Dingell family in office for 90+ years: Locals praise pavement-pounding, critics say it indicts incumbency
In an interview with Fox News Digital, however, Dingell, a Democrat, stressed she is not concerned with the idea she is continuing a record-breaking family legacy but instead the "quality" of work she does in-the-moment for the people in her district.
"I love my husband very much. And I'm proud of my last name. But I have to get up every day and earn the respect of the people that I represent. And I have to deliver for my constituents every day," Dingell said.
"Most important to me is being a voice in a room and at the table for the people that I represent."
Dingell's own lineage, like her husband's (Rep. John Dingell Jr.) and father-in-law's, is also one that epitomizes the area she represents. She is the great-granddaughter of one of the Fisher Brothers – whose Fisher Bodyworks company became an early component of what is now General Motors.
"Home is home to me," she said. "My district is a very complicated district. [It's] Mini-America. Downriver (southwest of Detroit) is home – they have a manufacturing legacy, but they have a lot of environmental issues, and I'm really proud of some of the things I did from the moment I stepped into this job."
Dingell spoke of regularly being on the phone with agencies from FEMA to healthcare, saying she always wants to "talk to people directly" and not politicize pressing issues.
"I don't have entourages because I don't believe in them. I love my staff… but I want people to talk to me directly … I go to farmer's markets every weekend because that's where [constituents are]."
Dingell supporters point to her willingness to work across the aisle, as the congresswoman said: "We've got to respect … [and] listen to each other."
In the century since Dingell Sr. took office, politics has gotten nastier, or as Dingell put it, "what we've lost in the legislative process is trust – people don't get to know each other anymore."
National Wildlife Federation CEO Collin O'Meara called Dingell and Dingell Jr. the "hardest-working people" he's worked with.
"I think in the conservation world, they're just kind of legendary figures," he said, noting that Dingell Sr. was a leader in the space as well, drafting the "Dingell-Johnson Act" in 1950 that helped restore sportfishing and continues to be utilized today.
The Dingells were instrumental in the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act and other key laws, he said, adding Dingell has led major cleanup efforts around Michigan while also leading nationally on conservation, including via caucus chairmanships.
O'Meara said that Dingell and her family have been "versatile lawmakers" in a Washington full of "one-trick ponies."
David Hecker, a former state president of American Federation of Teachers, said Dingell has supported domestic manufacturing, workers' rights and education issues.
"The congresswoman is everywhere, informing, but moreso listening: to needs and concerns of her constituents and supporting community organizations," Hecker said.
Trenton, Mich., Mayor Steve Rzeppa told Fox News Digital that Dingell and Dingell Jr., could not be "bigger fighters" in Congress.
Rzeppa's earliest political work was in Dingell Jr.'s district office.
"It's tough to even put into words what you learn working for someone like that," he said. "It was really more a way of living and serving others than it was a set of certain skills."
Rzeppa said the political family have been "champions" of the local auto industry, universal healthcare and conservation – recalling them also greeting workers at plants' shift-change.
Bentley Johnson of the League of Conservation Voters called the Dingells' district a "fascinating case study" as the home of UAW and heavy-industry workers who were longtime Democrats who have been trending more toward President Donald Trump or independent affiliation.
"In a lot of ways, it's a microcosm of the country in terms of political polarization. But what is interesting is that we see water and outdoor recreation as classic examples of issues that are top priorities for people across the entire political spectrum," Johnson said.
Johnson said the Dingells recognize that and that as "problem-solvers," there is "no situation too complex or politically sticky that they won't throw themselves into to try and find a solution."
Local colleges also praised the Dingells' tenure, with spokespeople for both the University of Michigan and Eastern Michigan University crediting their support for the institutions.
"Congresswoman Debbie Dingell has been an incredible supporter of Michigan Medicine, and we are fortunate to have someone of her caliber represent our students, faculty, staff and patients," said Mary Masson, a spokesperson for UMich-Health.
"As a lifelong resident of Ann Arbor and former local elected official, I've had the honor of working over many years with Debbie Dingell and, before her, John Dingell," added Eastern Michigan administrator Leigh Greden.
"The district has changed a lot over the years… What hasn't changed between John and Debbie is their omnipresence in the community."
The lack of change, however, has been something critics of term limits and "dynastic" political families have in turn called out.
Writer Andrew Sullivan previously dove into the "Dingell Dynasty" and cited several critiques of having a family in office that long.
He cited journalist Philip Klein's take that it is an indictment of incumbency.
"[Dingell Jr.] was re-elected over and over again due to the way congressional districts are drawn up and because incumbents have such a huge money and influence advantage that it creates a barrier to entry for any potential challengers," he said according to Sullivan.
"The United States was created by a revolution against a monarchy, and yet Americans have had an unhealthy obsession with political dynasties," added Klein, who noted that at the time, the nation was flirting with dynastic presidencies of Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush.
"And seriously, does anybody believe that Caroline Kennedy is the most qualified person in the country to serve as ambassador to Japan?" he wrote.
Outside The Beltway writer Doug Mataconis said following Dingell's primary win to succeed her husband, "as a general rule, there is something unhealthy about both political dynasties and long-term incumbency, and the Dingell case provides ample examples of both."
"Congressional seats such as Dingell's are made virtually immune from challenge by the opposing party … there is just something distasteful about the fact the same family has held the same congressional seat since Franklin Roosevelt was first elected to the presidency."
Dingell Jr.'s tenure by itself remains the longest of any member – at 59 years.
Former Democratic Sens. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, Daniel Inouye of Hawaii, and Carl Hayden of Arizona, and ex-Rep. Jamie Whitten of Mississippi all served about 50 years as did Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. Former Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, served 49.
At the state level, the "Byrd Machine," led by Democratic Sen. Harry Byrd, famously controlled Virginia's politics for almost all of the 20th century.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Schumer accused of 'political extortion' as Trump nominees await confirmation
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., joins 'Fox News Live' to discuss Senate Republicans pushing to confirm President Donald Trump's nominees as they accuse Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of trying to slow the process.
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
Boeing Defense Union Poised to Strike for First Time Since 1996
Boeing Co. is bracing for the first strike in nearly three decades at its St. Louis-area defense factories after union members rejected the company's modified contract offer. About 3,200 Machinists are set to walk off the job around midnight local time after members voted down a deal that would've raised wages 20% and boosted retirement contributions. The union last went on strike in 1996, with the stoppage lasting 99 days.
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
A Banker's Guide To Trump's Digital Finance Innovation Agenda
OBSERVATIONS FROM THE FINTECH SNARK TANK In 2022, President Biden signed an executive order directing the government to develop a framework for digital assets and financial technologies. In July, the US Treasury released Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology, a policy roadmap for federal agencies with innovation implications for banks. For too long, innovation in US financial services has proceeded without a cohesive national strategy. As a result, regulation has lagged behind market developments, and public infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the needs of a digital economy. Meanwhile, other nations—notably China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union—have made significant investments in their digital finance capabilities, coordinated regulatory reforms, and launched government-backed initiatives to modernize payments, identity, and data frameworks. The Treasury's report is a wake-up call: if the US is to remain a global financial leader, the public and private sectors must align around a shared vision for modernization. From Fragmentation to Coordination US innovation in financial technology has been fragmented across state lines, regulatory jurisdictions, and technological platforms. This fragmentation has led to inefficiencies, confusion, and lost opportunities. Banks face a regulatory patchwork that stifles experimentation while allowing unregulated fintechs to exploit gaps. Meanwhile, consumers encounter inconsistent standards for data privacy, interoperability, and identity verification. The Treasury says this is no longer tenable and calls for a national strategy that unifies public and private sector innovation. The bank connection: The message for banks is clear: future success will depend not just on internal innovation, but on strategic alignment with public policy goals and infrastructure initiatives. Faster Payments as the Linchpin The Treasury views instant payments as a building block for a digital financial system. In addition to recommending that government payments move to instant rails, it encourages government assistance to financial institutions to upgrade legacy systems, and provide technical assistance to smaller institutions that struggle with the transition. While the private sector has made strides in faster payments—through The Clearing House's RTP network and FedNow—adoption has been uneven, especially among smaller institutions. According to Cornerstone Advisors, heading into 2025, just 45% of banks and 38% of credit unions offered real-time (or faster) payments. Among them, however, roughly 80% only receive instant payments. While there are plenty of use cases for faster payments, banks are lacking business models for faster payments. The bank connection: These aren't just recommendations--they're signals. Banks that fail to adopt or integrate with real-time payment networks will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage—not only in terms of customer experience, but also in areas such as cash management, fraud mitigation, and liquidity optimization. The Missing Layer: Digital Identity An often overlooked barrier to financial innovation in the US is the lack of a trusted, interoperable digital identity system. Without secure digital identity credentials, banks rely on inefficient, error-prone, and--worse--fraud-prone methods for onboarding, authentication, and compliance. This imposes high costs, increases friction, and limits the potential for automation and innovation. The Treasury's report calls for investment in digital public infrastructure, with digital identity as a core component. While the private sector has offered various proprietary solutions, none have reached scale, in part because no actor can mandate adoption. The bank connection: Banks need to solve this problem—not just to reduce fraud losses, but to unlock the next generation of digital experiences. Bankers should advocate for public-private collaboration on digital identity standards, support pilot programs, and explore partnerships with providers working toward scalable solutions. Data and the (Possibly) Coming Open Banking Era To date, the US has taken a market-led approach to data access--relying on aggregators to bridge the gap between consumers and third-party applications--which has led to tensions over data security, user control, and liability. Poorly crafted rules from the CFPB--and two subsequent flip-flops--have caused more problems than they've solved. Other countries, however, have implemented formal open banking regulations with mandatory APIs, standardized data formats, and consent frameworks. The Treasury report calls for the development of a national strategy for data access. This includes support for secure, standardized APIs and policies that protect consumers while fostering competition. The bank connection: Instead of viewing open banking as a regulatory burden, bankers should see it as an opportunity to differentiate on trust, transparency, and user experience. Safely sharing data and integrating with external ecosystems are already key competitive differentiators. Global Competition and the Risk of Falling Behind The Treasury warns that the US is losing ground in the global race for digital financial leadership. China has deployed digital currencies at scale while the European Union has launched frameworks for instant payments, digital identity, and data portability. Even smaller jurisdictions like Singapore, Hong Kong, and New Zealand are punching above their weight by creating fintech sandboxes, government-backed infrastructure, and progressive regulatory environments. The Treasury is urging greater US engagement in international standard-setting bodies and greater coordination across agencies. The bank connection: Domestic policy, infrastructure investments, and international alignment are all part of the same strategic picture. Banks with international exposure should assess how shifts in regulatory and infrastructure alignment will affect their business models. Those without global operations should still recognize that domestic innovation will increasingly be influenced by international trends. What Banks Should Do About Digital Finance The Treasury's report isn't a roadmap for banks, but it is a clear signal of where federal policy is heading—and what will soon be expected of financial institutions. Waiting for regulatory mandates is a losing strategy. Banks that want to remain relevant must take proactive steps to align with the emerging digital finance agenda: 1) Accelerate adoption of real-time payments. Whether through FedNow, RTP, or both, institutions must modernize their payment infrastructure, align internal systems, and educate their customers and staff on the benefits and use cases. 2) Increase investment in--and deployment of--secure API frameworks. Update consent management systems and build partnerships with fintechs and aggregators. This is not just about compliance, but about creating new value propositions and customer experiences. 3) Support the development of a digital identity infrastructure. This includes participating in pilots, contributing to standards efforts, and aligning internal authentication and KYC processes with best practices in identity verification. 4) Reevaluate their data governance policies and practices. As data becomes the currency of digital finance, banks must ensure that their data is secure, accurate, and accessible—both to internal systems and authorized external partners. Digital Finance Isn't a Technology Initiative Digital finance isn't simply a technology initiative—it's a business imperative. Boards should ask tough questions about how the bank is preparing for a digital-first future, and how it's competing--and partnering--with fintechs, big techs, and global players. The Treasury report marks the beginning of a more coordinated, intentional strategy to modernize the financial system, protect consumers, and promote American leadership in an revolving global landscape. For banks, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge lies in adapting legacy systems, aligning with new expectations, and navigating a regulatory environment that is still taking shape. But the opportunity is far greater. Banks have the customer relationships, the trust, and the infrastructure to lead the next chapter of financial innovation—but must take advantage of these assets.
