Trump says he plans to put a 100% tariff on computer chips, likely pushing up cost of electronics
'We'll be putting a tariff on of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.'
The Republican president said companies that make computer chips in the U.S. would be spared the import tax. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to an overall uptick in inflation.
Inquiries sent to chip makers Nvidia and Intel were not immediately answered.
Demand for computer chips has been climbing worldwide, with sales increasing 19.6% in the year-ended in June, according to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics organization.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Trump's tariff threats mark a significant break from existing plans to revive computer chip production in the United States. He is choosing an approach that favors the proverbial stick over carrots in order to incentivize more production. Essentially, the president is betting that higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for mobile phones, TVs and refrigerators.
By contrast, the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act signed into law in 2022 by then-President Joe Biden provided more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. The mix of funding support, tax credits and other financial incentives were meant to draw in private investment, a strategy that Trump has vocally opposed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
4 minutes ago
- Global News
U.S. Air Force to deny retirement pay to long-serving transgender members
The U.S. Air Force said Thursday it would deny all transgender service members who have served between 15 and 18 years the option to retire early and would instead separate them without retirement benefits. One Air Force sergeant said he was 'betrayed and devastated' by the move. The move means that transgender service members will now be faced with the choice of either taking a lump-sum separation payment offered to junior troops or be removed from the service. An Air Force spokesperson told The Associated Press that 'although service members with 15 to 18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved.' About a dozen service members had been 'prematurely notified' that they would be able to retire before that decision was reversed, according to the spokesperson who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal Air Force policy. Story continues below advertisement A memo issued Monday announcing the new policy, which was reviewed by the AP, said that the choice to deny retirement benefits was made 'after careful consideration of the individual applications.' All transgender members of the Air Force are being separated from the service under the Trump administration's policies. 1:29 Biden reverses Trump's transgender military ban Separation process has hit some bumps The move comes after the Pentagon was given permission in early May by the Supreme Court to move forward with a ban on all transgender troops serving in the military. Days later, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a policy that would offer currently openly serving transgender troops the option to either volunteer to leave and take a large, one-time separation payout or be involuntarily separated at later date. Story continues below advertisement A Pentagon official told reporters in May that they viewed the policy as treating 'anyone impacted by it with dignity and respect.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy However, in late July, transgender troops told that they were finding the entire separation process, which has included reverting their service records back to their birth gender, 'dehumanizing' or 'open cruelty.' Shannon Leary, a lawyer who represents LGBTQ+ people in employment discrimination cases, says she expects lawsuits to challenge Thursday's decision. 'It seems quite arbitrary on its face and cruel,' she said. 'These military members have dedicated their lives to serving our country.' Normally, Leary said, when early retirement is offered in the military, it's available to all members who have served over 15 years. She said she expects other service branches to follow the Air Force's path. One Air Force service member says he's 'devastated' Logan Ireland, a master sergeant in the U.S. Air Force who has 15 years of service, including a deployment to Afghanistan, is one of the airmen impacted by the policy. 'I feel betrayed and devastated by the news,' he said. Story continues below advertisement Ireland said he was told that his retirement was being denied on Wednesday when his chain of command, 'with tears in their eyes,' told him the news. 1:49 Transgender military member disappointed over Supreme Court upholding transgender ban Officials have said that as of Dec. 9, 2024, there were 4,240 troops diagnosed with 'gender dysphoria' on active duty, National Guard and Reserve. Pentagon officials have decided to use the condition and its diagnosis as the main way to identify troops who are trans. However, the two are not an exact match — not every transgender person has the condition. As a result, there is an understanding that the actual number of transgender people within the military's roughly 2 million troops may be higher. Under the latest policy, active duty troops had until June 6 to voluntarily identify themselves and receive a payout while troops in the National Guard and Reserve had until July 7. Pentagon officials previously told reporters that they plan to lean on commanders and existing annual medical screenings to find any transgender service members who do not come forward. Story continues below advertisement Associated Press writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed reporting.
Global News
4 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump alleges U.S. banks discriminate against conservatives, orders probe
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order mandating a probe into whether banks have discriminated against conservatives and certain industries like gun manufacturers and cryptocurrency companies, invoking the vast powers to go after entities that the Republican president alleges have discriminated against him and his allies. The executive order deals with an issue known as 'debanking,' which is when banks close accounts of individuals or declines to go into business with certain industries. Trump has accused JPMorgan and Bank of America of debanking him and his companies in the past, something both banks have denied. Trump ordered federal bank regulators to make sure banks do not discriminate against individuals or companies for their political or religious beliefs. He also ordered bank regulators to probe when banks may have allegedly discriminated and refer the cases to the Department of Justice. The move could open banks to potential civil or criminal investigations, fines or punishments. Story continues below advertisement 2:05 Trump signs executive order to halt federal funding to NPR, PBS When Trump and his party discuss debanking, they typically refer to banks closing the accounts of a person or company when they no longer want to do business with them. Banks usually say they close accounts or deny loans because the person or business is deemed too risky. The banking industry has long argued that it has a constitutional right to choose whom they go into business with, if it does not violate laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The act, which was part of several pieces of legislation signed during the Civil Rights Movement, bans banks from discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, sex and other protected statuses. Another type of debanking is when government regulators tell banks to avoid doing business with industries or individuals. Democratic President Barack Obama's Department of Justice told banks to avoid doing business with 'high risk' industries, which included payday lenders and firearms manufacturers. Story continues below advertisement This type of government-directed debanking is also known as reputational risk, where the historic reputation of an industry prompts banks to be more careful about banking and lending. Historic examples include entities who did business in high-risk countries, did business largely in cash or were repeatedly flagged by bank regulators. 1:48 Trump to target 'anti-Christian' bias with new White House faith office Conservatives have argued that reputational risk has become an umbrella term that allows banks to discriminate. The banking industry insists it does not actively debank and does not target specific industries or individuals. Banks have already been removing any mention of reputational risk from their policies and procedures, particularly since Trump returned to the White House. 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' said a spokeswoman for JPMorgan Chase. The Obama administration's government-directed debanking has been a rallying cry for conservatives. It's one reason why the cryptocurrency industry backed Trump in 2024. While the Biden administration did not explicitly force banks to debank the crypto industry, Democratic President Joe Biden's bank regulators did express some public concern about it, a move that was read by banks as a reason to steer away from crypto. That phrasing by the Biden administration was often referred to as 'Operation Choke Point 2.0' by Trump and his allies. Story continues below advertisement Republicans have introduced legislation to cut down on alleged acts of debanking as well. Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, has introduced legislation that would require bank regulators to no longer consider reputational risk as a factor in how they measure a bank's health and risk profile.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge stops hazardous waste shipments to Michigan landfill from five states
DETROIT (AP) — A judge has stopped government contractors in five states from sending hazardous waste to a Michigan landfill after a year of legal challenges by Detroit-area communities concerned about possible environmental impacts. Wayne County Judge Kevin Cox said the risk was 'substantial and compelling' and outweighed the financial harm to Wayne Disposal, a suburban Detroit landfill operated by trash giant Republic Services. Cox's injunction, signed Tuesday, bars Wayne Disposal from accepting waste from Luckey, Ohio; Middletown, Iowa; Deepwater, New Jersey; Lewiston, New York; and St. Louis. Those cleanup sites are managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its contractors. The waste includes materials that were produced for weapons, early atomic energy and other uses before and after World War II. Shipments 'have been halted and we are working closely with our contractors to determine the next steps,' Jenn Miller, a spokesperson in the Army Corps environmental division, said Thursday. Tainted soil in Lewiston is a legacy of the Manhattan Project, the secret government effort to develop atomic bombs during World War II. While the lawsuit in Michigan was pending, officials recently decided to send Lewiston soil to a Texas landfill to keep the project moving, Miller said. Wayne Disposal in Van Buren Township, 25 miles (40.2 kilometers) west of Detroit, is one of the few landfills in the U.S. that can handle certain hazardous waste. Republic Services has repeatedly said the landfill meets or exceeds rules to safely manage hazardous materials. The company said the court order was 'overly broad.' 'Responsible management and disposal of these waste streams is an essential need, and Wayne Disposal, Inc. is designed and permitted to safely manage this material,' the company said. But critics say there are too many homes, schools and waterways near the landfill, making any leak at the site possibly dangerous. 'We stood strong with our community allies speaking collectively with one voice that we do not want this type of waste in our community,' said Kevin McNamara, the elected supervisor in Van Buren Township.
