Ohio could contribute millions toward panic alert systems in schools
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Ohio lawmakers are pushing for the state to contribute millions toward safety products in schools, such as panic alert buttons and artificial intelligence gun detection software.
House Bill 106, named 'Alyssa's Law,' would create a pilot program allowing public and chartered private schools to apply for grants to purchase panic alert systems. The program would contribute $25 million overall from the state's general revenue fund, which is primarily funded through taxes.
Columbus ranks among world's happiest cities
The bill, introduced in February by Reps. Angela King (R-Celina) and Melanie Miller (R-Ashland), is named after Alyssa Alhadeff, who was a victim of the 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
'By creating access to this life-saving technology, we can give both educators and students the security and peace of mind to feel safe while they're at school,' King said in a news release.
The Ohio Department of Public Safety (ODPS) would be in charge of developing an application process for schools and a method to determine grant amounts. The bill states funds should be equally distributed between schools in urban, suburban and rural areas, as well as schools with different socioeconomic statuses and enrollment sizes.
To be eligible for a grant, a school could not already have a security system in place. Additionally, the safety device would have to be developed in the United States and capable of immediately contacting local law enforcement. The bill used the examples of wearable panic alert buttons and AI firearm detection programs.
One measure of property tax relief works its way through Ohio Statehouse
To receive a grant, schools would also have to ensure the appropriate staff receives training on the safety device. The bill states the ODPS would begin distributing the funds on Jan. 1, 2026, or 'as soon as possible thereafter.'
The ODPS would be required to submit a report detailing the pilot program to the governor and legislature no later than Dec. 1, 2027. The report would include data such as program applications, rewarded grants and the types of device purchased.
Alhadeff's family founded the nonprofit Make Our Schools Safe in the wake of their daughter's death. The organization pushes for school safety legislation in a variety of states, specifically 'Alyssa's Law.'
Seven states have passed their own version of Alyssa's Law, which all look different from Ohio's current bill. The foundation of Alyssa's Law requires all public schools to be equipped with a wearable or stationary silent panic alarm, which can be pressed to notify law enforcement of an emergency. Six states' versions of the law require a panic alarm system in schools, while one's version states schools must 'consider' the use of such devices.
Revived Big Lots stores to reopen this spring; HomeBuys to acquire central Ohio shop
In the last General Assembly, an Ohio senator introduced a bill also called Alyssa's Law that would have required public school staff to wear panic alarm buttons. The bill had one hearing and did not pass by the end of the session.
HB 106 varies from Ohio's previous bill named Alyssa's Law and other states' versions of the statute since it would not require schools to implement panic alarms.
The legislation was assigned to the finance committee where it awaits its first hearing. It has one Democrat and four Republican cosponsors.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - From Odesa with love: Ukraine fights on with or without the US
The city of Odesa, once the pearl of the Black Sea and host to nearly 1,000 attendees during this year's Black Sea Forum, has regained its luster. Aside from smatterings of plywood-covered windows and burned-out or partially destroyed buildings, one would be hard pressed to think that it was in a country under siege, fighting for its collective life. This city is enjoying, under the circumstances, a fairly normal existence. The streets are pristine, unlike in too many American cities. Much of the architecture is Russo-French in design, dating back to the turn of the 19th to the 20th century. But most impressive are the Ukrainians. Determined to win this war, one is reminded of the stubborn British enduring the Blitz and Hitler's relentless attacks. This seemingly boundless display of optimism extends to the taxi drivers, restaurants and hotel staff, and the non-conference-attending civilians I encountered during my time here. The message is clear and is echoed by most of the European delegates who attended from parliaments and ministries of government, including the military, as well as the private sector, media and academia: Russia is a menace. If not stopped in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin is determined to wreck NATO and reestablish a new and greater Soviet Union-like empire. And America is unconscious or blind to this threat. On one hand, the war in Ukraine is not atop the list of things worrying most Americans. As someone in the distant past remarked, 'it's the economy, stupid.' On the other hand, the behavior of the current president fills the media and the airwaves on a daily basis, often blocking out other news and reporting. Yes, a growing percentage of Americans of both political parties say they support Ukraine, a statistic that is widely used here as evidence that the U.S. can and should do more. Yet, when pressed as to what that support should be in specific terms, from equipping Ukraine with the most modern weapons, to rebuilding a country largely still suffering the ravages of war, to the question of whether to send U.S. troops to the region or not, that consensus quickly dissipates. At this writing, while Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and others have gained the support of some 80 of their colleagues to impose sanctions on Russia. Has that chamber suddenly grown a backbone to take on Donald Trump, who so far has dominated Congress in ways Lyndon Johnson would envy? That said, I take the Ukrainian rationale to smash Russia now before it becomes too great a threat — and many would argue that this view has taken hold across Ukraine — with a bit of cold water. I believe we in the West are exaggerating Russia's ability to mount a broader military assault; certainly, for now and for the foreseeable future, while it rebuilds a force that has reportedly taken nearly a million casualties. To be sure, a supermajority of Ukrainians do not accept that Putin's appetite will be satisfied if he perseveres in this war. But the fact is, the acidic warning that the only thing worse than being an enemy of the United States is being a friend or ally may apply here. Millions of Vietnamese, Afghans and Iraqis would not disagree with that observation. Will Ukraine be next is a tragic question that must be addressed. Many of us in the relatively small foreign and defense policy world argued that wars are often lost by getting too little too late; meaning that from Russia's February 2022 invasion (which, for too long, Trump incredibly blamed on Ukraine) the U.S. has not supplied enough weapons and sinews of war to enable the Ukrainian military to turn the tide of battle beyond halting, and in some places, reversing Russian gains. But that is the past. What next? Despite my dissenting analysis of Putin's military muscle, what Russia has done has to be reversed. That almost certainly will not happen. Now, Trump will decide Ukraine's fate for better, or more likely, worse. Tragedy can be defined as a collision with reality. There was every reason to support Ukraine while some exit strategy could be developed. Now it appears the Trump exit strategy will leave it up to the two combatants — Russia and Ukraine — to end the war. Should that be the case, we should not be surprised by the outcome. And frankly if that does happen, Americans should be ashamed. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and David Richards are authors of the forthcoming book, 'The Arc of Failure: Can Decisive Strategic Thinking Transform a Dangerous World.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reynoldsburg approves outdoor drinking area on East Main Street
REYNOLDSBURG, Ohio (WCMH) – Reynoldsburg has become the latest central Ohio city to establish a district where residents and visitors can enjoy alcoholic beverages outdoors. Reynoldsburg City Council has approved a designated outdoor refreshment area (DORA), which will permit those who are 21 and older to order alcohol from participating businesses and drink it while walking around outside. The DORA will go into effect on June 27, one month after it was approved by the council. See NBC4's previous coverage in the video player above. The drinking district encompasses about 57 acres and is located primarily along East Main Street from Davidson Drive to Waggoner Road, an area commonly referred to as Olde Reynoldsburg. There will be signage posted in the area to alert people of the DORA's boundaries. Participating businesses within the DORA boundary will serve alcoholic beverages in a branded plastic cup. People will only be allowed to drink alcohol in these cups and cannot bring their own beverages. The DORA will be active annually from March 1 through Nov. 1, on Thursdays and Fridays from 4 p.m. to 10 p.m., along with Saturdays and Sundays from noon to 10 p.m. The mayor will be able to adjust the hours for holidays or special events, with approval of the council. The city will establish a safety plan with the Reynoldsburg Police Department and Truro Township Fire Department, as well as a sanitation plan implemented by the city's public safety and parks and recreation departments, the legislation says. The ordinance states the city council will evaluate the DORA every five years, to either approve its continued operation or to dissolve it. Designated outdoor drinking areas were legalized in Ohio in 2015 and provide an exception to open container laws. Reynoldsburg is joining multiple other local cities that have a DORA in place, including Bexley, Downtown Columbus, Dublin, Gahanna, Grove City, the Arena District, Hilliard, Worthington, Powell and Westerville. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Porter County commissioners raise rates for parking garage to keep up with maintenance costs
To recoup more than $600,000 in maintenance costs, Porter County is increasing the fee to park in the county garage south of the administration building during Popcorn Fest and also doubling the contract fee the city of Valparaiso pays to use the garage after business hours and on weekends. The fee to park during the Popcorn Fest will increase from $15 to $20 for the day and Valparaiso's contract fee is being doubled from $15,000 to $30,000. Under that contract, public parking is free from 5 p.m. to 1 a.m. on weekdays and from 9 a.m. to 1 a.m. on weekends. Last year, after a decade at $10 for the day of Popcorn Fest, the parking fee was raised to $15. At the time there had been talk of going to $20 but commissioners were uncomfortable with such a large jump all at once. Commissioner Barb Regnitz, R-Center, asked if any conversation had been had with the city about the proposed increase. 'Whatever conversation we're going to have is going to be one-sided,' replied Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North. 'They're not going to like it.' Biggs said Valparaiso didn't cut the county any slack in requiring it to pay a $39,000 building permit fee for the ongoing renovations to the Porter County Jail which is within city limits. 'Love doing business with them,' he said, 'but we have our own business to take care of here.' Porter County Facilities Director Joe Wiszowaty told the Board of Commissioners at its meeting Tuesday morning that $300,000 has already been spent on a complete overhaul of the garage and another $300,000 in maintenance is expected to be spent over the next five years. The garage was built in 1994 and recently had a full-depth restoration in which rebar was redone and deteriorated areas of the garage deck cut out and replaced. An epoxy overlay was also put on all seams. 'It should last a hundred years, easy,' Wiszowaty said. 'We've done all the corrective steps.'
