
GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warn
That's the message lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, industry executives and former Republican officials delivered on stage at the POLITICO Energy Summit on Tuesday.
The reconciliation bill that passed the House last month seeks to gut clean energy tax credits enacted by Democrats in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, particularly for wind and solar — two of the fastest-growing sources on the grid. President Donald Trump has derided those subsidies as the 'Green New Scam,' and congressional Republicans have said the two technologies must stand on their own after decades of support.
But the speedy sunset of the investment and production tax credits under the House bill would hurt companies that have made investments based on the IRA, several of the Summit speakers said.
The House-passed bill is not 'fair to businesses in the way that we're phasing [the credits] out,' said Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis. 'Investors have invested billions of dollars based on the rules of the road, and you have employees who have set careers based on these things.'
Energy companies have warned the bill could lead to the cancellation of hundreds of major electricity generation projects, just as the nation's utilities prepare for a surge in power demand from new AI data centers.
John Ketchum, chair and CEO of NextEra, the nation's biggest owner of natural gas-fired power plants and the world's leading generator of electricity from wind and solar power, said he agrees with the Trump administration's declaration of an energy emergency — but warned renewables cannot be taken 'off the table.'
'We cannot afford to do that. If we do that, we will lose the AI race, and we will bring this economic expansion in the United States to a screeching halt,' Ketchum said. That's because a new fleet of natural gas power plants won't be ready until 2032, he added, and nuclear power will take even longer.
And former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chair Neil Chatterjee, who served under the first Trump administration, said fossil fuels must be complemented by renewables and emerging technologies like geothermal and nuclear — as well as energy efficiency efforts.
'We can't possibly win the AI race and keep energy reliable and affordable with only fossil fuels,' Chatterjee said. 'We need every available electron.'
But the backing for renewables drew pushback from Jarrod Agen, the executive director of Trump's newly created National Energy Dominance Council, who said he was 'very happy' with the bill the House produced.
Wind and solar are 'intermittent' sources, he said, that 'can't stand on their own feet.'
While the administration believes that nuclear energy will ultimately be the 'perfect source,' fossil fuels and coal are the most reliable and secure sources today, Agen said.
Here are some other takeaways from Tuesday's event:
Curtis, who has urged his Senate colleagues for months to preserve the IRA credits, specifically called for the bill to set a phase-out date for the clean energy tax credits based on when developers start construction of new projects, rather than on when a project begins producing electricity, as the House bill does. The House language discourages new investment because construction timelines are often uncertain, he said.
'Changing it to say something about the date [construction] started would be a really significant difference and not really hurt the intent of what Republicans are trying to do on this bill,' Curtis said.
That echoed comments from Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), the top Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, who also urged changes to the bill's prohibition on foreign involvement in projects, which he said is 'completely unworkable in its current form.'
Even Jennifer Granholm, who oversaw much of the growth spurred by the credits as the Biden administration's energy secretary, told the summit the bill could be 'workable' if the Senate fixes those two provisions, as well as restores rules that allow companies to buy and sell the tax credits.
Former FERC leaders bemoaned President Donald Trump's treatment of the agency, with Chatterjee warning the moves could turn the independent regulator into the 'EPA,' which has whipsawed between administrations.
Trump requested that former Democratic Chair Willie Phillips depart the commission, and last week declined to renominate current Republican Chair Mark Christie for a second term. His administration has moved to exert more power over other independent agencies as well.
'If the White House exerts control over the agency and they have to clear everything through OIRA and through OMB, then effectively the role of FERC chairman is no longer as head of an independent agency, it's basically a staff position,' Chatterjee told the audience.
The energy world is still processing the falling-out between Trump and his former 'first buddy,' clean energy and electric vehicle entrepreneur Elon Musk.
House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) told the summit that Musk never brought up objections to the Republican megabill during a breakfast just hours after the House passed the measure.
'He talked about AI, he talked about all this stuff that [was] energy,' Guthrie said. 'Never mentioned the bill. And the bill had just been voted.'
Granholm signaled that clean energy advocates could welcome Musk back into the fold, calling his electric vehicle company Tesla 'amazing' while noting the 'later part of his journey has been more challenging.'
Pressed on Musk's support for clean energy, Agen, the White House official, said: 'The President is in charge.'
Granholm acknowledged that Democrats should have done a better job on the campaign trail last year selling their vision of job creation from the clean energy transition.
But the party going forward also needs to hone its messaging on 'keeping costs low by using the cheapest form of energy,' which is renewables, Granholm said.
Heinrich, too, forecast that Republicans' fossil fuel push would drive up energy prices — and provide a political opening to Democrats.
'We're in a constrained supply environment and an increased demand environment,' he said. 'People's electricity bills all over the country are going to go up. What I can guarantee you is in the next election and the election after that Republicans are going to own increased energy prices.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Mered CEO on Factors Driving Dubai Property Boom
Dubai's housing boom that began in late 2020 has continued despite Trump's tariff policies and conflict in the region. Michael Belton, CEO of Dubai-based developer Mered, spoke with Bloomberg's Chief Africa Correspondent Jennifer Zabasajja on Horizons: Middle East and Africa about the surge in property prices, and whether Dubai may be heading toward a bubble. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
European Gas Falls Further Ahead of Zelenskiy-Trump Meeting
European natural gas prices fell to a fresh 2025 low ahead of US President Donald Trump's meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who faces pressure to reach a peace deal with Russia that involves ceding territory. Benchmark futures extended their drop after the market plunged last week in anticipation of Trump's meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. An agreement to end the war — however steep the possible concessions for Ukraine would be — could ease global supplies if more Russian energy eventually comes to the market.


CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 13/08/2025
The market has largely viewed the latest overnight release of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation report in a positive light. The nominal CPI rose by 2.7% year-on-year, slightly below the expected 2.8%. The report also indicated stronger-than-expected inflation in service, while goods inflation came in lower than anticipated. These figures have reinforced market expectations for a rate cut and boosted the performance of U.S. stocks overnight. Specifically: All three major U.S. stock indices rose by more than 1% overnight, with the S&P 500 and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite both closing at record highs. According to CME FedWatch, the market's probability of a 25-basis-point rate cut by the Federal Reserve in September has increased from 85.86% the previous day to 94.93%. Although the market widely expects a rate cut in September, the focus among those supporting the move varies. Some are paying attention to inflation trends, while others are closely monitoring employment data. First, regarding the impact of Trump's tariff policies on inflation, expert opinions are divided. One camp argues that the effect of tariffs on U.S. inflation is actually quite limited. "Now you have six months of evidence, I don't really think tariffs cause inflation. Taxes don't cause inflation. And so what you're seeing in the data is very muted effects that are one time increases in the price level." It's worth noting that James Bullard is currently considered a top candidate for the next Federal Reserve Chair. In an interview with CNBC overnight, he also stated that he expects the Fed to cut rates by a total of 100 basis points over the next year. Meanwhile, another camp in the market warns that the impact of tariffs on inflation may gradually become more apparent in the future. Experts caution that, in addition to nominal CPI, it's crucial to monitor the trajectory of core CPI. "We are seeing a little bit of an uptick in the sequential core inflation and underlying inflation data. And I think a large part of that is the moderate impact we're seeing of tariff pass through that that is likely to grow in the months ahead." Additional analysis points out that while businesses may absorb costs in the short term, they will ultimately pass them on to consumers, particularly in industries with already narrow profit margins. "For instance, groceries, I mean, there's very little margin there. They're going to, you know, your tomato prices are going to go up because of because they can't really absorb, you know, those prices. It's just a matter of time that this, that the tariff related inflation starts to show up in the data." Finally, it's noteworthy that no consensus has yet been reached within the Federal Reserve regarding the pace of future rate cuts. Currently among Fed officials, Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller represent the dovish camp advocating for . However, Jeffrey Schmid, President of the Kansas City Fed struck a hawkish tone overnight, arguing for . With moderate voices further complicating the divide, analysts suggest that even if the Fed initiates a cut in September, the pace may remain measured due to persistent internal disagreements.