Protests, criticisms of anti-Semitism report continue
The recommendation to axe support for publicly funded institutions and festivals that promote or fail to effectively deal with hate speech features in a report by Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal.
The federal government is considering the advice in a bid to combat growing discrimination against Jewish Australians.
Criticism of the report has also focused on Ms Segal's recommendation Australia adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism, some arguing that it conflates the notion with criticism of Israel and Zionism.
While "unequivocally" condemning anti-Semitism, the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils says it is deeply concerned by the report.
"This plan, drafted by a politically appointed, unelected official, risks undermining free expression, marginalising already vulnerable communities and conflating legitimate criticism of the State of Israel and its policies with anti-Semitism," it said on Saturday.
"Combating anti-Semitism is a shared responsibility but it cannot come at the cost of justice, free speech and the equal treatment of all communities," council president Rateb Jneid added.
Racial justice organisation Democracy in Colour said the swift establishment of resources, recommendations and government attention for combating anti-Semitism stood in stark contrast to responses to other forms of racism.
The "selective urgency" exposed a "hierarchy of racism that continues to operate within our democratic institutions".
"The government's response pattern reveals a concerning truth: some forms of racism receive red-carpet treatment while others are relegated to performative gestures and token appointments," director Noura Mansour said.
About 50 diehard protesters gathered in central Sydney on Saturday afternoon in opposition to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and what they argue is Australia's wrongful participation in it.
The mostly silent action, outside the offices of defence contractor BAE Systems, continued months of similar demonstrations which have been staged in capital cities at weekends.
A larger protest has been scheduled for Sunday in the city's Hyde Park and another will go ahead in Melbourne.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Friday steps were already being taken to silence the behaviour Ms Segal had identified, pointing to a decision to block controversial US rapper Kanye West from entering the country after he released a song titled Heil Hitler.
"We screen people ... when they apply for visas it's something that we make sure that we represent Australia's national interests," he told reporters.
Ms Segal said criticisms of her findings misunderstood the Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism.
"(It) clearly says if Israel is criticised, that's absolutely fine - and indeed, so many Israelis are criticising the policies of their own government," she told ABC Radio.
Several other Jewish groups called for her recommendations to be adopted in full.
They include embedding Holocaust education into school curriculums and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, in addition to terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism.
Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024.
Australia's government-appointed envoy to combat Islamophobia, Aftab Malik, says he will soon provide "comprehensive" recommendations to the prime minister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
35 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
It's clear what was behind Kumanjayi Walker's killing. So why can't we say it?
Indeed, some are calling for a federal truth-telling commission while simultaneously lamenting the non-implementation of those royal commission recommendations. It speaks to the absurdity of the status quo and post-referendum fragmentation in Indigenous affairs to call for the same form of inquiry to achieve something we unequivocally know it can't. What can history tell us? While formal policies of compulsory racial segregation established by protection legislation ended in the latter part of the 20th century, there was little institutional reckoning with the role police had played in administering that regime. Police forces, which for over a century had played a key role in the enforcement of the system of Aboriginal reserves, missions and curfews, were reconstituted in the post-protection era as ostensibly neutral enforcers of the rule of law with no corresponding effort to reform the institutional culture or confront its origins in racial control. Loading The phenomenon of over-policing – where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, particularly youth, are disproportionately surveilled, detained and prosecuted for conduct that may not attract the same police or judicial response when committed by non-Indigenous peers – is not speculative. It is extensively documented across decades of institutional review and legal analysis, including the 2017 Australian Law Reform Commission's Pathways to Justice report. These are not isolated or anecdotal claims. They form part of a consistent body of empirical and legal evidence that demonstrates a structural problem embedded within our institutions. But equally confronting, for those calling for more truth-telling to replace structural change, is that Australians say they know the truth but want to move on. That's a truth that needs to be grappled with. This is possibly why the sky did not fall in with the Yoorrook findings of genocide in Victoria. They were, by and large, not controversial because this was already historically supported, perhaps demonstrating that societies do move on and the temporal, ideological motivations of the Aboriginal history 'culture wars' have disintegrated with the passage of time. It has been more than three decades since the release of the deaths-in-custody royal commission report, Australia's first truth-telling commission. There is much sentimentalising of the report. The inquiry emerged in a markedly different Australia, an era in which Australians trusted public institutions and politicians. Its findings were released when Aboriginal political structures were more unified and institutional forms such as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission provided a national platform for Indigenous voices. In the intervening years, the landscape has changed significantly. Aboriginal communities have experienced fragmentation, and the post-ATSIC policy environment has become saturated with a proliferation of individuals and organisations purporting to represent Aboriginal interests, often in unaccountable ways, and which commodify identity and political authority. Loading The royal commission was unequivocal in its central finding: that systemic change would be achieved only by reducing Aboriginal contact with the criminal justice system altogether. This imperative remains as urgent now as it was then. Yet, despite its clarity, much of the contemporary criminal justice response has been directed towards superficial modifications at the sentencing stage, design interventions and cultural overlays that attempt to 'Indigenise' the system without altering its foundational logic. These are, to borrow a phrase, cosmetic adjustments, lipstick on a pig that leaves the structural drivers of over-incarceration intact. The royal commission's recommendations on non-criminal justice system solutions are a pathway forward. The pursuit of these should not form part of the closing-the-gap monolith that hoovers up all things Indigenous these days – the wicked problem they've created to solve the wicked problem. A core insight of the royal commission, too often cited but insufficiently read, is that communities need autonomy and agency, and the safety of Aboriginal people depends on them avoiding the system altogether, not their adaptation within it. We've done the reverse over 30 years and wonder why the gap in disadvantage grows wider. The royal commission further called for a withdrawal of bureaucratic control and the reallocation of authority to Aboriginal communities. Ironically, the most recent national attempt to institutionalise this principle, the proposed Voice to parliament, was framed by its opponents as an exercise in bureaucratisation, despite its primary aim being to devolve authority to communities and reduce administrative gatekeeping. Loading In the aftermath of the failed referendum, bureaucratic entrenchment has, if anything, intensified. Critics of over-bureaucratisation have grown conspicuously silent, while initiatives such as justice reinvestment attract significant public expenditure without demonstrable systemic returns. The Justice Policy Partnership, established under the National Agreement on Closing the Gap, is dominated by bureaucratic actors. Several Aboriginal members have made serious accusations about its ineffectiveness. Yet, as is often the case in Indigenous policy, their concerns about the bureaucrats are ignored by the bureaucrats, and the dysfunction continues with no course correction. Today, the right of self-determination, as articulated by the royal commission, is far from the concept defined then. It has been reduced to 'partnership with government', whatever that means, and in practice it means incorporation via corporations statutes. In this way, self-determination has become synonymous with corporate compliance. What relevance these observations to the NT Kumanjayi Walker coronial inquest? The second version of the closing-the-gap framework adopted in 2020 pushed the Commonwealth's constitutional obligations and leadership responsibilities from 1967 back to the states and territories, which were notoriously bad at Indigenous policy. Now Aboriginal organisations are required, by agreement, to stand side-by-side with state and territory governments which claim to be in partnership with them while they implement draconian and ruthless criminal justice policies that render nugatory the various KPIs of justice, health and wellbeing that the closing-the-gap framework purports to achieve. The asymmetry and absurdity of the arrangements were evident when the Walker coronial inquest recommended, among many things, diversionary justice programs for Indigenous youth four days after the NT announced restricting youth offenders from accessing diversionary justice programs. Two ships passing in the night. The federal government has declined the invitation of the Indigenous sector to take more leadership. The most compelling solution here is for the Commonwealth to assume responsibility for Indigenous criminal justice and bring some leadership, accountability and coherency to the sector, if we are serious about the national closing-the-gap agreement and its justice outcomes. Something more serious is needed than the annual performative lamenting the gap.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Albo flaunts Aussie iron amid China fears
In a display of classic supply and demand salesmanship, Anthony Albanese will flaunt Australian iron ore at a roundtable with China's biggest steelmakers on Monday. The country's behemoth construction industry has slowed in recent years, fuelling fears a downturn in steel production could smash demand for Australian iron ore and threaten jobs as well as the national bottom-line. Both countries have also committed to cleaning up big polluting industries in line with their broader climate goals. With Australia the world's largest iron ore producer and China Australia's top customer, the Prime Minister will make the case for closer co-operation. 'I'm pleased to be here for an important discussion between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers,' Mr Albanese will tell the roundtable, according to speech extracts seen by NewsWire. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will speak with China's biggest steelmakers at a roundtable on Monday. Joseph Olbrycht-Palmer / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'Australia and China's iron ore and steel sector partnership has contributed to both countries' economic development for decades. 'Australian miners are reliable and stable suppliers of iron ore, responsible for almost 60 per cent of China's iron ore imports. 'That iron ore goes into Chinese steel production which accounts for over 50 per cent of global supply.' BHP, Hancock, Rio Tinto and Fortescue will all be seated at the roundtable, with Twiggy Forrest among the executives showing up. Nearly 145,000 Australians work in the metal ore mining industry, according to the latest official figures. In 2024, iron ore exports alone were worth north of $150bn. But it is a dirty business in a world scrambling for greener options. 'Steelmaking value chains are also responsible for 7 to 9 per cent of global emissions,' Mr Albanese will say. 'Achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement will require the decarbonising of steel value chains, presenting an opportunity for Australia and China to progress our long-term economic interests.' Mr Albanese will raise the 'challenges' of steel decarbonisation, but aim to reassure both the Australian mining chiefs and the Chinese steel bosses that Australia is willing to front up the cash investments and tweak policies. The Prime Minister will tell industry leaders the challenge of decarbonisation presents an opportunity for the Australia-China relationship. PMO via NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'What we need are enabling policy environments, extensive investments in research to develop new technologies, and collaboration across academia, industry and government,' he will say. 'Australia and China each have major stakes in how the decarbonisation efforts develop. 'As both countries co-operate to advance decarbonisation, we also need to work together to address global excess steel capacity. 'It is in both countries' interests to ensure a sustainable and market-driven global steel sector.' Later on Monday, Mr Albanese will have a lunch with Australian and Chinese business leaders. Both roundtables are key parts of his six-day diplomatic and big business blitz in China. Against a backdrop of an increasingly militaristic regional rivalry with Beijing, Mr Albanese has been keen to reframe the bilateral relationship in friendlier terms, such as tariff-free trade.
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
TV host slams age verification rules for Google as ‘devious' overreach
Sky News host James Macpherson reacts to reports that Australians will soon be required to verify their age when logged in to Google and other search engines. 'We were sold a ban on children using social media, but most people wouldn't assume that Google is social media,' Mr Macpherson said. 'For this to be snuck through, not in legislation but in regulation of codes for internet and big tech companies by the eSafety Commissioner, I think is quite devious because most Australians don't know this is happening.'
