
'I ditched my normal fake tan for this self-tanning milk and my skin has never felt softer'
This year, I've tried a range of self-tanning products, from celebrity-loved foams to drugstore classics, but I think my latest tanning find takes the cake. From the iconic brand Bali Body comes this Self Tanning Milk, which switches the traditional foam or moisturising formula for a milky consistency that feels more like skincare than my normal tanners.
With no sticky residue, long drying times, or even any colour cast, this self-tanning product doesn't feel like any product I've tried before—and at first, I was very apprehensive.
Other tanners I've tested that don't have a colour cast have been a little bit of a let down, with poor pigment or patchy results. Not to mention, the chances of mistakes when applying skyrocket when you can't see where you've applied the tanner. But this tanning milk was far from disappointing - in fact, I don't think I'll be using any other tanner for the rest of the summer.
As the name suggests, this tanning product features a milk formula that looks like a creamy serum rather than a moisturiser, foam, or mousse. It's still recommended that you use a tanning mitt to buff the liquid into the skin, though it's instructed that you apply the milk straight to the skin and then use the mitt (or brush, if you prefer) to spread it around.
Like I said earlier, at first, the milky formula made me a little apprehensive. This only increased when I began to buff it in, and the thin serum-like tanner began to soak into the skin without leaving any colour cast behind. But I had faith in the band known for producing impressive self-tanning products.
I applied all over, which was easy enough thanks to its thin consistency, though I was slightly worried about streaking or missing patches as I couldn't be entirely sure everywhere I wanted covered was evenly saturated.
More akin to a gradual tanner, this milk doesn't have a designated time that you have to leave it in. Thanks to the lack of a colour cast, it also doesn't require rinsing off. So I chose to leave mine on overnight (roughly 8 or 9 hours).
One thing that instantly earned me points was that, by the time I had finished applying, the tanner was already beginning to dry down without leaving behind a tacky texture. My skin felt instantly hydrated and nourished, in a way I've never felt with a tanning product before, and it was soft to the touch already. Plus, my skin wasn't sticky or still damp with the tan - something I love, as I tend to leave my tan on overnight and don't like feeling tacky when I go to bed.
Now, if I'm being honest, when I first woke up, the tanner hadn't done a huge amount; a fact that's slightly disappointing as I used the medium to dark variety. I had a noticeable glow to my skin and a healthy tinge of colour, but nothing that screamed 'I've just come back from a holiday on the coast'.
That said, my skin felt incredible. It was so soft and smooth, and didn't feel weighed down from the tanner. I felt rejuvenated and super hydrated. But the colour wasn't what I had hoped; it's worth noting that I prefer to tan darker when I'm using fake tan, so this may first layer that would suit someone who fancies a subtle, sunkissed look without going three shades darker.
Rather than give up, I decided to try the tanning milk again to see if it changed anything—and I'm so glad I did. When I woke up, my skin was just as glowy, looking healthy, and somehow almost blurred on my arms and legs.
My hands and feet didn't look absurdly darker than the rest of my body (which I've found with typical tanning mousses), and even dryer areas like elbows, knees, and armpits aren't significantly dryer or patchier, something I can only attribute to the fact that this milk definitely hydrates the skin while tanning.
The colour is stunning and just what I was looking for, and the end results are unbelievably seamless—no streaking, patches, or weird pigmentation. My skin looks flawless and feels so healthy. I've already received comments from friends and family who've noticed how smooth my skin looks and feels.
Though I can't comment on the longevity of the tan since it's only been a week so far, something I have noticed is that areas where my tan normally lifts first (feet, hands, armpits, around the bra area), whether it's from sweat, clothes, or washing, have not yet budged. Even after a gym session, the tan didn't appear to have moved. And when showering, I noticed very minimal colour rinsing off, which is reassuring. Plus, thanks to the lack of colour cast, there are no stains left behind on clothes or bed sheets.
Truly a blend of skincare and self-tanner, I don't think I'll go back to using other tanning products this summer, and it's quickly become a firm favourite of mine. Plus, for 240ml, this tanning milk is relatively affordable, selling for £27 from Boots, ASOS, and select supermarkets, including Sainsbury's.
Bali Body doesn't stop with this tanning milk. If you're looking for alternative hydrating tanners, check out their line of hydrating tanning serums, which cost £28.95 at Selfridges or £21.71 at Lookfantastic.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Meghan Markle's go-to skincare brand launches anti-ageing serum that firms skin in 1 week
A smart new serum has just launched from a celeb-favourite skincare brand, proven to delay visible signs of ageing by reducing senescent skin cell markers that cause this With season two of Meghan Markle's Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, airing next week, it has us thinking about some of the brands and products that the Duchess of Sussex had previously listed as her favourites. Tatcha's famous Dewy Skin Cream was one – and now that Tatcha has just dropped a seriously smart new anti-ageing serum, we wonder if this will be making its way into her bathroom cabinet too. Launching today, 18 August, Tatcha's The Longevity Serum taps into the current longevity trend with some clever science, creating a formula that's proven to reduce ageing skin cells to delay visible signs of ageing. The result is skin that's visibly firmer and smoother after just one week, with the look of fine lines improvements after two weeks. The key ingredient in this Tatcha Longevity Serum, which costs £82, is something called an 'Okinawa Cellescence Complex', a centuries-old blend of Japanese herbs and plants, known for their benefits on the skin. This helps to target senescent skin cells – also called 'zombie cells' – that give off inflammatory molecules and trigger inflammation that can lead to signs of premature ageing, and reduce them by 55%. In Tatcha's tests, 100% showed an improvement in skin barrier immediately and 90% showed an improvement in skin texture and moisturisation, while after one week of use, 100% showed visibly firmer, smoother skin, improved skin texture and softness. And after two weeks, 100% of testers reported an improvement in the look of fine lines. Like a lot of serums, this one is designed to be used morning and night after cleansing and before your moisturiser or SPF. If you have dry skin, Tatcha's iconic Dewy Skin Cream, from £26, gives a gorgeous glowy finish, while its new lighter sister, The Dewy Milk Moisturiser, £61, is better suited to normal-to-combination skin. This Tatcha serum is the latest in a line of smart serums to launch recently, including Medik8 C-Tetra Advanced, £69, and Liquid Peptides Advanced MP, £79, and SkinCeuticals P-Tiox Neuro-Peptide Serum from SkinCeuticals, £130, which contains a multi-peptide complex as well as PHA, niacinamide and laminaria extract to target nine different types of wrinkles, SkinCeuticals claims, from crow's feet to forehead lines. If you're looking for a cheaper alternative, Naturium Multi-Peptide Advance Serum comes highly rated by beauty editors, and is £27. Join our Shopping & Deals WhatsApp for the best bargains and fashion news WHATSAPP: Get the best deals and exclusive discount codes straight to your phone via our WhatsApp group. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. Some of these articles will contain affiliate links where we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from them. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our .


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Inside Meghan's tendency to 'control', according to a royal insider: How the Duchess sought to master 'every aspect' of her life and even had a 'careful plan' for how she would 'out' her relationship with Harry
By all accounts, Meghan's life story so far could be considered a modern day fairy tale. Meghan had a Cinderella–esque rise, growing up as a young girl in Los Angeles before she arrived at the Palace and became the Duchess of Sussex. However, while a fictional story will have many unforeseen twists and turns, in Meghan's case nothing happened by chance. Tom Bower, writing in his bestseller Revenge, looks back on the early days of Harry and Meghan's romance where he claims the former Suits actress meticulously planned how to 'out' Prince Harry as her boyfriend. 'In Meghan Markle 's life, little happened by chance. Beyond the empathetic smile was woman who disrupted spontaneity and liked to control every aspect of her life. In late September 2016 nothing was more important than her relationship with Harry,' Bower said. According to the royal insider, it was around this time that Meghan decided that her career needed an 'adjustment' – so in October 2016 her Wikipedia was purged of any reference to her work on Deal Or No Deal and her time as a model. 'A section headed "humanitarian work" was inserted' in its place, which referenced her speech at a United Nations women's event in New York among other achievements. It would appear as though, at this time, Meghan was attempting to downplay the media career she worked so hard to build and instead was beefing up her humanitarian work. Harry and Meghan at the 2018 Invictus Games. Meghan had a Cinderella–esque rise growing up as a young girl in Los Angeles before she arrived at the Palace and became the Duchess of Sussex And, unsurprisingly, two weeks later Meghan emailed her agent – Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne – to announce the end of her acting and commercial career. 'I realised it meant losing her as a friend as well as a client,' Gina told Bower. The timing of everything that month had been 'carefully planned' even down to the Halloween birthday party the couple attended in Toronto with Princess Eugenie and her boyfriend. Here, Meghan shared a photo on Instagram of her 'secret Halloween date'. Bower said: 'Most at the party were in no doubt that Meghan was '"outing" Harry. 'For her own good reasons she wanted the relationship to be publicised. In media hype, some would call it the "Greatest Story since the Abdication".' A week later the romance burst into public view when journalist Camilla Tominey broke the story. The Daily Mail soon caught on to it, reporting that the couple had 'matching bracelets' and pointing out that Harry's private instagram account followed Meghan. Bower wrote: '"It has a ring of truth," confirmed the Palace about the global sensation creating a frenzy outside Meghan's house. She emerged, smiling to a crowd of photographers, and drove to the Suits studio.' The ploy worked: Meghan gained 100,000 new followers and 'journalists received numerous tips about the clothes and accessories Meghan was wearing'. However, once Meghan became a working member of the Royal Family she quickly learnt that in the Firm the narrative would not be so easy to control. According to one royal author, Meghan allegedly tried to not only carve out their own independent career as a working royal but also tried to 'outshine' every other member of the family – including the late Queen Elizabeth II. Writing in his royal biography Yes Ma'am – which explores the lives of the men and women who serve the royals – author Tom Quinn claims that Meghan Markle caused a panic during her brief time as a working member of the family when the Duchess of Sussex signaled she wanted to operate separately from the Queen. Quinn said: ' Buckingham Palace became really worried when they became aware that Meghan had plans for her life as a working royal that were not going to be part of a general strategy agreed with the staff – she just wanted to do her own thing. 'Which is fair enough if you're not a member of a tightly controlled institution, but it was never going to be acceptable that Meghan should outshine Princess Anne, Prince Charles [as he then was] and Elizabeth the Queen.' Speaking to Quinn, a former Courtier for Elizabeth said: 'Elizabeth always had to be the centre and focus of everything the Royal Family did, and I don't think Meghan understood why that had to make her do things she didn't want to do. 'She didn't understand that when you join the Royal Family, you don't do as you please, you do as you're told. In a sense, you become a servant of the family.' Meghan's tendency to go off-script and rebel against the constraints of royal life were glaringly obvious during the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's tour of southern Africa in 2019. While stopping to speak to ITV journalist Tom Bradby, Meghan gave a remarkably candid interview about how she was struggling to cope with the media scrutiny on top of being a new mother and a newlywed. During the interview she thanked Bradby for asking if she was OK, claiming that 'not many people have asked if I'm OK'. And then when asked if it had been a struggle, she agreed with the reporter's analysis. While Meghan received praise in some circles for her openness, it was not the sort of answer many working royals would have been expected to give during a royal tour. And the interview, along with the trip, became something of a PR disaster for the Royal Family. Quinn added that Meghan 'undoubtedly felt constrained' by the Royal Family and that she and Harry needed 'do their own thing without consulting the big royal machine'. Only a few months later Harry and Meghan stepped down as working royals which not only gave them the freedom to control their narrative but also came with some lucrative benefits as well. In 2019, during the interview with Tom Bradby, Meghan was remarkably candid about how she was struggling to cope with the media scrutiny on top of being a new mother and a newlywed According to royal author Valentine Low, it was Meghan's yearning to monetise her royal title which led to 'Megxit'. Writing in his tell–all book Courtiers, Low claims that Meghan's desire to 'earn money for herself' led the couple to abandon their duties entirely. Low revealed that during discussions about how to reach a happy middle ground – which could please the whole family – multiple scenarios were explored. These ranged from Harry and Meghan 'having a month a year to do their own thing' to 'spending most of their time privately but doing a select number of royal activities'. The one caveat for the Sussexes continuing royal duties – however small or minor – was that they must stick to the 'normal rules about royal behaviour'. Crucially, that would mean Harry and Meghan could not 'act or take decisions in order to gain financially'. Low writes: 'Some suspected that in the end she wanted to make money. And the only way she was going to do that was by leaving her royal life behind and going back to America.' Indeed, since stepping down as a working royal, Meghan appears to have focused much of her energy on her solo business projects and media projects – with the next season on With Love, Meghan set to debut next week.


Edinburgh Live
2 days ago
- Edinburgh Live
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle skewered by TV host in brutal three-word putdown
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced criticism from Sky News Australia presenter Paul Murray as he took aim at their fresh agreement with Netflix. This follows the streaming giant's decision to extend its partnership with the duo through a multi-year, first-look arrangement, covering all television and film projects from Archewell Productions. Nevertheless, reports suggest that Harry and Meghan will only earn from this agreement if Netflix chooses to greenlight their proposals, marking a significant departure from their £80million arrangement in 2020. First-look agreements typically permit a company to assess a project before determining whether to proceed with it. Should they decline, the creator is then free to pitch it elsewhere, reports the Express. A representative for Meghan and Harry told the Daily Mail that the couple did receive compensation for the deal, though they declined to reveal further specifics, stating: "I can say no more owing to commercially confidential contractual agreements." Responding to the agreement, Sky News Australia presenter consulted US television commentator Megyn Kelly, asking: "Speaking of negotiations, what do you think the balance was between Harry and Meghan and Netflix? Because they have re-done a deal but it's a really 'p**s weak version' of the first deal, they don't get the automatic money and then you have to make something, you basically have to make something and then will decide whether they going to show it or not to get the money, how do you make of that negotiation went?" Megyn delivered a withering response as she stated: "To me it sounds like they Netflix while to cancel and someone representing Meghan and Harry begged them to at least say that it's a first look, in a way to say we don't think you're losers, you're not cut off, we think you're winners, such winners that we want to get the first look to see what you're doing later down the line because they might want to buy it. (Image: Sky News) "But really, it's just a save face mechanism, Netflix has these two under contract, if it wanted to have an exclusive deal with them, it would have, it has more money than God, it's not hurting for cash." Meghan's statement read: "We're proud to extend our partnership with Netflix and expand our work together to include the As Ever brand. My husband and I feel inspired by our partners who work closely with us and our Archewell Productions team to create thoughtful content across genres that resonates globally and celebrates our shared vision." One programme that is certain to be broadcast is the second series of With Love, Meghan, which features Meghan preparing dishes in the kitchen alongside celebrities and lifestyle experts.