Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books
The justices reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material.
The decision was not a final ruling in the case, but the justices strongly suggested that the parents will win in the end.
Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order unclearThe court ruled that policies like the one at issue in the case are subjected to the strictest level of review, nearly always dooming them.
The school district introduced the storybooks, including 'Prince & Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding,' in 2022 as part of an effort to better reflect the district's diversity. In 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding,' a niece worries that her uncle won't have as much time for her after he gets married to another man.
The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years and the case is among several religious-rights cases at the court this term. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries.
Many of the removals were organized by Moms for Liberty and other conservative organizations that advocate for more parental input over what books are available to students. Soon after President Donald Trump, a Republican, took office in January, the Education Department called the book bans a 'hoax' and dismissed 11 complaints that had been filed under Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, a Democrat.
The writers' group Pen America said in a court filing in the Maryland case that the objecting parents wanted 'a constitutionally suspect book ban by another name.' Pen America reported more than 10,000 books were banned in the last school year.
Parents initially had been allowed to opt their children out of the lessons for religious and other reasons, but the school board reversed course a year later, prompting protests and eventually a lawsuit.
At arguments in April, a lawyer for the school district told the justices that the 'opt outs' had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction in Montgomery schools that students can be excused from, lawyer Alan Schoenfeld said.
The case hit unusually close to home, as three justices live in the county, though they didn't send their children to public schools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls
GOP Rep. Doug LaMalfa drew taunts and jeers at two raucous town hall meetings Monday over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' LaMalfa, whose district spans much of the state's northern interior, is the latest Republican to face harsh in-person criticism, as members of the party attempt to sell Trump's sweeping agenda back home during Congress' August break from Washington. Last week, Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood – who also heeded the guidance of the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, to focus the district work period on the president's massive domestic policy bill – met a largely hostile crowd as he was pressed on a range of issues, including the agenda bill that Trump signed into law July 4. LaMalfa calmly address audience members throughout both town halls, even as some attendees cursed at him and railed against his support of the president, shouting 'Liar!' While the morning crowd in Chico had been much louder, the audience in Red Bluff later in the evening was at times just as vocal, especially when LaMalfa expressed skepticism about the role of carbon dioxide in climate change. At both town halls, LaMalfa was pressed over how Trump's agenda, which includes historic cuts to federal support for the social safety net, would affect rural hospitals, particularly those in his district. Other attendees asked questions about transparency around the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files. At the morning event, LaMalfa called it a 'bad look' to have Epstein-related information continue to be 'suppressed.' Still other attendees warned the president's tariffs would harm farmers in California and attacked the congressman's credibility. 'If you're not here to either announce your resignation, why aren't you here to apologize to the farmers of the north state because of your support for the Trump tariffs?' one audience members said at the Chico town hall. 'I'm not gonna do either. Thanks,' LaMalfa replied. 'Do you actually want to talk about something productive?' LaMalfa defended Trump's tariffs, insisting that the United States had been taken advantage of and that the tariffs were being used to negotiate better deals for American farmers. 'And you know, is it the ideal, perfect way to go? No, I hope these tariffs can end soon,' he said Monday evening. 'I want to believe at some point we'lll end up with very low or zero tariffs with all these countries.' LaMalfa also addressed Texas' redistricting effort, warning it is going to start 'a grass fire all across the country.' His comments come as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map, as CNN previously reported, could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative and could potentially target LaMalfa's seat. For his part, LaMalfa said he didn't support either redistricting push. 'It's really ugly and no matter which side of the aisle you're on, it doesn't look good. It doesn't give you more faith in the political process if legislators draw the lines merely to have an outcome for a partisan win,' the congressman said.
2 minutes ago
ABC News Live Prime: Mon, Aug 11, 2025
Trump deploys National Guard to D.C.; Dozens hurt after steel plant explosion; Israeli strike kills 5 Al Jazeera journalists; ABC News' Linsey Davis shares medical struggle with fibroids. August 11, 2025
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Pete Hegseth Responds to Claims That He and Trump Want 'Martial Law'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has pushed back against critics who say President Donald Trump's administration seeks to impose martial law, following the president's announcement of sweeping federal intervention in Washington, D.C. Speaking on Fox News' eponymous The Ingraham Angle, with host Laura Ingraham, Hegseth defended the deployment of up to 1,000 National Guard troops and federal takeover of the nation's capital police department as lawful measures to restore order. Why It Matters Trump's invocation of emergency powers to federalize D.C.'s Metropolitan Police Department represents one of the most aggressive federal interventions in local law enforcement in recent history. The move sets a precedent that could extend to other cities, with Trump specifically naming Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Baltimore as potential targets for similar federal deployments. Martial law is a term that references the military seizing control of a civilian area during an emergency. What To Know Trump invoked Section 740 of the 1973 D.C. Home Rule Act, allowing federal control for 30 days, with congressional approval required for extensions. The intervention was triggered following the August assault on Edward "Big Balls" Coristine, a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, in a Logan Circle carjacking attempt. During the Fox News interview, Ingraham pressed Hegseth on martial law concerns: "The question of martial law keeps getting raised by the left that Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth want to impose martial law, as authoritarians would." The defense secretary responded by pointing to Los Angeles as an example, noting the deployment of 4,000 California National Guard troops and Marines during immigration protests. "They were the troops available to ensure that we de-escalated the situation and didn't allow other lawbreakers to say, 'Look, it's wide-open. We can do whatever we want in these sanctuary cities,'" he said. Hegseth directly addressed critics' concerns about targeting political opponents: "I was told, 'Oh, you're going to lock up political opponents. You're going to go after Democrat, yada, yada. It's the same stuff every time. Mischaracterizing our intentions." He said that Trump's approach involves using "legal and lawful and constitutional means," including federalizing police departments, deploying National Guard units and bringing in federal marshals when local law enforcement proves inadequate. But the federal takeover in the nation's capital accompanies contradictory crime data. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime in D.C. has dropped to a 30-year low, with violent offenses falling 35 percent in 2024 and declining another 26 percent this year. Trump called Monday "liberation day," announcing plans for a broader "beautification" campaign including abolishing homeless encampments, launching street repairs and adding amenities like a White House ballroom. Ingraham: The left says Trump and Hegseth, they want to impose martial law as authoritarians… to that you say? Hegseth: To that I say look at Los Angeles… — Acyn (@Acyn) August 11, 2025 What People Are Saying Hegseth also said on The Ingraham Angle Monday: "The intentions of this president is to establish law and order using legal and lawful and constitutional means, which he completely has, and you know why they don't like him? He's got the guts to do it. He's got the guts to say, I'm gonna federalize the police that don't work. I'm gonna bring in the National Guard. I'm gonna bring in federal marshals." Trump, during a Monday news conference at the White House: "This is liberation day in D.C., and we're going to take our capital back." Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, in a statement sent to Newsweek on Monday: "This is the latest effort by the president to distract from the issues he should be focused on—including the roller coaster of the U.S. economy thanks to his policies. When it comes to public safety in Baltimore, he should turn off the right-wing propaganda and look at the facts. Baltimore is the safest it's been in over 50 years. Homicides are down 28% this year alone, reaching the lowest level of any year on record. We still have real work to do to build on this progress—but that work starts and ends here in Baltimore, with the local, state, and federal partners who have gotten us this far." Muriel Bowser, mayor of Washington, D.C., told MSNBC: "It is true that we had a terrible spike in crime in 2023, but this is not 2023—this is 2025. We've achieved that by working with the community, the police, our prosecutors, and, in fact, the federal government." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, accompanied by President Donald Trump, right, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, center, speaks at a news conference in the White House on August 11 in Washington, D.C. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, left, accompanied by President Donald Trump, right, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, center, speaks at a news conference in the White House on August 11 in Washington, Happens Next? The 30-day federal control period will test the administration's approach to urban crime management. Trump's threats to extend similar measures to other Democratic-led cities will likely face legal challenges and political opposition.
