
Hungary seeks EU sanctions after death of Hungarian in Ukraine
Prime Minister Viktor Orbán claimed last week that József Sebestyén, a 45-year-old ethnic Hungarian from Ukraine's Transcarpathia region, was beaten to death for refusing to join the Ukrainian army. Ukrainian authorities have firmly denied the allegations, stating the mobilisation was lawful and that Sebestyén died of a pulmonary embolism with no signs of bodily harm.
"The Hungarian government has initiated the inclusion of Ukrainian leaders responsible for József Sebestyén's death on the EU's human rights sanctions list," Orbán announced via Facebook.
Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said in Brussels on Tuesday that Hungary would formally request sanctions under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, which targets individuals involved in serious human rights abuses.
'We will officially propose that all Ukrainian military leaders responsible be placed on the EU sanctions list,' Szijjártó stated during the Foreign Affairs Council meeting.
Hungarian media, aligned with the government, reported that Sebestyén was beaten with iron rods during a forced mobilisation and died three weeks later. A video posted by his sister showed him on his knees speaking in Ukrainian, fuelling further outrage.
Ukraine rejected the allegations, identifying the man as Shebeshten Yosip Yosipovich, a Ukrainian citizen. As Ukraine does not recognise dual citizenship, he was not officially considered Hungarian. Kyiv added that the man had abandoned military training and was later treated for acute stress in psychiatric care. Authorities pledged a transparent investigation and warned Hungary against disseminating unverified, emotionally charged claims.
Rising Tensions
The incident has heightened already strained relations between Hungary and Ukraine. Budapest summoned the Ukrainian ambassador and escalated its criticism of Kyiv.
Orbán, who has long opposed Ukraine's EU accession, cited the death as further evidence of Ukraine's unfitness to join the bloc. Following a non-binding poll in which 95% of Hungarian respondents opposed Ukraine's membership, Orbán warned of 'economic and security disaster' should accession proceed.
The Hungarian government recently launched a billboard campaign featuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky alongside opposition leader Péter Magyar, implying the opposition serves foreign interests. Hungary also continues to veto EU military and financial support for Ukraine, calling instead for an immediate ceasefire.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
Which EU countries recognise Palestine amid France's decision?
French President Emmanuel Macron announced on social media on 24 July that France will recognise Palestine as a state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. Macron shared his letter to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in an X post, alongside a statement which read: "The French people want peace in the Middle East. It is up to us, the French, together with the Israelis, the Palestinians, and our European and international partners, to demonstrate that it is possible." France will become the first G7 country and the first permanent member of the UN Security Council (France, United States, China, United Kingdom and Russia) to recognise Palestine, joining 147 member states of the United Nations that have already done so. The act of recognition involves acknowledging the sovereignty and independence of Palestine within its pre-1967 Middle East war borders. This includes the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. The move will also lead to the establishment of full diplomatic relations between France and Palestine. This decision was taken amid a renewed push in Europe to bring the war in Gaza to an end. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the EU's chief diplomat Kaja Kallas have called the suffering in Gaza "unbearable" and "indefensible". Before France, 10 out of 27 EU countries had already recognised Palestinian statehood. Bulgaria, Cyprus, Hungary, Poland, and Romania recognised Palestine in 1988, well before they became EU member states. The former country of Czechoslovakia also recognised Palestinian statehood in 1988. However, after it split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1992, the Czech Republic did not recognise such a state. "The Palestinian state did not meet the conditions for statehood under international law, of which the Czechoslovak government was fully aware," the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic wrote on its official website in 2020. "The Czech Republic has not yet recognised the Palestinian state." Meanwhile, Slovakia reconfirmed its recognition of Palestine in 1993. In October 2014, Sweden became the very first country to recognise Palestine while being an EU member state. "The purpose of Sweden's recognition is to contribute to a future in which Israel and Palestine can live side by side in peace and security. We want to contribute to creating more hope and belief in the future among young Palestinians and Israelis who might otherwise run the risk of believing that there is no alternative to the current situation," said the then Swedish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Margot Wallström. Sweden took this step at the height of months-long clashes between Israelis and Palestinians in East Jerusalem. More recently, on 28 May 2024, Spain and Ireland recognised Palestine as a state, claiming the decision aimed to help Israelis and Palestinians reach peace. On 4 June 2024, Slovenia also recognised the state of Palestine. "Slovenia and Palestine have established good relations, which are underpinned by regular political dialogue," Slovenia's official website stated. The two countries also collaborate in education and humanitarian aid, including by implementing a variety of humanitarian projects." Macron's announcement sparked anger from Israel and the United States. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the decision, as did US State Secretary Marco Rubio. "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th," Rubio wrote on X. Netanyahu lashed out at France's announcement, calling it a betrayal by a close ally and warning it would "reward terror". "A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel — not to live in peace beside it," he said on X. What about other EU countries? Other EU countries have reacted to France's decision, stating that they will not follow these steps. Despite recent calls for an "immediate ceasefire" and "urgently needed humanitarian aid", Germany has claimed it has no plans to follow France's lead. Germany has traditionally been a particularly staunch ally of Israel in Europe, with relations rooted in the history of the Holocaust. It says recognising a Palestinian state should be "one of the concluding steps" in negotiating a two-state solution, and it "does not plan to recognise a Palestinian state in the short term". Italy is also not planning on recognising the state of Palestine. The country's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni stated that the recognition "without there being a state of Palestine" would be "counterproductive". Meanwhile, the Belgian position will be determined by the government in early September. "I will make a proposal to the government before the UN General Assembly in September so that it can decide on this matter, taking these elements into account," Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot wrote on X. Behind the recognition of a Palestinian state lies the idea of the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which served as the basis of peace negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians from the Oslo Accords in 1993 up until 2014. While the Palestinian Authority still advocates for two states, Israel no longer supports this solution to the conflict, nor does its ally, the US. In fact, settlement activity on the West Bank has further expanded in the past years, rendering the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. Add to that US President Donald Trump's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital in 2017, prompting the US embassy to move there from Tel Aviv. With this in mind, recognising a Palestinian state is largely symbolic and remains unfeasible as things stand on the ground.


Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
EU-US trade deal leaves future of pharma tariffs uncertain
The current status of tariffs on pharmaceuticals between the EU and the US remains uncertain, despite the announcement on Sunday of a new transatlantic trade agreement. The situation is particularly sensitive given the mutual dependency in the sector: the US imports large volumes of critical pharmaceuticals from the EU, while EU-based pharmaceutical companies—especially in Ireland and Denmark—rely heavily on access to the American market. Although the new trade agreement will officially enter into force on 1 August, pharmaceuticals will not be subject to a 15% tariff which will be slapped on most goods imported from the European Union to the United States. This does not mean that there won't be tariffs at all on pharmaceuticals, as the US is still conducting an investigation into imported pharmaceuticals to assess whether they threaten US national security. For this reason, pharmaceuticals were technically excluded from yesterday's formal agreement, several EU sources confirm, as the US could not commit to any decision on tariff changes, which will only come after the conclusion of that process. However, if tariffs are introduced following the investigation, the EU expects the US—under President Trump—to honour the informal understanding reached during negotiations. This includes a cap of 15% on tariffs, which the EU considers "all-inclusive", meaning it should apply even to products still under investigation, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. 'I believe that this commitment will be honoured and respected in this case as well,' said EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič during a press briefing following the deal. So, what happens after 1 August? In the short term, nothing will change. Despite earlier reports suggesting the US would impose a 15% tariff on pharmaceuticals too in line with most EU goods, that is not expected to happen immediately. 'There will be no tariffs on pharmaceuticals this Friday,' clarified a senior EU official who participated in the negotiations with President Trump in Scotland. Most pharmaceutical products traded between the EU and the US currently benefit from a 0% tariff rate under the Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) framework. This is consistent with prior US-EU trade arrangements and World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments. As a result, EU pharmaceutical exports have faced no tariff barriers when entering the US market—a condition that remained unchanged even after Trump's so-called "Liberation Day", when he announced imposing blanket tariffs on goods. Uncertain outcome of the US investigation But tariffs on pharmaceuticals are expected to come at one point. The key uncertainty revolves around the ongoing Section 232 investigation being conducted by the Trump administration. This probe, authorised under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, is intended to assess whether imports of pharmaceuticals (and other products as well such as semiconductors) threaten US national security. The investigation's conclusions could lead to unilateral actions by the US, including higher tariffs or import restrictions, independent of the broader trade deal struck yesterday. '[During the talks] President Trump wanted to make clear that they still have full freedom to conclude the 232 investigations and to choose any policy measures as a result,' said another EU negotiator. While EU officials cannot predict the outcome of the US investigation, they believe it is nearing completion. 'These are two investigations—pharmaceuticals and semiconductors—that are pretty close to conclusion,' an official noted. If the US does impose tariffs following the investigation, the EU expects these to be capped at 15% for both sectors, in line with the political understanding reached during the trade talks. EU's bet on pharma tariffs The EU's strategy is clear: even though Trump could not legally commit yesterday to tariffs on pharmaceuticals while the investigation is ongoing, the EU insisted on a 15% ceiling across all sectors, with no exclusions for pharmaceuticals. A senior EU official added that this understanding is backed by a broader political commitment, including planned investments by pharmaceutical companies in the US and pressure from the industry on both sides of the Atlantic to collaborate more closely. 'There is a clear understanding that investments, supply chain integration, and joint R&D efforts should all fall under the special 15% regime,' the official explained. Still, the EU acknowledges that this is not yet a legally binding commitment. 'Is this a legal commitment? No, not at this stage. That would have to come through an executive order once the US concludes its investigation,' the source continued. For now, both pharmaceutical and semiconductor products remain at zero-duty 0rates. No changes will occur on 1 August, but that could change once the US finalises its Section 232 investigation.


Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
Oil prices rise on EU-US trade deal and Trump comments on Ukraine
Oil prices rose on Monday afternoon in Europe after US President Donald Trump said he would reduce the deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal with Ukraine. WTI was up around 2.2% at $66.50 a barrel, while Brent crude oil was up around 2% at $69.80, as of 15.00 CEST. Trump issued the 50-day timeline to Putin in July, claiming that he would hit Russia with a 100% tariff if Moscow didn't end the war in Ukraine. 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. So we're going to have to look and I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number,' Trump told reporters in Scotland on Monday. 'I think I already know the answer, what's going to happen,' Trump said. The president was preparing to meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Oil prices had risen earlier in the day on Monday as investors reacted to news of a EU-US trade deal, announced on Sunday. Among other provisions, the EU agreed to buy $750 billion of US energy products, including oil, LNG, and nuclear energy over three years. The deal means that the EU will face a 15% tariff on most of its goods when Trump's tariff deadline ends on 1 August, rather than a threatened 30% rate. European stock markets also jumped during Monday morning trading on the news, before settling in the afternoon. Trump's tariff threats have previously deflated oil prices this year as investors predicted that a potential economic slowdown could affect demand for oil. Geopolitical risk, on the other hand, has stoked prices in cases where investors have expected threats to supply. US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, for example, prompted a spike in oil prices in June. An OPEC+ committee meeting is taking place on Monday, where participants will decide on production policy for September. Both the International Energy Agency and the US Energy Information Administration expect a strong oil surplus next year, with supply outpacing demand. After securing a deal with the EU, Washington has now set its sights on negotiations with China. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are meeting with Chinese officials, including Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, on Monday in Stockholm. China and the US agreed to temporarily lower reciprocal tariffs during a 90-day truce period, set to expire on 12 August. There are hopes that the two nations will be able to extend the grace period, with China currently taxing US goods at 10% and the US taxing Chinese goods at 30%.