DA's grandstanding an 'insult' to the nation
Life is hard for the vast majority of South Africans. Given the high unemployment rate, most are in survival mode. We are doing whatever is required to ensure that our loved ones are fed and safe while contending with rampant crime and rising drug and human trafficking. In this context, the least we expect from our politicians is integrity. We need service delivery and a stable political environment. Above all, we need a president who leads with strength and clarity.
That is why it was refreshing to see President Ramaphosa take decisive action for once. The removal of Andrew Whitfield from his position as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition for travelling abroad without permission was long overdue. He had participated in a political party delegation to the United States (US), where they met with top American officials and reinforced lies propagated about South Africa's transformation policies, especially land reform.
Their conduct not only smears our reputation abroad. It damaged diplomatic relations with one of our key trade partners, jeopardising domestic development. It posed a threat to our sovereignty and security. It also compromised the smooth handover of the G20 chairpersonship from South Africa to the US. The impact of their actions was severe. The dismissal of Whitfield is a very light punishment for the Democratic Alliance's (DA) disgraceful act of political sabotage.
Instead of showing remorse, the DA used the moment as an opportunity to grandstand. The party's arrogance, its blatant disregard for governance processes and inability to recognise the seriousness of the offence are exhausting. They fail to demonstrate the humility and respect required of members of a Government of National Unity (GNU).
The DA has repeatedly chosen to undermine the president. Their representatives refer to him by his first name in official communications. They challenge his authority at every turn and show little concern for the dignity of his office. This distorted sense of self-importance demonstrates disdain towards the president. It is also an insult to all South Africans.
What is most disturbing is the DA's willingness to harm the country in its pursuit of power. Instead of strengthening democracy, they run to foreign governments and institutions whenever they fail to get their way at home. Their cosy relationship with the US and Israel has become a convenient route to bypass the democratic process and cast South Africa in a negative light.
This behaviour is not new. It has been prevalent since the establishment of the GNU. The DA has consistently demonstrated that it believes the law applies only to others. When their actions are questioned, they cry foul. When their members are held accountable, they complain about political persecution. This is not in compliance with the rule of law. It is a double standard.
Steenhuisen's reaction to Whitfield's dismissal is a concrete example of the DA's duplicity. He was informed well in advance that this decision was on the table. Yet when it was implemented, he acted as if it were a surprise. He accused the president of undermining the coalition agreement. He dared to say that he feels disrespected and issued ultimatums. When the president refused to cower to their demands, the DA backtracked. Their desire for power was greater than their honour.
Instead, they decided to withdraw from the National Dialogue. While there is disagreement on the cost and format, there is general acceptance that public engagement and ownership are essential for the collective acceleration of the country's socio-economic advancement. Having committed to the dialogue in writing, the DA is now dismissing it as a waste of time. This is a betrayal of the public and of the agreements that brought the unity government into being.
Furthermore, the DA threatened to initiate a vote of no confidence in the president. It once again sought to create chaos, weaken public trust in leadership, and destabilise the country for narrow party gain. Having suddenly realised just how irresponsible that threat is, it has now also been withdrawn, trapping the government in endless court battles instead.
South Africans are tired of leaders who place their egos ahead of the nation. Tired of the noise. Tired of the never-ending circus of threats, ultimatums and name-calling. We face daily struggles that do not allow for political drama. Food insecurity, the high cost of living, crime and joblessness are real and persistent problems. These cannot be solved while elected politicians behave like squabbling children. The government is not a playground. It is a place for responsible leadership and mature decision-making.
We do not expect miracles. We know the problems are complex. However, we expect those who have been given the responsibility to govern to take it seriously. That includes respecting democratic processes and the offices of the state. It means engaging in dialogue even when it is uncomfortable. It means disagreeing without tearing the house down. And above all, it means remembering that governance is not about promoting party-political power. It is about improving the quality of life of citizens.
The DA must make a choice. It can be part of building a better South Africa, or it can continue on its current path of obstruction, grandstanding and political sabotage. If it chooses the latter, then it should not be surprised when South Africans stop listening. We are looking for solutions, not tantrums. We are looking for accountability, not arrogance.
President Ramaphosa has taken a small but meaningful step in the right direction. He must now go further. He must act swiftly and consistently in holding all members of government accountable. He must reinforce the principle that no one is above the collective goals of unity, service and integrity. If he does, the country will follow.
The time has come for calm, for order and for leadership that puts the people first. Let those who are unwilling to contribute step aside. Let those who are ready to serve do so with humility and focus. South Africa deserves nothing less.
* Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
The Missing Voice: Disability, Democracy and the National Dialogue in South Africa
SEDIBENG.- The recently announced commencement of a National Dialogue by President Cyril Ramaphosa should be a wake-up call for the South African Disability Sector. Framed as an inclusive effort to unify South Africans and shape the country's future, the Dialogue is composed of eminent persons from various sectors. However, upon closer examination, it becomes clear that there is a glaring omission, the deliberate exclusion of the Disability Sector. This is not only a political oversight but a failure of democratic integrity. Perhaps it is time for those of us within the Disability Sector, particularly those who assume leadership roles, to align our sector proactively rather than reactively. This means moving beyond waiting for recognition or reacting to marginalisation after it happens. Instead, it calls for building a strategic, unified and assertive movement that positions disability at the center of national debates, not on the margins. We cannot expect national healing and democratic renewal while the voices of millions of South Africans with disabilities remain unheard. There is no sector in this country without a rich leadership history, and the Disability Sector is no exception. From the dark days of apartheid to the hard-won gains of democracy, disabled South Africans and their allies have fought, organised, and built institutions not just for themselves but for a more just society. The role of history, after all, is not merely to remember the past but to ensure that its mistakes are never repeated and its strengths are intensified. The silencing of disability voices today, in the context of the 'inclusive' Dialogue, is a repetition of an old mistake, one we can no longer afford. Let us not forget that during the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) negotiations in the early 1990s, the Disability Sector was initially excluded from key discussions. But rather than accept this invisibility, disability activists and leaders mobilised and protested, forcing their way into the national conversation. That struggle was not in vain. It inspired none other than President Nelson Mandela to begin recognising disability not merely as a welfare issue but as a human rights and developmental issue, in essence, a national question. The lesson is clear: self-representation is not a luxury; it is a non-negotiable democratic principle. When disability is treated as an add-on or a footnote, it leads to policies that fail to address the real material conditions of disabled people. Inclusion cannot be symbolic. It must be structural, strategic, and substantive. We are also reminded of the words of President Thabo Mbeki, who once said: 'Among the yardsticks by which to measure a society's respect for human rights, to evaluate the level of its maturity and its generosity of spirit, is by looking at the status that it accords to those members of society who are most vulnerable – disabled people, the senior citizens, and its children.' This profound statement should serve as a moral compass to the current leadership corps and all those entrusted with shaping South Africa's social contract. It is not enough to host conferences, dialogues, or policy discussions if they exclude those most affected by injustice. Inclusion must be active, not passive. And the test of our democracy lies not in the speeches of our presidents but in the everyday experiences of disabled South Africans, many of whom still endure disproportionate poverty, unemployment, inaccessibility, and systemic neglect. Yes, we have a Ministry for Women, Youth, and Persons with Disabilities, and yes, we have some policy documents and action plans that mention disability. But representation is not bureaucracy. It is about voice, power, and agency. If a National Dialogue is to truly 'unite all South Africans to shape their future,' then the absence of the Disability Sector is an indictment. It reveals that disability is still seen as peripheral, not foundational, to the national project. We still have living legends in the Disability Sector, leaders who were instrumental in building the disability rights movement over four decades ago. These are individuals who resisted apartheid, challenged ableism, and laid the foundation for future generations of disabled activists and leaders. To exclude such individuals from the National Dialogue is to erase not only their personal contributions but the collective memory and vision of an entire movement. It suggests that the future is being imagined without us, rather than with us. And what of the youth? Young disabled South Africans are watching. They are absorbing the messages sent by institutions and government. If they see that national spaces for dialogue and policymaking exclude disability perspectives, they internalise the idea that they do not belong therefore their issues are not important, and that the fight for recognition must still continue. That is a betrayal of both history and hope. The question then becomes: What must we do? First, the Disability Sector must organise with renewed urgency and clarity of purpose. This means strengthening Disabled People's Organisations (DPOs), investing in leadership development for young disabled people, and building coalitions across sectors including with labour, civil society, faith-based organisations, and political allies. Second, we must insist on nothing about us without us. This rallying cry, born from global disability activism, must be more than a slogan. It must be a non-negotiable principle in all national processes especially those that shape the future. Third, we must hold our leaders accountable. We cannot allow Ministries, Parliament, or even the Presidency to claim inclusion while practicing exclusion. We must use every tool of democracy, from litigation and protest to public advocacy and media engagement to make visible the systemic exclusion that too often hides behind bureaucratic language. Fourth, we must use this moment to reimagine the Disability Sector itself. Too often, fragmentation, competition for resources, or donor-driven agendas have weakened our collective voice. This is a call for unity and solidarity, not just among disabled people but with all those who believe in justice. Finally, we must ensure that the National Dialogue and every other major national initiative, includes Disability at the table from the very beginning. Not because we are asking for pity or charity, but because we are claiming our rightful place in the national imagination. The future of South Africa cannot be built by silencing its most marginalised voices. It cannot be sustained by erasing history or overlooking those who built the path to democracy. If the National Dialogue is to have legitimacy, then it must include all of us, black and white, rich and poor, urban and rural, disabled and non-disabled. If it does not, then it is not a national dialogue. It is a national monologue, one that speaks of unity while practicing exclusion. And so we return to the question of leadership. Will the Disability Sector wait to be invited? Or will it reclaim its voice, its power, and its place? The answer will determine not only the future of disability rights in South Africa, but the very soul of our democracy. Lucky Tumahole – Disability Advocate At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
DA still mum on axed Andrew Whitfield's replacement
The fired deputy minister of Trade and Industry, Andrew Whitfield. Image: DTIC THE DA has yet to submit a replacement name to take over axed Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, the Presidency confirmed on Thursday. Whitfield was shown the door with immediate effect last week for taking a trip to the US without Ramaphosa's permission. The reasons for the trip remain unclear, and both Whitfield and the DA did not respond to questions on Thursday. In dismissing Whitfield, Ramaphosa had noted that 'his travel to the United States was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive. This requirement is known to all Ministers and Deputy Ministers. These rules and established practices were expressly communicated to all members of the Executive during the induction sessions at the commencement of the 7th administration'. Asked about Whitfield's intention for visiting the US and how significant this was in the decision to remove him from cabinet, Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya would only say: 'The President has made his decision, the matter is done. There's no further explanation or debate that's going to alter that decision. The President is still waiting for a replacement name from the DA that he will consider.' The DA did not respond to questions on why Whitfield had travelled to the US and whether the party supported his trip. Weighing on the matter, international relations expert Siseko Maposa, from Surgetower Associates Management Consultancy, suggested that the trip may have been influenced by the strained relations between the United States and South Africa at the time, as well as the DA's parallel attempts to negotiate independently, possibly through ex parte channels. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We can certainly engage in speculation about the motivations behind Former Deputy Minister of DTIC Whitfield's travels, particularly given the strained US-SA relations at the time and the DA's parallel efforts to negotiate ex parte,' Maposa said. 'One might even reasonably consider whether Ramaphosa deliberately ignored Whitfield's authorisation request precisely to deter the DA's efforts aimed at gaining an independent diplomatic channel with the US administration – we can't be sure.' He said the more substantive issue transcends party squabbles, it speaks to the 'erosion of statecraft' in South Africa. 'When deputy ministers traverse borders without authorisation, it undermines the coherence of governance and, ultimately, the sanctity of statehood itself. This shouldn't be about ANC or the DA – it ought to be about whether South Africa's leadership, across factions, grasps the gravity of disciplined state function. If the DA truly internalised this principle, its opposition to Ramaphosa's decision would likely be more measured. "Deeper still, this episode exposes the GNU's fundamental flaw: a coalition pulling in opposing directions, lacking a shared framework for negotiation, and failing to distinguish between government (the act of holding office) and governance (the art of wielding it effectively). Until this disconnect is resolved, such incidents will remain symptoms of a system in disarray.' Cape Times

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
SAPS Budget 2025: Mchunu targets GBV, corruption, and high-crime zones with R120 billion plan
Police Minister Senzo announces sweeping reforms to strengthen visible policing, invest in digital tools, and tackle gender-based violence, signalling a bold shift in SAPS strategy for the 2025/26 financial year Image: Tumi Pakkies/Independent Newspapers Police Minister Senzo Mchunu says South Africa's policing system is undergoing a strategic overhaul aimed at improving crime prevention, restoring public trust, and modernising police operations. Tabling the Budget Vote for the 2025/26 financial year in Parliament, Mchunu laid out a R120.89 billion allocation for the South African Police Service (SAPS), Civilian Secretariat for Police Service, and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID). ''While we welcome and appreciate the allocation, we are under no illusion about the scale of the task ahead. Crime is adaptive, dynamic, and, in many cases, well-financed — and so must our response be.' Mchunu outlined nine key crime-fighting priorities, including reducing the murder rate, fighting gender-based violence, tackling illegal firearms and drugs, and rooting out corruption within the SAPS. "Our commitment is to lead a police service that protects the vulnerable, disrupts criminality, and restores trust," he said. Mchunu noted that four provinces, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Western Cape, and Eastern Cape, remain the primary focus due to high crime levels. ''It is clear that identified high crime zones in all four provinces require intelligence-led targeted deployment of specialised units to combat criminality.' He also confirmed that 225 hotspot police stations have been identified for synchronised interventions. Mchunu said visible Policing will receive over 53% of the total budget, while Detective Services will account for nearly 20%. Compensation of employees remains the largest cost driver, making up more than 80% of the budget. He also confirmed that 5,500 new police trainees will be enlisted in January 2026 to maintain the personnel complement of 188,000. A total of R219.2 million has been allocated for securing the G20 conference in November 2025, R400 million for the 2026 Local Government Elections, and R34.8 million for costs related to the appointment of an additional Deputy Minister. Furthermore, R150 million is being shifted to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI) to support its anti-corruption partnerships. Community policing is also getting a boost, with R28 million allocated to Community Policing Forums and R8.5 million for public awareness campaigns, he said. To address Gender-Based Violence and Femicide (GBV+F), a total of R1.6 billion will be spent, including R1.5 billion for Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) Units. Mchunu said, 'The country is gripped and aggrieved by GBV+F, as its prevalence has reached distressing levels.' Moreover, Mchunu said to modernise operations, R670 million will be invested in building and upgrading police stations, while R20 million will fund mobile Community Service Centres. and R45 million on police station maintenance. Mchunu highlighted the role of partnerships with the private sector, particularly with Business Against Crime South Africa. Projects include piloting automated police stations, expanding forensic labs, and integrating SAPS systems with private sector technologies. SAPS will also roll out drones, body-worn cameras, and digital tools to enhance public safety and investigative capacity, he said. Mchunu highlighted the role of partnerships with the private sector, particularly with Business Against Crime South Africa. Projects include piloting automated police stations, expanding forensic labs, and integrating SAPS systems with private sector technologies. "The SAPS continues to advance its modernisation agenda through the deployment of strategic technology solutions aimed at improving operational efficiency, situational awareness, and public safety," Mchunu said. Addressing corruption within police ranks, Mchunu confirmed, 'We have taken a defined stance against corruption within the SAPS and we unequivocally state that there is no tolerance for corruption.' This includes recent arrests of senior officials in Crime Intelligence. Human resources are being restructured, with new recruitment strategies, leadership development, and incentives. A new Detective Critical Skills Allowance of R1,000 per month will be introduced from October 2025 to retain skilled investigators. Additionally, 200 former detectives will be re-enlisted and more contract appointments made, said Mchunu. Furthermore, the DPCI will ramp up efforts against corruption, cybercrime, and unresolved Truth and Reconciliation Commission cases.