logo
EU-US trade deal leaves future of pharma tariffs uncertain

EU-US trade deal leaves future of pharma tariffs uncertain

Euronews4 days ago
The current status of tariffs on pharmaceuticals between the EU and the US remains uncertain, despite the announcement on Sunday of a new transatlantic trade agreement.
The situation is particularly sensitive given the mutual dependency in the sector: the US imports large volumes of critical pharmaceuticals from the EU, while EU-based pharmaceutical companies—especially in Ireland and Denmark—rely heavily on access to the American market.
Although the new trade agreement will officially enter into force on 1 August, pharmaceuticals will not be subject to a 15% tariff which will be slapped on most goods imported from the European Union to the United States.
This does not mean that there won't be tariffs at all on pharmaceuticals, as the US is still conducting an investigation into imported pharmaceuticals to assess whether they threaten US national security.
For this reason, pharmaceuticals were technically excluded from yesterday's formal agreement, several EU sources confirm, as the US could not commit to any decision on tariff changes, which will only come after the conclusion of that process.
However, if tariffs are introduced following the investigation, the EU expects the US—under President Trump—to honour the informal understanding reached during negotiations.
This includes a cap of 15% on tariffs, which the EU considers "all-inclusive", meaning it should apply even to products still under investigation, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
'I believe that this commitment will be honoured and respected in this case as well,' said EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič during a press briefing following the deal.
So, what happens after 1 August?
In the short term, nothing will change.
Despite earlier reports suggesting the US would impose a 15% tariff on pharmaceuticals too in line with most EU goods, that is not expected to happen immediately.
'There will be no tariffs on pharmaceuticals this Friday,' clarified a senior EU official who participated in the negotiations with President Trump in Scotland.
Most pharmaceutical products traded between the EU and the US currently benefit from a 0% tariff rate under the Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) framework. This is consistent with prior US-EU trade arrangements and World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments.
As a result, EU pharmaceutical exports have faced no tariff barriers when entering the US market—a condition that remained unchanged even after Trump's so-called "Liberation Day", when he announced imposing blanket tariffs on goods.
Uncertain outcome of the US investigation
But tariffs on pharmaceuticals are expected to come at one point.
The key uncertainty revolves around the ongoing Section 232 investigation being conducted by the Trump administration.
This probe, authorised under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, is intended to assess whether imports of pharmaceuticals (and other products as well such as semiconductors) threaten US national security.
The investigation's conclusions could lead to unilateral actions by the US, including higher tariffs or import restrictions, independent of the broader trade deal struck yesterday.
'[During the talks] President Trump wanted to make clear that they still have full freedom to conclude the 232 investigations and to choose any policy measures as a result,' said another EU negotiator.
While EU officials cannot predict the outcome of the US investigation, they believe it is nearing completion.
'These are two investigations—pharmaceuticals and semiconductors—that are pretty close to conclusion,' an official noted.
If the US does impose tariffs following the investigation, the EU expects these to be capped at 15% for both sectors, in line with the political understanding reached during the trade talks.
EU's bet on pharma tariffs
The EU's strategy is clear: even though Trump could not legally commit yesterday to tariffs on pharmaceuticals while the investigation is ongoing, the EU insisted on a 15% ceiling across all sectors, with no exclusions for pharmaceuticals.
A senior EU official added that this understanding is backed by a broader political commitment, including planned investments by pharmaceutical companies in the US and pressure from the industry on both sides of the Atlantic to collaborate more closely.
'There is a clear understanding that investments, supply chain integration, and joint R&D efforts should all fall under the special 15% regime,' the official explained.
Still, the EU acknowledges that this is not yet a legally binding commitment.
'Is this a legal commitment? No, not at this stage. That would have to come through an executive order once the US concludes its investigation,' the source continued.
For now, both pharmaceutical and semiconductor products remain at zero-duty 0rates. No changes will occur on 1 August, but that could change once the US finalises its Section 232 investigation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time40 minutes ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time41 minutes ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the centre of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customise makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalised, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup
US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Fashion Network

time44 minutes ago

  • Fashion Network

US tech firm Zugara accuses Chanel of patent infringement over AR makeup

Legal disputes over augmented reality (AR) technology are escalating across fashion and beauty. The latest case involves Chanel, which California-based AR company Zugara is suing for allegedly infringing on its patented face-tracking process. Zugara filed the lawsuit on July 22 in Texas, claiming the French luxury house's virtual makeup try-on tool unlawfully replicates a patented system the firm developed for real-time cosmetic simulation. The tech company is known for providing AR tools to major clients such as Nestlé, Pepsi, Toyota, AT&T, and the U.S. Air Force. At the center of the case is a patented method that tracks users' eyes and lips to digitally apply makeup in real time. While there are several ways to achieve this effect, Zugara alleges that Chanel's 'Virtually Try-On' tool copies the specific sequence outlined in its patent. Zugara previously filed a similar complaint against Estée Lauder, which was reportedly settled out of court. Chanel's virtual try-on experience allows users to test makeup looks inspired by its Croisière 2025 runway show. The tool features curated palettes, limited-edition products, and options to customize makeup virtually before purchasing. Unlike virtual reality, which immerses users in a fully digital environment, augmented reality enhances real-world images by overlaying digital elements. In the beauty sector, AR try-on tools have become popular for offering personalized, contact-free shopping experiences. But the rise of AR tools has sparked more than just innovation. Legal challenges involving beauty brands and tech firms are becoming more common—particularly around the collection of biometric data. In the U.S., companies such as Charlotte Tilbury Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty, Mary Kay, and Ulta have previously been sued for allegedly capturing facial data without user consent. As companies like Apple and Meta push forward with AR-enabled devices, experts warn that biometric tracking, facial scanning, and consumer privacy will continue to raise legal and regulatory questions across the retail and tech industries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store