Sydney mayor Clover Moore says pro-Palestine march across Harbour Bridge would be ‘powerful symbol'
A New South Wales Labor MP has also rejected the premier's claim a march across the bridge would cause chaos and urged police to facilitate the demonstration 'within two to three weeks'.
On Sunday, the Palestine Action Group announced it would march across the bridge this weekend, veering from its usual course in the near-weekly rally though the CBD. The group then offered to delay it by a week after the NSW premier, Chris Minns, said it would not support a protest of that scale and nature.
Moore said the right to protest was paramount in a democracy.
'It would be an incredibly powerful symbol for our most iconic landmark to be the site of a demonstration against starvation in Gaza and in favour of lasting peace,' she said.
'The government should work to find a suitable alternate location for this week's protests, and if the community sentiment is significant enough to warrant the use of the bridge the government should work with organisers to plan for its use.'
Minns said in a statement on Monday: 'The NSW government cannot support a protest of this scale and nature taking place on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, especially with one week's notice.'
'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos,' he added.
The Liberals have backed Minns rejection, while the Greens have written to the premier urging he and the minister for roads to support it.
Anthony D'Adam, who Minns sacked from his parliamentary secretary roles after he criticised NSW police tactics at a pro-Palestine demonstration, said the assertion that it would cause chaos was overstated and past events showed it had led only to 'some inconvenience'.
'I'm sympathetic to the arguments around there not being enough notice, but I think that the police should be working with the Palestine Action Group to facilitate the protest,' he said, adding it should be within two to three weeks.
Peter Moss, from Labor Friends of Palestine – an internal campaign group of members and politicians that backs the march going ahead, said: 'The level of community sentiment for Palestine is comparable to those issues that have seen the bridge closed for previous mass public events.'
Josh Lees from the Palestine Action Group said if the government and police were prepared to commit to working together towards a two to three week timeline the group would welcome that.
But he said: 'If they won't commit to such support, then it unfortunately reveals that their professed concern for a lack of notice is not genuine, and we are prepared to defend out right to protest in court if necessary.'
The group announced the rally in a social media post, highlighting the starvation of adults and children in Gaza.
The World Health Organisation says it has recorded 74 malnutrition-related deaths in Gaza this year – 63 occurring in July, including 24 children under five.
'This is a genocide. Even if, under global pressure, Israel temporarily allows some food into Gaza, it will not mean the end of Israel's goal of ethnically cleansing the [Gaza] strip,' the Palestine Action Group said.
The group said 'this extraordinary situation' has led it to call for a March for Humanity over the bridge on 3 August 'to save Gaza'.
The group also pointed out the bridge is regularly closed at short notice for maintenance or emergencies, and was closed for the historic 2000 march for reconciliation and the 2023 World Pride march.
Global condemnation of Israel's actions in Gaza has sharply increased in recent weeks and days. International humanitarian organisations have pleaded for attention on starvation and malnutrition concerns for civilians still remaining in Gaza.
D'Adam said: 'The prime minister has already made very strong comments about his concerns about the state of affairs in Gaza and the prospect of mass starvation is concerning to all right thinking Australians.'
'I think it's clear those sentiments should be able to be expressed through a public demonstration.'
On Sunday, the WHO reported over 5,000 children have been treated for malnutrition in July, many with the most life-threatening form.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taiwan has a stronger claim to statehood than Palestine. Will Starmer recognise it?
Now that Sir Keir Starmer has declared his intention to recognise the imaginary state of Palestine, perhaps he might want to consider affording similar status to one that does actually exist: Taiwan. Starmer's decision to recognise Palestine at the UN next month might have helped to appease his restless backbenchers, who champion the Palestinian cause without having the faintest notion what they are talking about. But recognising a state that does not exist, is incapable of holding democratic elections and where a decent proportion of the population are in thrall to Islamist-inspired terrorism is hardly a blueprint for success. Taiwan, by contrast, is a self-proclaimed independent territory that regularly holds free and fair democratic elections – despite the malign efforts of China's Communist rulers to disrupt the process – where the overwhelming majority continue to uphold their right of self-determination. Apart from being a fully functioning democracy, Taiwan is also a valued trading partner, with total trade between the UK and Taipei currently averaging around £9.3bn. And yet, despite his willingness to offer full recognition to Palestine, an area that has no formal borders, a non-functioning administration and meagre trading options, our prime minister appears strangely reticent on the subject of upgrading our diplomatic ties with a democratic and prosperous ally such as Taiwan. This aversion to addressing the issue is all the more remarkable given that the official policy is to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression, a position that means the Royal Navy regularly conducts freedom of navigation exercises in the region – including through the Taiwan Strait – to demonstrate Britain's solidarity. The extent of the UK's military support for Taiwan is evident from the participation of HMS Prince of Wales, the Royal Navy's new 65,000-tonne aircraft carrier, in the Talisman Sabre exercises currently taking place in the Asia-Pacific region. The British warship is part of a 35,000-strong multi-national force conducting military exercises aimed at deterring China from launching an attack against Taiwan. Indeed, Defence Secretary John Healey was at his most bullish when asked about the UK's commitment to defend the region from Chinese aggression, commenting, 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together, and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' It is unlikely that we would ever see Healey, or any other Labour minister, making such robust comments about defending a future Palestine state – assuming, that is, that one ever materialises. The Starmer Government's desire to steer clear of any serious military entanglements in the Middle East was evident during the recent confrontation between the US and Iran. While the US deployed its aircraft carrier groups to the Gulf in anticipation of war with Tehran, the Prince of Wales, which was sailing through the region at the time, continued on its passage to Australia, out of harm's way. If the Government is so determined to defend Taiwan's right to exist, even risking the prospect of war with China by doing so, then it begs the question: why, having recognised a non-state like Palestine, will it not make the same commitment to Taipei? Ever since the leadership of the original Republic of China fled from the mainland to Taiwan in 1949, successive British governments have sought to adopt a neutral position in its dealing with the territory. While the UK is perfectly willing to maintain lucrative trade ties, as well as providing declarations of military support, ministers have been reluctant to upgrade Taiwan's diplomatic status for fear of causing offence to China, its more powerful and prosperous neighbour. Since 1972, when London eventually recognised the People's Republic as the sole government of China, the view in Whitehall has been that the future status of Taiwan should be a matter for the Chinese to decide. A number of recent factors have made this compromise appear less satisfactory, not least Chinese President Xi Jinping's pronounced determination to reclaim Taiwan as Chinese sovereign territory. Having declared that the ' reunification' of China with Taiwan is a cornerstone of his aim of achieving the Chinese dream of nation rejuvenation by 2049, Xi has authorised the Chinese military to engage in a massive build up, with some Western military analysts predicting a Chinese invasion could take place by 2027. The gathering storm clouds over China's territorial ambitions towards Taiwan have already resulted in significant changes to British policy to the region, most notably the 2021 Integrated Review that proposed an Indo-Pacific 'tilt' in our military and security outlook. Apart from sending an aircraft carrier to participate in joint naval exercises, the Royal Navy is also committed to upgrading its 'persistent presence' in the region to include the rotational deployment of nuclear submarines from 2027 as part of the recent Aukus agreement signed between the UK, US and Australia. If the UK is preparing to defend Taiwan's sovereignty, it makes sense for Starmer to give serious consideration to offering the Taiwanese people the same level of recognition that he is prepared to give to the Palestinians. Otherwise the UK could one day find itself in the invidious position of fighting for a people whose sovereignty it does not even acknowledge.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Protesters oppose one another at London hotel housing asylum seekers
Anti-racism demonstrators have turned out in large numbers outside a London hotel where asylum seekers are being housed to counter-protest against those opposed to it being used as Home Office accommodation. Both groups of protesters gathered near the Thistle City Barbican hotel in Islington, north London. The Metropolitan police said the anti-hotel protest was organised by a number of people under the banner 'Thistle Barbican needs to go – locals say no', but it has since been endorsed by groups from outside the area. Online groups that have voiced support for the protest include Patriots of Britain and Together for the Children. One speaker at the anti-hotel protest, which had a turnout of about 100 people, claimed counter-protesters had been paid by 'the Labour government and the trade unions' to attend. Some of those who gathered across the road from the hotel wore Mega (Make England great again) hats and one man was heard chanting 'Get these scum off our streets' towards the hotel. Directly outside the hotel, hundreds of people attended a counter-protest organised by Stand Up to Racism and supported by the former Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who is the MP for Islington North, located on the other side of the borough. They far outnumbered the anti-hotel protesters. Some people in the hotel could be seen watching the demonstration from their windows. Sarah Bailey, 63, who is retired, held a sign that said: 'To everyone in the hotel, you are valued, wanted [and] welcome. 'I know somebody that has connections with this hotel. I thought it was so important, because I realised they would be looking out of the windows, that we send a positive sign saying you are all these three things. 'I think it's so important to show people that have come here seeking safety and protection that they are welcome and to stand up to those who scare and bully them,' she said. Pat Prendergast, 21, said: 'I want people to feel safe. I think the [anti-hotel protesters] over there are making people feel unsafe. I want to stand up in solidarity and say that, you know, we want people here.' A separate group of masked protesters, dressed in black and chanting 'we are anti-fascist', appeared from a sidestreet and marched towards the anti-hotel demonstration. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The Met said plans were in place to 'respond to any protest activity in the vicinity of other hotels in London being used to accommodate asylum seekers'. A protest and counter-protest was also due in Newcastle outside the New Bridge hotel on Saturday. There were also posts online advertising a 'For our children, for our future' protest in Newcastle on Saturday outside the hotel. A 'stop the far right and fascists in Newcastle' counter-protest has been organised by Stand Up to Racism at the nearby Laing art gallery. On Friday evening, about 100 people attended a protest outside the Stanwell hotel in Spelthorne. Surrey police said a packet of lit firelighters was thrown at officers at the demonstration. The force added that a man was arrested on suspicion of attempted arson and inquiries were continuing to trace another suspect.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Hamas refuses to disarm until Palestinian state recognised
Hamas has said it will refuse to disarm unless an independent Palestinian state is established with Jerusalem as its capital. The Palestinian terror group said in a statement on Saturday that its 'armed resistance…cannot be relinquished except through the full restoration of our national rights, foremost among them the establishment of an independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital'. It comes after the UK, France, and Canada all vowed to recognise Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September this year. Sir Keir Starmer said the step would be taken next month unless Israel met a series of conditions, including ending the 'appalling' situation in Gaza. The Prime Minister was criticised for failing to impose any conditions on Hamas, including that the remaining 50 hostages be released. Hamas's statement also came after Arab states called on the terror group to disband and disarm amid the global push for a Palestinian state, and for an end to the war in Gaza. 'In the context of ending the war in Gaza, Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objectives of a sovereign and independent Palestinian state,' said the declaration by the Arab League of Nations. It was also signed by all 27 European Union states and 17 other countries, including Britain. While Hamas has previously called for a Palestinian state, it envisages an Islamic state across modern-day Israel, which it does not recognise. Indirect negotiations between Hamas and Israel aimed at securing a 60-day ceasefire in the Gaza war and deal for the release of hostages ended in deadlock last week. Sir Keir insisted this week that he was listening to the hostages' families but said he still intends to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel commits to a ceasefire and two-state solution. He told ITV that while the hostages should be released, the UK needed to do 'everything we can to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where we are seeing the children and babies starving for want of aid which could be delivered. 'That is why I've said unless things materially change on the ground, we'll have to assess this in September, we will recognise Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly in September.' The UK's announcement prompted anger from Emily Damari, the British-Israeli hostage who was held captive by Hamas for hundreds of days. She accused the Prime Minister of 'not standing on the right side of history' and that she was 'deeply saddened' by his announcement. Meanwhile, on Saturday, hospitals in Gaza reported the killing of more than a dozen people, including eight seeking food, after Israeli fire on Saturday. Yahia Youssef, who sought aid at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) site, said he saw people lying on the ground bleeding: 'It's the same daily episode.' The controversial US and Israeli-backed GHF said 'nothing happened at or near our sites'. It follows weeks of reports that food-seekers face being shot at, stabbed or trampled to death during rushes to get hold of vital life-saving aid. Israeli soldiers have been accused of shooting at civilians in Gaza, but they insist Hamas infiltrated the aid drops. Countries such as Jordan, the UK and France have co-ordinated to airdrop vital aid into the war-torn enclave, though restrictions have been in place about what reporters aboard the planes are able to show. The Washington Post, however, published a number of photos showing parts of the Gaza Strip that have been decimated by Israel's relentless bombing campaign. Countless buildings have been flattened, partially or totally destroyed, with hundreds of thousands of Gazans forced to live in makeshift tents wherever there is space. The enclave's skyline is blackened, with smoke pouring out of some buildings. The war in Gaza began when Hamas attacked southern Israel on October 7 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians and operates under the Hamas government.
