whose term as the first ambassador for WPS just ended. It's up to the rest of us, says Ms. von Hlatky, to keep the momentum going now that U.S. is abandoning what's been a smart and successful framework for peace and security both on and off the battlefield. After all, Mr. Hegseth's ignorant post is still up on X, suggesting the Trump administration is foolhardily committed to making America's military small again – while the rest of us understand that having women at the table increases the likelihood of enduring peace.
