logo
Kiwi medical waste company succeeding in Australia but battling Pharmac

Kiwi medical waste company succeeding in Australia but battling Pharmac

RNZ News09-07-2025
Photo:
Supplied
If you have ever been sitting in a GP's rooms, a hospital emergency department or hospital room you have probably watched as a doctor or nurse opens a sterile packet of something, uses it once, and then bins it.
If you had that stuff at home you would probably wash it and use it again - items such as deep vein thrombosis sleeves, patient transfer mattresses and blood pressure cuffs.
You would not be the only one wondering about the waste.
Now, a Kiwi company has an answer, and is taking more than 50 types of single-use medical devices and giving them a second life.
Canterbury-based Medsalv reckons it has so far saved more than half a million devices from landfills across Australia and New Zealand, throughout more than 90 hospitals.
It collects the old devices, remanufactures them by inspecting, cleaning, testing and repackaging; and returns them.
Along the way it's saving health care providers a lot of money, and creating jobs, many of them for people with barriers to employment.
If the whole country got on board, one estimate suggests it could prevent 1700 tonnes of medical waste going to landfills a year - and generate $100 million in savings.
But Medsalv has spent years banging its head against Pharmac's doors, and has only just got onto a secondary list (non-contracted) for approved suppliers, saving hospitals having to go through a procurement process.
In the meantime the company's work has been whole heartedly embraced by Australia, where Medsalv now has a factory with support and funding from the Victoria state government.
Medsalv founder and chief executive Oliver Hunt tells The Detail the process to get in the door with Pharmac has been long and exceptionally difficult.
After years of discussions, Pharmac has put the Medsalv's remanufactured medical devices on its new comprehensive list, effective from 1 July, but it still has not made it onto its main contracted list.
"So, we are on a list, but we are not on a contracted list. So, the products that we've put through don't have a price next to them, and the next step for us is to get a contract with whoever the contracting entity becomes.
"I think it's a step in the right direction, and it's good to show people the value of the products that we're delivering, but there are more steps to happen."
Pharmac says having your hospital medical devices in the Hospital Medical Devices List ensures that Health NZ hospitals can consider your products for use in their hospital.
Health NZ hospitals can choose which devices they buy from the list without needing to run a primary procurement process.
Pharmac also told The Detail that contracts for medical devices are generally evergreen, meaning they don't have an end date. And this helps to secure the best deals, with a wide range of suppliers.
It says the latest comprehensive list brings greater transparency to what's used and funded in public hospitals.
But haematologist Dr Ruth Spearing, a supporter of Oliver Hunt and Medsalv, tells The Detail, Pharmac's model is "completely wrong".
"I look at the amount of waste that goes to the landfill, the amount of money that is wasted, it is just horrendous. And anything, any company which can reduce that wastage and reduce its expenditure should be being supported and not blocked in the way that Pharmac has consistently blocked Oliver's company. It's such a shame.
"Pharmac's model is completely wrong in so much as it deals with big international device companies and gives them very long contracts and also gives them contracts with fixed amounts so there's no ability of Health New Zealand to actually become more efficient and decrease purchases because those companies have fixed amounts that they have been contracted to sell by Pharmac to Health New Zealand.
"So, the model is completely wrong. And any way to try to break into that model has been seemingly impossible."
Hunt, a mechanical engineer, founded Medsalv while completing his master's in engineering management at the University of Canterbury. The social enterprise was his master's project.
He says the reprocessing of used single-use devices is meticulous. Every item is collected after use, then cleaned, tested, and sterilised to internationally recognised standards. If anything doesn't pass inspection, it's binned; broken apart into individual materials and recycled where possible.
Hunt says the remanufactured devices come back at a lower cost, "we provide employment for people facing barriers to employment in the process, there's less emissions, less waste... we create some quite significant benefits for the health system and for the hospitals."
He says it is about using innovation to stretch the health dollar.
Dr Ruth Spearing says New Zealand needs to be "supporting these companies, we need to be supporting innovation, and we need to be supporting people like Oliver who are making a difference. It really is a win-win-win company."
Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail
here
.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on
Facebook
or following us on
Twitter
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis
Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis

Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Six months ago, Taranaki businessman John Burling received an abrupt call: his gas company was increasing prices by 40 percent. Burling, who owns the Taranaki-based Carac Group engineering and manufacturing company, was floored. "What do you mean? How do I pass it on?'" The reply was stark. "There's a shortage of gas, so that's going to be the new price." Overnight, Carac Group had to cut powder coating plant operations from five days to four, shelving expansion plans and curtailing production due to the energy-intensive gas-fired ovens. Across the country, many businesses are facing the same gas woes. "The untold story here is that there's a very large number of smaller industrial businesses that rely on gas and frankly they're gonna struggle to stay afloat," says Barney Irvine, executive director of the Northern Infrastructure Forum. "A lot of these businesses are feeling very desperate and pretty lost." The Pohokura oil and gas field is 4km offshore in Taranaki. Photo: Rob Tucker New Zealand's natural gas is drawn from wells in Taranaki, on the North Island's wild west coast. Around 290,000 households use gas for cooking and heating; in business, it is burned at dairy factories, fertiliser plants and in manufacturing. It's also used to produce electricity when there's not enough power generated from wind, water or the sun. Until recently, gas was reliable, even when other energy sources were scarce. But now, our wells are old and in decline, and our gas supply is dwindling, fast. Data released by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) in June reveals gas production has almost halved in the last ten years. Supply in February 2024 was the lowest since the 1980s. Gas reserves - the estimated available gas in the deep, underground reservoirs - have also fallen sharply, down 27 percent in the year to January. Forecasts say there is barely enough gas left in our existing oil and gas fields to last the decade, and even that is an optimistic guess. Demand now outstrips supply, forcing some businesses to struggle for gas, others onto 'demand management' plans requiring production shutdowns to support the electricity grid, and some to close operations entirely. "In my opinion gas supply is currently our most pressing energy security issue," says energy commentator Larry Blair. "The scale of the problem is huge, and we don't have any readily available alternatives to turn to." To combat the shortfall, the government has repealed the former Labour government's 2018 ban on new offshore oil and gas exploration permits. The policy aims to 'future-proof' the natural gas industry and reduce reliance on imported coal during dry years when hydro dams are low. The bill, spearheaded by Resources Minister Shane Jones, passed in the House last week. Coupled with a $200m co-investment in gas exploration, Jones says the policy will signal to international petrochemical companies New Zealand is "open for business". "It's to send a message that we will invest with you if it's appropriate as the Crown, but more importantly, there is a long-term future in New Zealand in terms of how we power our economy by using gas or coal." Industry has celebrated the law change. John Carnegie, chief executive of Energy Resources Aotearoa called the bill a "pragmatic and necessary step to help rebuild investor confidence." Jones and the Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, have blamed the 2018 exploration ban for the current state of the gas market. "The basic problem is that we don't have enough gas thanks to Labour screwing the scrum by banning oil and gas," Luxon told Morning Report last month. Prime Minster Christopher Luxon is blaming the gas ban for the energy crisis. Official advice says it's more complex than that. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Jones has said the ban, which was implemented to address climate change, was "the most destructive decision in the history of New Zealand's industry." But experts, including the government's own officials, warned the ban was not the main driver behind a lack of investment in gas or New Zealand's high energy prices - and won't be a magic fix for them either. Global investment in speculative drilling for oil and gas has been declining since 2014, when the oil price crashed. Since then, oil companies have focused on high-ranking, lower-cost petroleum provinces, putting New Zealand at a "geographical and geological disadvantage" due to its isolation and relatively unexplored status, officials wrote in a Cabinet paper last year. Records show that even before 2018, most of the major oil companies had given up their exploration permits and left New Zealand, citing "bad data", high technical risk or better opportunities elsewhere. "Clearly the ban was an important nail in the coffin," says Green Party MP Steve Abel, who worked on Greenpeace's oil and gas campaign. "But the government also should have been well aware of the obvious evidence that gas was running out and no one was interested in drilling for more, even though a lot of oil majors came and had a look." Whether those companies can be lured back will largely depend on whether we have enough big buyers to make it worth their while. New Zealand has a closed gas market, meaning there are no exports. Instead, local supply must meet local demand. Historically, developing new gas fields has relied on big contracts from major users like methanol producer Methanex. But if demand from those large industrial users drops, it poses a risk that the remaining, smaller users might not be able to purchase enough gas to support new investment. Currently, demand is dropping rapidly - advice from officials on the $200m investment shows overall gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. "At this point, the market is collapsing faster than we can put new reserves back into it," Larry Blair says. There is also the lingering damage by the ban to the country's reputation as a safe place to invest, and the very real risk that the policy could be re-reversed with a change of government. "The problem I see for people looking at New Zealand is there's no confidence that there's a sustainable market there in the long term." With such strong headwinds, experts say the $200m is unlikely to suddenly make it commercially viable to take a big gamble on entirely new discoveries, particularly when New Zealand hasn't found new gas in a new place for two decades or longer. It's more likely the money will be used to fossick around in our existing fields, trying to retrieve what's left. The government knows this. Its own advice has acknowledged the plan's flaws and its low certainty of success. "Investments may not all be successful. The risk of failed drilling is high in our mature fields. In the last five years around $1.8 billion has been invested in drilling 58 wells, and this investment has not managed to maintain or increase our gas reserves," MBIE's advice to Jones in March this year said. Even if the analysts are wrong, there is still the matter of timing. Data shows a new gas field could take a decade, or longer, to find, develop, and bring online. "There will be nothing left to power by then," says Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy. "Why are we doubling down on expanding what is clearly an industry in decline? In my view we are taking an absolute wrong turn." Critics like Duffy say more needs to be done now to bring down gas and electricity prices and shore up energy supply. Last month, an influential collection of energy users and advocacy groups called on Luxon to urgently fix the "broken" energy sector, which they said was crippling industry and leaving families freezing during winter. "Regional employers are shutting their doors, with hundreds of jobs and decades of investment lost," it said. "Families and communities are being left behind." Luxon is also under pressure from climate advocates, who have said the bill is "tipping oil on the climate crisis fire." A government Climate Implications of Policy Assessment (CIPA) estimated that reversing the ban would lead to a "substantial increase in emissions" of approximately 14.2 million tonnes of carbon by 2035, primarily from prolonged gas usage in electricity, commercial, and industrial sectors. Drilling for gas would make it harder for New Zealand to meet climate change targets, but could also undermine its obligations under the Paris Agreement, risk trade deals and breach international law , critics said. "From a climate change point of view, which everyone should be worried about, we can't afford to burn the existing fossil fuels that have already been discovered on the planet," said Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman. "But also, potentially, you are facing liabilities from other countries who are negatively affected by you burning more and more fossil fuels and destabilizing the climate. So it's grossly irresponsible." Gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. Photo: 123RF Jones recently said he considers climate change "largely moral hysteria." He said the recent judgment from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would not halt legitimate New Zealand industries. "Some people might try to use it, exploit it to undermine industry, undermine investment, stop manufacturing … but we will not allow our sovereignty to be compromised," Jones said. Instead, he has pitched gas as a "transition fuel" to reduce dependency on Indonesian coal to "keep the lights on". The government also plans to double geothermal energy. Plans to transition away from gas itself were shelved when the coalition was elected, alongside a plan to help fossil fuel workers retrain in low-emissions industries. While there are renewable energy projects in the pipeline it's not expected to be enough to fill the gap, especially as more companies decarbonise. Electricty Authority data shows more wind farms are in the pipeline, but critics say they need to be built now. Photo: In the same open letter sent last month, the group of concerned organisations called for the government to intervene in the market so more renewables could be built at pace. "Unlock investment in low-cost, renewable generation," it said. "Investment in new generation is being delayed, sustaining high prices, and contributing to the energy supply crisis we now face." Commentators say unless we can secure more energy soon, industry closures will begin to pile up as businesses run out of options. "I don't see a plan B for a lot of industries in New Zealand," says Blair. "That's the brutal reality of it." Consumer's Jon Duffy says he doesn't think there's a plan at all. "There's no Plan A. What we are really missing is a national energy strategy." Meanwhile, for industries like John Burling's, there are no good answers. His increased gas bill led to higher costs for running the gas-fired ovens, but Burling was unable to pass these on to customers. "It was a bit of a no-win really," Burling says. He's yet to find an alternative to his gas-fired ovens, and in any case, electricity would be even more expensive than gas. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

How to get a medical certificate without a doctor
How to get a medical certificate without a doctor

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

How to get a medical certificate without a doctor

Photo: 123rf Winter coughs and flu are still doing the rounds - and Covid hasn't gone away - so if you need to call in sick there are a few things to know. Employers can legally ask you for a medical certificate if you need to take sick leave - even for one day. It can be a long wait to see a GP but there are other ways to get a sick note. Part time and full-time employees are entitled to 10 days sick leave for themselves or to look after someone who's sick, but in some circumstances, employers may ask for a proof. Holidays Act states an employer may require an employee to produce proof of sickness or injury for sick leave if the sickness or injury that gave rise to the leave is for a period of three or more consecutive calendar days, and a proof of sickness or injury may include a certificate from a health practitioner. The employer could ask for proof within three consecutive calendar days, but they would have to pay the employee's expenses in obtaining the proof. E tū union national secretary Rachel Mackintosh said while it was legal for employers to ask for a sick note, they urged employers to waive the requirement. "This is the employers' right but it causes hardship to workers who either can't get a GP appointment or have to pay high consultation fees to GPs, including online doctor practices. "Employers don't have to ask for medical certificates and we would encourage them to drop the requirement unless there is some doubt in their minds about the genuineness of the illness." Paul Jarvie, manager of employment relations and safety at the Employers and Manufacturers Association, said there could be an imbalance in the medical certificate process. "One is the employment system, and the second one would be the medical system. Ideally they should work in tandem, but sometimes they appear to be working at odds with each other. The doctor can only hear the employees version of what's going on and there's no real ability for the doctor or whoever it is to contact the employer to find out their story of can the person come back to work, are there alternative duties that kind of stuff. So there's always been a bit of a disconnect." General practitioners The most common way to obtain a sick note is to go through a general practitioner. For enrolled patients, depending on the GP, the cost for an appointment can range from $18 to $90. However, with a GP shortage, it can take weeks to get a GP appointment. An RNZ-Reid Research poll found about 60 percent of respondents were able to get a GP appointment within a week, 30 percent were waiting for more than two weeks with 17 percent waiting three or more. Telehealth services Virtual healthcare businesses and some GP services offer online medical certificates. Patients can often get an on the day video call or phone call and receive a medical certificate for three to five days. An appointment generally costs around $40 to $65. However, buyer beware: a quick search by RNZ found overseas companies marketing sick notes for New Zealanders and asking for personal information including IDs in its application process. The Ministry of Health said only health practitioners registered with a New Zealand authority can issue valid sick notes. Some pharmacies issue medical certificates - but it pays to check first. Photo: RNZ /Dom Thomas Pharmacies Pharmacists are legally allowed to write sick notes. However, not all do. For pharmacists who confirm they are able to provide a medical certificate, an in-person consultation is required and costs between $30 to $40. It is best to call the pharmacy before your visit to confirm that they can write sick notes. Medical staff are seen wearing scrubs, and a stethoscope. Photo: Supplied/ Unsplash - Nap studio Ministry of Health says a health practitioner is defined under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 as a person who is, or is deemed to be, registered with a New Zealand authority as a practitioner of a particular health profession. A list of professions regulated under the Act and their responsible authorities can be found on the Ministry of Health website . The list contains 18 professions with a range that includes from Chinese medicine services to dietetics, nursing, osteopathy to psychotherapy. It is important to differentiate medical certificate and proof of sickness, while only medical practitioners, doctors, can write medical certificates, all health practitioners can certify proof of sickness. Healthline is a free over-the-phone health service available 24/7 and connects the caller to nurses and paramedics. But the service does not issue sick certificates. In an email, a spokesperson said: "That's because the Healthline service involved nurses and paramedics providing triage (assessing symptoms, providing health and treatment advice, developing a plan for next steps for care), not diagnosis. "And to be able to issue a medical certificate would mean being able to verify that someone was unable to work for at least 3 days, which most of the time would require some form of medical diagnosis, which is not part of the service we offer." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

North Shore Hospital has entire ward of people with no medical reason to be there
North Shore Hospital has entire ward of people with no medical reason to be there

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

North Shore Hospital has entire ward of people with no medical reason to be there

North Shore Hospital. Photo: rafaelbenari/123RF North Shore Hospital has an entire ward of people stuck in hospital with no medical reason to be there. The 20-bed ward was created in May for patients who were effectively medically discharged but did not have anywhere to go for lower level care, such as an aged care facility. RNZ understands they were not under the direct care of doctors, but were looked after by nurses and allied health staff such as physiotherapists and social workers. Some were there for weeks. Health NZ's Waitematā operations director Brad Healey said started the dedicated ward to help boost capacity in the busy winter period. It had helped improve the flow of patients because people were spending less time in emergency departments and were getting the care they needed sooner, he said. Deborah Powell heads the APEX Union, which includes allied health workers. It was not unusual for the patients to be in the ward for two or three weeks, but sometimes it was longer, she said. It was not ideal but it was a good, practical decision to have them in one place rather than dotted around the hospital, she said. "It would be better to have them in the community but we just don't have that capacity out there at the moment." The head of the senior doctor's union, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, Sarah Dalton, said it was not good for people to be in hospital when they did not need to be. "You're much better off to be in the community where you can be dressed and walking around and doing your daily things and doing exercise and getting rehab and all of those good things," she said. Having people stuck in hospital, also helped create longer surgical waiting lists, she said. "One of the biggest contributors to cancellations of elective surgeries in hospitals is that there aren't enough staffed beds to put the patients in after their surgery." "It has a domino effect back through the hospital in terms of other people's ability to access care." The government needed to do more to fund public aged residential care and also support services that allowed people to go back to their own homes, rather than the "last resort" of having to stay in hospital, Dalton said. Association of Salaried Medical Specialists chief executive Sarah Dalton. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro Health NZ's Brad Healey said each patient in the ward had a "responsible medical clinician" and could access medical care if their condition changed and a further medical assessment was needed. "The patients have complex discharge pathways, requiring specialist nursing and allied health workforces," he said. Those teams worked closely with the patients and their whānau to get the discharge support they needed, he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store