Poilievre slams Carney over investment disclosure, says PM needs to sell assets
Last week, the ethics commissioner publicized a list of Carney's investments before they were transferred to the trust. Carney transferred his assets shortly after winning the Liberal leadership but before being sworn in as prime minister.
"We want him to explain why he told Canadians the opposite of the truth during the election campaign," Poilievre said Monday during a news conference in Ottawa.
During the campaign, Carney declined to say what stocks he had transferred into the trust — stating that he had gone above and beyond what's required in the ethics rules.
A blind trust means the trustee is the legal owner of the assets and can buy and sell them as they see fit. The trustee is barred from seeking input from Carney — and Carney is barred from knowing what assets are in the trust.
Poilievre said Carney had made "false statements" by saying he didn't know what was in the trust — though he would have known what the assets were when he transferred them.
Poilievre also pointed to Carney saying he owned only cash and personal real estate as an example of a false statement.
"It was patently and provably false for him to say he owned nothing but cash and real estate," the Conservative leader said.
But those comments referred to assets that Carney held outside of the blind trust. The ethics filing shows the only other asset Carney holds outside the trust is the copyright to his book Value(s).
The filings show Carney had held hundreds of different stocks in an investment account managed by a third party.
Poilievre says Carney should sell all his assets, arguing they compromise his decision-making.
But it's not entirely clear if Carney would be able to do so, given that they are legally controlled by the trustee.
The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said in a statement on Friday that Carney has worked "to not only comply with his obligations under the Conflict of Interest Act but to exceed them — including having his team working with the [ethics] commissioner even before he was elected — and he will continue to do so."
CBC News has asked the PMO for a response to Poilievre's specific claims.
According to the filing posted by the commissioner, Carney also held assets in Brookfield Asset Management and Stripe, Inc. He previously sat on the board of directors for both companies.
The commissioner is required by law to make the prime minister's ethics disclosures public within 120 days of taking office.
The ethics commissioner also published details about the conflict of interest screen designed to prevent Carney from making decisions to the benefit of his former employers.
Marc-André Blanchard, Carney's chief of staff, and Privy Council Clerk Michael Sabia are tasked with ensuring Carney is not made aware of and does not participate in "any official matters or decision-making processes involving" Brookfield and Stripe.
Duff Conacher, director and co-founder of Canadian non-profit and non-partisan organization Democracy Watch, agrees that Carney should sell the assets inside the blind trust.
"Carney's ethics screen is an unethical, loophole-filled smokescreen as it allows him to participate in almost all decisions that affect the companies he is invested in," Conacher said in a statement.
Poilievre has defended blind trusts
Poilievre previously appeared to have no issue with public office holders using a blind trust.
In 2010, Nigel Wright was brought on to be then prime minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff after a career in the private sector.
Wright appeared before the House ethics committee — of which Poilievre was a member — to discuss his appointment, a conflict of interest screen that was set up with the ethics commissioner and a blind trust.
Poilievre, a parliamentary secretary at the time, said opposition MPs had "attacked" Wright's motives for taking the job and asked him to explain his blind trust.
"I transferred all of my controlled assets into the blind trust in late October. The blind trustee is the legal owner of them all now, and I'm not to have any communication of any sort — no direction, no advice, no information about what's in there. I do not know and will not know what's in there," Wright told the committee.
Poilievre responded by acknowledging Wright's experience in the private sector.
"There are going to be people in this public service world who come from different backgrounds," he said.
"But that is a strength for our country. We look forward to inviting people from various sectors, in this case the business sector, but from all sectors, to make a future contribution to our country."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
A judge struck down the Ford government's bike lane removals in Toronto. What comes next?
This week an Ontario court struck down a provincial law that required three bike lanes to be removed in Toronto and which also limited the installation of new bike lanes by municipalities. The decision handed a big win to advocacy group Cycle Toronto and two individual cyclists who challenged the law in court. Here's what you need to know about case and what might come next: What was the law meant to do Bill 212, titled the 'Reducing Gridlock, Saving You Time Act' was introduced in the legislature in October and passed the following month. Among other things, it called for the removal of bike lanes along Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue in Toronto. Why did the judge strike it down? Ultimately, the judge agreed with the evidence that removal of the bike lanes would put people at increased risk of harm and death, violating the right to life and security of the person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms enshrined in the constitution. But perhaps more importantly, the judge found that the government had not presented any evidence to support its claims. 'It's a spectacular failure on the part of the Ontario government to defend its decision to remove bike lanes,' David Schneiderman told A professor of constitutional law at the University of Toronto, Schneiderman said the government's case had little chance of success, even if the judge had been sympathetic, because of the lack of evidence to back up the province's claims. 'It's hard to predict many of these kinds of charter claims. It depends on how deferential a judge wants to be,' Schneiderman said. 'But it wasn't available to judge Schabas to be deferential because there was no evidence, and the Ontario government's own experts failed to show that there was any correlation between removing bike lanes and improving congestion in the City of Toronto.' Ontario bike lanes A cyclist rides in a bike lane on University Avenue in Toronto on Friday, December 13, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Laura Proctor (Laura Proctor/The Canadian Press) What message does the ruling send? 'It should send a message to this province and others that when they're providing services of whatever sort, when they act in ways that endanger lives, physical security, or generally make the situation worse for the people who are receiving those services without some evidence to support that decision, then it might very well be that it'll give rise to a charter claim,' Schneiderman said. What happens next? The government has already said that it plans to appeal the ruling, however Schneiderman said it will likely face an uphill battle because there is so little evidence the government presented in the original case. 'When cases go on appeal, the facts that are on the record are not contested. They can't be,' Schneiderman said. 'The hearing established certain facts, and the fact is that there was no evidence offered by the government to support the decision to remove bike lanes. So without facts to support their decision, it's a real uphill climb.' Why is government bothering with case if it's weak? While the government may have lost in court, they scored a win in another way, one political observer pointed out. 'They believe that the public is on their side. They particularly believe that their voter coalition is heavily opposed to bike lanes,' CTV News Political Analyst Scott Reid pointed out. 'So they think that the visibility of this sue, the volume with which they pursued it, and the conflict that's produced by a court challenge and even a court loss helps amplify their championing of this issue and therefore cements their political position. 'Arguably, they believe they are bigger winners by being losers, because it catapults this issue back to the front of the news cycle and reignites coverage and conversation, and they are positive that they're the overwhelming beneficiaries of that.' Biking A cyclist rides in a bike lane on University Avenue in Toronto on Friday, December 13, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Laura Proctor But in addition to being seen as champions against gridlock, Reid said, the issue gives the government an enemy to fight against. 'This issue forces their preferred opponents to come out and vocally support bike lanes, which the Ford government believes not only puts those stakeholders at odds with the general public, but they think it even puts them at odds with traditional downtown voting coalitions,' Reid said. 'They think this is an orphan issue that has relatively few champions, but for hardcore urbanists and so they see this as pure political charm.' But while the cycling advocates win in court and the government scores a political win, it's the voters who are ultimately the losers, Reid said, if they end up paying for infrastructure to be built and then ripped up, as well as for a court battle to be fought over the issue. What about the notwithstanding clause? If the government were to appeal the case and lose, it could still use the notwithstanding clause to override the charter. But would it? The Ford government has shown a willingness to do so before. It used the notwithstanding clause to push through a law limiting third party election advertising in 2021. It also threatened to use the clause when it unilaterally shrunk the size of Toronto City Council just ahead of a municipal election in 2018, and moved to block a teacher's strike in 2022. Schneiderman agrees the government could decide to make use of the clause if it loses an appeal in court, but he added that whether it does so could come down to a matter of public opinion over the issue. 'In my view, the notwithstanding clause is there to protect the citizens from rogue courts that make decisions that are against the public interest,' Schneiderman said. 'It's not just for provinces or the federal government to use in the case of a popularity contest. It's not about that. It shouldn't be.' In this case the question could be 'how popular are cyclists' in Toronto, Schneiderman said. He explains that while the notwithstanding clause is available to the government to override charter rights, voters could punish governments that curtail them. 'It's not a really popular thing. People like their rights. People like the fact that they have rights, and they don't like governments to be seen to be trampling on them.' Reid said there's another reason the government might be hesitant to invoking the notwithstanding clause. 'I would be surprised if they reached for the notwithstanding clause, for no other reason than they might fear that it actually pollutes this issue, and instead of allowing them to repeat their arguments around bike lanes and enjoy the cut and thrust of the usual suspects who oppose the Ford government on bike lanes, that it might transform the issue, sort of alchemize it into something else that's got less public appeal and might cut more against their grain,' Reid said. He added that they've 'been burned' by using it in the past since its use itself becomes a polarizing issue that may invite questions about other rights being curbed.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Will Marine Atlantic's commercial rate not being cut impact people in N.L.? Not much, says this trucker
While passengers riding the Marine Atlantic ferry will see a 50 per cent reduction in the cost of their ticket, commercial passengers and truckers won't see that same benefit. And while Newfoundland and Labrador's Minister of Jobs says it puts the province at a severe trade disadvantage, one trucker says it likely won't make much of a difference. "It was no big surprise, really. And it ain't going to impact the everyday lives of people here very much anyway, even if they're reduced," Tony Power, owner of operator of Power Trucking in Holyrood, told CBC News of the decision to not cut commercial rates for Marine Atlantic ferries. He pays $735 for a one way trip for his 75-foot truck. "If I reduce the rate to [merchants] for the ferry, they ain't going to take it off for the province anyway. There's just corporate greed across the board." Other ferries in Atlantic Canada and Quebec saw both commercial and passenger rates slashed in a decision by Prime Minister Mark Carney. Asked by CBC News why the change didn't apply to Marine Atlantic, St. John's East MP Joanne Thompson said rates needed to be frozen to protect other merchants in the industry. "Marine Atlantic is part of a broader chain of suppliers that bring commercial product in and out of the province. And we need to protect all players in the field, because we rely on the transfer of products from multiple sources," Thompson said. In response, Newfoundland and Labrador Jobs Minister Gerry Byrne said not lowering commercial rates goes against the announcement being a way to improve interprovincial trade efforts. "[Other Atlantic provinces] now have a very, very large competitive advantage over Newfoundland and Labrador in exports, in free trade, in competitiveness. Our economy now just took a blow," Byrne told CBC Radio Thursday. More passengers, delayed shipments? Power said he sided with Thompson's comments. He noted that if rates were to drop for travel on Marine Atlantic, other transporters would have to get the same cut and disrupt the overall market. But although he believes rates not being cut won't affect the price of food on the shelves, it could affect when it gets there — as a likely increase in passenger traffic could lead to less space being available for commercial trucks. "You're going to have less trucks per vessel," he said. "Those trucks that were there Tuesday for the [dangerous goods] crossing got to sit there 'till Wednesday. So, like, they got an extra two days on the wharf, which is delaying their products. It all got to come to the island, we got very few options to get to Newfoundland … that traffic got to come across that water." Power also expressed concerns with loosening interprovincial trade barriers, saying he believes it would impact the ability for local companies to prosper with business coming in from elsewhere.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Ferryland's lighthouse is shining bright for the first time in 5 years
A shining light on Newfoundland's Avalon Peninsula has fully reopened for the first time in five years, which one business owner says will help the region shine even brighter. The Ferryland Lighthouse has faced several hurdles and partial closures in recent years, closing due to the COVID-19 pandemic and then facing a second long-term closure when the building was severely damaged by Hurricane Larry in 2021. Jill Curran, the owner of Lighthouse Picnics operating out of the lighthouse, said it led to tough questions having to be asked about the future of her business. "We accumulated, unfortunately, a lot of debt trying to work around that," Curran told CBC Radio's The St. John's Morning Show. "It was just so hard, and I'm so appreciative of all the people that stayed with us. Because we continued to operate, but each year we looked different as we figured things out." Now, five years after the start of the pandemic and four years after the hurricane, the lighthouse has been fully reopened and business is back in full swing. "It's Lighthouse Picnics, so the lighthouse is a key ingredient to what we're doing out there," she said. "Five years was a really long time. And there was many times, you know, we just kind of hit roadblock after roadblock. [We] stumbled, and it was just like, 'Is it ever going to happen?' And so it's just been amazing, we've just been so happy with the feedback." Curran said years of work had to go into getting the lighthouse reopened. It still had its original structure from its construction in 1870 at the time of the hurricane, which was pounded by wind and surf to the point where it began to crumble. Heavy structural work had to be completed, which was complicated by large-scale supplies needing to be brought in on a narrow, gravel road. Now the work has been finished, Curran said she's beyond excited to welcome people back to the lighthouse that has been in her family for generations. "It was a real labour of love, and it means the world to me to see it so accepted by visitors and the community," she said. "It just gives me so much hope to see the building open again. Its breathed life into our business again. And so I think our lighthouse, and so many historic buildings around the province, are really a way for us to pay tribute to those that came before us."
