logo
‘India has drawn its red lines…': Ahead of Donald Trump's tariff deadline, officials say ‘ball in US court' on trade deal; here's what's happening

‘India has drawn its red lines…': Ahead of Donald Trump's tariff deadline, officials say ‘ball in US court' on trade deal; here's what's happening

Time of India4 hours ago
India's largest trading partner since 2021-22 has been the United States. (AI image)
India-US trade deal: Ahead of US President
Donald Trump
's July 9 tariff deadline, India has drawn the red lines on a mini trade deal. According to Indian officials, the decision on the mini or interim trade deal now rests with America.
Sources told PTI that should matters be resolved, an interim trade deal could be announced prior to July 9, which coincides with the conclusion of the 90-day suspension period of Trump-era tariffs announced on April 2, affecting multiple countries including India.
India-US Trade Deal: India Draws Red Lines
As negotiations continue for the proposed interim trade agreement between India and the US, India has established firm boundaries on crucial sectors including agriculture and dairy.
"India has drawn its red lines... now the ball is in the US court," sources told PTI.
India and the US spoke of discussions for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) in February, setting a timeline to complete the first phase by autumn (September-October) this year. Prior to this milestone, both countries are working to establish an interim trade arrangement.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: 'Don't make deals based on deadlines, national interest paramount', says Piyush Goyal as Donald Trump's tariff date nears
Following the US implementation of an additional 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian products on April 2, which was temporarily suspended for 90 days, America's 10% baseline tariff remains active.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다.
Undo
아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다.
Undo
아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다.
Undo
아픈 사람의 99%는 목이 뭉쳐있습니다.
Undo
India seeks complete exemption from the 26% tariff.
"If the proposed trade talks fail, the 26 per cent tariffs will come into force again," one of the sources said.
Commerce Minister
Piyush Goyal
emphasised last week that India's approach to trade agreements is not deadline-driven, and the country will only proceed with the US trade deal when it is completely finalised and aligns with national interests.
Trade agreements can only materialise when they provide mutual advantages to both participating nations, ensuring a beneficial outcome for all parties involved, he had stressed.
"National interest should always be supreme. Keeping that in mind, if a deal is made then India is always ready to deal with developed countries," Goyal had said on July 4.
India-US Trade Deal Issues
Following discussions in Washington regarding an interim trade agreement, the Indian delegation has returned. Outstanding issues remain concerning tariffs on steel, aluminium (50 per cent) and auto (25 per cent).
India has taken a firm stance regarding duty concessions to the US on agricultural and dairy products, considering their sensitive nature. Notably, India has maintained a consistent policy of keeping its dairy sector protected in all previous trade agreements.
The Donald Trump administration has initiated correspondence with 10-12 nations regarding reciprocal tariff rates, with plans to finalise the process by July 9.
India awaits clarity on whether a trade agreement with Washington can be reached before the US president's tariff deadline. The specific countries involved have not been disclosed by Trump.
The implementation of reciprocal tariffs is scheduled to commence from August 1.
The negotiations involve potential duty adjustments, with the US seeking concessions on industrial goods, electric vehicles, wines, petrochemicals, dairy products and agricultural items including apples, tree nuts and alfalfa hay.
India's considerations for duty reductions focus on labour-intensive industries, encompassing apparels, textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, plastics, chemicals, oil seeds, shrimp and horticultural products.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: What's the deadlock about? Top issues blocking agreement as Donald Trump's 26% tariff deadline looms
India-US Trade Ties
India's largest trading partner since 2021-22 has been the United States. The bilateral trade figures for 2024-25 reached $131.84 billion, comprising $86.51 billion in exports, $45.33 billion in imports, resulting in a trade surplus of $41.18 billion.
In the April-May period of the current fiscal year, India's merchandise exports to the United States increased by 21.78 per cent, reaching $17.25 billion. Similarly, imports grew by 25.8 per cent to $8.87 billion. Services trade between the two nations expanded from $54.1 billion in 2018 to approximately $70.5 billion in 2024.
Also Read |
'Take it or leave it': Donald Trump says US tariff letters ready for 12 countries ahead of July 9 deadline; will be sent out from...
The United States represents a significant market for Indian enterprises, particularly in sectors including professional, scientific, and technical services, manufacturing, and information technology.
In terms of India's overall trade composition, the United States contributes approximately 18 per cent of total goods exports, over 6 per cent of imports, and roughly 11 per cent of bilateral trade.
The United States invested $70.65 billion in India during the period from April 2000 to March 2025, positioning itself as the third most significant investor.
India's primary exports to the United States in 2024 comprised pharmaceutical formulations and biologicals worth $8.1 billion, telecommunications equipment valued at $6.5 billion, precious and semi-precious stones amounting to $5.3 billion, petroleum products at $4.1 billion, precious metal jewellery including gold at $3.2 billion, cotton garments with accessories totalling $2.8 billion, and iron and steel products worth $2.7 billion.
The key imports consisted of crude oil valued at $4.5 billion, petroleum products worth $3.6 billion, coal and coke at $3.4 billion, processed diamonds at $2.6 billion, electrical machinery amounting to $1.4 billion, aviation components at $1.3 billion, and gold imports worth $1.3 billion.
Also Read |
US plans 'economic bunker buster' bill: Will Donald Trump impose 500% tariff on countries importing oil from Russia? How it may impact India
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China Ran Campaign To Damage Rafale's Image After India-Pakistan Conflict: Report
China Ran Campaign To Damage Rafale's Image After India-Pakistan Conflict: Report

News18

time28 minutes ago

  • News18

China Ran Campaign To Damage Rafale's Image After India-Pakistan Conflict: Report

Last Updated: India used Rafales during the May conflict with Pakistan, which was one of the most serious military exchanges between the two nuclear neighbours in years China orchestrated a campaign, using its embassies, to damage the reputation and sales of the French-made Rafale fighter jet following its combat debut during India's May clashes with Pakistan, according to French intelligence officials. As per the findings from a French intelligence service seen by the Associated Press, defence attaches at various Chinese embassies actively cast doubt upon the Rafale's combat performance. Their goal, officials say, was to convince existing buyers, such as Indonesia, not to buy more, and to persuade other potential customers to choose Chinese-made alternatives The Rafale, built by Dassault Aviation, is a key part of France's defence exports. It has been sold to eight countries and plays a major role in France's military partnerships, especially in Asia, where China is growing in influence. India used Rafales during the May conflict with Pakistan, which was one of the most serious military exchanges between the two nuclear neighbours in years. Pakistan later claimed it had downed five Indian aircraft, including three Rafales. India acknowledged losses but didn't confirm the numbers. French Air Force Chief Gen. Jérôme Bellanger said available evidence shows three Indian aircraft were lost: one Rafale, one Russian Sukhoi and one Mirage 2000, another French jet. It marked the first known combat loss of a Rafale. Following the clash, countries that operate Rafales began raising questions about the jet's combat performance. French officials say that a disinformation campaign—linked to both China and Pakistan—spread quickly online. This included fake videos, AI-generated content, and even video game footage made to look like real combat. Thousands of new social media accounts pushed the message that Chinese military technology was superior. French officials have not directly linked the online efforts to the Chinese government. However, French intelligence says Chinese embassy staff echoed the same narrative during meetings with defence officials in other countries, including those considering Rafale purchases. Beijing denied the allegations. China's defence ministry said the claims were 'groundless rumours and slander," insisting it maintains a responsible policy on arms exports. France's Defence Ministry responded by saying that Rafale was the target of a 'vast campaign of disinformation." The ministry added that the attack was not just against an aircraft but aimed at undermining France's defence credibility and industrial strength. Dassault has sold 533 Rafales globally, with 323 of them going to countries such as Egypt, India, the UAE, Greece, and Indonesia. Indonesia, which has already ordered 42 jets, is reportedly considering more. Experts say China's goal may be to weaken France's growing security ties in Asia. According to Justin Bronk, a military analyst at the Royal United Services Institute in London, the campaign was likely designed to limit Western influence in the Indo-Pacific and promote China's defence industry instead. 'They certainly saw an opportunity to damage French sales prospects in the region," Bronk said. (With inputs from AP) Location : France First Published:

‘Strongest terms': Brics declaration slams Pahalgam attack, reaffirms stand against terror
‘Strongest terms': Brics declaration slams Pahalgam attack, reaffirms stand against terror

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Strongest terms': Brics declaration slams Pahalgam attack, reaffirms stand against terror

NEW DELHI: Leaders of the Brics nations on Sunday issued a strong condemnation of the April 22 terrorist attack in J&K's Pahalgam, which left 26 people dead. In a joint declaration following the summit in Rio de Janeiro, the leaders labelled the attack "criminal and unjustifiable" and called for united global action to root out terrorism in all its forms. "We express strong condemnation of any acts of terrorism as criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, whenever, wherever and by whomever committed. We condemn in the strongest terms the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir on 22 April 2025, during which 26 people were killed and many more injured," the BRICS declaration said while reaffirming the bloc's commitment to a "zero tolerance" approach to terrorism. The leaders underscored that terrorism, regardless of its motivation, origin or perpetrators, must be countered through unified international efforts. Cross-border terror, financing, and safe havens highlighted The Brics statement went further to denounce the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing, and the existence of safe havens for terrorist groups. "We reaffirm our commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including the cross-border movement of terrorists, terrorism financing and safe havens," the statement added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The declaration emphasised that terrorism must not be linked to any religion, ethnicity, civilisation, or nationality. It also insisted that those responsible for terrorist acts and those who support them must be held accountable under both national and international law. "We reiterate that terrorism should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilisation or ethnic group and that all those involved in terrorist activities and their support must be held accountable and brought to justice in accordance with relevant national and international law," it said. In a thinly veiled critique of inconsistent global responses to terrorism, the Brics leaders rejected "double standards" in counterterrorism. They emphasised the primary responsibility of nation-states to combat terrorism while urging international cooperation that respects the UN Charter, human rights law, and humanitarian law. "We urge to ensure zero tolerance for terrorism and reject double standards in countering terrorism. We emphasize the primary responsibility of States in combating terrorism and that global efforts to prevent and counter terrorist threats must fully comply with their obligations under international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, in particular the purposes and principles thereof, and relevant international conventions and protocols, in particular international human rights law, international refugee law and international humanitarian law, as applicable," it said. The declaration also called for the finalisation of the long-pending Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) under the United Nations framework — a proposal India has long championed. "We welcome the activities of the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Working Group (CTWG) and its five Subgroups based upon the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Strategy, the BRICS Counter-Terrorism Action Plan and the CTWG position paper. We look forward to further deepening counter-terrorism cooperation. We call for an expeditious finalization and adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism in the UN framework. We call for concerted actions against all UN-designated terrorists and terrorist entities," it said.

Beijing fumes at presence of Union Minister Rijiju, Arunachal CM Khandu at Dalai Lama's birthday celebrations
Beijing fumes at presence of Union Minister Rijiju, Arunachal CM Khandu at Dalai Lama's birthday celebrations

United News of India

time37 minutes ago

  • United News of India

Beijing fumes at presence of Union Minister Rijiju, Arunachal CM Khandu at Dalai Lama's birthday celebrations

New Delhi, July 6 (UNI) China today fumed at the presence of Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh CM Pema Khandu at the birthday festivities of the Dalai Lama in Dharamshala, and protested against remarks made by some of them regarding the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. The Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong, in a statement posted on his X handle, said the issue of the reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama 'is inherently an internal affair of China'. 'It has been noted that some Indian official recently made some remarks regarding the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. 'Chinese government opposes any attempts by overseas organizations or individuals to interfere in or dictate the reincarnation process. 'Xizang is an inalienable part of China's territory. Tibetan Buddhism traces its origins to China's Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.' 'The primary regions where Tibetan Buddhism is practiced are within China. The lineage of the Dalai Lamas took shape and evolved within China's Tibet region. 'The conferment of their religious status and titles is the prerogative of the central government of China. 'The reincarnation and succession of the Dalai Lama is inherently an internal affair of China. The Chinese government upholds the principle of independence and self-governance in religious affairs and administers the reincarnation of Living Buddhas, including that of the Dalai Lama, in accordance with the law. 'No interference by any external forces will be allowed.' Earlier this week, China had protested against Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju's remarks that the decision on the incarnation of the Dalai Lama would be taken by the established institution and the leader of Tibetan Buddhists himself and no one else. Days ahead of his 90th birthday, the Dalai Lama had announced that the institution of the Dalai Lama will continue. Rijiju, in posts on X today, after attending the 90th birthday celebrations of the Dalai Lama, said: 'I feel privileged to attend 90th birth anniversary celebrations of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama. It feels like a deeply personal journey of reverence and gratitude.' '90th Birth Anniversary Celebrations of His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama at Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh - a deeply spiritual gathering graced by His Holiness, along with Head Lamas of all Tibetan Buddhist & Bon traditions.' UNI RN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store