
If Kemi and Nigel want to stop clueless Keir destroying Britain, they need to do a deal
Asked about the prospect of local or national co-operation between the Tories and Reform following their disastrous local election results, which saw Nigel Farage's party make huge gains, Nigel Huddleston, the Tory co-chairman, declared: 'I can't see why we'd do that ... Reform's golden strategy is the destruction of the Conservative Party and they don't share many of the values and principles that we hold.'
He added: 'We've done deals in the past on a council level where it's to implement Conservative policies and Conservative principles.
'We are under new leadership now. We're using our time in opposition wisely, we're developing a whole new set of principles and policies because we need to present ourselves as an alternative government.
'Not a protest party, not a populist party that will go around saying that we've got simple, straight answers to really complex questions. That's not a credible long-term proposition.'
It might not be a 'credible long term position' but it's working for Reform, and the Conservative Party pretending otherwise is an insult to its own electorate. A 17.4 point swing to Reform in Runcorn and Helsby, one of the safest Labour seats, isn't a protest. It's a revolution.
Moreover, who are the Tories kidding when they say Reform 'don't share many of the core principles and values that we hold'? They're a low-tax, low-immigration, anti-woke party that wants to slash government waste. If those aren't Conservative values then the Tories truly are finished. Quite a few Conservatives would rather nationalise steel than import it from China, too.
Similarly, Farage calling the idea of a pact with the Tories 'revolting' also lacks credibility, for precisely the same reason: he is a former Conservative being propelled to power largely by former Conservatives. I can think of far more revolting things: a Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition with a side order of Greens being chief among them.
Both parties can pretend they have nothing in common until the cows come home – but voters on the Right will never forgive them if they allow their differences to bring about more of the same come 2029.
Yes, Reform are more Right-wing than the Tories, as evidenced by the socialists protesting outside polling stations on Thursday shouting 'racists' and accusing the party of 'demonising' migrants. Yet the reason for Reform's success also threatens to be its failure. This is why a pact has to happen, if not before the next election, then immediately afterwards.
Yes, the Tories may be on their knees right now. Voters certainly haven't woken up to the party being 'under new leadership'; according to YouGov, one in five British adults have never even heard of Kemi Badenoch. But the local election results, while horrific, are not the extinction level event Reform claims them to be. They've lost a great many seats from the high watermark of 2021, and they've been pushed into second place by Reform even in places like leafy Goffs Oak in Hertfordshire. But they've not been wiped out completely. They've even won the mayoralty in Cambridgeshire.
Sure, there's an Electoral Calculus poll doing the rounds suggesting that if the swing in Runcorn was applied nationally, it would see Reform gain 427 seats, Labour lose 255 seats and the Conservatives wiped out to just four.
But we are talking about a working-class constituency where the sitting Labour MP, Mike Amesbury, punched a constituent in the face. The same rules don't apply to seats in the South West and the Home Counties.
On this, the mayoral votes are telling. The combined Reform and Tory vote would have been enough to obliterate the combined Labour/Liberal Democrat/Green vote in Doncaster (58 to 37 per cent), Greater Lincolnshire (68 to 24 per cent) and North Tyneside (50 to 44 per cent). But in the West of England, the Left massively outgunned the Right with a 59 per cent vote share compared to 39 per cent for Reform and the Tories.
Unlike Boris Johnson, who could reach parts that other politicians couldn't, huge swathes of the Blue Wall still elude Farage.
And this isn't simply because they are inhabited by 'wet' Tories. Just as there are plenty of Thatcherites out there who no longer support the Tories, there are plenty of others who still can't bring themselves to support Farage, considering him to be a political spiv.
Their worst fears about 'untried and untested' Reform are immediately confirmed by Andrea Jenkyns celebrating victory in the Greater Lincolnshire mayoral race with the suggestion that migrants should be 'housed in tents instead of hotels'.
Amid growing resentment towards Labour – and with Sir Ed Davey hobby horsing around – the Tories could well mount a comeback in these constituencies in three years' time with a bit of hard work.
Farage lacks Blue Wall appeal and Badenoch lacks Red Wall appeal but together they appeal to both. Righties currently finding the idea of voting for either unpalatable would strangely be more comfortable with a mash-up of Farage keeping the Tories honest, and the Tories keeping Reform from going off the reservation.
This is a huge electoral strength that must be capitalised upon. The facts of life, as Margaret Thatcher once put it, remain conservative. Additionally, Labour could not be more unpopular now, even among the 33 per cent of a 60 per cent turnout who voted for them last year. Sir Keir Starmer is on the ropes, but conservatives, both small and big C, must box clever.
What's truly astonishing about these two Right-wing parties is their comparative lack of electoral nous compared to the Left.
Sure, the Conservatives are alleged to have played some dubious games. Jenkyns, who defected from the Tories to Reform last November, claimed to have been 'smeared' by her old party, which she said 'called the police on me and implied I slept with political friends'. At one point, her opponents tried to remove her from the ballot.
But similar dirty tricks have been used by the parties of the Left for years.
I don't condone it, but rather than getting mad with each other, the Right should get even on its real enemy: the so-called progressives hell-bent on destroying Britain.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
24 minutes ago
- ITV News
As Europe's leaders head to Washington, Trump could shift to favouring Russia
They are travelling with a mood of collective concern — presidents, prime ministers, and a secretary general, descending on Washington today in a flotilla of flag-draped planes, uneasy that this is what it takes to help ensure their path towards a fair deal isn't thrown off course. As one European official told ITV News: "If we assume that Trump only hears the last person in the room, we should make sure that we are the last people in the room." For the United States, this is a moment of growing alignment — yes, alignment. But not with Britain, Germany, or France, as you might expect. Because, as European leaders travel to the White House with the transatlantic alliance on Ukraine sounding shaky - and their declarations of allegiance at times insincere - it's Washington and Moscow that emerged from Anchorage on Friday showing signs of agreement. Donald Trump is, in some ways, echoing Vladimir Putin's framing of the conflict at least as much as Volodymyr Zelenskyy's. And Putin has already set the trap: to portray Europeans and Ukrainians as the true obstacles to peace. On Friday, he warned Europe not to 'torpedo progress.' Yesterday, Kirill Dmitriev — a Kremlin negotiator and one of Putin's closest allies - went further, tweeting that 'European and British warmongers/saboteurs are in full panic mode. They should not stay in the way of Peace,' punctuating his message with a dove emoji. This was Russia draping itself in the robes of peacemaker, its critics cast as potential saboteurs. For European leaders, the danger isn't subtle - a narrative in which Putin gets to play statesman while they are painted as the wreckers. It's Donald Trump who Moscow hopes will buy that story. But what was agreed in Anchorage is still unclear, besides an agreement that Ukraine should be able to receive security guarantees like those it would receive if it was a member of Nato, the specifics are unclear. Trump himself was evasive on Friday: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' What has since emerged is that Putin demanded Ukraine withdraw from Donbas — the Donetsk and Luhansk regions — as the price of ending the war, while offering a freeze along the rest of the frontline. Trump signalled willingness to back a plan that would see Russia handed not just occupied areas, but unoccupied Ukrainian territory too, in return for what he could present as peace. Whether Ukraine freezes the conflict or cedes land outright is more than a technical distinction; in practice, it is the difference between a country catching its breath or being permanently diminished. Last week, Trump assured Europeans that Moscow had made concessions which, it turned out, were never on the table. That ambiguity is exactly why Europeans are wary of Trump negotiating with Putin alone — and equally unwilling to leave Trump and Zelenskyy alone, mindful of the Oval Office humiliation in February when Trump berated the Ukrainian president in front of cameras. No European leader is prepared to risk a repeat of that scene. Meanwhile, Washington's tone has softened. Where the administration once threatened severe consequences if no ceasefire was reached, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that fresh measures would take time to bite and would only drive Russia from the table. The result: no new punishment for Putin, no clear cost for saying no. He left Alaska without agreeing to a ceasefire, but with a photo op, a red carpet, and a round of applause — prestige without compromise. It was against that backdrop that Zelenskyy and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appeared together yesterday. Their message was blunt: Donetsk will not be handed to Russia, because Putin has failed to take it in twelve years of fighting. Talks cannot take place while Russian missiles still fall — 'it's impossible to negotiate under the pressure of weapons,' Zelenskyy said. This was a clear attempt to fix the terms of debate before heading to Washington. Two kinds of unity now shape this moment. The anticlimax in Alaska revealed the American president drifting closer to the Russian one. Washington could now reveal another — Europe's leaders rallying behind Ukraine not as bystanders, but as counterweights.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Benefit sanctions fall under Labour
Benefit sanctions have fallen sharply under Labour after a jump in the number of claimants who say they are too sick to look for work. Figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show that 109,570 people claiming Universal Credit had their payments docked in May for failing to comply with benefit rules. This is down from just over 124,000 sanctions just before Labour took power in July and a peak of 137,000 under the Tories in 2023. The overall sanctions rate has fallen from 6.2pc to 5.3pc since Sir Keir Starmer won a landslide victory in July 2024. The fall comes after the proportion of people claiming benefits where sanctions can be applied fell to a record low, amid a surge in mental health claims from people who say they are too sick to work. Just 26.6pc – or two million people – can now be subject to sanctions when claiming Britain's main employment benefit. This means three quarters of people now have no conditions tied to their welfare. This is in stark contrast to 2017, when a series of benefit reforms spearheaded by George Osborne meant 64.8pc of people on benefits faced having them docked if they failed to attend a work placement, or did not show up for a job interview. Lockdown saw a surge in the number of people who stopped looking for work owing to ill health, with millions now parked on sickness benefits that have no requirement for people to look for work. Roughly 1,500 people a day have been signed off on incapacity benefits with no work requirements since Labour took power. Disability benefit claims are also rising, with the Government forced by backbenchers to shelve key reforms designed to reduce the financial burden on the state and encourage more people to go back to work. Millions of older welfare claimants who have been parked on benefits for years have also been moved onto Universal Credit as Labour completes a shift away from a series of legacy benefits. Official figures published last week showed that the number of working-age Britons who have been parked on joblessness benefits that do not require them to look for work has climbed by a million since Labour took power. There are currently 3.7 million Britons – or almost half of those currently claiming Britain's main unemployment benefit – who are now not required to look for a job. That is up from 2.67 million in July 2024, following Labour's landslide victory. By contrast, the figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) showed that the number of people who have to look for a job as a condition of receiving their benefits fell from 1.65 million to 1.6 million over the same period. Reforms to the benefits system that would have tackled a lockdown-related surge in benefit payments linked to mental health were shelved following a backlash from Left-wing Labour MPs. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has highlighted that just one in 20 people who have been out of work for more than a year ever go back to work. The tax-and-spending watchdog has also predicted the cost of footing Britain's sickness and disability benefits bill will approach £100bn a year by the end of the decade. A government spokesman said: 'We know that people face huge barriers to work – which is why we are overhauling jobcentres as part of our Get Britain Working Plan to give people the personalised support they need to get ahead. 'But as we shift the department's focus from welfare to work, it is right that there are obligations to engage with employment support, look for work and to take jobs when they are offered.'


ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Government urged to intervene as London pubs struggle with rising costs and high tax rates
The British Beer and Pub Association is calling on the government for more support for pubs in the capital that are struggling with rising costs and high tax rates A survey by the BBPA found 59% of Londoners think business rates for pubs are unfair. It comes despite data from the Office for National Statistics suggesting London saw a net loss of just 10 pubs between 2023 and 2024. The government says its protecting and extending business rates relief. In a statement the Treasury added: "We know the vital importance of pubs to local communities and the wider economy, which is why we are protecting pavement pints and al fresco dining, have cut alcohol duty on draught pints in the pub, and are protecting and extending business rates relief which would have ended without this government's action. "The tax decisions we took at the Budget last year mean that we have been able to deliver on the priorities of the British people, from investing in the NHS to cutting waiting lists and putting more money in their pockets with a wage boost for millions as we deliver on the Plan for Change." Figures from the Office for National Statistics reveal: 59% of Londoners say the current business rates deal for pubs is unfair 50% of voters in London would back a party that pledges to cut pub taxes, turning rates reform into a potential election lever 69% have taken part in a community activity in a pub this year, and 44% fear losing that space if their local shuts – highlighting the pub's role as a lifeline. Kate Davidson, Publican of The Old Ivy House in Clerkenwell said: "We knew it would be tough, but it's become relentless. "We're growing, but the profits don't reflect that proportionally. "The pub isn't just about pints; it's about lonely people finding connection, students bonding with retirees, and parents feeling welcome. That's the value the current rates system completely ignores."