It takes a foreign investor to cheer up the doom-laden Americans
A t the junk bond king Michael Milken's annual jamboree in Beverly Hills this week, the mood among billionaires and chief executives is sombre.
In ballrooms at the Beverly Hilton, asset managers, bankers and investors listening to doyens of Wall Street give their take on the investment climate heard Henry Kravis, co-founder of KKR, warn how the uncertainty caused by trade policy was causing investors to sit on their hands.
In a conference interview, Marc Rowan, chief executive of Apollo Global Management, said: 'We have done damage to the US brand — the brand for stability, predictability, regularity. I see us moving from what was hyper-exceptionalism to merely exceptional.'
The most optimistic chief executives are hoping that US leadership in technological advances around AI and quantum
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
New stock market for shares in private companies to open in UK
A new type of stock market will open in the UK later this year, allowing investors to trade shares in privately-owned companies — as opposed to those that are publicly owned and listed, for example on the London Stock Exchange (LSE). Referred to as Pisces — which stands for a Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System — the first trading could begin on the new stock market in the next few months after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) approved the rules around it. The FCA hopes the move will support the UK economy by giving more choices to the investment community and attracting new funds for growing businesses. Although Pisces has already officially launched, trading cannot begin until companies who will act as operators start their platforms, which are subject to licences. With more companies choosing to stay private for longer, the new trading system was created to give investors access to businesses they otherwise could not fund, and to allow those holding shares in private businesses the chance to cash out. That can be as a result of shares being given as part of an employment package, for example, or by being an investor in an earlier round of private fundraising — which isn't always accessible to private investors. Operation Pisces is set up in the FCA's sandbox environment to allow for experimentation on what works, what is required and what best practice will turn out to be. The plan is for around a five-year developmental phase, during which time testing and adjusting will take place with the framework, ahead of permanent rules being established in 2030. While Pisces is the framework for the stock exchange itself, individual operators will operate the ability to trade — comparative to now, for example, in how people with an investing Isa on an app or with their bank go through them to buy or sell companies or funds listed on the LSE. Those operators will have flexibility on the type of private companies they list; the FCA expect some may operate by size or industry, or perhaps on timing of share sales. Shares may be available to buy quarterly or annually in different private companies, for example, or during set windows according to their need. Caution While the new private stock market is largely welcomed, investors will need to be aware of the additional risks which may be involved, compared to putting money into listed companies. Legislation exists to demand retail investors have a certain amount of knowledge before parting with their money, but this includes being 'self-certified' according to investing experience. Additionally, while public stock markets are heavily regulated — one of the reasons companies stay private instead of floating — the idea for this sandbox platform is to stay similar to private market processes and laws. As a result, for example, the process known as insider trading will not apply in the same way, potentially leading to an imbalance of information between those privately investing and institutional, professional investors. Emma Reynolds, economic secretary to the Treasury, said: 'Pisces is a great example of industry, regulators and the government working together to go further and faster on innovative reforms to strengthen UK capital markets, supporting economic growth and putting more money in people's pocket as part of our Plan for Change. 'I welcome the FCA's announcement, which follows our legislation and opens Pisces to industry. This also builds on our announcements on a Stamp Taxes on Shares exemption for Pisces transactions, and on employees retaining the tax advantages on eligible shares traded.' Simon Walls, executive director of markets at the FCA, added: 'This bold design rebalances risk, but it is bold risk taking that made the UK the leading financial centre it is today. The new platforms will give investors greater access and confidence to invest in exciting new companies, while early backers and employees can sell up and invest again. 'Pisces is the latest step in the FCA's wide-ranging reforms to the UK's markets to boost growth and competitiveness.'
Finextra
35 minutes ago
- Finextra
Why is regulation no longer a priority for US financial services?
0 Financial regulation in the US is so yesterday's news. Based on recent actions and/or comments from the Trump administration and the regulatory agencies assigned to measure and monitor a multitude of factors that surround and secure the country's financial system, oversight of banks, savings institutions and credit unions (FIs) – and even emerging sectors and those previously deemed 'risky' - isn't a top federal priority anymore. The Trump administration's postings and pronouncements in the first half-year of its tenure don't only involve reducing 'red tape' for existing financial providers and products under the purview of these agencies and others. They're also aimed at opening up the industry to new or potential products, services and entrants like crypto firms, buy now pay later (BNPL) companies, money service businesses, and other banking and fintech upstarts. New regulations cancelled, pending ones pulled, some fingers pointing to potential reasons why The marketplace in financial services is in constant flux, which is one of the reasons - along with the fact that the industry deals every second with payments, deposits, and transfers of hard-earned cash and earnings which consumers and businesses trust to be safely managed - that it has been closely regulated by the federal government for at least 100 years. As agency oversight of all kinds continues to be deemphasised by the Trump regime, keep watching as other fringe financial products and services emerge over the coming months, and advocacy for consumer protection either wanes or increases as result. Then there are the vexing 'separation of powers' and ethical issues involved. Some industry enthusiasts and others have pointed out that the Trump family's ownership and development of various cryptocurrency and other assets raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest related to personal profit and the president's influence on industry regulations. The Supreme Court may end up confronting some of these issues, though it's anyone's guess exactly when or how this would occur. Old and new financial services rules dropped, loosened under new Trump agency heads According to the Brookings Institution's Center on Regulation and Markets tracker, some of the substantial changes that have been made by Trump administration agencies to overturn previously Biden-passed or sponsored initiatives directly or tangentially involving financial services include 'nullifying' the previous cabinet's rules or executive orders limiting overdrafts for large financial institutions, protecting Americans from harmful data broker practices, governing the introduction and use of digital assets, setting the future of cryptocurrency regulation, and ensuring the development of secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence tools. Dropping enforcement actions, already on the books from the previous administration, is just a start. Some would argue there are other decisions not mentioned above but listed on the Brookings tracker - like Trump's executive order withdrawing the US from the Paris climate change agreement – that have major impacts on financial services as well. This is because financial institutions in general and especially some of the world's largest firms headquartered in this country have been identified as linchpins – due to their influence on the policies of multinational to smaller companies using their lending and other banking services - to achieving net zero carbon emissions or other environmentally related goals in the US, but across the globe. Bank and fintechs wrestling with upheaval of 'catch-and-release' 'America First' tariff edicts The current administration's 'America First' trade policy and increased or newly instituted tariffs on products made by countries from A to Z clearly have a substantial impact on financial institutions and fintechs as well. They have quickly changed the nature and likely the total number of international transactions handled by banking firms. The constant revisions and restatements of tariff policies and rules and frequent delays or suspensions of regulatory implementation for such import taxes against supply chain partners or suppliers in various nations around the globe have led to significant uncertainty. This lack of clarity impacts not just commercial enterprises and the businesses and consumers who are their customers, but established and emerging banking providers for all of them as well. Open banking regulation – as defined under Biden CFPB, is dead – yet data sharing continues One of several examples of the new administration's direction on financial regulation emerged late in May when open banking reform - via a much-discussed and debated amendment to original post-2008-10 financial crisis Dodd-Frank legislation - was officially deemed 'dead' – at least for now. The partisan Dodd-Frank Act was passed by Congress in 2010 under the Obama administration to help fix some of the damage wrought by what Investopedia termed 'perhaps the worst economic catastrophe to befall the country (and the world) since the Wall Street crash in 1929,' and widespread losses largely caused, they said, 'by greed-driven behavior and lax oversight of financial institutions.' Later, bipartisan legislation was signed in 2018 to reduce the law's regulatory burdens on smaller financial institutions. The '1033 rule,' finalised by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in October 2024 after being formally proposed a year prior, was designed to further update Dodd-Frank to modernise industry interoperability and data sharing through use of standard interfaces (APIs.) This would eliminate the 25-year-old practice of 'screen-scraping' (often at the request of customers) of one financial services company's online data records to fill another's held in that same client's name. Rule 1033 provided clear guidelines for greater consumer rights in data control and protection, data handling, and third-party sharing requirements for Fis and fintechs around financial services and inclusion. Though many financial institutions supported 1033's aims in principle, some had strong concerns about the specific technical challenges and potential liability issues that it raised. These were primarily associated with its requirements for managing customer data ownership and responsibilities for data-sharing and permissions among multiple providers. The rule (and with it, most plans to formally progress open banking initiatives) has now been sent back to the drawing board, with its declaration as 'unlawful' by federal regulators as of the end of May. About face on many regulatory fronts thrills some, concerns others in financial services arena In a business world that usually champions laissez faire governmental policies, financial services deregulation or rule repeals as described have been hailed by some as a 'good thing' for business. Some operators, especially those outside of the mainstream FI world, might go even further to say 'no' regulation at all is best. But the Trump team's recent moves to kill or reduce many landmark regulations and cut thousands of agency staff responsible for policy development and ongoing monitoring of financial services providers and rules has been more than a wake-up call for the industry. Advocate groups are worried about reduced protection and oversight for consumer and business accounts and community lending, as well as how federal regulatory retreat might derail efforts to promote financial inclusion of the unbanked and underbanked across society. Indeed, the rapid changes made to financial services regulations and policies have left some in-country and outside observers and even leaders of some individual entities involved concerned. That's because regulations can stabilise and standardise industry rules and expectations (help 'level the playing field') while their detractors might claim they impose undue, unfair limitations on the marketplace. Yet, given recent administration proposals to relax bank capital requirements and privatise government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the mortgage arena, more disruption surely looms in the near future for the industry in the coming year. Trump agencies steamroll regulations from A to Z, even as court challenges continue That discord and uncertainty should no longer surprise anyone. Over the past (nearly) six months, the Trump administration and the president's new agency head appointees at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), and of course the much-maligned Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) – which as it's been under a 'stop work' order for weeks pending lawsuits now in process, may or may not still exist when you read this - have taken an increasingly hands-off approach to the industry they oversee. Additionally, the Biden era rule that would have added new weight to the nearly 50-year-old Community Reinvestment Act as it 'evaluated bank performance on a nationwide basis' and 'took into account deposit-taking services,' according to a report from the Goodwin Law firm, will now be withdrawn by order of the new management of federal agencies that had previously supported it. Apparently, in this case at least, Goodwin opines, most financial institutions would be in favor, as 'reversion back to the old rules would likely be seen by the industry as a lowering of the regulatory burden.' A bigger and potentially more controversial change under Trump, according to the firm's Bill Stern, comes from new guidance and the proposed removal by the FDIC and OCC of 'reputational risk' as a factor during bank and savings association examinations. This would be a significant departure from policies known well to current financial institutions and compliance departments. In Stern's view, this shift in policy is 'likely to provide some additional flexibility for banks to provide services to companies that present heightened risk – in particular anti-money laundering risk' associated with money services and crypto firms, previously off-limits as customers to most traditional banks (and their regulators.) Mergers and acquisitions get green light despite financial inclusion and consumer cost concerns Finally, regarding government regulators' and Congress's intentions to oppose or contest 'creative' new mergers or acquisitions in the financial services arena, they appear dead in the water as well. The acquisition of Discover by Capital One to create a huge new player (eighth largest bank by assets) and processing power in the cards and payments arena had been challenged by the Biden administration's policymakers for increasing industry concentration among payments providers. The Trump administration dropped its opposition in early April and the deal was approved around ten days later by the Federal Reserve and OCC. Now, as announced by Capital One in May, it is complete. This may be the start of further industry consolidation amid other similar financial services merger approvals. Based on two major rescissions of FDIC and OCC rules on mergers in late May, it looks like the federal agencies' desires to question or contest banking combinations and acquisitions – shaped for more than three decades or more under several prior administrations - have been largely squelched. The message being transmitted now from previously activist financial regulatory bodies to many of their covered entities has shifted, in less than six months, from 'Let's take a closer look at that, because...' to something akin to 'Never mind what we said last year, or during the prior administration - just go for it!'
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Payments fintech Navro acquires first US licence
Navro, the London-headquartered fintech that simplifies international payments for businesses, has secured its first US money transmitter licence. 0 The Delaware licence means that Navro can now operate under full regulatory governance in the state, providing US firms access to its payments curation platform. The technology is designed to address the various cross-border payments challenges currently faced by businesses in the US, such as the high transaction costs and lengthy timescales associated with Swift. It claims to provide access to the best payment services through one platform, one API, and one contract, removing the need for businesses to deal with a complex web of providers, gateways and local regulatory authorities. Navro, which raised $41 million in Series B funding earlier this year, has already secured licences in Canada and the European Union. It is now targeting Apac and the Middle East. Aran Brown, CEO, Navro, says: "The Delaware approval underlines our commitment to achieving licences within robust regulatory guard rails. It also initiates the process of extending Navro's footprint across the US. "Strategically we are laser-focused on ensuring that the gold-standard compliance that we've built into our platform extends into every new region and relationship."
